【目的/意義】量化學者學術影響力評價指標間的關系和相互聯系的緊密程度,并綜合評估選取最客觀、公正的評價指標,為評價學者學術影響力提供科學依據。【方法/過程】以CNKI期刊庫為數據來源,以競爭情報為檢索詞,統計該領域所有學者,并計算被引頻次排名靠前的99位學者的發文量、篇均被引頻次、重要論文數、重要論文被引頻次、合作率、h指數、g指數、p指數,利用SPSS22.0分析各指標之間的關系。【結果/結論】運用不同的評價指標評價學者學術影響力將得出不同的結論;各評價指標之間存在較多相關性;p指數在眾多指標中更具區分度、靈敏度以及適用性和可靠性,是一個極具應用前景的評價指標。

【Purpose/significance】To quantify the relationship between evaluation indicators of academic influence,and the degree of closeness between them, and to comprehensively evaluate and select the most objective and impartial evaluationindicators, so as to provide a scientific basis for effectively evaluating academic influence of scholars.【Method/process】Taking the CNKI journal database as the data source and the competitive intelligence as word retrieval, collecting all schol-ars, calculating published papers,average cited papers,important papers, important cited papers, cooperation rate, h-index,g-index and p-index of 99 scholars cited the top, and using SPSS22.0 to analyse the relationship between the various indi-cators.【Result/conclusion】Using different evaluation indexes of scholars to evaluate academic influence will come to dif-ferent conclusions; there are correlation between the evaluation indexes; p-index has more discrimination, sensitivity, appli-cability and reliability in many indicators, and it is a promising index.