:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:自反性與共享資訊的動力: 以Independent Media Center自主媒體網站為例
作者:陳佳蓓
作者(外文):CHEN, CHIA-PEI
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:新聞研究所
指導教授:黃瑞祺
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2006
主題關鍵詞:IMC/Indymedia反全球化自反性現代化網絡空間資訊共享IMC/Indymediaanti-globalizationreflexive modernizationnetwork spacesharing information
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:58
以反全球化為焦點,自己成為記者並報導生活週遭相關的議題,將之置放在Independent media center網站(本文以IMC作為通稱)中,成為共享的資訊,這是1999年底在美國西雅圖反全球化集結運動中崛起並快速蔓延的一場現象,雖說是經由科技帶動起的網路串聯,實則是一記鮮明的社會徵候,特別是資訊時代裡,在遍佈於各大城市總共約182個IMC分站中,IMC作為抵抗主流媒體的全球網絡,以自主的模式謀求資訊內涵與傳播管道的其他可能,這所展現的是由下而上對資訊批判力量的一場迸發,如何匯聚起這股力量並促成IMC運作是本文研究動機的起始。
本文由此追溯,分為三個面向討論IMC的生成動力:全球化、自反性現代化與網絡空間。
首先了解IMC的反全球化立場在於反對資訊商品化,特別是跨國集團媒體對於全球化的片面詮釋,而破除商品化之一的手段便是資訊共享,這一層次的了解引領至本文討論知識、資訊在現代化社會中的角色,知識逐漸與資訊等價而資訊本身則信任削減,使得個人不得不反覆檢視日常行動隨時做出回應,這一體認是Beck與Giddens所提自反性現代化(Reflexive Modernization)的理論內涵,繼而受到Scott Lash美學面向自反性現代化的啟發,對資訊商品化的回應便是引領出一個創造的形式,對資訊的批判是一場意義填補的遊戲,而以行動去完成。在IMC所行動的網絡空間裡,對比於Taiwan IMC的聚集狀況與香港不使用IMC機制但有香港獨立媒體In-Media的比較分析,本文歸納出IMC的生成條件不僅僅是挪用其技術,而是對於黑客(Hackers)文化與IMC代表的共享精神的認同,共享的精神由黑客文化延續而來,將資訊作為禮物,使用Open Publishing自由發佈系統體現開放原始碼軟體意義,加上部落格這場新科技的實驗,資訊充分的自由流動性與全面開放的完整性增加了實現的條件,加速因共享精神的召喚而來的聚集現象,而流動性與完整性則是資訊共享的前提。
統整上述三個面向的分析,本文於結論中整理出研究發現,在自反性現代化作用之下,IMC所批判的資訊商品化有其改變的可能,以共享資訊作為行動來實踐其批判,完成了重新定義資訊的目的,這場具有創造性的實驗裡,本文於結論中討論IMC可能的社會影響,並在結語提出本研究的限制。
The motive of this dissertation is inspired by a network phenomenon of IMC in 1999, which occurred at the scene of anti-globalization in Seattle. Readers of IMC (Independent media center) website volunteered to post their own articles related to anti-globalization issues on line and urged to set up a local branch site for the possibility of non-mainstream information production though an autonomous communication environment. The wild spread of IMC local branch sites emerged and prompted not only through new technology but also the burst of information critique in the form of bottom-up reflected ideology. Therefore, the naissance of IMC is the motivation of this dissertation.
To broaden the theoretical aspects for answering question, the perspectives of research question divided by three dimensions, including: Globalization, Reflexive Modernization and Network Space.
According to literatures of globalization, the statement of anti-globalization of
IMC is against information commercialization, meanwhile, the perception of information as products also led IMC to respond to it with the action of the spirit of sharing information. Refer to the theory of Reflexive Modernization, it doesn’t only explain how this perception shaped up (refer to the interpretation of Beck and Giddens) but also clarify that the responses as a creative acting was inspired by the transformation of information connotation in our daily life (refer to the interpretation of Scott Lash). In addition, IMC took place at the network space, comparing to Taiwan IMC and Hong Kong anti-globalization websites, we draw a conclusion of naissance of IMC to the fact of hackers’ spirit, which means they treat the information as gift and the open publishing system combined with Blog features operated by IMC as the presuppositions of sharing information.
To sum up the three dimensions of analysis, we concluded that the possibility of critique of information caused by IMC was created by the dynamic operation of globalization and reflexive modernization, meanwhile, we finalized the redefinition of information based upon the network space. We also brought up the possible social impacts generated by IMC phenomenon and research limits of this dissertation.
文化研究學會(2001)。〈尋找社會運動的新空間-網路、小眾消費市場、社區〉,《文化研究學會座談會會議記錄》,台北:紫藤蘆。
王小惠、羅美玲(1999年12月20-21日)。〈從網路新聞讀者的動機特質談網路媒體的發展方向〉,「中央研究院社會學研究所1999第三屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會」宣讀論文,台北南港:中央研究院社會學研究所。
王振寰(1992)。〈廣播電視的控制權〉,鄭瑞城(編),《解構廣電媒體:建立廣電新秩序》,頁77-128。台北:澄社。new window
王振寰(1993)。〈臺灣新政商關係的形成與政治轉型〉,《臺灣社會研究季刊》,14:123 -163。new window
王偉豐(無日期)。〈「他人」或「別它」〉,取自:http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/~hkshp/humanities/ph86-11.txt
毛榮富(2001)。《網路社會的神話塑造-政治經濟學的批判》。國立台灣大學社會研究所博士論文。new window
台灣年鑑(2005)。取自:http://www.gov.tw/EBOOKS/TWANNUAL/show_book.php?path=3_003_031
汪暉(2001)。〈新自由主義的歷史根源及其批判-再論當代中國大陸的思想狀況與現代性問題〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,頁1-65。new window
朱元鴻(1991)。〈消費-政治經濟學之外〉,《當代》,67:13-23。
朱元鴻(1992)。〈布希亞科幻劇場〉,《當代》,75:13-27。
朱元鴻(2000)。〈風險知識與風險媒介的政治社會學分析〉,《台灣社會研究叢刊-08:我們活在不同的世界-社會學框作筆記》,頁119-144。台北:唐山。new window
余小玲(2002)。〈網絡社會的形構-Castells論流動空間〉,《資訊社會研究》,3:239-250。new window
吳齊殷、莊庭瑞(2004)。〈超連結網路分析:一項分析網路社會結構的新方法〉, 《資訊社會研究》,6:127-148。new window
呂怡然、秦亞萍(2000年11月22-27日)。〈試論網絡新聞傳播的把關人〉,「朝陽科技大學傳播藝術學系第三屆兩岸傳播媒體邁入二十一世紀學術研討會」,台中:朝陽大學。
吳音寧(2003)。《蒙面叢林:探訪墨西哥查巴達民族解放軍》,台北:印刻。
余永定(2002)。〈2001-2002年世界經濟形勢回顧與展望〉,王洛琳、余永定(編),《2001-2002年世界經濟形勢分析與預測》,頁1-22,北京:社會科學文獻出版。
李石曾(編譯)(1961)。《理想國》世界文學大系外國之部第3冊,台北:啟明。(原書Plato. [1947].The Republic. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.)
李任初(1992)。《新自由主義-宏觀經濟的蛻變》,台北:商務。
李其慶(2003)。〈全球化背景下的新自由主義〉,李其慶、劉元琪(編),《全球化與新自由主義》,頁1-29。桂林:廣西師範大學。
李嘉文(2002)。《數位落差的反思-從日常生活與資訊科技談起》。國立台灣大學社會研究所碩士論文。
李瞻(1993)。《世界新聞史》。台北:三民書局。
沈湘平(2003)。《全球化與現代性》。湖南長沙:湖南人民。
沈愛國(編)(2001)。《新聞學基礎》。杭州:浙江大學。
沈清松(1993)。〈《真理與方法》導讀〉,《詮釋學I-真理與方法:哲學詮釋學的基本特徵》,頁ix-xvi,台北:時報。
阮新邦(1997)。《批判理性、社會實踐與香港困境》。香港:八方文化。
周金福(2000年3月23日)。〈台灣電子報線上記者新聞價值判斷之研究〉,「銘傳大學傳播管理研究所展望新世紀國際學術研討會」,桃園:銘傳大學。
周桂田(1998a)。〈風險社會中結構與行動的轉轍〉,《台大社會學刊》,26:99-150。new window
周桂田(1998b)。〈現代性與風險社會〉,《台灣社會學刊》,21:89-129。new window
周桂田(2003年12月19-20日)。〈從「全球化風險」到「全球化在地風險」之研究進路:對貝克理論的批判思考〉,《全球化、歐洲化、在地化論文集》,「南華大學歐洲研究所第九屆學術研討會」,台北:政大國關中心。new window
林克寰(2004a)。〈妳不能不知道的部落格 ── Blog 是甚麼碗糕啊?〉。上網日期:2004年5月11日,取自:http://jedi.org/blog/archives/003856.html
林克寰(2004b)。〈部落格與全民媒體化〉,《UDN數位文化誌》。上網日期:2004年6月25日,取自:http://mag.udn.com/mag/dc/storypage.jsp?
f_MAIN_ID=2&f_SUB_ID=5&f_ART_ID=205
林志明(2003)。〈布希亞:社會學家或形上學家?〉,黃瑞祺(編),《後學新論》,. 頁189-219,台北:左岸文化。new window
林麗雲(2003)。〈坐而言,起而行:「無盟」的實踐〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,50:145-169。new window
林鶴玲(2001)。〈數位新聞時代的倫理挑戰:台灣網路新聞發展的一些經驗〉,《亞洲研究》,39:74-114。new window
南方朔(2003)。〈全球化的見解與答辯〉,《勇者致富:全球化在拒絕與接受之間》,頁10-14,台北:天下。
洪昆裕、林能白(2000)。〈網路新聞產業結構與分工模式〉,「國立台北大學2000國際電子商務理論與實務研討會」,台北:台北大學。
洪浩唐(2004年9月16日)。〈「網友說」代表了什麼〉,《蘋果日報》,論壇版。
洪漢鼎(1993)。《詮釋學I-真理與方法:哲學詮釋學的基本特徵》,台北:時報。(原書:Gadamer, Hans- Grorg. (1960). Wahrheit und Methose: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik.)
胡幼慧(編)(1996)。《質性研究:理論方法及本土女性研究實例》,台北:巨流。
胡錦媛(2004)。〈專輯弁言〉,《中外文學》,33(6):13-15。
唐士哲(2003)。〈媒介社會的批判實踐:評介Scott Lash的《資訊批判》〉,《新聞學研究》,75:247-251。
夏可君(2004)。〈禮物的精神-德希達思想禮物及其對神學的解構〉,《道風:基督教文化評論-德里達與神學》,20:103-129。new window
徐泓(2000年11月22-27日)。〈網路記者初探〉,「朝陽科技大學傳播藝術學系第三屆兩岸傳播媒體邁入二十一世紀學術研討會」,台中:朝陽大學。
徐國淦(2003年3月6日)。〈成立蜂報 盼在大選發揮影響力〉,聯合報(2003年3月6日),取自http://udn.com/PE2004/topic/200311137779784/200311141830892.shtml
曹永慶(2002)。《紀登斯論現代社會的風險》,淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。
程光泉(2003)。〈全球化與現代性總序〉,程光泉(編),《全球化與現代性》,頁3-8,湖南長沙:湖南人民出版。
陳光興(1991)。〈真實-再現-擬仿 布希亞的後現代(媒體)社會學〉,《當代》,65:18-47。
陳百齡(2000年3月23日)。〈邁向網路新聞媒體:美國報業的轉型與挑戰〉,「銘傳大學傳播管理研究所展望新世紀國際學術研討會」,桃園:銘傳大學。
陳其邁,(2001)。《失控的世界 全球化與知識經濟時代的省思》 台北:時報文化(原書Giddens Anthony(2002) Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. Routledge)
陳秀惠(2001)。《音樂產業價值創造系統演進之研究》,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳湘嵐(2004)。《網際網路、替代性媒介與社會運動:以南方電子報為例》,國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
陳樺誼,周樹林(2005年7月6日)。《2005台灣網路使用者行為分析》,台北:資策會。
陳薇莉、谷玲玲(2001)。〈網路電子報對新聞產製的挑戰與衝擊〉,「銘傳大學傳播管理研究所新世紀新思維國際學術研討會」,台北士林:銘傳大學。
陳學明(1996)。《文化工業》。台北:楊智。
陳豐偉(1998年9月28日)。〈我們已經浪費了寶貴的四年〉,南方電子報,取自:http://www.esouth.org/sccid/review199809.htm。
張志偉(2000)。〈Linux的真義-唯有開放可以累積〉,《開放原始碼-Linux與自由軟體運動對抗軟體巨人的故事》,蔡憶懷(譯),頁XIX-XXX,台北:商周。(原書Wayner, Peter. [2000].Free for all: how Linux and the free software movement undercut the high-tech titans. New York: Harper Collins Business.)
張義東(1994)。《社會學的形態想像-從伊里亞斯的文明化過程談起》。台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
彭家發(1992)。《新聞論》。台北:三民書局。
黃宏昭(1997)。《符號、擬仿、內爆。布西亞媒介社會論述探討》。文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
黃厚銘(2002)。〈皮耶.布赫迪厄與反身社會學 (Reflexive sociology)〉,《網路社會學通訊期刊》,第22期,南華大學社會學研究所應用社會學系。取自:http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/22/22-02.htm
黃昭謀(2003年2月28日-3月1日)。〈資訊經濟的批判與反思〉,「清華大學社會學研究所2003網路與社會研討會」,新竹:清華大學。(Feb. 28th- Mar,1st, 2003)。
黃孫權(2004年8月31日-9月1日)。〈公平發展倡議:獨立媒體運動,IMC網站獨立媒體中心的熱情與實用主義〉,「台灣國際醫學聯盟全球公平發展青年培力營講座會議論文」,頁54-59,台北:新店。
黃國清(1997)。《知識社會的當代轉折-以Elias 與Foucault 為例》,國立政治大學社會研究所碩士論文。
黃新生(1994)。《電視新聞》。台北:遠流。
黃瑞祺(1990)。《曼海姆》。台北:風雲論壇。
黃瑞祺(1998)。《批判社會學-批判理論與現代社會學》(修定二版)。台北:三民。new window
黃瑞祺(2005)。〈自反性與批判社會學〉,黃瑞祺、羅曉南(編),《人文社會科學的邏輯》,頁165-180,台北:松慧文化。
黃錦祥、梁維國(2000年12月)。〈網路新聞媒體可信度之構面與評價〉,「中央大學資訊管理系第六屆資訊管理研究暨實務研討會」,新竹:中央大學。
黃錦祥、梁維國(2002)。〈網路新聞媒體可信度及其影響因素之探討〉,「輔仁大學資訊管理系第三屆產業資訊管理學術暨新興科技實務研討會」,台北新莊:輔仁大學。new window
馮建三(譯)(1999)。《資訊社會理論》,台北:遠流。(原書:Webster, Frank. (1995). The theories of the information society. London, N.Y.: Routledge.)
楊志弘(2000)。〈網路媒體的互動功能探討:堅論互動網路新聞的發展〉。「銘傳大學傳播管理研究所網路媒體的跨世紀挑戰」,台北士林:銘傳大學。new window
楊維中(2004)。〈破報十載!回顧專題系列(五)-台灣十年網路分享史:從1.0到1.0〉,《破報》,復刊338期封面報導。
楊舜慧(2004)。〈南方電子報的出現〉,「元智大學資訊社會學研究所2004資訊社會研究生論文發表會」,桃園中壢:元智大學。
鄔昆如(1983)。《理則學》。台北:黎明。
趙剛(2001)。〈為何反全球化?如何反?關於全球化的一些問題思考與對話〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,44:49-146。new window
鄭陸霖、林鶴玲(2001)。〈社會運動在網際網路上的展現:台灣社會運動網站的聯網分析〉,《台灣社會學》,2:55∼96。new window
劉昌德(2000年5月)。〈資訊革命—是誰搞的鬼?許勒的資訊式社會觀點〉,《當代》,153:39-46。
劉維公(2001a)。〈第二現代理論:介紹貝克與季登斯的現代性分析〉,顧忠華(編),《第二現代:風險社會的出路》,頁1-15。台北:巨流。new window
劉維公(2001b)。〈第二現代與日常生活中的美學體驗〉,顧忠華(編),《第二現代:風險社會的出路》,頁141-157。台北:巨流。new window
劉韌(2004/8/24)。〈劉韌談網路:WikiWiki快點快點〉,取自:http://mag.udn.com/mag/dc/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=1878
劉曙光(2003)。《全球化與反全球化》,長沙:湖南人民出版。
數位時代雙週(2004年10月6日)。〈創意共享(CC):數位時代的創意棲息地〉,《數位時代雙週電子報》,取自:http://mag.udn.com/mag/dc/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=2660
蔣安國(2001)。〈線上新聞學新聞處理過程與模式之研究〉,銘傳大學傳播管理研究所「新世紀新思維國際學術研討會」,台北士林:銘傳大學。
賴曉黎(2000)。《資訊的共享與交換-黑客文化的歷史、場景與社會意涵》,台灣大學社會研究所博士論文。new window
賴曉黎(2004)。〈網路的禮物文化〉,《資訊社會研究》,6:149-172。new window
錢震(1967)。《新聞論(上)(下)》。台北:中央日報社。
簡妙如(1998)。〈將布希亞佔為己用-擬象論的解讀與媒體分析的再延伸〉,《哲學雜誌》,24:31-53。
魏玓(2000)。〈至死不渝的左派研究先驅:許勒的生平、思想與辯論〉,《當代》153:18-29。
顧忠華(1994)。〈風險社會的概念及其理論意涵〉,《政大學報》,69:57-79。
顧忠華(2001)。〈風險、社會與倫理〉,顧忠華(編),《第二現代:風險社會的出路》,頁17-46。台北:巨流。new window
顧爾德(2003)。〈風暴過後,台灣的紐約時報在哪裡?〉。《新新聞週報》,843, 40-41。
















Axel, Honneth. ([1984]1992):〈片段化的象徵世界,波笛爾文化社會學的省思〉(Die Verissene Welt der symbolischer Formen, Kölner Zeitschrift fűr soziologie und sozialpsychologie, 36.)劉維公譯,《當代》,77:15-31。
Appelbaum, Richard P. & Robinson, William I. (2005). Toward a critical Globalization studies- continued debates, new directions, neglected topics. In Richard P. Appelbaum & William I. Robinson. Critical globalization studies. Pp. xi-xxxiii.
Atton, Chris & Couldry, Nick. (2003). Introduction to special issue. Media, Culture and Society, 25(5), 579-586.
Barbrook, Richard & Cameron, Andy. (1996). The californian ideology, Science as Culture, 26(6), Part 1, 44-72.
Barbrook, Richard. (1998). The hi-tech gift economy. First Monday, 3(12),Avaliable:
http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_12/barbrook/index.html
Barsamian, David. (2002). The decline and fall of public broadcasting.(2ed Ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: South and press.
Baudrillard, Jean. ([1970]1991).〈消費社會與消費慾望〉(La société de consommation : ses mythes et ses structures. Chapter 1 and 5.Paris: Gallimard.)蔡崇隆譯,《當代》,65:48-71。
Baudrillard, Jean. (1981). Beyond use value. in Charles Levin (trans.& an introduction). For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St. Louis, MO: Telos Press. pp.130-142.
Baudrillard, Jean. (1988). Fatal Strategies. in Jacques Mourrain & Mark Poster (trans.& an introduction), Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings . Cambridge and Stanford: Polity and Stanford University Press. pp.185-206.
Baudrillard, Jean. (1993). Symbolic exchange and death. (Mike Gane., trans.& an introduction).London: Sage.(Original work published 1976)
Baudrillard, Jean. (1998). The consumer society: myths and structures. (C. T. & George Ritzer, trans.& an introduction).London: Sage. (Original work published 1970)
Baudrillard, Jean.([1968]1977):《物體系》 (Le systeme des objets. Paris : Gallimard), 林志明譯。台北:時報。
Baudrillard, Jean.(1983). Simulations. (Paul Foss, Paul Patton&Philip Beitchman, trans.). New York: Semiotext(e) Inc.
Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony & Lash, Scott.(1994). Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. UK, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich. (1992). Risk society: toward a new modernity. (Mark Ritter trans.). London: Sage.
Beck, Ulrich. ([1998]1999):《全球化危機》(Was ist Globalisierung? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.)孫治本譯。台北:台灣商務。
Beck, Ulrich. (1999). World risk society. Malden, Mass : Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich. (2000). What is Globalization? (Patrick Camiller trans.)Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beckerman, Gal. (2003). Emerging alternatives: edging away from anarchy- inside the indymedia colletive, passion v.s. pragmatism. Columbia journalism review,42(3), 27-30
Bell, Daniel. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society : a venture in social forecasting. New York : Basic books.
Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann, Thomas. (1966). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York : Anchor Books, Doubleday.
Berman, Marshall. (1983). All that is solid melts into air: the experience of modernity.
Best, Steven & Douglas Kellner. ([1991]1994):《後現代理論-批判的質疑》(Postmodern theory: critical interrogations. New York : Guilford Press.),朱元鴻、馬彥彬、方孝鼎、張崇熙、李世明譯,台北:巨流。
Bocock, Robert. (1993). Consumption. London: Routledge.
Boczkowski, Pablo.(2000). Distribute and conquer? Changing regimes of information creation in the online newspapers. Paper presented in Santa Fe Institute workshop on “Hierarchies: Distributed intelligence and organization of Diversity. ”
Boczkowski, Pablo.(2002). The development and use of online newspapers: what research tells us and what we might want to know. In Leah A. Lievrouw & Sonia Livingstone.(Eds.), The handbook of new media. London: Sage. pp.270-286.
Borgmann, Albert. (1999). Holding on to reality: The nature of information at the turn of the millennium. Chicago: the university of Chicago press.
Boudieu, Pierre.(1992). The logic of practice. (Richard Nice trans.). Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, Pierre.(1998). The essence of neoliberalism, le monde diplomatique, December, Available: http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieu.
Brand, Stewart.(1995). We owe it all to the hippies: Forget antiwar protests, Woodstock, even long hair. The real legacy of the sixties generation is the computer revolution. Time magazine, 145(12), special issue, Available: http://members.aye.net/~hippie/hippie/special_.htm
Bushkin, Arthur A. & Yurow, Jane H. (1980). The foundation of United States information policy. Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of commerce. Information Hotline, 12(9/October): 12-18.
Castells, Manuel ([1989]1995):〈社會運動與資訊城市〉(Social movements and the informational city. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 21: 197-206. ),《空間社會文化身體與性別:翻譯文選》,王志弘譯,台北:明文。
Castells, Manuel ([1992] 1997):〈流動空間〉(The space of flows: A theory in the informational society.),王志弘譯,《城市與設計學報》,1:1-15。(Original Paper presented on conference of The new urbanism organized by Princeton university. October, 1992)
Castells, Manuel ([1998] 1998):〈草根性流動空間〉(Grassrooting the space of flows),林秀姿譯,《城市與設計學報》,5/6:1-8。(Original Paper presented on conference of Atlanta telecommunications and the city by University of Georgia. March 21th –23th, 1998)
Castells, Manuel. ([1996]1998):《網絡社會之崛起》(The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell. )夏鑄九、王志宏、殷寶寧、溫蓓章、黃麗玲、魏慶嘉譯,台北:唐山。
Castells, Manuel. (2000). The end of millennium. (2ed ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, Manuel. (2001). The Internet galaxy: reflections on the internet, business and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. (1999). Acts of aggression : policing rogue states. New York : Seven Stories Press
Chomsky, Noam. (2004). Reflections on power and globalization. In Henry Veltmeyer.(Ed.), Globalization and antiglobalization. UK: Ashgate.pp.139-153.
Clarke, Roger. (1995). Information Wants to be Free .. Available:
.http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/II/IWtbF.html
Clarke, Roger. (1999). Freedom of information? The internet as a harbinger of a new dark age. First Monday, 4(11). Available:http://www.firstmonday.dk
/issues/issue4_11/clarke/
Clarke, Roger. (2003). To Share *and* To Profit. Paper presented at a Debate on ‘To Share or Not to Share’, a plenary session of the Queensland TAFE “Shooting the Tube' Conference”, Griffith University. (July 4th, 2003). Available: http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/EC/TAFECD030704.html
Cohen, Elliot D. (1992). Philosophical issues in journalism. New York: Oxford.
Couch, Carl J. (1996). Information technologies and social orders. New York: aldine de gruyter.
Dannin, Robert.(2003). Sacred media/global sacrifice. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 30.
Dichter, Aliza.(2003). Is this what media dempcracy looks like? Indymedia and the new net news. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 15-17.
Dodd, Nigel. (1999). Social theory and modernity. Malden, Mass : Polity Press.
Dordick, Herbert S. & Wang, Georgette. (1993). The information society: a retrospective view. C.A.: Sage.
Downing, John D. H. (2001, May). The Seattle IMC and the socialist anarchist tradition. Paper presented at the meeting of the Our Media, Not Theirs conference, Washington DC.(May 24th, 2001) Available: http://www.ourmedianet.org/general/papers.html
Downing, John. D. H. (2002a, April). The indymedia phenomenon: space-place-democracy and the new independent media centers. Paper presented at the meeting of 2001 Bugs globalism and pluralism conference, Montreal (April,27th, 2002)
Downing, John. D. H. (2002b).Independent media centers: a multi-local, multi-media challenge to global neo-liberalism. In Marc Raboy (Ed.), Global media policy in the new millennium. Luton, Bedfordshire, U.K. : University of Luton press. pp.215-232.
Drucker, Peter Ferdinand. (1950). The new society: the anatomy of the industrial order. New York : Harper.
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L.(1979). The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe. New York:Cambridge University Press
Elias, Nobert. (1991a). Symbol Theory. (Richard Kilminster trans.). London, Newbury Park : Sage.
Elias, Nobert. (1991b). The society of individuals. (Michael Schroter trans.). Oxford:Blackwell.
Ettema, James S. (1989). Interactive electronic text in the United States: can videotex ever go home again? In Jerry Lee Salvaggio & Jennings Bryant (Eds.), Media use in the information age: emerging patterns of adoption and consumer use. Hillsdale,N. J.: Erlbaum.pp.105-123.
Feather, John. (2001). The information society: a study of continuity and change. London: Library Association Publishing.
Ganley, Gladys D. (1992). The exploding political power of personal media. New Jersey: Ablex press.
Garfinkel, Harold. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology . Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, Anthony.(1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: polity press.
Giddens, Anthony.([1998]1999):《第三條路:社會民主之更新》(The third way : the renewal of social democracy),鄭武國譯,台北:聯經出版。
Giddens, Anthony & Pierson, Christpher. ([1998]2002):《現代性:紀登斯訪談錄》(Making sense of modernity: conversations with Anthony Giddens. Oxford: Polity press.),尹弘毅譯,台北:聯經。
Godelier, Maurice. (1999). The enigma of the gift. (Nora Scott trans.). Cambridge, London: Polity Press.
Guillén, Mauro F. (2001). Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the social science literature. Annual review of sociology, 27, 235-260.
Gillmor, Dan. ([2004]2005). 《草根媒體》(We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people for the people. Taipei: O’Reilly),陳建勳譯,台北:歐萊禮。
Habermas, Jürgen ([1985]1987). The Philosophical Discourse
of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. (Frederick Lawrence trans.).(Original work published in 1985. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Halleck, DeeDee. (2002, July). Gathering Storm: the open cyber forum of indymedia. Paper presented at the pre-conference of ‘Our Media: the international association for media and communication research’, Spain: Barcelona. (July 20th, 2002).
Halleck, DeeDee. (2003).Indymedia: building an international activist internet network. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 11-15.
Held, David, McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David & Perraton, Jonathan (1999). Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Oxford: Polity Press.
Held, David & McGrew, Anthony. (2002). Globalization and anti-globalization. UK, Cambridge: Polity.
Higgins, John. W.(2002, July). Alternative media and the cult of individualism: Experiences from U. S. public access cable TV. Paper presented at the meeting of the ‘our media’ pre-conference of the international association for media and communication section, Barcelona, Spain.(July,20th ,2002)Available: http://faculty.menlo.edu/~jhiggins/ourmedia/issue7_4/hyde/
Himanen, Pekka. ([2001]2002):《駭客倫理與資訊時代精神》(The hacker ethic and the spirit of the information age. New York: Random House),劉瓊云譯,台北:大塊。
Hirst, Paul & Thompson, Grahame. ([1999]2002):《全球化迷思》(Globalization in question: the inernational economy and the possibilities of governance),朱道凱譯,台北:群學出版。
Hintz, Arne.(2003). Indymedia Germany: A local node of the global network. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 21-25.
Hyde, Gene.(2002). Independent media center: Cyber-subversion and the alternative press. First Monday, 7(4), April. Available: http://www.firstmonday.org/
issues/issue7_4/hyde/index.html
Indymedia: from counter-information to informational utopics.(2004). Paper presented at the meeting of Symposium Active research in group discussion by Martin, Jeff, Enric&Mayo. Barcelona. Available: http://www.
investigaccio.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=49
Jankowski, Nicholas W. & Jansen, Marieke. (2003, December). Undymedia: Exploration of an alternative internet-based source of movement news. Paper presented at conference of Digital news, social change and globalization. Hong Kong: Baptist University. (December 11th-12th, 2003).
Kenney, Martin. & Goe, W. Richard.(1990). A social or economic good? The role of information in the information society. In Sven B. Lundstedt. (Ed.), Telecommunications, values, and the public interest. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing. pp.254-270.
Kenney, Martin. (1996). The role of information, knowledge and value in the late 20th century. Futures, 28(8), 695-707.
Kidd, Dorothy. (2003a). The independent media center: A new model. Indymedia and the new net news. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 7-10.
Kidd, Dorothy. (2003b). Indymedia.org.: a new communications commons. in Martha McCaughey & Michael D. Ayers, (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice. New York: Routledge. pp.47-70.
Kidd, Dorothy. (2003c, May). Carnival and commons : the global IMC network. Paper presented at conference of ‘Our Media III’. Colombia: Barranquilla.( May 17th-20th , 2003).
Krishnan, Raghu & Skanthakumar, B.(2001). Anti-Globalization and Its Discontents. What Next ?, Vol.19. Available: http://www.whatnextjournal.co.uk/Pages/Back/Wnext19/Global.html
Lakatos, Imre & Musgrave, Alan, (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lash, Scott & Urry, John.(1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.
Lash, Scott. (2002). Critique of information. London: Sage.
Latour, Bruno.(1993). We have never been modern. Hemel Hempsteat: Harvester Whearsheaf.
Levinas, Emmanuel(1990).《生存及生存者》,顧建光、張樂天譯,台北:遠流。
Lee, Alice & So, C. (2001a). Dissolving boundaries: electronic newspaper as an agent of redefining social practices. In Joseph M. Chan and Bryce T. McIntyre. (Eds.), In Search of Boundaries: Communication, Nation-States, and Cultural Identities. Norwood, New Jersey :Ablex Press. pp.72-94.
Lee, Alice & So, C. (2001b). Electronic newspaper as digital marketplaces. World Futures, 57:203-230.
Lessig, Lawrence. (2001).The future of ideas : the fate of the commons in a connected world. New York : Random House.
Levinson, Paul. ([1999]2000):《數位麥克魯漢》(Digital McLuhan : a guide to the information millennium. New York: Routledge.),宋偉航譯,台北:貓頭鷹、城邦。
Loewenstein, Anthony. (2003, December 3). There is no space for news: A survey of Australia's media landscape. Znet, Asia. Available: http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=4605§ionID=44
Lovink, Geert. (2002). Dark Fiber: Tracking critical internet culture (electronic culture: history, theory, and practice). MIT university: MIT Press.
Lyotard , Jean-François ([1979 ]1984). The postmodern condition: A report on Knowledge. (Geoff Bennington & Brian Massumi trans.). (Original work published in 1979. La Conditoin posrmoderne: rapport sur le savoir.) U.K.: Manchester University Press.
Machlup, Fritz. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Magee, Bryan. (1973). Popper. London: Fontana Press.
Mannheim, Karl. (1936). Ideology and utopia. N. Y. : Harcourt Brace & World.
Martin, James. (1978). The wired society. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall.
Martinez, Elizabeth & Garcia, Arnoldo.(1997). What is neo-liberalism: A brief definition for Activists. National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Paper presented at the meeting of the Intercontinental Encounter for Humanity and against Neoliberalism, La Realidad, Chiapas. (1996, July 27-August 3). Available: http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=376
Masuda, Yoneji. (1981). The information society: as post-industrial Society. Washington: world future society.
Mauss, Marcel. ([1950]1990). The Gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. (W.D.Halls trans.). London ,New York : W.W. Norton.
McChesney, Robert W. (2001). Global media, neoliberalism , and imperialism, Monthly Review, 52(10),1-19. Available: http://www.monthlyreview.org
/301rwm.htm
McManus, John H.(1994). Market-driven journalism: let the citizen beware? Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Sage.
Meikle, Graham. (2003). Indymedia and the new net news. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 3-6.
Merritt, Davis (1996). Missing the point. American Journalism Review, 18(6), 29-31.
Meyer, John W. & Brian, Rowan. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Miller, David. (1993). Deliberative democracy and public choice. Political studies, Special issue, 40. Also In David Held (ed.), Prospects for democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press. pp.74-92.
Mittelman, James H. (1996). The dynamics of globalization. In James H. Mittelman. (Ed.), Globalization: critical reflections. London: Lynne Pienner. pp.1-20.
Micklethwait, John & Wooldridge, Adrian. ([2000]2002):《完美大未來:全球化機遇與挑戰》(A future perfect: the challenge and hidden promise of globalization),高仁君譯,台北:商周出版。
Morris, Douglas. (2004). Globalization and media democracy: the case of indymedia. In Douglas Schuler and Peter Day (Eds.), Shaping the network society: the new role of civil society in cyberspace. London: MIT Press, pp.325-352.
Mosco, Vincent. (1996). The political economy of communication: rethinking and renewal. London : Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications.
Naidoo, Prishani.(2003).The independent media center: south Africa. Indymedia and the new net news. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 18-20.
Naisbitt, John. (1984). Megatrends: ten new directions transforming our lives. New York, N.Y. : Warner Books.
O’Brien, Martin. ([1998]2002):〈導論:安東尼紀登斯的社會學〉,《現代性:紀登斯訪談錄》(In Giddens, Anthony & Pierson, Christpher.(1998)Making sense of modernity: conversations with Anthony Giddens. Oxford: Polity press.),尹弘毅譯,頁i-xxvi,台北:聯經。
Plou, Dafne Sabanes. (2003). Opening new information spaces for social movements in Argentina. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 26-27.
Porat, Marc Uri. (1977). The information Economy: Definition and measurement. United States Office of Technology Special Publication,77-12(1), The U.S. government printing office. Washington: Department of Commerce, Office of Telecommunications.
Poster, Mark (1995).The second media age. Cambridge, U.K. : Polity Press
Poster, Mark. (1990). The mode of information: poststructuralism and social context. Cambridge: Chicago university.
Raymond, Eric. S. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar:musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Cambridge, Mass.: O'Reilly and Associates, Inc. Available: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_3/
raymond/ rwm.htm
Robertson, Roland. (1992). Globalization: social theory and global culture. London: Sage.
Roszak, Theohore. (1986). The cult of information: the folklore of computers and the true are of thinking. NY: Pantheon books.
Rogers, Everett M.(2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York : Free Press
Sam and Annie.(2003). From indymedia UK to the united collectives. Media Development, XLX(61,April), 27-28.
Sen, Amartya. (2000). How to judge Globalism. In Frank J. Lechner. The globalization reader (2ed ed.). MA: Blackwell. pp. 16-21.
Shannon, Claude Elwood. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
Shiller, Herbert I.(1996).The mind managers. Boston : Beacon Press.
Singer, Jane B. Tharp, Martha P. & Haruta, Amon (1999). Online staffers: superstars or second-class citizens? Newspaper Research Journal, 20(3), 29-47.
Stiglitz, Joseph E.([2002]2002):《全球化的許諾與失落》(Globalization and its discontents)李明譯,台北:大塊文化。
The growth and growth of Bristol Indymedia. (2003). Media Development, XLX(61,April), 29.
Thompson, John B. (1995). The media and the modernity: a social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Thompson, Michael .(1979). Rubbish Theory: the creation and destruction of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thurow, Lester C.(1999). Building wealth : the new rules for individuals, companies, and Nation in a knowledge-based economic. New York: HarperBusiness
Toffler, Alvin. (1980). The third wave. New York : Morrow.
Tumber, Howard. (2001). Democracy in the information age: the role of the fourth estate in cyberspace. Information, Communication and society, 4(1), 95-112.
Uzelman, Scott. (2002). Catalyzing participatory communication: Independent media center and the politics of direct action. Master dissertation, Simon Fraser University. U.S.
Van Dijk, Jan. (1999). The network society. (Leontine Spoorenberg trans.). London: Sage.
Veltmeyer, Henry.(2004). The antinomies of antiglobalization. In Henry Veltmeyer.(Ed.), Globalization and antiglobalization. UK: Ashgate.pp.169-193.
Virilio, Paul. (2000). The information bomb.(Chris Turner trans.). N.Y.: Verso.

Waters, Malcolm. ([1995 ]2000):《全球化》(Globalization),徐偉傑譯,台北:弘智。
Wayner, Peter. ([2000]2000):《開放原始碼-Linux與自由軟體運動對抗軟體巨人的故事》(Free for all: how Linux and the free software movement undercut the high-tech titans. New York: Harper Collins Business.),蔡憶懷譯,台北:商周。
Webster, Frank & Robins, Kevin.(1986). Information technology : a luddite analysis. Norwood, N.J. : Ablex.
Webster, Frank. ([1995]1999):《資訊社會理論》(The theories of the information society. London, N.Y.: Routledge.)馮建三譯,台北:遠流。
Wells, Gary J., Shuey, Robert & Kiely, Ray. (2001). Globalization. New York: Novinka Books.
Went, Roberet. (2000). Glibalization: neoliveral challenge, radical responses.(Peter Drucker trans.). London: Pluto Press.
Whitaker, Mark. (2003, June). Affirming the pre-existing plurality of local, democratic voices: a short history of US media, compared to the global independent media centers phenomenon since 1999. Paper presented at the meeting of ‘Media studies seminar presentation’ University of Wisconsin-Madison. (June 25th , 2003)
Worthington, Richard. (2000). Rethinking Globalization: Production, politics, actions. New York: Peter Lang.
Wray, Stephan.(1999).On electronic civil disobedience. Peace Review, 11(1), 107-111.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE