:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兒童攻擊行為相關因素與認知行為策略輔導效果之研究
作者:洪榮照 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Jung-Chao
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:特殊教育學系
指導教授:何東墀
學位類別:博士
出版日期:1998
主題關鍵詞:攻擊行為認知行為家庭環境敵意歸因自我概念aggressive behaviorcognitive behaviorfamily environmenthostility attribution biasself concept
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:29
本研究旨在探討兒童攻擊行為與各相關因素之關係及認知行為策略對
高攻擊性兒童的輔導效果。研究分為調查與實驗兩階段進行,調查部份由
研究者隨機抽取中部地區四所國民小學五、六年級學生,合計1047人,進
行問卷調查,以瞭解兒童的攻擊行為分別與自我概念敵意歸因、社會技能
、父母管教態度、家庭環境、社經背景的關係;實驗研究部份,於中部兩
所學校各抽取高攻擊性兒童24名,並隨機分派於實驗組與控制組,進行為
期兩個月12單元的認知行為策略團體輔導,輔導結束後實施立即後測、兩
週後實施追蹤評量,以瞭解輔導效果。本研究主要發現歸納如下: 壹
、調查研究部份 一、攻擊行為與個人因素、家庭因素之關係 (一
)、兒童的攻擊行為分別與其自我概念、社會技能、家庭環境、社經背景
、父母管教態度等變項呈現顯著的負相關。 (二)、兒童的攻擊行為
與其敵意歸因呈現顯著的正相關。 (三)、以多元逐步迴歸方式分析
各相關變項對攻擊行為的預測力,結果顯示進入迴歸方程式者依序為:「
社會技能」、「自我概念」、「社經背景」、「意圖歸因」等,總預測力
為 37.85% 二、高攻擊性與非高攻擊性兒童之比較 (一)、個人
因素部份:高攻擊性兒童在自我概念、社會技能、敵意歸因等方面與非高
攻擊性兒童均有顯著差異。 (二)、家庭因素部份:高攻擊性兒童在
社經背景、家庭環境、父母管教態度等方面與非高攻擊性兒童有顯著差異
。 三、不同背景變項在攻擊行為與敵意歸因之差異 (一)、男性
兒童在攻擊行為與敵意歸因均顯著高於女性兒童。 (二)、父母親不
同教育程度之兒童在攻擊行為與敵意歸因並無顯著差異。 (三)、單
親家庭兒童與雙親家庭兒童在攻擊行為與敵意歸因並無顯著差異。 (
四)、不同社經背景兒童的攻擊行為與敵意歸因,均有顯著差異。 (
五)、不同家庭環境之兒童,在攻擊行為與敵意歸因,均有顯著差異。
(六)、不同父母管教態度之兒童,在攻擊行為與敵意歸因上,均有顯著
差異。 貳、實驗處理部份 一、在認知行為策略團體實驗結束後,
進行立即後測與兩週後追蹤評量,發現實驗組與控制組成員在攻擊行為量
表(自陳量表)與社會技能量表、敵意歸因量表等得分均有顯著差異。
二、在認知行為策略團體實驗結束後,進行立即後測與兩週後追蹤評量,
發現實驗組與控制組成員在攻擊行為評定量表、自我控制評定量表、自我
概念量表等得分均無顯著差異。 除針對上述研究結果加以討論外,並
提出若干在教育上與未來進一步研究的建議。
The purpose of this study is to examine the related factors of
children''''''''s aggressive behavior and the effects of using
cognitive behavior strategies for guidance. There
were two stages of this study: the survey study and the
experiment. In order to understand the children''''''''s
aggressive behavior and its related factors, the author
randomly chose 1047 5th and 6th graders in four elementary
schools in the central Taiwan area as the subjects to
respond the survey questionnaire for the first
stage of this study. There are six related factor
catalogs, namely, self-concept, hostility attribution
bias, social skills, parents attitude, family environment, and
social-economical status. At the second stage of this study,
there were 24 highly aggressive children in two
elementary schools were screened from the survey for
the experiment. They were randomly assigned to the
experimental group and the control group. These
participants received 12 units of group guidance of cognitive
behavior strategies for two months. Post-test was held after the
experiment, a follow-up evaluation was given two weeks later.
The findings of this study were the followings :
I. The Survey Findings A. The relation between aggressive
behavior and personvariables.
a. There is a very significant difference between children''''''''s
aggressive behavior and his/ her self-concept, social skills,
family environment, social-economical status, and
parent''''''''s attitude. b. The result appeared a
very significant positive relevance between
children''''''''s aggressive behavior and hostility attribution bias.
c. When applying the stepwise multi regression to analyze the
predictability of the related variables toward the aggressive
behavior, it revealed the sequence entering the stepwise
regression as the following: social skills, self-
concept, social-economical status, and hostility
attribution bias. The total predictability is 37.85%.
B. The comparison between aggressive and nonaggressive children.
a. Personal factors: there was a significant difference between
aggressive and nonaggressive children in terms of self-concept,
social skills, and hostility attribution bias .
b. Family factors: in terms of social-economical status, family
environment, and parents attitude, the aggressive children
received significant lower score than nonaggressive
children. C. The difference between
aggressive behavior and hostility attribution
bias in terms of different background variables.
a. Boys received a higher score both in aggressive behavior and
hostility attribution bias than girls.
b. Parents educational background played no difference in
children''''''''s aggressive behavior and hostility attribution bias.
c. There was no difference between single-parent family children
and double-parent family children in terms of aggressive
behavior and hostility attribution bias.
d. There was a significant difference between different social
economical status children in terms of aggressive behavior and
hostility attribution bias.
e. There was a significant difference between different family
environment in terms of aggressive behavior and hostility
attribution bias.
f. There was a significant difference between different parents
attitude in terms of aggressive behavior and hostility
attribution bias.
The Experiment
A. After the experiment, there were a post test and a follow up
evaluation two weeks later. The result revealed that there was a
significant difference between the experimental and control
group in terms of aggressive behavior, social skills,
hostility attribution bias.
B. However, in terms of aggressive behavior rating scale, self
concept, self-control, there was no significant difference.
A number of suggestions were made for further study and
educational purpose.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE