:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣阿美族法制之研究
作者:陳士章
作者(外文):Shih-Chang Chen
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:施正鋒
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:法倫理學規範倫理學法律人類學法社會學民族法學阿美族法Legal EthicsNormative EthicsLegal AnthropologySociology of LawEthnic LawAmis’ Law
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:177
阿美族是臺灣原住民族當中最大的族群,前後經過文化解構、融合及重構階段。學界討論原住民族權利保障以及法律體系建構,有時直接進入如何修訂憲法的研究,而未能先從解釋法律的方法入手,完整地思考現行法制其實存有許多足以對應處理原住民族權利保障的條文,可以給予周延的認識與理解,藉以實現原住民族人權的保障。畢竟法律的修訂,必須通過複雜的程序,遠不如法律解釋來得平常容易;在實現原權保障的策略順序上,法律解釋恆應先於法律制定。
台灣現行法規範對於原住民族的人權保障,如足以給予充分保障的條文,依循正確的問題意識,把握正確的觀念,賦予恰當的解釋,即使在法律未予修訂之前,也能提供原住民族完足的人權保障。
因此,所謂保障原住民族人權之國家法制,必須兼顧個人不因原住民族身分而受國家法令歧視之權利保障,以及原住民族做為一個整體以成為享受國家法令提供平等保障之權利主體的位置安排。檢討憲法增修條文原住民族條款與原住民族基本法等法令規定是否妥適,必須以此為審視基點。
準此,本文欲從四個方面來探討阿美族所欲建立的法律解釋或是法律價值體系:首先,透過探討國內外民族法學理論,理解法律人類學所勾勒之價值;次之,研析既有法規範體系秩序中轉型正義與原住民族權利與法制的糾葛與衝突;再者,針對阿美族法規範的調查與整理,提出見解;最後,歸納出阿美族法律體系之建立,延續既有憲政秩序,所建構之法律解釋、適用以及司法審查基準,應朝何種方向邁進,提出建議。
Amis’ People are the basic unit and most amounts of indigenous people in Taiwan. Tribal culture has gone through the phases of destruction, integration, and reconstruction. The enhancement of the legal system subjectivity is the extreme expression of Taiwan indigenous people movements. Legal subjectivity is demonstrated in that whether the indigenous people have the right to determine their developments in politics, economy, society, culture, and education. This dissertation first reviews the traditional institution of the aboriginal tribes and understands the governmental ideology in tribes and clans, so as to analyze what legal subject would be, how their structures conflict with each other, and the condition of restructuring. Afterwards, the study suggests the framework of forming the relationship of equal rights and coexistence between legal autonomy and national governance. The applied research methods include literature method, interview method, historical research, and comparative research.
一、中文文獻:
土田茲,1989。〈アミ語〉《言語學大辭典:世界語言編(上)》第1卷。東京:三省堂。
巴奈.母路,2010。〈阿美族巫師sikawasay的milasung窺探祭〉《臺灣原住民巫師與祭儀展演》。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所,頁333-381。
王泰升,1993。〈臺灣法制史之建立〉《臺大法學論叢》第23卷第1期,頁1-24。new window
王泰升,1999。《臺灣日治時期的法律改革》。臺北:聯經。new window
王泰升,2002。《臺灣法的斷裂與連續》。臺北:元照。new window
王泰升,2005。〈多源而多元的臺灣法:外來法的在地化〉《當代》第220期,頁10-27。
王泰升,2006。《臺灣法律史的建立》。臺北:臺大法學叢書(107),頁7-13;17-31;35-55;57-98。new window
王泰升,2007。〈臺灣的法律繼受經驗及其啟示〉《中研院法學期刊》創刊號,頁111-135。new window
王泰升,2010。〈法律史-臺灣法律發展的「輪替」、轉機與在地化(2007-2009)〉《臺大法學論叢》第39卷第2期,頁165-198。
王崧興,1961。〈馬太安阿美族之宗教及神話〉《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》第12卷。
王崧興,1962。〈馬太安阿美族的故事〉《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》第14卷。
王嵩山,2001。《臺灣原住民的社會與文化》。臺北:聯經。new window
王嵩山,2005。《想像與知識的道路:博物館、族群與文化資產的人類學書寫》。臺北:稻鄉。new window
王學新,1998。《日治時期東臺灣地區原住民史料彙編與研究》。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。
古野清人(葉婉奇譯),2000。《臺灣原住民的祭儀生活》。臺北:原民文化,頁378。
臺灣省文獻會,1965。《臺灣省通志稿:卷八同胄志》。南投:臺灣省文獻會。
臺灣省文獻會,1995。《重修臺灣省通志:卷三住民志同胄篇》。南投:臺灣省文獻會。
臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣習調查會(中央研究院民族學研究所譯),2000。《番族慣習調查報告書第二卷:阿美族、卑南族》。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
末成道男(羅素玫編譯),2007。《臺灣阿美族之社會組織及其變化:從招贅婚到嫁娶婚》。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
石磊(Leach, Edmund著),1974。〈社會結構的歷史發展〉《思與言》第11卷第6期,頁45-50。new window
石磊(Fox, Robin著),1979。《親屬與婚姻》。臺北:黎明文化。
行政院,2007。《行政院公報》第13卷第19期。
伊能嘉矩,1973。《臺灣蕃政志》。臺北:古亭書屋。
伊能嘉矩,2000。《臺灣蕃人事情》。東京:草風堂。
夷將.拔路兒、陳中禹,2008。《臺灣原住民族運動史料彙編》。臺北:國史館。
佐川融吉,1914。《蕃族調查報告書:阿美篇》,東京:臨時臺灣舊慣習調查會。
何明修,2004a。〈政治機會結構與社會運動研究〉《國立政治大學社會學報》第37期,頁33-80。
何明修,2004b。〈文化、構框與社會運動〉《臺灣社會學刊》,頁157-199。new window
何建志,1997。《法律的意義與詮釋》,國立臺灣大學法律研究所碩士論文,頁40-51。
吳明義,2000。〈阿美族的文化傳承與傳統教育〉《玉山神學院學報》第7期,頁125-158。new window
吳從周,2010。〈試論判例作為民法第一條之習慣法〉《臺大法學論叢》第39卷第2期,頁227-299。
李壬癸,1991。《臺灣南島語言的語音符號系統》。臺北:教育部教育研究委員會。new window
李幼蒸,1994。《結構與意義:現代西方哲學論集》。臺北:聯經。
李幼蒸,1997。《理論符號學導論:卷四文化符號學》。臺北:唐山。
李亦圍,1957。〈南勢阿美族的部落組織〉《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》第4卷,頁117-144 。
李亦園,1962。《馬太安阿美族的物質文化》。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
李亦園,1987。《臺灣土著民族的社會與文化》。臺北:聯經。new window
李建良,2003。〈淺說原住民族的憲法權利〉《臺灣本土法學雜誌》第47期,頁117。
阮昌銳,1965。〈臺灣土著民族的今昔〉《中國邊政》第11期,臺北:國立政治大學民族社會學系。
阮昌銳,1967。〈港口阿美族年齡組織〉《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》第24卷。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
阮昌銳,1969。〈大港口的阿美族(上冊)〉《中央研究院民族學研究所專刊》第18卷。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
阮昌銳,1969。〈大港口的阿美族(下冊)〉《中央研究院民族學研究所專刊》第19卷。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
阮昌銳,1989。《中國婚姻習俗之研究》。臺北:臺灣省立博物館。
阮昌銳,1994。《臺東麻老漏阿美族的社會與文化》。臺北:臺灣省立博物館。new window
明立國,1990。《里漏社的「米勒祝克」(Mirecuk):阿美族宗教信仰與儀式歌舞之研究》。臺北:臺灣書局。
林子傑,2006。《人之圖像與憲法解釋》,國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,頁111-119。
林明昕,2004。〈原住民地位之保障作為「基本權利」或「基本國策」?〉《憲政時代》第29 卷第3 期,頁337-340。
林超駿,2004。〈初論多元文化主義(Multiculturalism)作為我國原住民權利保障之理論基礎〉《法治與現代行政法學:法治斌教授紀念論文集》。臺北:元照,頁314-326。
林端,1994。《儒家倫理與法律文化:社會學觀點的探索》。臺北:巨流,頁45-75。new window
法治斌,2003。〈司法審查中之平等權:建構雙重基準之研究〉《法治斌,法治國家與表意自由:憲法專論(三)》。臺北:正典,頁209、235-245。
施正鋒,2005a。〈民族的有效政治參與以及代表性的呈現〉《憲法原住民族專章會議實錄》。行政院原住民族委員會:憲法原住民族政策制憲推動小組,頁241-252。new window
施正鋒,2005b。〈憲政體制與原住民族自治安排〉《憲法原住民族專章會議實錄》。行政院原住民族委員會:憲法原住民族政策制憲推動小組,頁341-344。new window
施正鋒,2005c。〈原住民族的主權〉,發表於臺灣師範大學地理系區域研究中心主辦「第九屆臺灣地理學術研討會」。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學綜合大樓國際會議廳。new window
施正鋒,2006。〈憲政體制的選擇與憲政改造的過程〉,發表於淡江大學公共行政學系暨公共政策研究所舉辦「永續發展與制度變革學術研討會」。臺北,淡江大學。new window
施正鋒,2007。〈臺灣民主化過程中的的族群政治〉《臺灣民主季刊》第4卷第4期,頁177-189。new window
紀駿傑,2002。〈邁向自治之路:加拿大原住民的經驗與臺灣省思〉《原住民教育季刊》第26期,頁14-16。
容邵武,2007。〈文化、法律與策略:鄉鎮調解過程的研究〉《臺灣社會學刊》第38 期,頁57-104。new window
唐美君,1957。〈阿美族里漏的巫師制度〉《臺灣研究》第2輯。臺北:臺灣文化協進會。
高宣揚,1990。《結構主義》。臺北:遠流。
康培德,1999。《殖民接觸與帝國邊陲:花蓮地區原住民十七至十九世紀的歷史變遷》。臺北:稻香。new window
張文貞,2002。〈面對全球化:臺灣行政法發展的契機與挑戰〉《翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集:當代公法新論(中冊)》,頁3-26。臺北:元照。
張英磊,2009。《多元移植與民主轉型過程中我國環評司法審查之發展》,國立臺灣大學法律研究所博士論文。
張英磊,2011。〈比較法視角下我國環評司法審查之發展〉《臺灣大學法學論叢》第40卷第3期,頁955-1028。
張偉仁,1987。〈傳統觀念與現行法制〉《臺灣大學法學論叢》第17卷第1期,頁1-64。
張偉仁,1991。〈Traditional Chinese Legal Thought: A Foreword〉《臺灣大學法學論叢》第20卷第2期,頁1-21。
張偉仁,1998。“The Confucian Theory of Norms and Human Rights.” Confucianism and Human Rights. Columbia University Press, pp.117-141.
張偉仁,2006。〈中國傳統的司法和法學〉《法制史研究》第9期,頁201-222。new window
張景智(Culler, Jonathan著),1992。《索緒爾》。臺北:桂冠。
移川子之藏、,1935。《高砂族系統所屬之研究》。臺北:臺北帝國大學土俗人種研究室。
許木柱,1987。《阿美族的社會文化變遷與青少年適應》。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
許木柱等,1995。《重修臺灣省通志:卷三住民志同冑篇阿美族》。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。
許木柱、廖守臣、吳明義,2001。《臺灣原住民史:阿美族史篇》。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。new window
許功明、黃貴潮,1996。《阿美族的物質文化:變遷與持續之研究》。臺北:行政院原住民族委員會。new window
許宗力,1995。〈試論民主法治國家的「市民不服從」〉《法與國家權力》。臺北:月旦,頁73-114。new window
郭書琴,2008。〈法律人類學之理論與方法初探:以外籍配偶為例〉《法律思想與社會變遷雙年刊》。臺北:中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處,頁215-254。
陳士章,2004。〈論司法的政策形成功能-以大法官解釋第二四二號為例〉《政治學學報》第2期 ,頁39-69。
陳士章,2005a。〈臺灣原住民族的制憲運動—憲法原住民族專章(草案)之評釋〉,臺灣智庫與東華大學財經法律所合辦「憲政改造論壇」。花蓮:東華大學文學院第二講堂。
陳士章,2005b。〈臺灣原住民族自治與國家權力之劃分—法律觀點〉,發表於太魯閣族自治推動委員會主辦「太魯閣族自治議題研討會」。花蓮:國軍英雄館。
陳士章,2007。《原住民族傳統習慣之調查整理及評估納入現行法體系之研究阿美族、噶瑪蘭族》第3期。臺北:行政院原住民族委員會。
陳士章,2008。〈原住民族法與國家權力之劃分-以加拿大Nunavut法案為例〉《臺灣原住民族研究季刊》第1卷第2期,頁139-163。new window
陳士章,2009。〈建構中的原住民族法律體系-憲法觀點〉《人權會訊》第93卷,頁36-39。
陳文德,1986。〈阿美族親屬制度的再探討〉《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》第61卷,頁41-80 。
陳文德,1989。〈阿美族年齡組制度的研究與意義〉《中央研究院民族學研究所專刊》第68期,頁105-144。
陳文德,2001。《臺東縣史卑南族篇》。臺東:臺東縣政府。new window
陳文學,2004。《我國原住民族自治之研究:規劃評估觀點》。國立臺北大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,頁84。
陳奇祿,1992。《臺灣土著文化研究》。臺北:聯經。new window
陳俊男,2008。〈阿美族研究文獻回顧〉《臺灣原住民研究論叢》第4期,頁135-160。new window
陳清清,1961。〈馬太安阿美族之人口與家族〉《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》第11卷。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
陳愛娥,1999。〈臺灣行政程序法立法過程的幾個特點〉《月旦法學雜誌》第50期,頁34-40。
陳愛娥,2002。〈「兩性平等教育法」草案與「兩性地位之實質平等」〉《月旦法學雜誌》第84期,頁174。
陳瀅巧,2006。〈符號構成世界:結構主義〉《圖解文化研究》。臺北:易博士文化,頁94-97。
鹿野忠雄(宋文薰譯),1984。《臺灣考古學民族學概觀》。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。
黃居正,2008。〈特殊權利概念的重建:評析原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例〉《傳統智慧與公共領域:原住民族傳統智慧創作保護論文集》。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會數位典藏計畫,頁121-160。new window
黃茂榮,1982。〈法律體系之存在基礎及其定義 〉《臺灣大學法學論叢》第12卷第1期,頁163-203。new window
黃茂榮,2005。〈法律體系(上)〉《植根雜誌》第21卷第2期,頁1-40。
黃茂榮,2009。《法學方法與現代民法》。臺北:植根。new window
黃宣衛,1998。《一個海岸阿美族村落的時間、歷史與記憶:以年齡組織與異族觀為中心的探討》。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
黃宣衛,2005a。《國家、村落領袖與社會文化變遷》。臺北:南天。
黃宣衛,2005b。《異族觀、地域性差別與歷史:阿美族研究論文集》。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
黃宣衛、羅素玫,2001。《臺東縣史:阿美族篇》。臺東:臺東縣政府文化局。new window
黃舒芃,2005。〈比較法作為法學方法:以憲法領域之法比較為例〉《月旦法學》第120期,頁183-198。new window
黃舒芃,2009。《變遷社會中的法學方法》。臺北:元照。new window
黃貴潮,1988。〈宜灣阿美族的傳統Kawas觀念〉《思與言》第26卷第4期,頁341-354。new window
黃貴潮,1989。〈宜灣阿美族三個儀式活動的記錄〉《中央研究院民族學研究所專刊》第2卷。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
黃貴潮,1989。〈宜灣阿美族的傳統Adada(疾病)觀念〉《臺灣風物》第39卷第2期,頁125-140。new window
黃道琳(Leach, Edmund著),1994。《結構主義之父:李維史陀》。臺北:桂冠。
黃應貴,1988。《臺灣土著社會文化研究論文集》。臺北:聯經出版社。new window
黃應貴,2001。《臺東縣史布農族篇》。臺東:臺東縣政府。new window
尊重原住民文化 ∕ 原民國有地搬櫸木不算竊盜(2010年2月10日)。自由時報,第A12 版。
楊仁煌,1978。〈從外婆家回到爸爸家:一個阿美族人在社會變遷中的自述〉《中國論壇》第7卷第4期,頁16-18。
楊仁煌,1978。《變遷中的薄薄阿美族社區》,國立政治大學邊政研究所碩士論文。
楊仁煌,1994a。〈談文化與族群關係(上)〉《民主憲政》第20期。
楊仁煌,1994b。〈談文化與族群關係(中)〉《民主憲政》第21期。
楊仁煌,1994c。〈談文化與族群關係(下)〉《民主憲政》第22期。
楊仁煌,1997。〈族群發展與文化延續:教育文化〉《雲南省社會科學院報》。雲南:雲南省社會科學院。
楊仁煌,2004。《臺灣阿美族Taluan會所文化內涵與發展之研究》,國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所博士論文。new window
楊仁煌,2007。〈文化建構與復振之研究〉《臺灣原住民研究論叢》第1期,頁69-102。
楊仁煌,2008。〈阿美族之歲時祭儀〉《臺灣原住民研究論叢》第4期,頁1-26。new window
廖元豪,1996。〈美國「種族優惠性差別待遇」( Racial Affirmative Action )合憲性之研究:兼論平等原則之真義〉《東吳法律學報》第9卷第2期,頁1-38。new window
劉文仕,2000。〈自治規則的類別、定位與法律保留〉《律師雜誌》第244 期,頁33。
劉斌雄,1961。〈秀姑巒阿美族的親屬稱謂制〉《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》第12卷。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
劉斌雄,1987。《臺灣土著祭儀及歌舞民俗活動之研究》。臺北,中央研究院民族學研究所。
劉斌雄等,1965。《秀姑巒阿美族的社會組織》。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window
蔡中涵,2008。〈臺東市阿美族豐年祭儀的變遷與傳承〉《臺灣原住民研究論叢》第4期,頁27-64。new window
蔡中涵,2011。〈阿美族傳統社會組織與財產制〉《臺灣原住民族研究學報》第1卷第3期。new window
蔡茂寅,2003。《地方自治之理論與地方制度法》。臺北:學林,頁167。new window
衛惠林,1953。〈臺灣東部阿美族的年齡階級組織制度初步研究〉《臺灣大學考古人類學刊》第1期。臺北:國立臺灣大學人類學系,頁2-9。
衛惠林,1961。〈阿美族的母系氏族與母系世系群〉《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》第12卷,頁1-40。
衛惠林,1965。〈臺灣土著社會的部落組織與權威制度〉《臺灣大學考古人類學刊》第25、26期(合刊),頁71-92。臺北:國立臺灣大學人類學系。new window
衛惠林,1972。《臺灣省通志:卷八同冑志第八冊-阿美族、雅美族篇》。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。
衛惠林等,1965。《臺灣省通志稿:阿美族》第24冊第11篇。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。
謝世忠,2001。〈少年婚、文化、與傳統力量:一個花蓮太魯閣族部落的例子〉《臺灣大學考古人類學刊》第57期,頁35-54。new window
謝世忠,2007。《北臺灣都市阿美族原住民的豐年祭儀式參與及文化認同》。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。
薄慶玖,1996。《地方政府與自治》。臺北:五南圖書公司,頁5。
瞿同祖,1978。《中國法律與中國社會》。臺南:僶勉。new window
顏厥安,2004a。〈公共理性與法律論理〉《政治與社會哲學評論》第8期,頁1-46。new window
顏厥安,2004b。〈自由、評價與知識的雙面性〉《法令月刊》第55卷第1期,頁81-83。new window
顏厥安,2004c。〈論證、規範縫隙與法的論述概念〉《法令月刊》第55卷第3期,頁89-92。new window
蘇永欽,2001。〈私法自治中的國家強制-從功能法的角度看民事規範的類型與立法釋法方向〉《中外法學》第13卷第1期,頁92-109。













二、英文文獻:
Adams, Michael. (2003). Fire and Ice: The United States, Canada and the Myth of Converging. Toronto: Penguin Canada.
Adams, William Y. (1998). The philosophical roots of anthropology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Alexy, Robert. (2003). “On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison.” Ratio Juris, 16(4), 433-49.
Arendt, Hannah. (1958). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Cleveland: The World Publishing Company.
Aronoff, Myron J. (1983). “Conceptualizing the Role of Culture in Political Change.” Political Anthropology, 2: Culture and Political Change. MJ Aronoff, ed. New Brunswick. NJ: Transaction Books.
Astuti, Rita. (1995). People of the sea: identity and descent among the Vezo of Madagascar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Atlantic Council Working Group on the United States and Canada. (1982). “The Policy Paper. U.S. Policy toward Canada: The Neighbor We Cannot Take for Granted.” Willis C. Armstrong, ed. Canada and the United States: Dependence and Divergence, 1-30. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger
Axford, Barrie and Gary K. Browning. (1997). Introduction. In Politics: An Introduction. Barrie Axford (at. al.), eds. London and New York: Routledge.
Bachrach, P &; M. S. Baratz. (1962). “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review, 56, 947-52.
Bachrach, P &; M. S. Baratz. (1963) . “Decisions and Nondecisions: A Analytical Framework.” American Political Science Review, 57, 632-42.
Bachrach, P &; M. S. Baratz. (1970). Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford Uni. Press.
Balkin, Jack. (1997). “The Constitution of Status.” 106 YALE L.J. 2313.
Bailey, Frederick G. (1969). Strategems and Spoils: A Social Anthropology of Politics. New York: Schocken Books.
Barth, Fredrik. (1969). “Ethnic Groups and Boundaries.” London: Allen &; Unwin. Bailey, FG. Stratagems and Spoils: A Social Anthropology of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barth, Fredrik. (2005). Britain and the Commonwealth. In One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French, and American Anthropology. Fredrik Barth et. al. eds. Chicago Uni. Press.
Bauman, Zygmunt. (1987). Legislators &; Interpreters :On Modernity, Post-Modernity and Intellectuals. Cornell Uni. Press.
Bell, Catherine. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford Uni. Press.
Benford, Robert D &; Snow, David. (1992). Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT:Yale Uni. Press.
Benford, Robert D &; Snow, David. (2000). “Framing Process and social Movments: An Overviow and Assessment.” Annuel Review Sociology, 26 ,611-33.
Berman, Paul Schiff. (2005). The Globalisatin of International Law. Aldershot, Ashgate.
Blanchard, Dallas. (1994). The Antiabortion Movement and the Rise of the Religious Rights: From Polite to Fiery Protest. Chicago: Twayne Publishing.
Bohannan, Paul. (1957). Justice and Judgement among the Tiv. London.
Bohannan, Paul. (1967). “The Differing Realms of the Law.” In Bohannan, P. eds. Law and Warfare, 43-58. New York.
Boissevain, J. (1964). “Factions, Parties, and Politics in a Maltese Village.” American Anthropologists, 66.
Brand, Oliver. (2007). “Conceptual Comparisons: Towards a Coherent Methodology of Comparative Legal Studies.” 32 Brooklyn J. of Inter. L., 405-66.
Brigham, John. (1988). “Rights, Rage and Remedy: Forms of Law in Political Discourse.” Studies in American Political Development, 2, 303-16.
Brigham, John. (1997). The Constitution of Interests: Beyond the Politics of Rights. New York: New York Uni. Press.
Bruner, Jerome. (2002). “The Legal and the Literary.” In Making Stories: Law, Literature, and Life. Cambrdge, MA: Harvard Uni. Press, 37-62.
Carozza,Paolo G. (1997). “Continuity and Rupture in New Approaches to Comparative Law.” Utah L. Rev., 657-663.
Cohen, Abner. (1965). Arab Border Village in Israel: A Study of Continuity and Change in Social Organisation. Manchester Uni. Press.
Cohen, Abner. (1969a). “Political Anthropology: The Analysis of the Symbo lism of Power Relations.” Man, New Series 1,4 (2).
Cohen, Abner. (1969b). Customs and Politics in Urban Africa. London: Rouldege &; Kegan Paul.
Cohen, Abner. (1974a). “Two Dimensional Man: An Essay on the Anthropology of Power and Symbolism.” In Complex Societies. London: Routledge &; Kegan Paul.
Cohen, Abner. (1974b). Urban Ethnicity. London: Tavistock.
Cohen, Ronald. (1965). “Political Anthropology: The Future of a Pioneer.” Anthropological Antiquity, 38.
Cohler, Anne. (1989). ( eds.) Montesquieu: Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni Press.
Cohn, Bernard. (1992). “Representing Authority in Victorian India.” In The Invention of Tradition. New York: Cambridge Uni. Press, 165-209.
Cossman, Brenda. (1997). “Turning the Gaze Back on Itself: Comparative Law, Feminist Legal Studies, and the Postcolonial Project.” Utah L. Rev., 525-44.
Culler, Jonathan. (2002). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; Ithaca: Cornell Uni. Press.
Damaska, Mirjan R. (1975). “Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure,” 84(3), Yale Law Journal, 480-544.
Damaska, Mirjan R. (1986). The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. Yale Uni. Press.
Donham, D. (1999). History, Power, Ideology: Central Issues in Marxism and Anthropology. Berkeley: California Uni. Press.
Douglas, Mary. (1966). Pruity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Polution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Dunn, John. (1984). Locke. Oxford Uni. Press.
Dunn, John. (1969). The Political Thought of John Locke: A Historical Account of the Argument of the Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge Uni. Press.
Duplessis, J. (2006). Comparative Law and the Study of Mixed Legal Systems. Oxford Uni. Press.
Dux, R. (1978). Rechtssoziologie. Stuttgart.
Easton, David. (1959). “Political Anthropology.” Biennial Review of Anthropology, 1.
Edward, William. (1995). “Comparative Jurisprudence (Π): The Logic of Legal Transplant.” 43 Amer. J. of Comp. L., 489-510.
Epp, Charles. (1998). The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activities, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: Chicago Uni. Press.
Eunbner, G. (1997). Global Law without a State. Dartmouth.
Firth, R. (1954). “Social Organization and Social Change.” Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 84.
Fortes, Meyer &; Pritchard, Evans. (1940). African Political System. Oxford.: Oxford Uni. Press.
Fried, Morton. (1964). Anthropology and the Study of Politics. In Horizons of Anthropology. Sol Tax, ed. Chicago: Chicago Uni. Press.
Fried, Morton. (1967). The Evolution of Political Societies: An Essay in Political Anthropology. New York: Random House.
Friedman, Lawrence Meir. (1986). A History of American Law. Baker &; Taylor Books.
Friedman, Lawrence Meir. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 189-98.
Gabel, Peter. (1980). “Reification in Legal Reasoning.” Law and Sociology, 3, 25-52.
Galanter, Marc. (1983). “The Radiating Effects of Courts.” In Empirical Theories of Court, ed. By Keith D. Boyum and Lynn Mather. New York: Longman.
Geertz, Clifford. (1983). “Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective.” In: Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, 167-234. New York: Basic Books.
Gellner, Ernest. (1995). Anthropology and Politics: Revolutions in the Sacred Grove. Oxford Blackwell.
Giddens, Anthony. (2000). Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives. New York: Routledge.
Gillespie, John. (2008). “Towards a Discursive Analysis of Legal Transfers into Developing East Asia.” 40 N. Y. U. J. of Inter. L. &; Pol., 657-721.
Gledhill, J. (1994). Power and Its Disguises: Anthropological Perspectives on Politics. London: Pluto Press.
Glenn, H.P. (2000). Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford Uni. Press.
Gluckman, Max. (1965). Politics, law and ritual in tribal society. Chicago: Aldine.
Gluckman, Max. (1963). Order and Rebellion in Tribal Africa. London: Cohen &; West.
Gluckman, Max. (1956). Custom and Conflict in Africa. London: Basil Blackwell.
Gluckman, Max. (1940). “Analysis of a Social Situation in Modern Zululand.” Bantu Studies, 14.
Griffiths, Anne. (2009a). Spatializing Law: An Anthropological Geography of Law in Society. Ashgate, 102.
Griffiths, Anne. (2009b). The Power of Law in a Transnational World: Anthropological Enquiries. Berghahn Books, 206.
Griffiths, John. (1986). “What is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, 1-55.
Handler, Joel F. (1987). Social Movements and the Legal System. New York: Academic Press.
Hannerz, Ulf. (1987). “The World in Creolization.” Journal of International African Institute, 57(4).
Harris, Marvin. (1999). Theories of Culture in Postmodern Times. New York: AltaMira Press.
Hendy, Andrew Von. (2002). The Modern Construction of Myth. Bloomington: Indiana Uni. Press.
Herbert, M.K. (2002). Legal Systems of the World. Santa-Barbara, ABC-CLIO.
Herzfeld, Michael. (2001). Anthropology: Theoretical Practice in Culture and Society. Oxford: Blackwell; Paris: UNESCO.
High Court of Australia Judgments. (1984). FC 88/062. Mabo and Another Vs. The State of Queensland and Another. No.166 CLR 186.
Hoebel, E. A. (1954). The Law of Primitive Man. Cambridge.
Holy, Ladislav. (1996). Anthropological Perspectives on Kinship. London: Pluto Press.
Hooker, M.B. (1998). Adat Law in modern Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford Uni. Press.
Humphrey, Caroline &; James Laidlaw. (1994). The Archetypal Actions of Ritual. New York: Oxford Uni. Press.
Inoue, Tatsuo. (2007). “The Rule of Law as the Law of Legislation.” In Legislation in Context: Essays in Legisprudence, ed. By Luc F. Wintgen. Hampshire. UK: Ashgate Publishing, 55-74.
Justinger, Judith M. (1979). “Reaction to change: A Holocultural Test of Some Theories of Religious Movement.” Ann Arbor, University Microfilms, no 7817047. State University of New York at Buffalo, Dissertation, Anthropology.
Keal, Paul. (2003). European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press.
Kennedy, David. (1986). “Critical Theory, Structuralism and Contemporary Legal Scholarship.” 21 New Eng. L. Rev., 209-90.
Kennedy, David. (2006). “The ‘Rule of Law,’ Political Choices, and Development Common Sense.” In David Trubek &; Alvaro Santos, eds, The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press, 95-128.
Kennedy, Duncan. (1991). “The Semiotics of Legal Arguments.” 42 Syracuse L. Rev., 75-116.
Kennedy, Duncan. (2006). “Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought 1850-2000.” In David Trubek &; Alvaro Santos, eds, The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press, 19-73.
Kertzer, David. (1988). Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven: Yale Uni. Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert. (1986). “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57-85.
König, R. (1967). Soziologie. Frankfurt/M.
Kunkel, W. (1966) An Introduction to Roman Legal and Constitutional History. Oxford: Clarendon Press (translated by Kelly, J.M.)
Kuper, Adam. (2005). “Alternative Histories of British Social Anthropology.” Social Anthropology, 13(1).
Kuper, Adam. (1988). The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformation of an Illusion. London and New York: Routledge.
Kurtz, Donald V. (2001). Political Anthropology: Paradigms and Power. Boulder: Westview.
Lama, A. O. (1997). “Comparatively Speaking: The Honor of the East and the Passion of the West.” 2 Utah L. R., 287-307.
Langer, Maximo. (2004). “From Legal Transplant to Legal Translation: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure.” 45 Har. Inter. L. J., 1-64.
Layton, Robert. (1997). An Introduction to Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press.
Leach, ER. (1954). Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure. London: Aldine.
Lewellen, Ted C. (1994). Political Anthropology: An Introduction. London: Bergin &; Garvey.
Maine, Henry Sumner. (1861). Ancient Law. J. Murray, London.
Mair, LP. (1969). “Small: Scale Societies Change.” In Penguin Survey of Social Sciences. J. Gould, ed. Anthropology and Social Change. London: Athlone.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1926). Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1927). Sex and Repression in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner &; Co.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1944). A scientific theory of culture. Buenos Aires: Ediciones South America.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1948). Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
Malleson, K. (2005). The Legal System. Oxford Uni. Press.
Martin, Jeffrey. (2007). “A Reasonable Balance of Law and Sentiment: Social Order in Democratic Taiwan from the Policeman's Point of View.” 41(3), Law and Society Review, 665-98.
McCann, Michael. (1994). Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Chicago Uni. Press.
McCann, Michael. (2004a). “Law and Social Movements.” In Austin Sarat ed. The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 506-22.
McCann, Michael. (2004b). “Legal Mobilization and Social Reform Movements: Notes on Theory and Its Application.” Law and Social Movements. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 3-32.
McCann, Michael. (2004c). “Introduction.” Law and Social Movements. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, xi-xxvi.
McCann, Michael. (1996). “Unity and Diversity:Some Tensions in the Construction of Europe.” Social Anthropology, 4(1), 47-60.
Menand, Louis. (2001). The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Merry, SE. (1988). “Legal Pluralism.” Law and Society Review, 22(5), 869-89.
Merry, SE. (1992a). “Anthropology, Law and Transnational Processes.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 357-79.
Merry, SE. (1992b). “Culture, Power and the Discourse of Law.” New York Law School Law Review, 37, 209-29.
Merry, SE. (2004a). “Colonial and Postcolonial Law.” In Sarat, A., ed., The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society. London: Blackwell, 569-88.
Merry, SE. (2004b). “Regulation and Relations.” Law and Society Review. Beijing: Renmin Uni. Pres, 63-78. Published in Chinese.
Merry, SE. (2005). “Human Rights and Global Legal Pluralism: Reciprocity and Disjuncture.” In von Benda-Beckman, F. &; von Benda-Beckman, K. &; Griffiths, A.,eds., Mobile People, Mobile Law: Expanding Legal Relations in a Contracting World.Aldershot. UK: Ashgate.
Merry, SE. (2006a). “New Legal Realism and the Ethnography of Transnational Law.” Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation, 31 (4), 975-95.
Merry, SE. (2006b). “Anthropology and International Law.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 99-116.
Mintz, Sidney. (1985). Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Viking.
Moore, S.F. (1972). “Law and Social Change: the Semi-autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.” Law and Society Review, 7, 719-46.
Moore, S. F. (2000). Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. Hamburg: LIT, Oxford.
Morgan, Lewis H. (1982). Ancient Society. Arizona Uni. Press.
Nash, J. (1979). We Eat Mines and the Mines Eat Us: Dependence and Exploitation in Bolivian Tin Mines. New York: Columbia Uni. Press.
Nader, Laura. (1965). The ethnography of law. Menasha, Wisconsin: American Anthropological Association.
Nader, Laura. (1990). Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village. Stanford: Stanford Uni. Press.
Nader, Laura. (2005). The Life of the Law: Anthropological Projects: Anthropological Projects. California Uni. Press, 28-9.
Nader, Laura. (2008). Plunder: When the Rule of Law is Illegal. Blackwell Publishers.
Nelken, D. &; Feest, J. (eds.). (2001). Adapting Legal Cultures. Oxford, Hart Publishing.
Ohnuki-Tierney, Emiko. (1990). “Introduction: The Historicization of Anthropology.” In Culture through Time: Anthropological Approaches. California: Stanford Uni. Press, 1-25.
Partington, M. (2000). Introduction to the English Legal System. New York, Oxford Uni. Press.
Press.Peter, Badura. (1992). “Arten der Verfassungsrechtssätze.” In Isensee/Kirchhof (Hrsg.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, Bd. VII, 2. Aufl., S. 41.
Polanyir, Karl. (1965). Dahomey and the Slave Trade: An Analysis of an Archaic Economy. Seattle: Washington Uni. Press.
Polanyir, Karl. (1957). “Economy as Institute Process.” In Trade and Market in the Early Empires. K. Polanyi, CW Arensberg, and HW Pearson, eds. New York: The Free Press.
Polanyir, Karl. (1944). The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart.
Pritchard, Evans. (1940). Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Living and Political Institute of a Neolithic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Radcliffe, Brown A.R. (1952). Structure and Function in Primitive Society: Essays and Addresses. London: Cohen &; West.
Rappaport, Roy. (1999). Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. New York: Cambridge Uni. Press.
Reid, Kenneth G.C. (2003). “The Idea of Mixed Legal Systems.” 78 Tulane Law Review, 5-40.
Rentlen, A.D. &; Alan Dundes.(eds) (1995). Folk Law: Essays in the Theory and Practice of Lex Non Scriptum. Madison: Wisconsin Uni. Press.
Riles A. (2004). “Property As Legal Knowledge: Means and Ends.” 10 J. Roy. Anthrop. Inst., 775,775-95.
Riles A. (1999). “Wigmore’s Treasure Box: Comparative Law in the Era of Information.” 40 Harv. Inter. L. J., 231-41.
Riles A. (1994). “Representing in-between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity.” U. Ill. L. Rev., 597.
Rose, Dorothy. (1991). The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press.
Rosenberg, Gerald. (1991). “The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? “ Chicago: Chicago Uni. Press.
Sahlins, Marshall. (1972). Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine.
Sahlins, Marshall. (1963). “Poor Man, Rich Man, Big Man, Chief: Political Types in Melanesia and Polynesia.” Comparative Studies in Societies and History, 5.
Sahlins, Marshall. (1960). “Political Power and the Economy in Primitive Society.” In Essays in the Science of Culture in Honor of Leslie White. Gertrude Dole and Robert L. Carneiro, eds. New York: Thomas Crowell Co.
Sahlins, Marshall. (1958). Social Stratification in Polynesia. Seattle: Washington Uni. Press.
Sarat, Austin &; Stuart A.Schiengold (ed). (2001). Cause Lawyering and the State in the Global Era. Oxford: Oxford Uni. Press.
Scalia, Antonin. (1997). A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts the Law. Princeton Uni. Press.
Schiengold, Stuart A. (2004). The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Michigan Uni. Press.
Schott, R. (1970). “Die Funktionen des Rechts in Primitiven Gesellschaften.”In Jahrbuch für Rechtssziologie und Rechtstheorie, Bd.l, S., 108-74. Bielefeld.
Schott, R. (1983). “Rechtsethnologie.”In Fischer, H.(Hg.)Ethnologie, Eine Einführung, S., 181- 203. Berlin.
Seidman, Louis Michael. (2003). Constitutional Law: Equal Protection of the Laws. New York: Foundation Press.
Smith, MG. (1968). Political Anthropology: Political Organization. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. David Sills, ed. New York: Macmillan/The Free Press.
Smits, J.M. (2006). Comparative Law and its Influence on National Legal Systems. Oxford Uni. Press.
Southworth, Ann. (2000). “The Rights Revolution and Support Structures for Rights Advocacy.” Law and Society Review, 34, 1203.
Starr, June &; Goodale, Mark. (eds.) (2002). Practicing Ethnography in Law: New Dialogues, Enduring Methods. Palgrave: Macmillan, 2; 40-8.
Stolleis, Michael. (2001). Public Law in Germany 1800-1914. Virginia: Berghahn Books Herndon.
Summer, W. G. (1906). Folksways. Boston.
Swartz, M. (ed) (1968). Local Level Politics. Chicago: Aldine.
Swartz, M. Turner, VW &; A. Tuden (eds). (1965). Political Anthropology. Chicago: Aldine.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. (1993). “The Folly of the Social Scientific Concept of Legal Pluralism.” Journal of Law and Society, 20, 192-217.
Tambiah, S. J. (1985). Culture, Thought, and Social Action. Cambridge: Harvard Uni. Press.
Teubner, Gunther. (1998). “Legal Irritant: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences.” 61 The Modern L. Rev., 11-31.
Thurnwald, R. (1934). Werden, Wandel und Gestaltung des Rechts. Berlin.
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. (2001). “The Anthropology of the State in the Age of Globalization: Close Encounters of the Deceptive Kind.” Current Anthropology, 42(1).
Tully, James. (1995). Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press.
Turk, Austin. (1975). “Law as a Weapon in Social Conflict.” Social Problems, 23, 276.
Turner, Bryan S. (2007). “The Enclave Society: Towards a Sociology of Immobility.” European Journal of Social Theory, 10(2).
Twining, W. (2001). Globalisation and Legal Theory. Evanston: Northwestern Uni. Press.
Vincent, Joan. (1978). “Political Anthropology: Manipulative Strategies.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 7.
Vipond, Robert. (1990). Liberty and Community: Canadian Federalism and the Failure of the Constitution. Albany: NY: Suny Press, 13-5.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Free Press.
Watson, Alan. (1983). “Legal Change: Sources of Law and Legal Culture.” 131 U. of Penn. L. Rev., 1121-57.
Weir, Tony. (1998). Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford: Clarence Press.
Wesel, U. (1985). Frühformen des Rechts in Vortaatlichen Gesellschaften, Frankfurt.
Wolf, Eric. (1999). Envisioning Power: Ideologies of Dominance and Power. Berkeley: California Uni. Press.
Wolf, Eric. (1990). “Facing Power-Old Insight, New Questions.” American Anthropologist, 92.
Wolf, Eric. (1982). Europe and the Peoples without History. Berkeley: California Uni. Press.
Wraight, Christopher. (2008). Rousseau's The Social Contract: A Reader's Guide. London: Continuum Books.
Zabusky,S.E. (1995). Launching Europe:An Ethnography of European Co-Operation in Space Science. Princeton: Princeton Uni. Press.
Zemans, F.K. (1983). “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review, 77, 690-703.
Zifcak, S. (2005). Globalisation and the Rule of Law. London: Routledge.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE