:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:活躍老化高齡者學習特質之研究
作者:楊志和
作者(外文):Chiho Yang
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:成人及繼續教育研究所
指導教授:魏惠娟
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:成功老化活躍老化高齡者補償與尋伴理論學習特質active aginglearning characteristicscompensation and partnership theoryolder adultssuccessful aging
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:91
本研究目的為探討八十歲以上活躍老化高齡者的學習特質,採紮根理論研究法,結合立意抽樣與理論抽樣,選取十二位長期參與非正規學習活動的高齡者為研究對象,研究參與者均通過SF-36健康量表與SPMSQ簡易心智狀態問卷調查表,且擁有穩定的經濟能力與安全的居住環境,符合活躍老化「健康、參與、安全」的定義。本研究以訪談法為主,參與觀察為輔,分析歸納活躍老化高齡者的學習特質,包括生活背景、個性特質、家庭與人際關係、學習動機、參與條件與限制,學習的態度、內容與方式,以及學習效益等面向。
研究結果發現,高齡者參與學習或志工活動的動機為補償學習機會、滿足個人興趣與彌補人際互動需求,並透過長期參與活動獲致夥伴關係,進而提升身心健康,維繫認知功能,滿足社會接觸與回饋社區,達到活躍老化的效益。本研究提出「補償與尋伴理論」,並以「補償缺乏的尋伴之旅」作為活躍老化高齡者學習特質的主軸概念。
針對研究目的,本研究提出以下結論:
一、活躍老化高齡者展現正向的個性特質、積極的生活型態,主動的學習態度。
二、配偶家人為參與學習的關鍵因素,同儕支持是長期持續參與的重要動力。
三、高齡學習以補償需求為動機,以建立夥伴關係為途徑。
四、教育程度與學習動機存在正向關係,未來世代差異將擴大而性別差異將縮小。
五、機構因素仍為主要參與障礙,先備知識有益高齡學習的廣度與深度。
六、透過參與學習促進身心健康、維繫認知功能、提升生活安全。
依據研究結果,本研究提出以下建議:
一、對於政府部門:
(一)透過退休準備教育提升對於高齡學習的認識與參與。
(二)對高齡教育的補助方式可以更靈活多元。
二、對於高齡學習機構:
(一)利用社區活動包裝學習,透過夥伴關係招募成員。
(二)活動內容應考量性別差異,並就未來世代差異預作準備。
(三)鼓勵居民自行規劃學習活動,開發在地人才並活化場地利用。
三、對於高齡者與家人:
(一)成年期發展終身學習態度,廣泛培養知識興趣。
(二)善用配偶與家人管道,鼓勵高齡者進入學習場域。
四、對於未來研究的建議:
(一)嬰兒潮世代高齡者的學習特質必然展現新貌,值得比較與深入探討。
(二)非活躍老化與第四齡高齡者的參與動機、活動內容與學習效益有待探討。
The purpose of the study is to explore the learning characteristics of active aging older adults of eighty years old and above. By means of grounded theory approach, twelve octogenarians were selected through random sampling and theoretical sampling. As long-term participants in learning activities or voluntary services with financial and housing security, they were first evaluated by SF-36 Health Survey and SPMSQ questionnaire and qualified as active aging. Several aspects of characteristics were analyzed and deducted via semi-structured interview supplemented by participation observation method, including life background, personality, family and interpersonal relations, learning incentives, prerequisites and limitations, and learning attitudes, contents, methods, and effects.
The study concludes that older adults participate in learning activities to make up for learning opportunities, fulfill personal interests, and compensate for the lack of interpersonal relations. Through peer partnership in learning activities, older adults enhance physical and mental health, maintain cognitive abilities, obtain social contact, provide feedback to the community, and eventually achieve active aging. Based on the findings, the study proposes “compensation and partnership theory” that defines the main characteristic of active aging older adults’ participation in learning activities as “a journey of seeking compensation and partnership”.
The study leads to the following conclusions: 1. Active aging older adults demonstrate positive personalities, lifestyles, and learning attitudes. 2. Family plays a vital role for older adults’ participation in learning activities, while peer partnership a motivation for long-term engagement. 3. Compensation for deficiency is the major incentive for older adults’ learning, and peer partnership as the main approach. 4. A positive relationship exists between educational levels and learning incentives, with increasing generation differences and decreasing gender differences expected in the future. 5. Institutional factors remain the major participation barriers for older adults, while prior knowledge proves useful in facilitating learning activities. 6. Learning activities promote physical and mental health, maintain cognitive abilities and enhance life security.
The study proposes the following suggestions: First of all, the government should consider implementing compulsory retirement education to promote learning activities after retirement, and subsidies for older adult education may be appropriated with more diversity and creativity. Secondly, learning organizations may make use of voluntary services as a means for recruiting older adult participants, while gender preferences and generation differences should be considered in future program planning, and older adults be encouraged to organize their own programs and recruit more local residents to share their knowledge and expertise. Thirdly, life-long learning habits and broad interests should be cultivated in adulthood for active participation in older adult learning, and family members as major encouragers should play a more active role in promoting older adults’ participation in learning activities. Finally, more studies should probe into learning characteristics of baby-boomers, who display obvious distinction from their prior generations. In addition, learning motivation, contents, and effects for people of the fourth age and non-active aging older adults are worth further investigating.
一、中文部份
王文科、王智弘 (2012)。教育研究法。臺北:五南。new window
王仁癸 (2009)。成功老化的策略。北縣終教,32,42-49。
王悅琳 (2012)。台中市國小教師老化態度、活躍老化學習認知與學習需求之研究。國立中正大學教學專業發展數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
王雅各 (2008)。質性研究導論。載於謝臥龍(主編),質性研究(頁3-55)。臺北:心理。
內政部 (2013a)。內政國際指標。主要國家預期退休後需渡過之年限。2013年4月9日,
取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/national/list.htm
內政部 (2013b)。性別統計指標。福利救助暨保險。老人福利。老人長青學苑概況。2013
年4月9日,取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/gender/list01.html
內政部戶政司 (2012a)。人口年齡結構重要指標101年1月。2012年2月13日,取自http://www.ris.gov.tw/37
內政部戶政司 (2012b)。人口統計戶籍人口統計速報。2012年2月13日,取自http://www.ris.gov.tw/37
內政部社會司 (2012a)。內政部「長青學苑」推動情形簡報。2012年4月9日,取自
http://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/ezcatfiles/b001/img/img/28/145020417.pdf
內政部社會司 (2012b)。老人福利法。2012年5月13日,取自
http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/04/02/02_1.htm
內政部統計處 (2012)。內政統計通報(101年第十三週)。2012年4月5日,取自
http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=6090
石泱 (2010)。成功老化、活躍老化與生產老化對我國老人福利政策的省思。社區發展季刊,132,234-251。new window
行政院經濟建設委員會 (2008)。台灣地區97至145年人口推計及分析。2012年3月11日,
取自www.cepd.gov.tw/att/0000455/0000455_14.pdf
行政院經濟建設委員會 (2010)。2010年至2060年臺灣人口推計報告。2012年2月13日,
取自http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0000455
李世代 (2010)。活躍老化的理念與本質。社區發展季刊,132,59-72。new window
吳明烈 (2012)。我國推動高齡學習的幾項重要思考。成人及終身教育雙月刊,38,23-31。
吳逸如 (2011)。戰後嬰兒潮世代公教人員活躍老化學習需求及參與意願之探討。國立中正大學高齡者教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
林東龍、余嬪、陳武宗 (2011)。退休經驗的社會脈絡分析。臺灣社會福利學刊,9(2),new window
39-90。
林淑萱 (2010)。我國高齡婦女活躍老化的政策探討。社區發展季刊,132,340-352。new window
林麗惠 (2004a)。高齡者對成功老化條件及策略之初探。載於中華民國成人及終身教育
學會(主編),高齡社會與高齡教育(頁151-183)。臺北:師大書苑。
林麗惠 (2004b)。高齡學習者。載於黃富順(主編),高齡學習(頁179-195)。臺北:五南。
林麗惠 (2004c)。高齡學習活動參與。載於黃富順(主編),高齡學習(頁199-216)。臺北:
五南。
林麗惠 (2006a)。高齡者參與志願服務與成功老化之研究。生死學研究,4,1-36。new window
林麗惠 (2006b)。台灣高齡學習者成功老化之研究。人口學刊,33,133-170。new window
林麗惠 (2008)。高齡教育的課程。載於黃富順(主編),高齡教育學(頁184-201)。臺北:
五南。
洪淑宜 (2011)。中高齡者對於活躍老化課程認知與學習參與差異之研究:以新北市樂齡學習中心為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
胡夢鯨 (2012)。緒論:樂齡學習的誕生。載於魏惠娟(主編),台灣樂齡學習(頁1-11)。
臺北:五南。
范麗娟 (2008)。深度訪談。載於謝臥龍(主編),質性研究(頁83-123)。臺北:心理。
徐宗國(譯) (1997)。Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.著。質性研究概論(Basics of qualitative
research : Grounded theory procedures and techniques)。臺北:巨流。
徐宗國 (2008)。紮根理論研究法:淵源、原則、技術與涵義。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性
研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁37-59)。臺北:巨流。
徐慧娟 (2003)。成功老化:老年健康的正向觀點。社區發展季刊,103,252-260。new window
徐慧娟 (2012)。成功老化之生命週期分析。人文與社會科學簡訊,13(4),22-28。
徐慧娟、張明正 (2004)。台灣老人成功老化與活躍老化現況:多層次分析。台灣社new window
會福利學刊,3(2),1-36。
張秀琪(譯) (1995)。栗田昌鈺著。動動手指健康法。臺北縣:世茂。
教育部 (2013)。重編國語辭典修訂本。2013年4月11日取自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/newDict/dict.sh?cond=%AFS%BD%E8&pieceLen=50&fld=1&cat=&ukey=-2028680427&serial=1&recNo=0&op=f&imgFont=1
陳玉燕 (2011)。桃園縣國小教師老化態度、活躍老化學習認知與活躍老化學習需求之研
究。國立中正大學教學專業發展數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
陳明蕾 (2004a)。心理老化與學習。載於黃富順(主編),高齡學習(頁159-175)。臺北:
五南。
陳明蕾 (2004b)。高齡者的學習需求。載於黃富順(主編),高齡學習(頁219-241)。臺北:
五南。
陳怡璇 (2011)。戰後嬰兒潮男性對於活躍老化學習重要性認知及參與之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
陳昺麟 (2001)。社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹。勤益學報,19,327-342。
莊雅婷、魏惠娟、黃錦山 (2008)。台灣地區高齡教育的現況分析。載於魏惠娟(主編),
高齡教育政策與實踐(頁121-178)。臺北:五南。
曾方鶴 (2011)。南投縣國小教師老化素養、活躍老化學習認知與學習需求之研究。國立
中正大學教學專業發展數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
曾宇凡 (2011)。嬰兒潮世代男性對活躍老化的學習需求與學習偏好之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
曾旭民、盧瑞芬、蔡益堅 (2002)。國人生活品質評量(II):SF-36台灣版的常模與效度檢測。台灣衛誌,22(6):512-518。new window
舒昌榮 (2008)。由積極老化觀點論我國因應高齡社會的主要策略~從「人口政策白皮書」
談起。社區發展季刊,122,212-235。
黃國彥 (1991)。台灣地區老人學習需求與內涵之研究。教育部委託研究。嘉義:國立嘉
義師範學院。
黃富順 (1995)。成功的老化。載於中華民國成人教育學會(編),成人教育辭典(頁118)。
臺北:中華民國成人教育學會。
黃富順 (2004a)。高齡學習活動的發展。載於黃富順(主編),高齡學習(頁23-55)。臺北:new window
五南。
黃富順 (2004b)。緒論。載於黃富順(主編),高齡學習(頁3-18)。臺北:五南。new window
黃富順 (2009a)。我國屆齡退休人員及高齡者參與學習意向調查研究。成人及終身教育new window
雙月刊,24,23-34。
黃富順 (2009b)。高等教育待開發的新領域--高齡學習者。成人及終身教育雙月刊,22,new window
23-34。
黃瑞琴 (2008)。質的教育研究方法。臺北:心理。
黃筱薇 (2011)。台灣老人退休前後社會參與變化之性別差異。國立成功大學老年學研究
所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
楊千霈 (2011)。樂齡大學課程規劃者對於活躍老化學習課題的認識與規劃之研究。國立中正大學高齡者教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
楊志和 (2010)。台灣高齡教育的先驅--高雄市長青學苑的起源與發展。高雄師大學報,new window
29,27-49。
楊志和 (2012)。「成功老化」詮釋觀點探討—2000-2011年英文期刊文獻分析。載於國立
中正大學高齡教育研究中心舉辦之「活躍樂齡系列論壇(三):學習活躍樂齡、創造在地成功研討會」論文集,嘉義縣。
楊依茹 (2011)。嬰兒潮世代對於活躍老化學習認知及參與情形之研究—以南投縣為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
楊國德 (2008)。高齡教育的對象。載於黃富順(主編),高齡教育學(頁146-159)。臺北:
五南。
楊聖意 (2006)。教牧對教會老人的牧養關顧。台南神學院道學碩士論文,未出版,台南
市。
葉宏明、吳重慶、顏裕庭 (2001)。成功的老化。臺灣醫界,44(5),10-11。
葉欣蓉 (2012)。嘉義縣國小教師老化態度、活躍老化學習認知與活躍老化學習需求之研究。國立中正大學教學專業發展數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
葉高華 (2012)。為什麼沒有一起變老。人籟論辯月刊,89,18-21。
廖汶娟 (2011)。鄉村高齡女性對於活躍老化的認識與學習之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
劉仲冬 (2008)。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向與出路。載於胡幼慧(主
編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁101-116)。臺北市:巨流。
劉美蓉 (2012)。雲嘉南地區榮民退休準備歷程及其對活躍老化學習需求之啟示。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
潘淑滿 (2009)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北:心理。
蔡榮貴 (2011a)。高齡者健康促進與活躍老化關係模式建構與驗證。2012年5月14日,取
自http://ir.chna.edu.tw/bitstream/310902800/25011/1/CN10013.pdf
蔡榮貴 (2011b)。我國高齡者活躍老化教育模式與策略。2012年5月14日,取
自http://ir.chna.edu.tw/bitstream/310902800/25010/1/CN10013-14.pdf
蔡瓊儀 (2007)。建立台灣地區成功老化地區層次評估指標。亞洲大學健康管理研究所
碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
蔣若葳 (2012)。台灣嬰兒潮世代高學歷女性活躍老化認知與學習需求之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
鄧世雄 (2006)。全國老人失智症篩檢計畫:認識他.找到他.關懷他.照顧
他。健保雙月刊,59,32-33。2013年4月9日,取自
http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=6&menu_id=168&web
data_id=1350
盧瑞芬、曾旭民、蔡益堅 (2002)。國人生活品質評量(I):SF-36台灣版的發展及心理計量特質分析。台灣衛誌,22(6):501-511。new window
蕭文高 (2010)。活躍老化與照顧服務:理論、政策與實務。社區發展季刊,132,42-58。new window
蕭如君 (2012)。不患老,患無對策--專訪社會人口學專家薛承泰。人籟論辯月刊,89,
12-17。
顏寧、黃詠光、吳欣隆(譯) (2009)。Charmaz, K.著。建構紮根理論(Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis)。臺北:五南。
魏惠娟 (2010-2013)。成功老化取向的中高齡教育方案模式之建構與應用:規範性需求的觀點。國科會計畫(I, II, III)(NSC 99-2410-H-194-034-SS3),成果報告。
魏惠娟 (2012)。學習「老化」,永不嫌早:加速發展活躍老化課程。載於國立中正大學
高齡教育研究中心舉辦之「活躍樂齡系列論壇(三):學習活躍樂齡、創造在地成功
研討會」論文集,嘉義縣。
魏惠娟 (2012)。台灣高齡教育的回顧:前樂齡時期的實踐。載於魏惠娟(主編),台灣
樂齡學習(頁13-46)。臺北:五南。
魏惠娟、胡夢鯨、陳冠良(2010)。台灣樂齡學習中心課程之分析:McClusky需求幅度理
論的應用。成人及終身教育學刊,15,115-150。
嚴祥鸞 (2008)。參與觀察法。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研
究實例(頁163-184)。臺北市:巨流。
二、英文部分
American Association of Retired Persons. (2000). AARP survey on lifelong learning. Washington, D.C.: Harris Interactive Inc.
Alfageme, A. (2007). The clients and functions of Spanish university programmes for older people: A sociological analysis. Ageing & Society, 27, 343-361.
Baker, J. L. (1959). The unsuccessful aged. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 7, 570-572.
Baltes, M. M. (1996). The many faces of dependency in old age. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge
University Press.
Baltes, M. M., & Carstensen, L. L. (1996). The process of successful ageing. Ageing and Society, 16, 397-422.
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611-626.
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52(4), 366-380.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1980). Plasticity and variability in psychological aging: Methodological and theoretical issues. In G. E. Gurski (Ed.), Determining the effects of aging on the central nervous system (pp.41-66). Berlin, Germany: Schering.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1998). Savoir vivre in old age. National Forum, 78(2), 13-18.
Baltes, P. B., & Lindenberger, U. (1988). On the range of cognitive plasticity in old age as a function of experience: 15 years of intervention research. Behavior Therapy, 19(3), 283-300.
Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (2003). New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Retrieved on April 13, 2013, from http://catalogue.iugm.qc.ca/GEIDEFile/13120.PDF?Archive=193686891186&File=13120_PDF
Bouwer, J. (2010). Successful ageing and spirituality. In J. Bouwer (Ed.), Successful ageing, spirituality and meaning (pp.1-12). Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.
Bowling, A., & Iliffe, S. (2006). Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing. Age and Ageing, 35, 607-614.
Bowling, D., & Dieppe, P. (2005). What is successful ageing and who should define it? British Medical Journal, 331(7531), 1548-1551.
Butler, R. N. (1974). Successful aging. Mental Health, 58(3), 7-12.
Caro, F. G., Bass, S. A., & Chen, Y. (1993). Introduction: Achieving a productive aging society. In F. G. Caro, S. A. Bass & Y. Chen (Eds), Achieving a productive aging society (pp. 3-25). Westport. CT: Auburn House.
Chandler, A. R. (1948). Cicero 's ideal old man. Journal of Gerontology, 3(4), 285-289.
Chui, E. (2012). Elderly learning in Chinese communities: China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore. In G. Boulton-Lewis, & M. Tam (Eds.), Active ageing, active learning: issues and challenges (pp. 141-154). New York: Springer.
Cross, K. P. (1981). Adults as learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Crowther, M. R., Parker, M. W., Achenbaum, W. A., Larimore, W. L., & Koenig, H. G. (2002). Rowe and Kahn’s model of successful aging revisited: Positive spirituality – The forgotten factor. The Gerontologist, 42(5), 613-620.
Davey. J. A. (2002). Active ageing and education in mid and later life. Ageing & society, 22, 95-113.
Duay, D. L., & Bryan, V. C. (2006). Senior adults' perceptions of successful aging. Educational Gerontology, 32(6), 423-445.
Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Escuder-Mollon, P. (2012). Modelling the impact of lifelong learning on senior citizens’ quality of life. Procedia -- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2339-2346.
Ferrario, C. G., Freeman, F. J., Nellett, G., & Scheel, J. (2008). Changing nursing students’ attitudes about aging: An argument for the successful aging paradigm. Educational Gerontology, 34(1), 51-66.
Fisher, B. J. (1992). Successful aging and life satisfaction: A pilot study for conceptual clarification. Journal of Aging Studies, 6(2), 191-202.
Fisher, B. J. (1995). Successful aging, life satisfaction, and generativity in later life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41(3), 239-250.
Fisher, B. J., & Specht, D. K. (1999). Successful aging and creativity in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 13(4), 457-472.
Frankel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: Correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and aging, 13(4), 531-543.
Gatto, S. L., & Tak, S. H. (2008). Computer, internet, and e-mail use among older adults: Benefits and barriers. Educational Gerontology, 34, 800-811.
Gibson, R. C. (1995). Promoting successful and productive aging in minority populations. In L. A. Bond, S. J. Cutler & A. Grams (Eds.), Promoting successful and productive aging (pp. 279-288). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Havighurst, R. J. (1961). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 1(2), 8-13.
Havighurst, R. J. (1963). Successful aging. In R. H. Williams, C. Tibbits, & W. Donohue (Eds.), Process of aging: Social and psychological perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 299-320). New York: Atherton Press.
Hooyman, N. R. (2005). Conceptualizing productive aging. In L. W. Kaye (Ed.), Perspectives on productive aging (pp. 37-57). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Houle, C. (1961). The inquiring mind. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hsu, H., Tsai, C., Chang, M., & Luh, D. (2010). Constructing area-level indicators of successful ageing in Taiwan. Health and Social Care in the Community, 18(1), 70–81.
Inui, T. S. (2003). The need for an integrated biopsychosocial approach to research on successful aging. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(5), 391-394.
Jamieson, A. (2007). Higher education study in later life: What is the point. Ageing & Society, 27, 364-384.
Jarvis, P. (2001). Learning in later life: An introduction for educators & careers. London, U.K.: Kogan Page.
Jarvis, P. (2010). The age of learning: Seniors learning. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 175-182). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier.
Kerschner, H. & Pegues, J. A. M. (1998). Productive aging - A quality of life agenda. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98(12), 1445-1448.
Kim, A., & Merriam, S. B. (2004). Motivations for learning among older adults in a learning in retirement institute. Educational Gerontologist, 30, 441-455.
Knipscheer, K. (2010). The early concept of successful ageing in gerontology. In J. Bouwer (Ed.), Successful ageing, spirituality and meaning (pp. 15-28). Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.
Kobylarek, A. (2010). Integration of elderly citizens through learning. The New Educational Reviews, 22(3-4), 309-314
Larson, R. (1978). Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 33(1), 109-125.
Lawton, G. (1946). Aging successfully. New York: Columbia University Press.
Leedham, C. A., & Hendricks, J. (2006). Foucault and successful aging as discourse:
Explorations in biopower and the practice of freedom. In J. Powell & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Foucault and aging (pp. 31-45). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Menec, V. H. (2003). The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: A 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B(2), S74-S82.
Minnesota Department of Health. (2006). Creating healthy communities for an aging population. Retrieved on May 14, 2012, from http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/orhpc/pubs/healthyaging/hareportnofs.pdf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Policies for healthy ageing: An overview. Retrieved on May 14, 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DELSA/HEA/WD/HWP(2009)1&docLanguage=En
Osorio, A. R. (2008). The learning of the elderly and the profile of the adult educator. Convergence, 41(2-3), 155-172.
Palmore, E. (1979). Predictors of successful aging. The Gerontologist, 19(5), 427-431.
Pappas, W., & Silver, R. (1958). Developmental differences between the successful and unsuccessful aged. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 6, 360-367.
Pfeiffer, E. (1975).A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic
brain deficit in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 23(10),
433-441.
Phelan, E. A., Anderson, L. A., LaCroix, A. Z., & Larson, E. B. (2004). “Older adults’ views of ‘successful aging’—How do they compare with researchers’ definitions?” Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 52(2), 211-216.
Phelan, E. A., & Larson, E. B. (2002). “Successful aging”—Where next? Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 50(7), 1306-1308.
Pressey, S. L. (1949). Differentia of success in old age. American Psychologist, 4(7), 309.
Pressey, S. L., & Simcoe, E. (1950). Case study comparisons of successful and problem old people. Journal of Gerontology, 5(2), 168-175.
Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2003). The learning needs of older adults. Educational Gerontology, 29, 129-149.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: Usual and successful. Science, 237, 43-149.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433-340.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Dell Publishing.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (2000). Successful aging and disease prevention. Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy, 7(1), 70-77.
Rozanova, J., & Northcott, H. (2006). Seniors and portrayals of intra-generational and inter-generational inequality in the globe and mail. Canadian Journal on Aging, 25(4), 373-386.
Ryff, C. D. (1982). Successful aging: A developmental approach. The Gerontologist, 22(2), 209-214.
Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful ageing. The International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12(1), 35-55.
Ryff, C. D. (1989b). In the eye of the beholder: Views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 195-210.
Simcoe, E., & Pressey, S. L. (1948). Character sketch comparisons of “successful” and “problem” old people. Journal of Gerontology, 3(4), 9.
Sloane-Seale, A., & Kops, B. (2004). Creative retirement: Survey of older adults’ educational interests and motivations. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 30(2), 73-89.
Sloane-Seale, A., & Kops, B. (2007). Older adult learners: A comparison of active and non-active learners. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 33(1), 17-34.
Sloane-Seale, A., & Kops, B. (2008). Older adults in lifelong learning: Participation and successful aging. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 34(1), 37-62.
Sloane-Seale, A., & Kops, B. (2010). Older adults’ participation in education and successful aging: Implications for university continuing education in Canada. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 36(1), 1-29.
Smith, J. A., Braunack-Mayer, A., Wittert, G., & Warin, M. (2007). “I've been independent for so damn long!”: Independence, masculinity and aging in a help seeking context. Journal of Aging Studies, 21(4), 325-335
Steverink, N., Lindenberg, S., & Ormel, J. (1998). Towards understanding successful ageing: Patterned change in resources and goals. Ageing and Society, 18, 441-467.
Strawbridge, W. J., Wallhagen, M. I., & Cohen, R. D. (2002). Successful aging and well-being: Self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn. The Gerontologist, 42(6), 727-733.
Swindell, R. (2012). Successful ageing and international approaches to later-life learning. In G. Boulton-Lewis, & M. Tam (Eds.), Active ageing, active learning: Issues and challenges (pp. 35-63). New York: Springer.
The Swedish National Institute of Public Health. (2007). Healthy ageing – A challenge for Europe. Retrieved on May 14, 2012, from http://www.nigz.nl/upload/misc/HealthyAgeingFull.pdf
Torres, S. (2002). Relational values and ideas regarding “successful aging”. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33(3), 417-430.
Turock, B. J. (1982). Serving the older adult: A guide to library programs and information sources. New York: Bowker.
United Nations. (2002). World Population Ageing:1950-2050. Retrieved on February 12, 2012, rom http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/worldageing19502050/
Walker, A. (2002). A strategy for active ageing. International Social Security Review, 55, 121-139.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36® Health Survey: Manual & Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, R.I.: QualityMetric Inc.
Williamson, A. (2000). Gender issues in older adults’ participation in learning: Viewpoints and experiences of learners in the University of the Third Age (U3A). Educational Gerontology, 26, 46-96.
Wilson, R. S., Krueger, K. R., Arnold, S. E., Schneider, J. A., Kelly, J. F., Barnes, L. L. et al. (2007). Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(2), 234-240.
Withnall, A. (2006). Exploring influences on later life learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(1), 29-49.
Withnall, A. (2010). Improving learning in later life. Oxon, Canada: Routledge.
World Health Organization. (2002). Active aging: A policy framework. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Retrieved on March 1, 2012, from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE