:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:抗戰初期中共軍事發展方針變動的史實考析--兼談所謂“七分發展,二分應付,一分抗日”方針的真實性問題
書刊名:近代史研究
作者:楊奎松
作者(外文):Yang, Kuisong
出版日期:2015
卷期:2015(6)
頁次:4-26+160
主題關鍵詞:中共毛澤東抗日戰爭國民黨七二一方針
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:123
  • 點閱點閱:63
1937年"七七事變"爆發前,蔣介石及其南京中央政府擁有近200萬軍隊,國民黨已基本上統一中國。中共這時只剩下2萬黨員、3萬左右紅軍和陝甘交界處十幾個縣的活動範圍。在此背景下,雙方已就中共蘇維埃政府和紅軍改制改編問題達成初步妥協,唯具體辦法尚未落實,十年內戰造成的隔閡與敵對的情緒也並未消失。"七七事變"爆發,戰火迅速蔓延,日軍很快打進山西,直接威脅到中共中央所在的陝北。紅軍加速改編並出兵山西,與國民黨軍配合作戰,已不可避免。但是,中共及毛澤東均首次碰到如此復雜且多變的政治軍事情勢,既要在開戰前先解決好軍隊、政權、防地和黨的合法性問題,又要千方百計阻止日軍占領山西;既要在軍事上表現出相當氣勢,給華北各軍鼓氣,又要避免兩三萬紅軍在完全不熟悉的條件和不擅長的方式下對日作戰,包括出動後被調散,造成毀滅性的損失。因此,圍繞著出兵速度、作戰及指揮方式等問題,中共中央內部一度出現了意見分歧。不過,即使當年9月下旬紅軍主力全部出動後,毛澤東等主要關注的軍事作戰及其發展區域,仍限於山西。所謂向敵後發展,以及去平原地區創建根據地等,都是在日軍占領了大半個山西以後,才逐漸開始提上毛澤東和中央軍委的議事日程的。
Before the outbreak of the Marco Polo Bridge Incident in 1937, Chiang Kai-shek and his Nationalist government in Nanjing had nearly 2 million troops, and the Kuomintang(KMT) had basically unified China. At the same time, the Communist Party of China (CPC) only had around 20,000 party members and 30,000 Red Army soldiers, and only controlled around a dozen counties in the border region between Shaanxi and Gansu provinces. Against this background, the two Parties had reached a preliminary agreement on the reform and reorganization of the CPC’s Soviet-style government and the Red Army. However, they had not implemented a specific approach, and the strain and hostility developed during ten years of civil war had not disappeared. After the eruption of the Marco Polo Bridge Incident, the flames of war swiftly spread, and the Japanese army rapidly invaded Shanxi province, directly threatening the security of the CPC’s base in North Shaanxi province. The Red Army accelerated its reorganization and sent troops to Shanxi province, where it was forced to cooperate with the KMT army in order to defend against the Japanese. However, this was the first time the CPC and Mao Zedong had faced such a complicated, fast-changing political and military situation. They therefore endured devastating losses. This is because, before entering battle, they needed to resolve questions about the legitimacy of the Party, its military capability, its political power, and its defense, but they also needed to make every attempt to prevent the Japanese from occupying Shanxi province. They also suffered losses because they wanted to display their strength to inspire the other armies in North China, but they needed to avoid fighting the Japanese in a situation in which 20,000 to 30,000 Red Army troops were completely unfamiliar with both the situation and necessary military tactics such as dispersal. Because of these problems, the Central Committee of the CPC split over issues like deployment speeds, combat, and command leadership. However, even after the core of the Red Army went to the battlefield in late September of 1937, the area of military operations and development with which Mao Zedong and the other leaders were primarily concerned was limited to Shanxi province. Only after the Japanese occupied most of Shanxi did the policies of developing in the rear areas and building a base of operations in the plains gradually arise in discussions of the agenda among Mao Zedong and the Central Military Committee of the CPC.
期刊論文
1.楊奎松(1988)。抗日戰爭爆發後中國共產黨對日軍事戰略方針的演變。近代史研究,1988(2)。  延伸查詢new window
2.李雲漢(19870600)。盧溝橋事變:第二次中日戰爭的開端。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,16,383-410。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.龔希光(1996)。朱德與華北抗戰初期的運動游擊戰爭問題。黨的文獻,1996(6)。  延伸查詢new window
4.李羿(1999)。彭德懷與華北抗戰初期的"運動游擊戰"問題考析。軍事歷史研究,1999(1)。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.傅應川(2015)。抗戰期間共軍的發展策略及其戰略影響。戰爭的歷史與記憶:抗戰勝利七十週年學術討論會,(會議日期: 2015/07/07-2015/07/09)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張國燾(1981)。我的回憶。北京:現代史料編刊社。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐中約、計秋楓、朱慶葆(2005)。中國近代史。香港中文大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王焰(1998)。彭德懷年譜。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊奎松(2010)。失去的機會?--抗戰前後國共談判實錄。新星出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.古屋奎二、中央日報社(1971)。蔣總統秘錄--中日關係八十年之證言。臺北:中央日報社。  延伸查詢new window
6.中國人民解放軍歷史資料叢書編審委員會(1992)。八路軍(參考資料)。解放軍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊成武(1987)。楊成武回憶錄。解放軍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.中國人民解放軍歷史資料叢書編審委員會(1987)。八路軍(文獻)。解放軍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.中共中央文獻研究室(1993)。毛澤東年譜(1893-1949)。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.中國人民解放軍軍事科學院毛澤東軍事思想研究所年譜組(1994)。毛澤東軍事年譜1927-1958。廣西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.中共中央文獻研究室、中國人民解放軍軍事科學院(1993)。毛澤東軍事文集。北京:軍事科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.袁偉(1996)。朱德軍事活動紀事。解放軍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.章伯鋒、莊建平(1997)。抗日戰爭。四川大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.周恩來軍事活動紀事編寫組(2000)。周恩來軍事活動紀事。中央文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.中共中央文獻研究室、中央檔案館(2011)。建黨以來重要文獻選編(1921-1949)。中央文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.中共黨史研究室張聞天選集傳記組(1993)。張聞天文集。中共黨史出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.中共中央文獻研究室(1996)。周恩來年譜(1949-1976)。中央文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳永發(20010000)。中國共產革命七十年。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.戴晴。國共紛爭,http://www.cclawnetcom/daiqin-005.html,2015/08/08。  new window
圖書論文
1.(1985)。第八路軍中共支部書記李法卿揭述中共在抗戰期間的整個陰謀。中華民國重要史料初編--對日戰爭時期。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會黨史委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔣中正(1984)。蘇俄在中國--中國與俄共三十年經歷紀要(1956年12月)。總統蔣公思想言論總集。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會黨史委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE