:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學校長領導風格與校園選舉行為關係之研究:以組織文化為中介和調節變項
作者:鄭可偉
作者(外文):Cheng Ko-Wei
校院名稱:臺北市立教育大學
系所名稱:教育學系博士班
指導教授:林天祐 博士
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:校長領導風格組織文化校園選舉行為principals' leadership styleorganizational cultureschool voters’ behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:147
本研究主要目的在瞭解國民小學校長領導風格、組織文化與校園選舉行為之現況;探討不同背景變項的國民小學教師,在國民小學校長領導風格、組織文化與校園選舉行為的知覺差異情形;檢定國民小學校長領導風格、組織文化與校園選舉行為結構方程模式之適配情形;以學校組織文化為中介和調節變項,探討國民小學校長領導風格與校園選舉行為之關係。本研究採調查研究法,研究工具以「國民小學校長領導風格、組織文化與校園選舉行為關係調查問卷」進行調查;以臺灣地區之公立國民小學教師為對象,計抽取131所國民小學,發出1,295份問卷,有效樣本789份;蒐集的資料以描述性統計、卡方考驗、多變量變異數分析、迴歸分析、結構方程模式等統計方法進行分析。獲得結論如下:
一、國民小學校長領導風格趨向於層級管理型。
二、學校組織文化趨向於朋黨文化與科層文化。
三、國民小學校園選舉行為之形象評價、能力評價與人際網絡等行為層面對教師投票抉擇最具影響力。
四、不同性別、年齡、學歷教師對校長領導風格、學校組織文化的知覺程度無顯著差異;不同服務年資、擔任職務教師對校長領導風格、學校組織文化的知覺程度達顯著差異。
五、不同年齡教師對校園選舉行為的知覺程度無顯著差異;不同性別、學歷、服務年資、擔任職務教師對校園選舉行為的知覺程度達顯著差異。
六、不同性別、年齡、學歷、服務年資校長對校長領導風格、學校組織文化與校園選舉行為的知覺程度無顯著差異。
七、不同學校歷史的國民小學教師所知覺校長領導風格、學校組織文化與校園選舉行為達顯著差異;不同學校規模、學校地區教師對校長領導風格、學校組織文化與校園選舉行為的知覺程度不一致。
八、校長領導風格可透過學校組織文化影響的部份中介作用,正向影響校園選舉行為。
九、校長領導風格與校園選舉行為之關係會受學校組織文化的影響所調節。
依據研究結論,提出相關建議,以提供教育行政機關、國民小學及未來研究之參考。
The main purposes of this research was to examine the current situations of principals' leadership styles, organizational culture, and voting behavior in elementary schools, and to analyze the differences among principals' leadership styles, organizational culture, and voting behavior in personal variables, and school environmental variables in elementary schools. Furthermore, it assessed the fitness of the structural equation model among principals' leadership styles, organizational culture, and voting behavior in elementary schools. Finally, it explored the relationships between principals' leadership styles and voting behavior in elementary schools: organizational culture as the mediation and moderation variable. The research method this study adopted was survey research. “The Investigative Questionnaire of Relationships among Principals' Leadership Styles, Organizational Culture, and Voting Behavior in Elementary Schools” was the main tool in use. The samples were 1,295 teachers randomly selected from 131 elementary schools in Taiwan, and 789 of the distributed copies were returned as valid. The collected data were analyzed by using the statistical methods of descriptive statistics, chi-square test, multivariate analysis of variance, regression analysis, and structural equation model. The conclusions of this research are as follows:
1.Among all of the dimensions of principals' leadership styles, hierarchy management style was the dominance in the elementary schools.
2.Among all of the dimensions of school organizational culture, clan and hierarchy were the dominance in the elementary schools.
3.Among all of the dimensions of voting behavior, image evaluation, capability evaluation and interpersonal network could positively affect teachers' voting choice in the elementary schools.
4.There were no significant differences in the general performance of principals' leadership styles and school organizational culture in terms of teachers' gender, age, and academic degrees; school teachers with various years of experience, and positions had significant and different perceptions on principals' leadership styles and school organizational culture.
5.There were no significant differences in the general performance of voting behavior in elementary schools in terms of teachers' age; school teachers’ gender, academic degrees, various years of experience, and positions had significant and different perceptions on voting behavior in elementary schools.
6.There were no significant differences in the general performance of principals' leadership styles, school organizational culture, and voting behavior in terms of principals' gender, age, academic degrees, and years of experience.
7.There were significant differences in the general performance of principals' leadership styles, school organizational culture, and voting behavior in terms of school history; school teachers from various school sizes, and school locations had different perceptions on principals' leadership styles, school organizational culture, and voting behavior in elementary schools.
8.The principals' leadership styles could positively affect voting behavior in elementary schools through the partial mediation of school organizational culture.
9.The relationships between principals' leadership styles and voting behavior in elementary schools could be moderated by school organizational culture.
Based on the conclusions mentioned above, some suggestions are proposed for education authorities, elementary schools, and future research.
一、中文部份
王世璋(2005)。國小校長轉型領導、學校組織學習與學校組織創新關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。new window
王美慧、唐資文、曾秋蘭(2007)。公部門組織文化、員工工作滿足、全面品質管理與服務品質滿意度之研究。品質學報,14(1),1-15。new window
王博弘、林清達(2006)。臺灣近二十年來校長領導實徵研究與學校效能關係之探討。花蓮教育大學學報,22,283-306。new window
王瑞壎(2002)。從符號互動論的觀點探討學校組織文化。臺東師院學報,13,61-90。new window
王聖文(2006)。花蓮縣國民中學校長轉型領導與體育教師工作士氣關係之研究。北體學報,14,120-131。new window
王鼎銘(2003)。政策認同下的投票效用與選擇:空間投票理論在不同選舉制度間的比較。選舉研究,10(1),171-206。new window
王鼎銘、郭銘峰、黃紀(2008)。選制轉變過程下杜佛傑心理效應之檢視:從日本眾議院選制變革的經驗來觀察。問題與研究,47(3),1-28。new window
王麗雲(2007)。地方教育治理模式分析。教育政策論壇,10(1),189-228。new window
田培林(1977)。教育學新論。臺北市:文景。
江大樹、張力亞(2009)。縣市長的領導力與地方治理:一個標竿學習的實證研究。臺灣民主季刊,6(2),61-125。new window
江欣彥、莊姿鈴、王業立(2006)。人民團體選舉制度之研究:單記、全額連記、限制連記法之影響。選舉研究,13(1),1-42。new window
江滿堂(2007)。國民小學校長多元領導型態、團體動力、學校組織文化特質與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東縣。new window
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。行政院教育改革審議委員會總諮議報告書。取自http://www.sinica.edu.tw/info/edu-reform/farea2/tsy-all_abs.html
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
吳宗祐(2008a)。由不當督導到情緒耗竭:部屬正義知覺與情緒勞動的中介效果。中華心理學刊,50(2),201-221。new window
吳宗祐(2008b)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究,30,3-63。new window
吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎(2008)。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究,30,65-115。new window
吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎(2002)。怒不可遏?或忍氣吞聲?華人企業中主管威權領導行為與部屬憤怒情緒反應的關係。本土心理學研究,19,3-49。new window
吳明隆(2007a)。SPSS操作與應用問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆(2007b)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
吳明雄(2010)。國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,臺中市。new window
吳金香(2000)。學校組織行為與管理。臺北市:五南。new window
吳勁甫(2007)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為之衡量。學校行政,52,163-192。new window
吳勁甫(2008)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
吳勁甫(2009)。競值架構應用在國民小學學校組織文化之衡量。教育研究與發展期刊,5(3),37-72。new window
吳政達、湯家偉、羅清水(2007)。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為結構關係之驗證:以臺北地區國民中學學校組織為例。教育政策論壇,10(1),133-159。new window
吳重禮(2002)。臺灣地區「派系政治」研究文獻的爭議:美國「機器政治」分析途徑的啟示。政治科學論叢,17,81-106。
吳培源(1994)。臺灣省高級中學校長領導型態、學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北市。new window
吳清山(1992)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。new window
吳清山(1996)。教育發展與教育改革。臺北市:心理。
吳清山(2000)。學校行政。臺北市:心理。
吳清山(2005)。後現代教育思潮與教育改革。謝文全(主持人),後現代思潮與教育組織發展。後現代思潮與教育發展學術研討會,國立臺灣師範大學。new window
吳清山、林天祐(1998)。轉型領導、互易領導。教育資料與研究,24,63-64。
吳清山、林天祐(2003)。教育小辭書。臺北市:五南。
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。後設分析。教育研究月刊,137,160。
吳清山、賴協志(2006)。國民中小學學校創新經營成效、阻力與因應途徑之研究。教育研究月刊,141,58-74。new window
吳朝森(2008)。組織文化對於團隊互動與團隊效能之影響:以團隊領導者領導風格為中介效果。環境與管理研究,9(2),1-23。new window
呂春嬌(2003)。大學圖書館館長領導風格之質性研究。師大學報人文與社會類,48(1),37-52。new window
李明來(2007)。國小校長領導風格、權力運用與教師組織變革支持度關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺南市。new window
李芝靜(2008)。中小學校長領導風格、組織文化與學校效能關聯性之研究。教育資料與研究,81,125-152。new window
李政翰(2006)。形塑優質學校組織文化途徑之探討。學校行政,45,47-59。
李茂能(2009)。圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用。臺北市:五南。
李新民、陳密桃(2007)。組織公民行為的因素結構與影響因素:巢狀結構與階層線性模式的分析。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,22,69-91。new window
李逸嫻、賴廷彰(2006)。內部行銷、組織文化、組織承諾現況之研究:以新竹地區國民小學爲例。教育暨外國語文學報,4,1-26。
周昌柏(2005)。認真性與下屬工作滿意感:變革型領導的仲介作用。心理科學,28,1237-1239。
周昌柏(2007)。國小學校組織文化與教師組織承諾之研究。學校行政,49,84-106
周昌柏、范熾文(2006)。國小校長轉型領導、交易領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。花蓮教育大學學報(教育類),22,255-281。new window
周陽山(1990)。自由與權威。臺北市:三民。
周燦德(2002)。校園內的河流整治工程:形塑優質學校文化。北縣教育,43,23-30。
林天祐(2004)。教育政治學的基本概念。載於林天祐(總校閱),教育政治學(1-36)。臺北市:心理。new window
林志成(2004)。校長卓越領導之行動智慧。學校行政,33,10-20。
林邦傑、林宜旻、蔣佳良(2009)。國民中學組織文化對行政人員情緒勞務和工作滿意度影響之路徑分析。教育研究與發展期刊,5(3),1-36。new window
林明地(2002)。學校領導:理念與校長專業生涯。臺北市:高等教育。
林明地(2004)。教育行政體系與教師會組織之互動:組織多元分析架構的運用。現代教育論壇,10,523-528。
林明杰、林鴻均、黃錦華、林信任(2007)。領導風格對團隊學習之影響:團隊心理安全的中介角色。中華管理學報,8(3),1-22。new window
林逸青(2003)。國中校長權力運作策略、衝突管理策略與學校效能之關係:微觀政治分析(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所,臺北市。new window
林新發(1990)。我國工業專科學校校長領導行為組織氣氛與組織績效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北市。new window
林新發(1999)。教育與學校行政研究:原理和應用。臺北市:師大書苑。
林新發、王秀玲、仲秀蓮、顏如芳、黃秋鑾、鄧珮秀(2007)。國民小學校長變革領導、學校文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研究:以臺灣北部地區三縣市為例。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC95-2413-H-152-005),未出版。new window
林鉦棽(2005)。組織公民行為之跨層次分析:層級線性模式的應用。管理學報,22(4),503-524。new window
林鉦棽、謝瑜玲(2007)。策略性人力資源管理與組織文化對組織公民行為的影響之研究。人文暨社會科學期刊,3(1),1-15。
林嘉誠、朱浤源(2000)。政治學辭典。臺北市:五南。
林聰吉(2007)。解析臺灣的民主政治:以民主支持度與滿意度為觀察指標。選舉研究,14(1),61-84。new window
林聰吉(2008)。社會網絡、政治討論與投票參與。選舉研究,14(2),1-24。new window
林曜聖(2003)。權力運作與衝突處理中的學校政治行為:校園微觀政治之概念、分析架構與方法。學校行政,25,64-76。
林瓊珠(2008)。議題、候選人評價、黨派意識:2006年臺北市長選舉投票行為研究。臺灣民主季刊,5(2),59-87。new window
邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南。
邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市:雙葉。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例。臺北市:五南。
施佩芳(2006)。校長轉型學校領導與學校組織文化之研究。花蓮教育大學學報(教育類),22,75-99。new window
胡佛(1998)。政治參與與選舉行為。臺北市:三民。new window
胡蘭沁、黃建皓(2007)。校長領導、組織文化知識管理與學校效能關係之探討:研究文獻的回顧。學校行政,50,145-166。
范熾文(2001)。轉型領導理論在學校本位課程發展上應用。學校行政,14,42-53。
范熾文(2002)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
范熾文(2004)。西方與本土:轉型領導與家長式領導的探究省思。載於國立臺中師範學院(主編),現代教育論壇(頁40-46)。臺中市:國立臺中師範學院。
范熾文(2005)。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報(教育類),19(2),1-22。new window
范熾文(2006)。國小校長轉型領導、學校組織文化與教師組織承諾關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC 94-2413-H-026-012),未出版。new window
唐永泰(2006)。轉換型領導、工作動機與員工創新行為的關係。人力資源管理學報,4,47-66。new window
孫瑞霙(2002)。競值架構下領導型態、組織文化與組織效能之研究:以臺灣地區技術學院為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北大學企業管理學系,臺北縣。new window
徐火炎(2005)。認知動員、文化動員與臺灣2004年總統大選的選民投票行為:選舉動員類型的初步探討。臺灣民主季刊,2(4),31-66。new window
徐正光(2001)。漢人與周邊社會研究。臺北市:唐山。
秦夢群(1997)。教育行政-理論部份。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群(2005)。教育領導新理論與研究取向之分析。教育研究月刊,136,106-118。new window
秦夢群、吳勁甫(2009)。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與組織效能關係之研究:中介效果模式之檢證。當代教育研究,17(3),83-124。new window
馬信行(2007)。後設分析之方法論問題之探討。量化研究學刊,1(1),188。
高三福(2009)。教練的轉型與交易領導及運動員的團隊承諾:內在動機的調節效果。體育學報,42(3),45-61。new window
張中一(2008)。領導風格、組織文化與自我效能對組織績效影響之研究:以傳統產業法人研究機構為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系,臺北市。
張火燦、劉淑寧(2002)。從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享。人力資源管理學報,2(3),101-113。new window
張世熒(2005)。選舉研究-制度與行為途徑。臺北市:新文京。
張世熒、許金土(2004)。社會關係取向對選民投票行為之影響:2001年金門縣長選舉個案研究。中國行政評論,13(4),143-175。new window
張佑宗(2009)。選舉輸家與民主鞏固:台灣2004年總統選舉落選陣營對民主的態度。臺灣民主季刊,6(1),41-72。new window
張佑宗、趙珮如(2006)。社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004 年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇。臺灣民主季刊,3(2),1-38。new window
張明輝(2000)。學習型學校的領導理念與策略。載於中國教育學會(主編),新世紀的教育願景(117-136頁)。臺北市:臺灣書店。
張明輝(2004)。幾項領導新議題對學校領導的啟示。教育研究月刊,119,26-34。new window
張明澍譯(1996)。公民文化。臺北市:五南。
張勉、張德(2004)。組織文化測量研究述評。外國經濟與管理,26(8),2-7。
張雅雯、耿曙(2008)。中國大陸基層選舉中的物質誘因與投票動員:以上海「先進」、「發達」兩社區「村改居」為例。東吳政治學報,26(4),145-195。new window
張瑞村(1998)。高級工業職業學校校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。new window
張德銳(1994)。教育行政研究。臺北市:五南。new window
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄市。new window
張慶勳(1999)。學校組織轉化領導研究。高雄市:復文。new window
張慶勳(2001)。學習型學校組織文化與領導。學校行政,14,29-41。new window
張慶勳(2003)。學校組織文化研究方法之評析。屏東師院學報,18,1-40。new window
張慶勳(2004)。國小校長領導風格與行為之研究。屏東師院學報,20,1-38。new window
張慶勳(2006)。學校組織文化與領導。臺北市:五南。new window
張憲庭、鄭可偉、林天祐(2010)。校園選舉策略測量指標之建構。教育研究與發展期刊,6(3),183-222。new window
戚樹誠、楊美玉、黃瓊億(2008)。團隊成員們的強勢溝通行爲與團隊關係衝突有關嗎?探討團隊集體性的調節效果。組織與管理,1(2),37-60。new window
教育部(2009年10月28日)。98學年度國民小學名錄。取自 取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8868
教育部(2010年4月16日)。中華民國教育統計(99年版)。取自 http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=23553
畢鵬程、郎淳剛、席酉民(2005)。領導風格和行為對群體決策過程和結果的影響。西安交通大學學報(社會科學版),25(2),1-10。
盛杏湲(2008)。政黨的國會領導與凝聚力:2000年政黨輪替前後的觀察。臺灣民主季刊,5(4),1-46。new window
盛治仁(2003)。理性抉擇理論在政治學運用之探討。東吳政治學報,17,21-52。
盛治仁(2004)。媒體、民調和議題-談競選過程中民意的變動性和穩定性。選舉研究,11(1),73-98。new window
莊文忠、胡龍騰(2006年10月21日)。地方治理因素與選民投票行為:2005年縣市長選舉的實證分析。臺灣選舉與民主化調查-2006國際學術研討會論文,國立政治大學。
郭彥宏、謝盛文、王月雲(2006)。人際網絡結構因素對資訊系統策略規劃成效之影響。工商管理學刊,2(1),45-53。
陳文俊(2003)。藍與綠-臺灣選民的政治意識型態初探。選舉研究,10(1),41-80。new window
陳木金(2002)。學校領導研究:從混沌理論研究彩會學校經營的天空。臺北市:高等教育。
陳成宏(2005)。學校變革與校長領導理論的整合性觀點:Bolman和Deal之多元架構領導途徑分析。教育研究與發展期刊,1(2),155-176。new window
陳成宏(2008)。學校行政領導中的滿意與不滿意議題。教育研究與發展期刊,4(3),117-138。new window
陳幸仁(2007)。微觀政治學:一個學校行政的新興研究領域。教育行政與評鑑學刊,3,67-86。new window
陳幸仁(2008)。學校教師會運作之微觀政治分析:一所小學之個案研究。屏東教育大學學報,30,23-54。new window
陳明惠、陳相甫(2008)。研發團隊社會網絡的個案研究:以專案發展階段的觀點。科技管理學刊,13(3),1-31。new window
陳玫良(2009)。國中自然與生活科技教師課程領導、組織承諾和教學校能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系,臺北市。new window
陳陸輝(2003)。政治信任、施政表現與民眾對臺灣民主的展望。臺灣政治學刊,7(2),1-40。new window
陳陸輝、連偉廷(2008)。知性、黨性與資訊:台灣民眾政治效能感的分析。臺灣民主季刊,5(3),121-156。new window
陳富強、方顯光、劉世彥(2007)。探討國防主財人員對領導型態、組織文化、工作滿足與組織承諾關聯性之認知。多國籍企業管理評論,1(2),67-86。new window
陳琦凱、張婉菁(2009)。組織公平、組織文化、領導:成員交換關係與工作滿意之關係。東吳經濟商學學報,66,1-32。
陳順宇(2007)。結構方程模式。臺北市:心理。
陳榮德(2004)。組織內部社會網絡的形成與影響:社會資本觀點(未出版之博士論文)。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,高雄市。new window
陳慶盛(2004)。優質學校文化之探討與型塑。學校行政,32,24-34。
陳學賢(2006)。高雄市國小校長轉型領導、學校願景發展與教師組織承諾關係之研究。臺東大學教育學報,17(1),77-106。new window
陳樹(1998)。領導風格與組織文化關聯性之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣大學商學系,臺北市。
陳龍弘(2009)。感恩與青少年運動員幸福感:中介歷程與調節效果之探討(未出版之博士論文)。國立體育大學體育研究所,桃園縣。
傅恆德(1996)決定投票選擇的結構、心理和理性因素:民國八十五年總統選舉研究。選舉研究,3(2),157-186。new window
傅恆德(2005)。政治知識、政治評價與投票選擇:第五屆立法委員選舉研究。選舉研究,12(1),39-68。new window
彭瑞芝、曾欽正、賴文祥(2008)。領導風格、組織文化、資訊文化與個人創新性關係之研究。臺灣企業績效學刊,1(2),251-282。new window
曾文志(2008)。大學生的生活事件、人際長處與心理健康之復原力取向研究:中介與調節效果的探討。教育心理學報,40 (2),221-240。
湯志民(2008)。空間領導:理念與策略。教育研究月刊,174,18-38.new window
黃乃熒(2002)。以教師彰權益能觀點重建學校權力生態的機會之窗:教評會運作之論述。教育政策論壇,5(1),62-90。new window
黃秀端(2005)。候選人形象、候選人情感溫度計、與總統選民投票行為。臺灣民主季刊,2(4),1-30。new window
黃昆輝(1988)。教育行政與教育問題。臺北市:五南。
黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
黃信豪(2006)。政治功效意識的行動效果(1998-2003)。臺灣民主季刊,3(2),119-58。new window
黃哲彬(2006)。論組織政治行為對學校教育之啟示。教育趨勢報導,18,3-11。
黃哲彬(2007)。組織政治行為對校長領導之啟示。學校行政,49,2 -15。
黃敏萍(2003)。臺灣之組織領導研究:從客位到主位之研究途徑。應用心理研究,20,27-52。new window
黃慕也、張世賢(2008)。政治媒介藉由政治效能政治信任對投票行為影響分析:以2005年選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,5(1),45-85。new window
溫子欣(2006)。領導特質論視角的再審視。學校行政,42,108-120。
溫忠麟、侯杰泰、張雷(2005)。調節效應與中介效應的比較和應用。心理學報,37(2),268-274。
溫忠麟、張雷、侯杰泰(2006)。有中介的調節變量和有調節的中介變量。心理學報,38(3),448-452。
溫忠麟、張雷、侯杰泰、劉紅云(2004)。中介效應檢驗程序及其應用。心理學報,36(5),614-620。
溫福星、邱皓政(2009)。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果:以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報,26(2),189-211。new window
葉倩亨(2004)。國民中學教師人情特質、人際情感、組織文化與知識分享關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。new window
董文慧、顏志龍(2008)。 轉換型領導與交易型領導對領導者與部屬交換關係之預測效果:價值觀相似性的中介效果。復興崗學報,91,19-48。new window
廖年淼、何信助、賴銘娟(2004)。高級職業學校組織文化與教師組織承諾關係之研究。中正教育研究,3(2),69-96。new window
廖益興(2005)。競選行為效應的審視。中華行政學報,2,95-102。new window
廖益興(2006)。臺灣選民投票參與行為的研究。中華行政學報,3,185-202。new window
劉嘉薇(2008)。2005年縣市長選舉選民投票決定之影響因素:臺北縣、臺中市、雲林縣以及高雄縣的分析。臺灣民主季刊,5(1),1-43。new window
歐用生(2005)。日本課程決策的政治分析。教育資料與研究,65,1-16。new window
蔡育軒、陳怡君、王業立(2007)。社區發展協會、選舉動員與地方政治。東吳政治學報,25(4),93-135。new window
蔡松純、鄭伯壎、周麗芳、姜定宇、鄭弘岳(2009)。領導者上下關係認定與部屬利社會行爲:權力距離之調節效果。中華心理學刊,51(1),121-138。new window
蔡培村(2005)。領導學。高雄市:麗文文化。
蔡啟通(2006)。領導者部屬交換與員工創新行為:組織正義之中介效果及組織特性之干擾效果。管理學報,23(2),171-193。new window
蔡進雄(2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
蔡進雄(2005)。超越轉型領導:國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊,13,37-63。new window
蔡毓智(2008)。社會網絡:社會學研究的新取向。思與言:人文與社會科學雜誌,46(1),1-33。new window
鄭夙芬(2004)。臺灣民眾眼中的政黨:一個焦點團體研究用實例之初探。選舉研究,11(2),185-211。new window
鄭伯壎、謝佩鴛、周麗芳(2002)。校長領導作風、上下關係品質及教師角色外行為:轉換型領導與家長式領導的效果。本土心理學研究,17,105-161。new window
鄭彩鳳(1996)。競值途徑應用在高中職校長領導角色、學校組織文化與組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。new window
鄭詩釧(2004)。國民中小學組織文化與教師專業發展關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
蕭文龍(2007)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書。臺北市:碁峰。
蕭怡靖、游清鑫(2008)。施政表現與投票抉擇的南北差異:2006年北高市長選舉的探討。臺灣民主季刊,5(2),1-25。new window
賴志峰(2008)。一所公立國民中學的學校領導之探究:瞭解領導架構圖的應用。教育研究與發展,4(3),139-172。new window
賴志峰(2009)。教師領導的理論及實踐之探析。教育研究與發展,5(3),113-144。new window
賴協志(2008)。國民小學校長知識領導、組織學習與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。臺北市立教育大學教育學系,臺北市。new window
戴興豪、周麗華(2006)。新竹市公立國小校長轉型領導與體育教師工作壓力之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊,5,1-14。new window
濮世緯(2003)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北市。new window
謝文全(2007)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育。
謝文豪(2007)。校長領導之意義:國小校長的觀點。花蓮教育大學學報,24,45-75。new window
簡賢昌(2004)。微觀政治與教育。載於林天祐(總校閱),教育政治學(255-297)。臺北市:心理。
羅家德(2003)。企業關係管理:NQ關係管理智慧。臺北市:聯經。
羅清俊(2008)。小規模立法委員選區的分配政治:選民對於補助利益的期待。臺灣民主季刊,5(4),47-85。new window
羅清俊、謝瑩蒔(2008)。選區規模與立法委員分配政策提案的關聯性研究:第三、四屆立法院的分析。行政與政策學報,46,1-48。new window
杨春宝、牛德丽(2009)。校长领导行为与学校组织文化建设关系浅析。重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版),2009(1),118-119。


二、英文部份
Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421-455.
Adler, E. S. (2002). Why congressional reforms fail. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Al-khalifa, K. N., & Aspinwall, E. M. (2001). Using the competing values framework to investigate the culture of Qatar industries. Total Quality Management, 12(4), 417-428.
Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. New York, NY: Oxford University.
Avolio, B. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62(1), 25-33. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.25
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). The multifactor leadership questionnaire sampler set: Manual, forms and scoring key. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
Ayman, R. (2004). Situational and contingency approaches to leadership. In Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 148-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Badaracco, J.L.(2002). Leading quietly: An unorthodox guide to doing the right thing. Massachusetts, MA: Harvard Business College.
Bahry, D., & Silver, B. D. (1990). Soviet citizen participation on the Eva of democratization. American Political Science Review, 84(3), 821-847.
Ball, S. J. (1987). The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. London, England: Methuen.
BarNir, A., & Smith, K. A. (2002). Interfirm alliances in the small business: The role of social networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 219-232.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182。
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Freene, S., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The Social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organization influences on presidential choice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 57-73.
Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Benoit, W. L. (2006). Communication in political campaigns. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Berrin, E., Liden, R. C. & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader-member exchange: the moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 395-406.
Blase, J. (1988). The teachers' political orientation vis-à-vis the principal: The micropolitics of the school. Journal of Education Policy, 3(5), 113-126.
Blase, J. (1991). The politics of life in schools: power, conflict, and cooperation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2002). The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 6-44. doi: 10.1177/0013161X02381002
Bolden, R., Gosling, J., Marturano, A., & Dennison, P. (2003). A review of leadership theory and competency frameworks. Report for Chase Consulting and the Management Standards Centre, University of Exeter.
Bolino, M.C., Turnley, W.H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505-522.
Bonneau, E. M., & Cottrill, J. B. (2004). The house public works committee and the distribution of pork barrel projects? Paper presentation at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 2-5.
Bratton, M., & Lewis, P. (2006). The durability of political goods? Evidence from Nigeria’s new democracy. Paper presented at the 20th International Political Science Association World Congress, Fukuoka, July 9-13.
Bratton, M., & Mattes, R. (2001). Support for democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or instrumental? British Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 447-474.
Bratton, M., Mattes, R., & Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2005). Public opinion, democracy and market reform in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
Bryant, M., & Son, J. (2006, May 16). Proper human relationships: Korean principals' leadership styles. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.autorpa.tmue.edu.tw:81
Burn, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Bush, T. (2003). Theories of educational leadership and management (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cameron, K. S., & Ettington, D. R. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp.356-396). New York, NY: Agathon.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (Rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. Oxford, England: Oxford University.
Chen, L. Y. (2004). Examining the effect of organization culture and leadership behaviors on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and job performance at small and middle-sized firms of Taiwan. Journal of American Academy of Business. 5, 432-438.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. S., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89-117.
Chong, D. (2000). Rational life: Norms and values in politics and society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
Chu, Y., Diamond, L., Nathan, A., & Shin, D. C. (2008). How east Asians view democracy. New York, NY: Columbia University.
Cohen, C. Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1986). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president (2nd ed). Boston: Harvard Business School.
Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap…and others don’t. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., & Porter, L. H. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
Connell, J., Ferres, N., & Travaglione, A. (2003). Engendering trust in manager-subordinate relationships: Predictors and outcomes. Personnel Review, 32(5), 569-587.
Cooke, R. A. & Lafferty, J. C.(1987). Level V: Organizational culture inventory-form III. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics.
Cremer, D. D., Dijke, M. V., & Bos, A. E. R. (2007). When leaders are seen as transformational: The effects of organizational justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1797-1816.
Crowther, F., Kaagan, S. S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Curtice, J. (2002). The state of election studies: Mid-life crisis or new youth? Electoral Studies, 21(2), 161-168.
Daft, R. L. (2006). Organization theory and design: A modern introduction. New York, NY: Thomson.
Dahl, R. A. (1998). On democracy. New Haven and London, CT: Yale University.
Datnow, A. (1998). The gender politics of educational change. London, England: Falmer.
Davies, B. (Ed.) (2005). The essentials of school leadership. London, England: Paul Chapman and Corwin.
Deal, T. (1990). Reframing reform. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 6-12.
Deng, L., & Gibson, P. (2008). A qualitative evaluation on the role of cultural intelligence in cross-cultural leadership effectiveness. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(2), 181-197.
Denver, D. (2003). Elections and Voters in Britain. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004-1012.
Dubrin, A. J. (2007). Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331-351.
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735-744.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007).Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.
Eguiluz, V. M., Zimmermann, M. G., Cela-Conde, C. J., & San, M. M. (2005). Cooperation and the emergence of role differentiation in the dynamics of social networks, American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 977-1008.
Eilertsen, T., Gustafson, N., & Salo, P. (2008). Action research and the micropolitics in schools. Educational Action Research, 16(3), 295-308.
Eran, V. (2000). Internal politics in public administration systems: An empirical examination of its relationship with job congruence, organizational citizenship behavior, and in-role performance. Public Personnel Management, 29(2), 185-210.
Erikson, R. S. (2002). National election studies and macro analysis. Electoral Studies, 21(2), 269-281.
Evans, D. (2004). Greasing the wheels: Using pork barrel projects to build majority coalition in congress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Ferris, G. R., Fedor, D.B., Chachere, J. G., & Pondy, L.R. (1989). Myths and politics in organizational context. Group and Organization Studies, 14, 88-103.
Flanagan, S. C. (1991). The Japanese voter. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Franklin, M. (1985). Assessing the rise of issue voting in British election since 1964. Electoral Studies, 4(1), 37-56.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College.
Fullan, M. (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16-20.
Goldman, E. (1998). The significance of leadership style. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 20-22.
Gray, J. H., & Densten, I. L. (2005). Towards an integrative model of organizational culture and knowledge management. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 9 (2). 594-603.
Gray, J. L., & Starke, F. A. (1988). Organizations behavior concepts and application (4 th ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Hallinger, P., & Kantamara, P. (2000). Educational change in Thailand: Opening a window onto leadership as a cultural process. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 189-205.
Hetherington, M. J. (1999). The effect of political trust on the presidential vote, 1968-1996. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 791-808.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Hoyle, E. (1986). Politics of school management. Hightstown, NJ: Princeton.
Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2003). Transformational and transactional leadership in virtual and physical environments. Small Group Research, 34, 678-715.
Huckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W., & Sprague, J. (1998). Election campaigns, social communication, and the accessibility of perceived discussant preference. Political Behavior, 20(4), 263-294.
Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (2006). Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Hunt, J. G. (1991). Leadership: A new synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jackson, R.A., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Group effects on party identification and party coalition across the United States. American Politics Research, 30(1), 66-92.
Jantzi, D., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Toward an explanation of variation in teachers perceptions of transformational school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 512-538.
Johnston, M., Shively, W. P., & Stein, R. V. (2002). Contextual data and the study of elections and voting behavior: Connecting individuals to environments. Electoral Studies, 21(2), 219-233.
Johnston, R., & Brady, H. E. (2002). The rolling cross-section design. Electoral Studies, 21(2), 283-295.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Kacmar K. M., & Baron R. A. (1999). Organizational politics: The state of field, links to related process, and an agenda for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 17, 1-39.
Karlgaard, R. (2009). Four styles of leadership. Forbes, 184(8), 23.
Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 105-120.
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London, England: Sage.
Kim, J., Elliott, E., & Wang, D. M. (2003). A spatial analysis of county-level outcomes in US presidential elections: 1988-2000. Electoral Studies, 22(4), 741-761.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
Koberg, C. S., & Chusmir, L. H. (1987). Organizational culture relationships with creativity and other job-related variables. Journal of Business Research, 15(5), 397-409.
Kouzes, J. M., & Ponser, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-bass.
Kradhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342-369.
Kradhardt, D. (1993). MRQAP: Analytic versus permutation solutions. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.
Kuchinke, K. P. (1999). Leadership and culture: Work-related values and leadership styles among one company’s U.S. and German telecommunication employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(2), 135-154.
Lakoof, R. J. (1990). Talking power: The politics of power. Berkeley, CA: Basic Books.
Lapierre, L., & Hackett, R. (2007). Trait conscientiousness, leader-member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A test of an integrative model. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 80(3), 539-554.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Education Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D.(2005). Leadership and policy in school. The world's knowledge, 4, 201-227.
Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M.(1996). Transformational school leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart(Eds.), The international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp.785-840). Nethevlands: Kluwer Academic.
Lim, B. C. & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relation to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 610-621.
Lorenzen, M. (2005, June 9). Localized learning and social capital: The geography effect in technological and institutional dynamics. Retrieved from http://www.druid.dk /wp/wp.html.
Louis, M. R. (1983). Organizations as cultural-bearing milieu. In I. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, P. J., G. Morgan, & T. C. Dandridge (Eds.). Organizational Symbolism (pp. 39-54). London, England: JAI.
Lowry, R. C., & Potoski, M. (2004). Organized interest and the politics of federal discretionary grants. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 513-533.
Luo, J. D. (2003). The impacts of social network structure on organizational social capital: A comparison across the Taiwan strait. Paper Presented at International Association for Chinese management Research Inaugural Conference, Beijin, June 19-22.
Lussier, R. N. & Achua, C, F. (2001). Leadership: Theory application skill development. Columbus, OH: South-Western College.
Marsh, M. (2002). Electoral context. Electoral Studies, 21(2), 207-217.
Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martin, L., & Kragler, S. (1999). Creating a culture for teachers' professional growth. Journal of School Leadership, 9(4), 311-320.
Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1031-1056.
Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141-172.
Mathieu, J. E., Deshon, R. P., & Bergh, D. D. (2008). Mediational inferences in organizational research: Then, now, and beyond. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 203-223.
Mathiue, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organization Behavior, 28, 141-172.
McIntyre, S. E. (1997, August). Superior-subordinate conflict management style reported by self and other. Paper presented at the 105th Annual Convention of American Psychological Association, Chicago, MI.
Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80(2), 521-540.
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2005). What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1050-1078.
Moulder, B., & Aligina, J. (2002). Comparison of models for estimating and testing latent value interactions. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 1-19.
Mutz, D. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838-855.
Newman, C. B. (2001). The perceptions of elementary principals regarding the relationship between leadership and school culture(unpublished doctoral dissertation). Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO.
Niemi, R. G., & Weisberg, H. F. (2001). Controversies in voting behavior (4th ed). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Northouse, P. G. (1997). Leadership: Theory and practice. California, CA: Thousand Oaks.
Nowakowski, J., & Conlon, D. (2005). Organizational justice: Looking back, looking forward. International Journal of Conflict Management. 16(1), 4-29.
Oh, H., Chung, M. H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860-875.
Patrick,B.L.(1995). Perceptions of teachers’ micropolitical behavior during change:A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Miami.
Pattison, P. (1993). Algebraic models for social networks. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge.
Pierce, J. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (2006). Leaders & the leadership process: Readings, self-assessments & applications (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Mc Graw-Hill.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker , D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.
Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey -Bass.
Ranney, Austin. (1982). Governing: An introduction to political science. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Razik, T. A., & Swanson, A. D. (1995). Fundamental concepts of educational leadership and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rogers, P. S., & Hildebrandt, H. W. (1993). Competing values instruments for analyzing written and spoken management messages. Human Resource Management, 32(1), 121-142.
Rojas, R. R. (2000). A review of models for measuring organizational effectiveness among for-profit and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 11(1), 97-104.
Roueche, J. E., Baker, G. A., & Rose, R. R. (1989). Shared vision: Transformational leadership in American community colleges. Washington, DC: The Community College.
Rudolph, T. J., Gangl, A., & Stevens, D. (2000). The effects of efficacy and emotions on campaign involvement. Journal of Politics, 62(4), 1189-1197.
Ruggieri, S. (2009). Leadership in virtual teams: a comparison of transformational and transactional leaders. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 37(8), 1017-1021.
Sahin, S. (2004). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership styles of school principals and school culture (The case of Izmir, Turkey). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4(2), 387-395.
Salk, R., & Schneider, I. (2009). Commitment to learning within a public land management agency: The influence of transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 27(1), 70-84.
Sannwald, W. W. (2000). Understanding organizational culture. Library Administration & Management, 14(1), 8-14.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership:A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schoena ,L. T., & Teddlie, C. (2008). A new model of school culture: a response to a call for conceptual clarity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 129-153.
Schumacker, R. E. (2002). Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 40-54.
Schyns, B., & Marcel, A. C. (2006). A model of task demands, social structure, and leader-member exchange and their relationship to job satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(4), 602-615.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990). Value-added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in schools. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Sheng, S. Y. (2006). The personal vote-seeking and the initiation of particularistic benefit bills in the Taiwanese legislature. Paper presented at the Conference on Political Center or Periphery: Legislatures and Parliaments in the 21st Century, Soochow University, Taipei, July 7-8.
Sherwood, A. L., & Depaolo, C. A. (2005). Task and relationship- oriented trust in leaders. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(2), 65-81.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
Simon, H. A. (1960). New science of management decision. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Smart, J. C. (2003). Organizational effectiveness of 2-year colleges: The centrality of cultural and leadership complexity. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 673-703.
Sternberg, R. J. (2008). A new approach to leadership: Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity (WICS). Baltic Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 6-29.
Stewart, M. C., & Clarke, H. D. (1992). The (Un)importance of party leaders: Leader images and party choice in the 1987 British election. The Journal of Politics, 54(2), 447-470.
Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2002). Designing multi-level studies: Sampling voters and electoral contexts. Electoral Studies, 21(2), 235-267.
Stringer L. (2006). The link between the quality of the supervisor-employee relationship and the level of the employee's job satisfaction. Public Organization Review, 6(2), 125-142.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190.
Thoemmes, F., Mackinnon, D. P., & Resier, M. R. (2010). Power analysis for complex mediational designs using Monte Carlo methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 510-534. doi: 10.1080/10705511. 2010.489379
Torres, C. A. (1998). Democracy, education, and multiculturalism: Dilemmas of citizenship in a global world. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wallach, E. J. (1983). Individual and organizations: The cultural match. Training and Development Journal, 37, 28-36.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420-432.
Wang, L. Y. (2004, April). Acting professionally or politically? Changes in superintendents' roles before and after the passage of local management law in Taiwan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Webb, P. (2008). Re-mapping power in educational micropolitics. Critical Studies in Education, 49(2), 127-142.
Wen, Z., Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. (2002). Interaction effects in growth modeling: A full model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 20-39.
Whitefield, S., & Evans, G. (1999). Political culture versus rational choice: Explaining responses to transition in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. British Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 129-154.
Williams, R. (2006). Leadership for school reform: Do principal decision-making styles reflect a collaborative approach?. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 53, 1-22.
Wills, J. E. (1995). The post-postmodern university. Chang, 27(2), 59-63.
Wu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE