:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:容積移轉管制之制度經濟分析
作者:謝琦強 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh Chi Chiang
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:地理學系
指導教授:莊翰華
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:容積移轉制度經濟空間外部性交易成本Transferable Development Rights (TDR)Institutional EconomicsSpatial ExternalityTransaction Cost
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:74
都市發展係針對實質及社會環境的改善,著重規劃、制度及治理的良好結合。近來全台實施「都市計畫容積移轉」制度,其制度內涵異於歐美先進諸國;如未明確指定適當容積移入地區的方式,在不動產開發市場日益朝向特定區位聚集趨勢下,相對催化某些正值高度成長市區的交通、土地使用與公共設施服務水準等問題惡化,因而先後列入於2006年行政院「經濟永續發展會議」及2008年內政部「全國都計建管會議」的重要議題。另一方面由建築開發者以捐贈公共設施保留地方式換取開發標的建築容積增加,賦予其土地發展權之可分割性、可交易性;亦形成建築開發市場的新增次市場;亟待建立符合當前國內容積移轉及相關制度的變遷分析架構,進行實證研究,據而推動制度創新。
本研究藉由混合方法研究,採用制度經濟學的空間外部性與交易成本取向為主軸,以目前全台具代表性的台中市進行個案研究。在空間外部性方面,首先針對當地建築投資業者進行問卷調查,透過建築投資業者模擬評估,以描述統計方法與空間區位圖分析,探討容積移轉潛在開發區位特性。其次,藉由產、官、學互動過程的焦點團體訪談法與問卷調查,選取區位條件、現況容受力及相關空間因素;針對台中市現行容積移轉制度所核准接受基地,以地理資訊系統量測、運算各因素數據,應用因素分析之主成份分析法與群落分析法,解釋相關區位特性、空間分佈,後段則追蹤進行半結構式訪談,務實探討現行制度所形成全市空間結構、容積移入地區及都市發展政策等不同層面的相關空間外部性問題。另一方面則自交易成本觀點,針對國內容積移轉制度運作進行相關專業技術人員的問卷調查,結合半結構式訪談,對於整體交易過程的各類型成本環節進行比較分析。
最後整合相關分析結果,建構制度創新網絡,運用分析網絡程序法進行制度創新評估。在空間外部性層面反映現行制度面臨「都市發展總量與成長管理的脫軌」、「缺乏引導容積移入合理區位的市場誘因設計」、「欠缺主要容積移入地區的資訊流通及回饋機制規劃」及「亟待整合相關政策性工具,引導都市空間結構的合理發展」等需求;而交易成本層面則歸納為「活化開發成本門檻與資訊流通」、「擴大開發型態選擇,增進產品競爭力」、「開發許可與配套管制之影響」及「提升接受基地規劃與管控開發風險」面向;對照經濟評估結果顯示「建立容積移入區位有效監測、警戒模式」雖受制度供需者所重視,然過去公部門並未積極投入人力、預算與技術發展,形成實施基礎過度空洞;「適度放寬管制,增進建築開發彈性」、「法令修訂公開透明化,維持開發誘因」等則涉及複雜之法令結構層面,迄今未見進展。公私部門必須合力克服制度創新落後變遷需求的危機。
Improvement of urban development and society environment, that counts on good integration of policy planning, institution establishment and management. The increasing application of TDR all over Taiwan recently however system differs from western countries for instance the lack of clear rules for designating receiving areas. As market tendency that towards more concentrated location therefore services quality become worsened for instance transportations, land uses and public facilities in central areas among growing cities of Taiwan. Observations successively listed as key emphases during “Conference of Sustaining Taiwan’s Economic Development by , Executive Yuan, 2006” and “National Conference on Urban Planning, Urban Design & Building Administration, Minister of Interior, 2008”. Besides, with creation of divisibility and tradability of land development rights, a new submarket derived for developers’ purpose to acquire additional floor areas through the donation of reserved lands for public facility to governments. With above reasons of necessity to promote institutional innovation, this empirical study aims to contribute a framework of appropriate analytical structure of Taiwan in terms of TDR and mechanism evolution.
By adoption of the mixed research methods, key objectives are spatial externality and cost-led transaction of Institutional Economics. Taichung City, case study of this research as most representative sample of Taiwan, the first dimension of spatial externality starts on location characteristic analysis of TDR receiving area via questionnaire surveys with developers, descriptive statistics and location map analysis. The group interviews with industrial, official and academic sectors, as well as the questionnaire analysis. Factors of location, current carrying capacity and spatial-related variables afterward are selected. Total samples are approved receiving sites of TDR in Taichung City, and measures of geographical information system, operational analysis are applied for factorial analysis (Principle component analysis & Cluster analysis) in order to probe into interpretation of locality characteristic and spatial distribution. Later part is semi-structure interviews for current externality problems review in relation to spatial structure in city level, TDR receiving areas and urban development policies. Second dimension, the cost-led transaction undertook by surveys of on-the-job employees in related-field specialists and semi-structure interviews, then to conduct cost comparison analysis during whole transaction process.
Conclusions through analytic network process, dimension of spatial externality are: “The disorder between overall urban development quotas and growth management”, “The lack of provisions of market incentive in guiding the development to suitable location”, “The lack of information circulation & compensation mechanism of receiving area”, “Necessity of polices integration for guiding to a reasonable pattern of urban spatial structure”. Conclusions on dimension of transaction cost are:“To loosen threshold restriction of development cost and information circulation”,“To extend the development alternatives in order to improve products competiveness”,“Impact of development permit and supporting mechanisms”,“Enhancement of site planning and risk management of receiving areas”. Indication after the comparison of economic evaluation, though importance of “Establishment of effective monitoring and alarm system” are identified with both policy makers & followers, in past the public sector yet not devoted actively in human resource, budget and technique development. Another suggestion is the insignificant progress due to complicated law structure for instance of “Suggestion of untie the management for widening development flexibility”, “Law amendment be brought into open for maintaining the development incentives”. In all, both public and private have cooperatively to cope with aforementioned crises which now causing delay of new institutional innovation of Taiwan.
中文部分
王文宇(1996)"財產法的經濟分析與寇斯定理:從一則古老的土地相鄰判決談起",月旦法學雜誌,第15期,頁1-17。
王秉五、王大立(1995)"台中市住宅價格空間結構之研究",規劃與設計學報,第1卷4期,頁127-143。
王薇凱(2008)台中市公共設施保留地容積移轉機制檢討之研究。私立逢甲大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
王躍生(1997)新制度主義,台北,揚智。
台中市政府(2001)修訂台中市綜合發展計畫,台中,台中市政府。
台中市政府(2004)變更台中市都市計畫(主要計畫)(不包括大坑風景區)(第三次通盤檢討)(有關計畫圖、第十二期重劃區、部分體二用地、後期發展區部分)案,台中,台中市政府。
台中市政府(2005)台中市都市計畫容積移轉及原後期發展地區發展策略研究案,台中,台中市政府。
台中市政府(2006)變更台中市都市計畫(主要計畫)(不包括大坑風景區)(第三次通盤檢討)(經內政部都市計畫委員會第630次會議審決部分)案,台中,台中市政府。
台中市政府(2007)95年台中市都市計畫年報,台中,台中市政府。
台中市政府(2008)因應容積移轉政策辦理台中市都市計畫通盤檢討規劃案,台中,台中市政府。
台中市政府(2006)台中市政府都市發展處政策白皮書,台中,台中市政府。
台中縣政府(2006)台中縣實施容積移轉地區調查規劃與研訂作業機制案,豐原,台中縣政府。
行政院經建會(2006)土地變更作業手冊,台北,五南書局。
朱柔若譯(2000)社會研究方法:質化與量化取向,台北,揚智出版社。
朱琴芬(2006)新制度經濟學,上海,華東師範大學。
何東坡(1993)"住宅過濾現象之檢證-以台南市為例",國立成功大學學報,第28期,頁61-74。
吳卓夫、韓道昀(2004)"以土地開發觀點探討容積移轉之應用--以台北縣為例",現代營建,第289期,頁59-66。
吳彩珠(2002)"都市更新法制變遷之制度經濟分析",中國行政評論,第11卷3期,頁63-94。new window
呂宗盈(2003)環境變遷與土地使用管理制度關係之研究-土地與法律互動模式之應用,國立台北大學都市計畫研究所博士論文。new window
李小建(2007)"經濟地理學的關系轉向評述",世界地理研究,第16卷4期,頁19-27。
李承嘉(1997)"仕紳化意義及條件之研究",法商學報,第33期,頁219-257。
李家儂(2007)"容受力應用於都市地區建築容積總量管制之探討",土地問題研究季刊,第6卷3期,頁82-97。new window
辛晚教(1979)"談容積管制對地價之影響",都市與計劃,第5卷1期,頁25-29。new window
林元興、陳貞君(1999)"容積移轉與古蹟保存",人與地,第188期,頁20-25。
林建元(2002)"都市計畫容積移轉制度面臨的挑戰與機會",內政部營建署都市計畫容積移轉作業講習會,台北。
林英彥等編著(1999)都市計畫與行政,台北,國立空中大學。
林淑萍(2002)住戶換屋行為與住宅福祉變遷解析,私立中原大學建築系碩士論文。
林莉婷(2002)建構容積移轉接受基地分析模型之研究,國立台北科技大學建築及都市設計研究所碩士論文。
林森田(2002)"土地使用分區之制度經濟分析",土地問題研究季刊,第1期,頁9-18。new window
林勵偉(1984)"談台北市實施容積管制",台灣房屋市場,第111期,頁62-67。
周一夔(1976)"美國發展權移轉體制簡介",都市與計劃,第2期,頁1-11。
周志龍(2003)全球化、台灣國土再結構與制度。台北,詹氏書局。new window
卓越(2006)"新制度經濟學的新發展:歷史比較制度分析",經濟學家,第6期,頁19-27。
青木昌彥(2001)比較制度分析,上海,遠東書局。
邱皓政(2005)量化研究與統計分析,台北,五南書局。
吳耿東(2003)不動產投資分析,台北,文笙書局。
侯英(2007)"混合方法研究及其對教育技術研究的啟示",中國教育技術,第12期,頁1-6。
姜美如、黃詩芬(2001)"擬定容積移轉實施策略",空間,第137期, 頁13-17。
施建生(1999)"制度經濟學的新發展",台灣經濟研究月刊,第22卷4期,頁8-11。new window
施建生(2000)"范伯倫〔Thorstein Veblen〕制度經濟學",經濟前瞻,第69期,頁126-129。
施鴻志、邱景升(1989)"建築容積管制的實施與制定",都市與計劃,第16期,頁83-96。new window
洪于婷、鄒克萬(2006)"地方永續發展空間結構變遷之分析",都市與計劃,第33卷4期,頁321-344。new window
胡志平(2002)"空屋鍵與住宅福祉計量評估解析-排序性選擇模式之應用",建築與規劃學報,第3卷2期,112-135。new window
胡海豐(2001)土地使用變更與政府行為,國立政治大學地政系博士論文。new window
胡海豐(2003)"從財產權觀點檢視政府的土地使用變更政策",中國行政評論,第13卷第1期,57-96。new window
胡琬玲(2001)從新制度主義論歐洲議會職權之變遷,私立中國文化大學政治研究所博士論文。
桃園縣政府(2003)桃園縣推動容積移轉制度之研究成果報告書,桃園,桃園縣政府。
夏鑄九、彭揚凱(2006)"容積移轉-不可不慎",2006年9月30日中國時報論壇。
徐仁輝(1995)"新制度經濟學與公共行政",世界新聞傳播學院學報,第5期,頁273-288。
徐世榮(1998)"新社會運動、非營利組織、與社區意識的興起",中國行政,第66期,頁1-19。
涂平子(1999)"容積移轉與都市品質:紐約市古蹟保存與擴大使用發展權移轉辦法爭議",城市與設計學報,第7期,頁239-265。new window
涂永式(2006)制度結構創新論網,上海,三聯書局。
秦美琪(1999)"全面實施容積管制對房地產市場之影響座談會. ",人與地,第185期,頁49-52。
許戎聰(2003)不動產投資評估指標建構之研究-以建設公司觀點,國立台灣大學管理學院知識管理組碩士論文。
莊翰華(2005)"知識經濟下的空間規劃系統建構",國立彰化師範大學文學院學報,第4期,頁3-31。new window
張世典(1977)"建築容積管制與都市容積計劃",科學與技術,第1卷4期,頁81-90。
張世典(1978)"建築容積管制的概念",建築師,第4卷2期,頁8-13。
張美娟(2003)國內有線電視發展數位電視服務經營策略之研究,國立台灣師範大學圖文傳播學系碩士論文。
張效通(2000)"開發負擔與受益回饋之制度經濟分析",台灣土地金融季刊,第37卷2期,頁39-69。
張祖璿(1979)"容積管制之實施",都市與計劃,第5卷1期,頁1-4。new window
張清溪等編著(2002),經濟學,台北,翰蘆出版社。
張隆盛(1979)"容積管制實施之法令問題",都市與計劃,第5卷1期,頁5-7。new window
張隆盛(2001)"公共設施保留地容積移轉--弊多於利",國家政策論壇,第1卷3期,頁155-156。
張聰明(2000)"美加容積移轉制度之探討",立法院院聞,第28卷4期,頁38-47。
張魁峰(2009)Super Decisions軟體操作手冊-以 ANP 突破AHP的研究限制,台北,鼎茂出版社。
陳立人(2004)"土地使用管制與Coase定理─管制權與利用權的探討",土地問題研究季刊,3卷4期,頁28-39。new window
陳立剛(2002)"全球化治理:台灣都會治理的困境與體制建構─地方政府跨區域合作探究",中國地方自治,56卷2期,頁4-19。
陳玉樹、黃財尉、黃芳銘譯(2006)結構方程模式的基本原理,高雄,麗文書局。
陳冲(2007)"高容積是商機也是危機",2007年12月4日經濟日報A12版觀點論壇。
陳坤宏(1991)"都市及區域空間結構理論與研究資料之引介",規劃學報,第18期,頁55-89。new window
陳坤銘、李華夏譯(1995)廠商、市場與法律,台北,遠流出版社。
陳明燦(2000)"財產權保障、土地使用限制與損失補償之探討--兼評「都市計畫容積移轉實施辦法」",國立台北大學法學論叢,第47期,頁243-284。new window
陳明燦(2002)"土地使用限制補償之法制經濟分析",國立中正大學法學期刊,第8期,頁147-189。new window
陳泓文(2002) "全面實施容積管制效應之研究",德霖學報(理工類),第16期,頁264-274。
陳冠華,(1999)不確定市場下建商投資行為之研究,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
陳建元(2006)"土地使用制度的選擇與產權結構關係之研究-制度經濟的觀點與應用",載於2006海峽兩岸土地學術研討會,台中,頁358-375。
陳健忠、談克誠、張蒙珍(1991)"容積管制 水土不服?",太聯房屋市場,第105期,頁14-35。
陳敦源(2001)"新制度論的範圍與方法:一個理性選擇觀點的方法論檢視",行政暨政策學報,第3期,頁129-184。new window
新竹市政府(2004)新竹市實施容積移轉作業計畫總結報告書,新竹,新竹市政府
葉艾青(2006)以財產權觀點探討美國成長管理運動與私有財產權運動,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
黃世孟(1991)都市計畫專業用語之解說及彙編,台北,營建雜誌社。
黃朝陽(1985)"談台灣地區施行容積管制",人與地,第24期,頁13-17。
黃舜銘(2004)"大稻埕歷史風貌特定區容積移轉機制之研究",國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文。
楊友仁(2004)"經濟地理學的制度轉向:一個理論性回顧與研究取向的建議",國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報,第12期,頁69-80。new window
楊亮(2007)"公共政策失靈與政府失靈的區別",山西黨校學報,第29期4卷,頁58-61。
楊重信、林瑞益(1994)"可轉讓土地發展權市場之效率與公平性",人文及社會科學集刊,第83期6卷,頁21-62。new window
楊重信(2001)"容積移轉可能變成票房毒藥",2001年2月20日中國時報論壇。
楊德才(2007)新制度經濟學,南京,南京大學。
榮泰生(2007)SPSS與研究方法,台中,五南書局。
詹有順(2000)"都市計畫地區容積移轉之試算:以蘆洲李宅古蹟的保存為例",空大行政學報,第10期,頁273-286。new window
彰化縣員林鎮公所 (2005) 都市計畫公共設施保留地及古蹟保存容積移轉可行性之研究,員林,彰化縣員林鎮公所。
廖石(2004)"從城鄉互動的觀點探討台灣農地釋出的政策課題--以桃園台地為例",台灣土地金融季刊,第41卷2期,頁83-102。
廖佳展(2005)"現行容積移轉制度下容積移轉估價方法之初探",土地問題研究季刊,第4卷2期,頁110-119。new window
廖耀東(1999)"容積移轉實施之可行性",台灣地政,第155期,頁23-26。
蔡侑妤(2007)台中市新市政中心專用區發展歷程之研究,私立逢甲大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
熊秉元(1993)"市場之尺和心中之尺─論釋寇斯定理和布坎南對寇斯定理的質疑",經濟論文,第21卷2期,頁331-356。new window
熊秉元(1996)"平價住宅、寇斯定理、制度經濟學",台灣土地金融季刊,第33卷1期,頁15-30。
趙建雄(1991)"都市空間結構的變遷",中國地理學會會刊,第19期,頁91-124。new window
劉厚連(2004)"我國實施古蹟容積移轉制度之問題檢討",土地問題研究季刊,第3卷2期,頁65-74。new window
劉淑芬(1977)"容積管制之概念",海洋學院學報,第12期,頁375-382。
劉瑞華譯(1994)制度、制度變遷與經濟成就,台北,時報文化出版社。
蔡仁毅(1991)"對現有土地使用分區管制規則中有關建築容積管制辦法之探討-以台北市為例",營建季刊,第2卷3期,頁41-53。
蔣曉梅(1996)"由香港容積管制之經驗探討我國容積管制於都市設計層面之因應",正修學報,第9期,頁169-177。new window
賴宗裕、李家儂(2000)"現行容積移轉制度與容積可移轉量評估之探討",土地經濟年刊,第11期,頁69-98。new window
賴宗裕、胡宏昌(1999)"建構容積移轉機制之探討--對都市計畫容積移轉辦法草案之評論",經社法制論叢,第23期,頁311-328。
賴宗裕 (2001) "以成長管理觀點探討現行容積策略合理性",載於中華民國區域科學學會-住宅學會2001年聯合年會及論文研討會論文集,台北,頁1-15。
錢世皓(1997)"動態都市空間結構理論之初探",復興學報,第1期,頁55-62。
錢世皓、劉小蘭(2006)"多核心都市動態空間結構模式的初步架構與模擬",規劃學報,第33期,頁1-20。new window
謝博明(1990)住宅投資市場分析之研究,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
謝潮儀(1979)"容積管制之研擬--台北市住宅區個案分析",都市與計劃,第5卷1期,頁51-71。new window
謝潮儀、鍾起岱(1980)"都市空間結構理論簡介及其評估",法商學報,第15期,頁141-160。
鍾中信(2005)"容積移轉之估價方法研究-以公共設施保留地之計畫道路為例",土地問題研究季刊,第4卷2期,頁130-136。new window
瞿宛文(2003)全球化下的台灣經濟,台北,唐山書局。
瞿喜寶、袁慶明(2006)"制度的功能問題研究",雲夢學刊,第27卷4期,頁64-66。
簡龍鳳(2005)"論永續發展概念下緊密都市之空間結構思維",土地問題研究季刊,第4卷2期,頁16-24。new window
韓道昀(2003)就投資觀點探討台北縣私有公共設施保留地容積移轉之研究,私立中華大學營建管理研究所碩士論文。
顏愛靜(2001)"新制度經濟學的評價-「制度與經濟理論」導讀",人與地,第210期,頁19-36。
鍾麗娜(2006)土地經濟學,台北,文笙書局。
邊泰明(1991)地價變動對土地利用強度影響之研究,國立政治大學地政研究所博士論文。new window
邊泰明(2000)"容積移轉經濟分析",土地經濟年刊,第11期,頁27-37。new window
邊泰明(2003)土地使用規劃與財產權,台北,詹氏書局。
蘇志超(1999),"建築容積移轉辦法理想與實際之討論",人與地,第187期,頁18-22。
英文部分
Akerlof, G. A. (1997) "Social Distance and Social Decisions", Econometric, 65:1005-1027.
Alexander, E. R. (1992) "A Transaction‐cost Theory of Planning", Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2): 190‐200.
Alexander, E. R. (2001a) "A Transaction‐cost Theory of Land use Planning & Development ", Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2): 190‐200.
Alexander, E. R. (2001b) " Governance and Transaction Costs in Planning Systems: a Conceptual Framework for Institutional Analysis of Land-use Planning and Development Control -the Case of Israel", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28:755-776.
Anselin, L. (2003a) "Spatial Externalities", International Regional Science Review, 26(2): 147-152.
Anselin, L. (2003b) "Spatial Externalities, Spatial Multipliers, and Spatial Econometrics", International Regional Science Review, 26(2):153-166.
Aoki, M. (2000) "Institutional Evolution as Punctuated Equilibria in Menard C. Institutions, Contracts and Organizations: Perspectives from New Institutional Economics Northampton, M.A., USA: Edward Elga.
Arendt, R. (1991) "Cluster Development: A Profitable Way to Save Open Space", Land Development, 42:26-30.
Audretsch, D. B. (2003) "Innovation and Spatial Externalities", International Regional Science Review, 26(2):167-174.
Balmond, C. (1998) "New Spatial Structure ", Architecture, 20:86-99.
Bardhan, P. and C.Udry (1999) "Development microeconomics", Oxford: Oxford University.
Barzel, Y. (1997) "Economic Analysis of Property rights", Cambridge Cambridge University.
Bathelt, H and J. GIückler (2003) "Toward a Relation Economic Geography ", Journal of Economic Geography, 2003(3):117-144.
Bollens, A. (1992) "States Growth Management: Intergovernmental Frameworks and Policy Objectives", APA Journal, 58:454-466.
Buitelaar, E. (2004) “A Transaction‐Cost Analysis of the Land Development process,” Urban Studies, 41(13): 2539‐2553.
Campell, S. and S. S. Fainstein (1996) Reading in Planning Theory, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Carpenter, B. E., and Heffley, D. R. (1982) "Spatial-equilibrium analysis of transferable development rights", Journal of Urban Economics, 12(2):238-261.
Carr, Fergus and Massey, Andrew (1999) Public Policy in the New Europe –Euro governance in Theory and Practice, London: Edward Elgar.
Cars, Goran Patsy (2002) "Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux", 2002: 222-225.
Chomitz, K. M. (2004) "Transferable Development Rights and Forest Protection: An Exploratory Analysis", International Regional Science Review, 27(3):348-373.
Coase, R. H. (1990) The Firm, the Market and the law, Chicago: the University of Chicago.
Colwell, P. F. (1997) "Tender Mercies: Efficient and Equitable Land Use Change", Real Estate Economics, 25(4):525-537.
Costonis, J. J. (1972) "The Chicago Plan: Incentive Zoning and the Preservation of Urban Landmarks", Harvard Law Review, 85: 574-631.
Crump, A. (1993) Dictionary of Environment and Development: People, Places, Ideas and Organizations, Cambridge: MIT.
Cullingworth, J. B., and V. Nadin (2001), Town and Country Planning in the UK, London: Routledge.
Dahlman, C. J. (1979) "The Problem of Externality," Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1): 141‐162.
Dana, D. A. and T. W. Merrill (2002) Property:Takings, New York: Foundation.
Deng, F.F. (2002) "Ground Lease-based Land Use System Versus Common Interest Development", Land Economics, 78(2): 190-206
Deng, F. F. (2003) "The rebound of private zoning: property rights and local governance in urban land use", Environment and Planning, 35:133-149.
DeGrove, J. M. (2005) Planning Policy and Politics - Smart Growth and the States, Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Demsetz, H. (1967) "Toward a Theory of Property Right", American Economic Review", 57(2): 347-359.
Dicken, P.and A. Malmberg (2001) "A Firm in Territories: a Relational Perspective", Economic Geography, 77: 345-363.
Djankov, S., E. Glaeser, R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer (2003) "The New Comparative Economics", Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4):595-619.
Dubios, D. and H. Prade (1978) "Operations on fuzzy numbers", International Journal of System Science, 9: 613-626.
Duke, J. M., and L. Lynch (2006) "Farmland Retention Techniques: Property Rights Implications and Comparative Evaluation", Land Economics, 82(2):189-213.
Dye, Tomas (2002) Understanding Public Policy, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Egbu, A. U., P. Olomolaiye and R. Gameson (2008) "A Neo-institutional Economic Critique of the System for Allocating Urban Land and Development Rights in Nigeria", Habitat International, 32(1):121-135.
Elizabeth, C. S. (2002) " Agricultural land fragmentation: the spatial effects of three land protection strategies in the eastern United States", Landscape and Urban Planning, 58:255–268.
Epstein, R. E. (2005) "A Popular Insurrection on Property Rights", Free, 55(9): 8-11.
Ergin, I. H. (2002) "Efficient Resource Allocation on the Basis of Priorities", Econometrica, 70(6): 2489-2497.
Ervin, D. E. (1977) Land Use Control-Evaluating Economic and Political Effects, New York: Ballinger.
Fiani, R. (2004) "An Evaluation of the Role of the State and Property Rights in Douglass North’s Analysis", Journal of Economic Issues 38(1): 1003-1020.
Field, Barry C. (1986) Induced Changes in Property Rights Institutions, Mass: University of Massachusetts.
Fischel, W. A. (1987) "The Economics of Land Use Exactions: A Property Rights Analysis", Land and Contemporary Problems, 50: 101-114..
Fischel, W. A. (1995) Regulatory Taking, Cambridge: Harvard University.
Floyd, J. and Jr. Fowler (2002) Survey Research Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Foglesong, R.E. (1996) "Planning the Capitalist City", in Reading in Planning Theory, Massachusetts: Blackwell, pp. 169-175.
Foldvary, F. (1994) Public Goods and Private Communities, London: Edward Elgar.
Frederickson, H. G. and G. A. Johnson (2003) The Adapted City Institutional Dynamics and Structural Change, Cleveland: Cleveland State University.
Fujita, M. (1989) Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Furubotn, E. C. and R. Rudolf (2000), Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Garret, J. M. A. (1987) Land Use Regulation, New York: Pager.
Geoghegan, J. (2002) "The value of open spaces in residential land use", Land Use Policy, 19(1):91-98.
Gilbert, A. J. and L. C. Braat (1991) Introduction: Issues and Perspectives -Modeling For Population and Sustainable Development, New York: Routledge.
Goldsmith, Stephen and William D. Eggers (2004) Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institutions.
Gordon, P., and J. E. Moore (1991) "Planning the Trajectories of Land and Development Rights Rents via Discrete Programming Models", Environment and Planning A, 23(11):1561-1570.
Grief, A. (1998) "Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis", American Economic Review, 1998(2): 80-84.
Grief, A. (2006) Institution and the Path to Modern Economy, New York: Cambridge University.
Harper, R. (1989) Exploring Social Change, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Harvey, D. (1988) Social Justice and the City. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, L. (1990) Urban Planning and Economy, Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Hay, C. and D. Wincot, (1998) "Structure, Agency, and Historical Institutionalism", Political Studies 46(5): 951-957.
Hayek, F. A. (1958) Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: Chicago University.
Helsley, R. W. and J. V. Henderson, (2004) Urban Political Economics: Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, New York: Elsevier.
Hopkins, L. D. (2001) Urban Development: The Logic of Making Plans, Washington DC : Island.
Hoyle, R. H. (1995) Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Application, Newbury Park: Sage.
Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications: A state-of-the-Art Survey, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Irwin, E. G., and N. E. Bockstael (2004) "Land Use Externalities, Open Space Preservation, and Urban Sprawl", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(6):705-725.
Johnson, R. B. and A. J. Onwuegbuzie (2004) "Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time has Come", Educational Researcher, 33(7):12-26
Kaiser, H. F. (1974) "An Idea of Factorial Simplicity", Psychometrika, 39:31-36.
Kanemoto, Y. (2000) "Price and Quantity Competition among Heterogeneous Suppliers with Two-Part Pricing: Applications to Clubs, Local Public Goods, Networks, and Growth Controls", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(6): 587-608.
Kearns, A. and Ronan Paddison (2000) "New challenges for urban governance", Urban Studies, 37: 845-850.
Kissling, Naf I., and K. Bisang, (2001) "Rethinking recent changes of forest regimes in Europe through property-rights theory and policy analysis", Forest Policy and Economics, 3(4): 99-111.
Konishi, H. (2006) " Tiebout's Tale in Spatial Economies: Entrepreneurship, Self-Selection, and Efficiency, Boston College Department of Economics, Boston College Working Papers in Economics, 655: 1-34.
Kranser, J. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little Brown.
Ladd, B. (1990) Urban Planning and Civic Order in Germany, 1860-1914, New York: Harvard University.
Lai, W. C., and P. Y. Chan (2004) "The Formation of Owners Corporations in Hong Kong Private Housing Estates ", Property Management, 22(1):55-68.
Lawrence, David P. (1997) "Integrating Sustainability and Environmental Impact Assessment", Environmental Management, 21(1):23-42.
Leslie, T. F. and J. D. Landis (2006) "Growth Management Revisited", Journal of the American Planning Association 72(4): 411-430.
Lane, J. E. (2000) "Polycentric Phoenix", Economic Geography, 82(2):167-192.
Levinson, A. (1997) "Why Oppose TDRs? Transferable Development Rights Can Increase Overall Development", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27(3):283-296.
Li, L.H. and X. Li (2007) "Land Readjustment: An Innovative Urban Experiment in China", Urban Studies, 44(1):81-98.
Lin, Y. (1989) "An Economic Theory of Institutional Change: Induced and Imp.", Cato Journal, 9: 21-35.
Logan, T. H. (1976) "The Americanization of German Zoning", Journal of American Institute of Planner, October: 377-385.
Field, Bary C. and J. M. Conrad (1975) "Economics Issues in Programs of Transferable Development Rights", Land Economics, 51:331-340.
Fujita, M. and A. Venables (1999) The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade, M.A.: MIT Cambridge.
MacCallum, S. H. (2003) "The Enterprise of Community: Market Competition, Land and Environment ", Journal of Libertarian Studies, 17(4):1-15.
Machemer, P. L., and M. D. Kaplowitz (2002) "A Framework for Evaluating Transferable Development Rights Programmes", Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(6):773-795.
Mayer, C. and C. T. Somerville (2000) "Residential Construction: Using the Urban Growth Model to Estimate Housing Supply", Journal of Urban Economics, 48: 85-109.
McConnell, V., E. Kopits and M. Walls (2005) "Farmland Preservation and Residential Density: Can Development Rights Markets Affect Land Use?" Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 34(2):131-144.
McConnell, V., E. Kopits, and M. Walls (2006) "Using Markets for Land Preservation: Results of a TDR Program", Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(5):631-651.
McConnell, V., M. Walls and E. Kopits, (2006) "Zoning, TDRs and the Density of Development", Journal of Urban Economics, 59(3):440-457.
McMillan, J. (2002) Reinventing The Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets, New York: W. W. Norton
Menard, Claude (2004) Transaction Costs and Property Rights, London: Elgar.
Miller, A. J. (1999) "Transferable Development Rights in the Constitutional Landscape: Has Penn Central Failed to Weather the Storm?" Natural Resources Journal, 39(3):459-516.
Mills, D. E. (1980) "Transferable development rights markets", Journal of Urban Economics, 7(1):63-74.
Millward, H. (2006) "Urban containment strategies: A case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian cities ", Land Use Policy, 23: 473-485
Mion, G. (2004) "Spatial Externalities and Empirical Analysis: the Case of Italy", Journal of Urban Economics, 56(1):97-118.
Nabli, M. K., and J. B. Nugent, (1989) "The New Institutional Economics and its applicability to development", World Development, 17(9):1333-1347.
Needham, B. and G. de Kam (2004) "Understanding How Land Is Exchanged: Co-ordination Mechanisms and Transaction Costs", Urban Studies, 41(10):2061-2076.
Needham, B. and E. Louw (2006) "Institutional Economics and Policies for Changing Land Markets: The Case of Industrial Estates in the Netherlands", Journal of Property Research, 23(1):75-90.
Neuman, W. Lawrence (1997) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, M.A.: Allyn and Bacon.
North, D. C. (1991a) "Institution", Journal of Economics Perspectives 5(1): 97-122.
North, D. C. (1991b) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University.
Pack, J.R. (1992) "BIDs, DIDs, SIDs and SADs: Private Government in Urban America", Brookings Review, Fall: 18-21.
Papageorgiou, Y. Y. (1990) The isolated city state: An economic geography of urban spatial structure, New York: Routledge.
Parker, D. C. (2007) "Revealing "Space" in Spatial Externalities: Edge-effect Externalities and Spatial Incentives", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54(1):84-99.
Pennington, M. (2000) "Planning and the Political Market: Price", Urban Studies, 19(3):293-302.
Peters, B. G. (1999) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, London: Pinter.
Pierson, P. (2000) "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics", American Political Science Reviews, 94(2): 251-267.
Poulton, M. C. (1997) "Externalities, Transaction Costs, Public Choice and the Appeal of Zoning: A Response to Lai Wai Chueng and Sorensen", Town Planning Review, 68(1):81-92.
Powell, W. W. and P. J. DiMaggio (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Price, C. (1982) "Residential Density and Spatial Externalities", Urban Studies, 19(3): 293-302.
Pruetz, R. (1993) Putting Transfer of Development Rights to Work in California, L.A.: Solano.
Ramsey, R. and W. J. Samuels (2003) "Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology", J.A.I., 22: 347-378.
Richard, David A. "Development Rights Transfer in New York City", The Yale Law Journal, 82(Dec): 338-372.
Richardson, H. W. (1996) Analytical urban economics, London: Elgar.
Ravallion, M., and J. Jalan, (1996) "Growth Divergence Due to Spatial Externalities", Economics Letters, 53(2): 227-232.
Ravetz, J. (2001) City-Region 2020:Integrated Planning for a Sustainable Environment", London: Gogan Page.
Roth, A. E. (2002) "The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics", Econometrica, 70(4): 1341-1378.
Saaty, T. L. (1987) "How to Handle Dependence with the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Mathematical Modeling, 9(3-5): 369-376.
Saaty, T. L. (1990a) "Decision Making for Leaders: the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World", RWS, 1: 14-92.
Saaty, T.L. (1990b) "How to Make a Decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process ", European Journal of Operation Research, 48: 9-26.
Saaty, T. L. and K. P. Kearns, (1991) "Analytical Planning: the Organization of Systems, RWS, 1: 19-62.
Saaty, T. L. and L. T. Tran (2007) "On the Invalidity of Fuzzifying Numerical Judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 46(7-8):962-975.
Saaty, T. L. and M. Sodenkamp (2008) "Making Decisions in Hierarchic and Network System, International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 1(1):24-79.
Samuelson, P. (1954) "The Pure Theory of Public Expenditures", Review of Economics and Statistic, 36: 387-389.
Schiffman, I. (1999) Alternative Techniques for Managing Growth, Berkeley:University of Berkeley.
Schuitz, T. W. (1968) "Institutions and the Rising Economic Value of Man", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 5: 16-29.
Schwartz, S. I. and D. E. Hansen (1975) "Two methods for preserving agricultural land at the urban fringe: Use-value assessment and transferable development rights", Agriculture and Environment, 2(2):165-180.
Scott, W. R. (1994) Institutional Environments and Organization, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Scott, W. R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Siegan, B. H. (1990) "Land Use Regulations Should Preserve Only Vital and Pressing Governmental Interests", Cato Journal, 10(1):127-158.
Silva, Carlos Nuñes, (2004) Public-Private Partnership and Urban Governance:Towards a New Concept of Local Government, London: Ashgate.
Shoshany, M. and N. Goldshleger (2002) "Land-use and Population Density Changes in Israel -1950 to 1990 Analysis of Regional and Local Trends", Land Use Policy, 19(2): 123-133.
Shutz, S. D. and D. A. King (2001) "The Use of Census Data for Hedonic Price Estimates of Open Space Amenities and Land Use", Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22(3): 239-252.
Simmons, C. S. (2002) "The Local Articulation of Policy Conflict: Land Use, Environment, and Amerindian Rights in Eastern Amazonia", Professional Geographer, 54(2): 241-258.
Smith, A. (1976) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Chicago: Chicago University.
Smith, P. S. (2002) Doing Cultural Geography, London: Sage.
Smith, T. R. and G. J. Papageorgiou (1982) "Spatial Externalities and the Stability of Interacting Populations near the Center of a Large Area", Journal of Regional Science, 22(1):1-18.
Song, Y. (2005) "Smart Growth and Urban Development Pattern a Comparative Study", International Regional Science Review, 28(2): 239-265.
Staley, S. R. (2001) "Ballot-Box Zoning, Transaction Costs, and Urban Growth", Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1):25-37.
Strange, W. C. (1995) "Information, Holdouts and Land Assembly", Journal of Urban Economics, 38: 317-332.
Strong, A. L. and D. R. Mandelker, (1996) "Property Rights and Takings", Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(1): 5-15.
Stuart, H. W. (2004) "Efficient spatial competition", Games and Economic Behavior, 49(2):345-362.
Sullivan, A. M. (1983) "The General Equilibrium Effects of Congestion Externalities", Journal of Urban Economics, 14: 80-104.
Taleai, M., A. Sharifi, R. Sliuzas, and M. Mesgari (2007) "Evaluating the Compatibility of Multi-functional and Intensive Urban Land Uses", International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9(4): 375-391.
Tiebout, C. M. (1957) "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure", Journal of Political Economy, 64: 416-424.
Tideman, T. N. (1990) "Integrating Land-Value Taxation with the Internalization of Spatial Externalities", Land Economics, 66(3):341-355.
Townsend, R. E., J. McColl and M. D. Young (2006) "Design Principles for Individual Transferable Quotas", Marine Policy, 30(2):131-141.
Vanden, J. C. and P. Nijkamp (1996) "Models of Spatial Externalities and Networks", International Journal of Transport Economics, 23(2):121-139.
Veal, A. J. (2002) Leisure and Tourism Policy and Planning, New York: CABI.
Verhoef, E. T. and P. Nijkamp (2002) "Externalities in Urban Sustainability: Environmental versus Localization-type Agglomeration Externalities in a General Spatial Equilibrium Model of a Single-sector Monocentric Industrial City", Ecological Economics, 40(2):157-179.
Verhoef, E. T. and P. Nijkamp (2004) "Spatial Externalities and the Urban Economy. Urban dynamics and growth: Advances in urban economics", Contributions to Economic Analysis, 266, 87-120.
Vesterby, M. (1991) "Land Use and Demographic Change: Result from Fast-Growth Counties", Land Economics, 67(3): 273-291.
Viadero, D. (2005) "Mixed Methods’ Research Examined Researchers See Pros and Cons of Mixed Methods’Studies", Education Week, 2(20):20.
Watt, P. A. (2003) "Voluntary Roads and Streets", Economic Affairs, June:3-9.
White, S. S. (2000) "State Property Rights Laws:Recent Impacts and Future Implications", Land Use Law and Zoning Digest, 52(7): 3-9.
Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies, New York: Free.
Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free.
Williamson, O. E. (1998) "Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works; Where It Is Headed", De Economist 146(1): 23-58.
Williamson, O. E. (1999) "Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective", Journal of Law, economics, and Organization, 15(1): 306-342.
Williamson, O. E. (2000) "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead", Journal of Economic Literature, 38(September): 596-613.
Wolfram, Gary (1981), The Sale of Development Rights and Zoning in the Preservation of Open Space: Lindahl Equilibrium and a Case Study", Land Economic, 57: 398-413.
Wu, J., and A. J. Plantinga (2003) "The Influence of Public Open Space on Urban Spatial Structure", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(2): 288-309.
Yang, C. H. and R. Y. Lin (1992) "Residential Density Zoning: Optimum, Market and Second Best", in Handbook of the Second PRSCO Summer Institute, Taipei: Academia Sinica, pp. 53-72.
Yeung, H. W. C. (2005) "The Firm as Social Networks: An Organizational Perspective", Growth and Change, 36(3): 307-328.
Zheng, X. P. (1990) "The Spatial Structure of Hierarchical Inter-Urban Systems: Equilibrium and Optimum", Journal of Regional Science, 30(3): 375-392.
網際網路資料
內政部營建署全球資訊網:http://w3.cpami.gov.tw/
內政部營建署市鄉規劃局網站:http://www.tcd.gov.tw/
內政部營建署資訊中心網站:http://www.moi.gov.tw/info/
中時電子報網站:http://news.chinatimes.com/
台中市政府全球資訊網:http://www.tccg.gov.tw/
台中縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.taichung.gov.tw/
台北市政府全球資訊網:http://www.taipei.gov.tw/
台北縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.tpc.gov.tw/
台東縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.taitung.gov.tw/tw/
台南市政府全球資訊網:http://www.tncg.gov.tw/
台南縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.tainan.gov.tw/
自由時報電子報網站:www.libertytimes.com/
宜蘭縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.e-land.gov.tw/
花蓮縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.hl.gov.tw/
南投縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.nantou.gov.tw/
苗栗縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.miaoli.gov.tw/
屏東縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.pthg.gov.tw/
高雄市政府全球資訊網:http://www.kcg.gov.tw/
高雄縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.kscg.gov.tw/
桃園縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.tyhg.gov.tw/
基隆市政府全球資訊網:http://www.klcg.gov.tw/
雲林縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.yunlin.gov.tw/
新竹市政府全球資訊網:http://www.hccg.gov.tw/
嘉義市政府全球資訊網:http://www.chiayi.gov.tw/
嘉義縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.cyhg.gov.tw/
彰化縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.chcg.gov.tw/
澎湖縣政府全球資訊網:http://www.penghu.gov.tw/
聯合新聞網:http://udn.com/NEWS/main.html
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE