:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會資本與夥伴關係關聯性之研究:以社會福利服務領域為例
作者:莊俐昕
作者(外文):Chuang, Li-hsin
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:社會政策與社會工作學系
指導教授:詹宜璋
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:社會資本夥伴關係網絡治理社會福利服務Social CapitalPartnershipNetwork GovernanceSocial Welfare Service
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:146
夥伴關係是地方治理的重要模式,且被視為實務運作上的萬靈丹。然而,當夥伴關係被認為是件好事時,卻往往被視為是一種「信念」甚於「事實」。社會資本不僅是一種強化組織認同或團體凝聚力的「膠」,同時亦是組織與外界建立關係與互動的「潤滑劑」,更是有助於獲取外部資源的「媒介」。夥伴關係作為社會福利服務實務的重要策略,其運作需要有形資源的投入,亦需要無形的社會資本作為組織間互動的基礎與後盾,兩者之間的關係值得予以重視。本研究期待以網絡治理觀點為基礎,探討社會資本與夥伴關係的關聯性,主要研究目的包括:(1)瞭解社會福利組織中有關組織及個人社會資本的情形;(2)探究社會福利組織間夥伴關係運作之現況;(3)分析社會福利組織之社會資本與夥伴關係的關聯性,並建立兩者之間的關係模式;(4)依據研究結果檢視社會資本與夥伴關係的運作對網絡治理的意涵,進而提出促進社會資本與夥伴關係之相關策略。
本研究採取量化研究,在檢閱有關治理、社會資本與夥伴關係相關文獻後,研究者自行設計結構式問卷,以台灣中部地區之社會福利組織為研究對象,採面訪方式進行普查,共計回收有效問卷323份。本研究主要發現與討論如下:
1.社會資本兼具私有財與公共財的特性,不僅讓構成社會資本之各要素間可以彼此強化,個人及組織的社會資本亦具有互補及互惠作用,顯見社會資本的累積並非零合遊戲,而是兼具加乘作用與正向循環的雙重效果。
2.多數受訪者高度同意夥伴關係的理念,也期待夥伴關係的運作能夠為組織及相關服務帶來良好的效果,然而,在實務運作中卻往往出現「知易行難」的落差。
3.社會資本與夥伴關係兩者之間存在著高度的關聯性,且兩者之間存在著良性循環作用,其中以「網絡」對夥伴關係結果面的影響性最為顯著;組織若能以社會資本為基礎,善用其影響力,將有助於組織夥伴關係的建構與維繫。
在對研究結果進行討論與分析後,本研究建立在網絡治理及社會資本的基礎上,從政策、實務與學術等三個面向分別提出相關建議,以供後續建立夥伴關係之相關政策、實務及學術研究上的參考。
Partnership is one of important models of local governance, and has been seen as a ‘panacea’ of practical operation. However, when partnership has been seen as a good thing, it has also often been thought as a ‘faith’ rather than ‘fact’. Social capital is not only beneficial to consolidate organizational identification and group cohesion, but also to play as a ‘glue’ or ‘grease’ of creating and maintaining relationship and interaction within and between organizations, and to act as a ‘catalyst’ of fighting for resources outward. As an important strategy of social welfare service practice, the operation of partnership needs input of tangible resources, and support of intangible social capital as a basis. The relationship between social capital and partnership is worthy of paying attention. Accordingly, based on the perspective of ‘network governance’, this research is intended to discover the correlation of social capital and partnership, and further aims to achieving the following goals:
1.To understand the general pictures of organizational and individual social capital of social welfare service organizations.
2.To analyze the status quo of inter-organizational partnership in social welfare service field.
3.To analyze the correlation of social capital and partnership in social welfare service filed, and to create the relational model of both facts.
4.To reflect the operational model of social capital and partnership, and its implications for network governance, and further to provide suggestions of related strategies enhancing social capital and partnership.
To achieve the mentioned goals, quantitative method is adopted in this research. After reviewing literatures related to governance, social capital and partnership, a set of structured questionnaire was designed by researcher, and representatives of social welfare organizations registered in central Taiwan were surveyed and interviewed. A total of 323 questionnaires were completed and analyzed. The main findings are shown and discussed as followed.
1.The characteristics of social capital containing private and public goods is not only enhancing various elements of social capital, but also possessing the traits of complementary and reciprocal. Obviously, the accumulation of social capital is not a zero-sum game, but with a double effect of added-multiplication and positive circulation.
2.Most of the interviewers agreed with the idea of partnership, and expected to bringing better results for organizations and their services. However, there are significant gaps between idea and reality in practical operation.
3.There are highly and positively significant correlation between social capital and partnership, in particular the influence of ‘network’ variable on the partnership. Accordingly, based on the social capital, if organizations could take advantage of the asset, their partnership with others could be constructed and developed better.
Based on the previous findings and discussion, and the perspectives of network governance and social capital, this research is concluded by providing suggestions for further creating and developing partnership from policy, practice and academic aspects.
【中文部分】
山岡義典(編)(2005)。《NPO 基礎講座》。東京:ぎょうせい。
方世榮、江淑娟、方世杰(2002)。〈夥伴關係整合模型的實證研究:以中小企業為對象〉,《管理學報》,第19期第4卷,頁615-645。new window
王千文(2004)。《公私協力執行的經驗性研究:以臺北市社區規劃師制度為例》。臺北市:世新大學行政管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
王中天(2003)。〈社會資本:概念、源起及現況〉,《問題與研究》,第42期第5卷,頁139-163。new window
王玫婷(2006)。《組織成員間協議式夥伴關係與領導行為之研究》。臺中市:逢甲大學公共政策研究所碩士論文,未出版。
王春勝(2008)。《居民社區參與行為之影響模式研究》。高雄市:國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所博士論文,未出版。new window
史美強、蔡武軒(2000)。〈網絡社會與治理概念初討〉,《中國行政評論》,第10期第1卷,頁33-74。new window
朱柔若(1996)。《社會科學研究方法與資料分析》。臺北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
朱景鵬(2009)。〈建立中央與地方夥伴關係:提升政府治理量能〉,《研考雙月刊》,第33期第6卷,頁7-9。
朱景鵬、吳松林(2010)。〈我國區域治理發展脈絡與展望〉,《研考雙月刊》,第34期第6卷,頁12-22。
朱森村(1999)。《公私部門協力關係之研究:臺北市推動社區大學個案分析》。臺北市:國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
朱鎮明(2005)。〈政策網絡中協力關係的成效:理論性的探討〉,《公共行政學報》,第17期,頁113-158。new window
江宗仁(2003)。《地方政府、非營利組織與身心障礙者在參與社會福利業務互動關係之探討:以高雄縣庇護工場之「一家工場」為例》。高雄市:國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
江岷欽、孫本初、劉坤億(2004)。〈地方政府間建立策略性夥伴關係之研究:以臺北市及其鄰近縣市為例〉,《行政暨政策學報》,第38期,頁1-30。new window
江明修(2001)。《青輔會與第三部門夥伴關係之研究》。行政院青年輔導委員會專題研究報告(報告編號:NYC-4-01),未出版。
余伯泉、李茂興譯,E. W. Aronson and R. M. Aker原著(2003)。《社會心理學》。 臺北市:弘智文化事業有限公司。
吳英明(1996)。《公私部門協力關係之研究:公私部門聯合開發與都市發展》。高雄:麗文文化事業有限公司。
吳濟華(2001)。〈公私協力策略推動都市建設之法制化研究〉,《公共事務評論》,第2期第1卷,頁1-29。new window
呂育誠(2005)。〈地方治理意涵及制度建立策略之研究:兼論我國縣市推動地方治理的問題與前景〉,《公共行政學報》,第12期,頁1-38。new window
宋麗玉(2001)。〈精神病患社會功能量表之發展與驗證:以實務應用為取向〉,《中華心理衛生學刊》,第14期第3卷,頁33-65。new window
李月霞(2004)。《中介組織與會員組織間關係之研究》。南投縣:國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文,未出版。
李佳霖(2009)。《非營利組織與企業夥伴關係之研究:以弘道老人福利基金會為例》。嘉義縣:南華大學公共行政與政策研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李宗勳(2000)。〈社區聯防夥伴關係之治理體制初探〉,《中國行政評論》,第9期第4卷,頁35-80。new window
李宗勳(2004)。〈公私協力與委外化的效應與價值:向進行中的治理改造工程〉,《政大公共行政學報》,第12期,頁41-78。new window
李宗勳(2005)。〈協力夥伴跨域治理的挑戰與機會:以社區風險治理為例〉,《警政論叢》,第5期,頁1-41。new window
李宗勳、鄭錫鍇(2001)。〈知識經濟時代的新治理模式一:歐陸新治理(modem governance)的觀點〉,發表於「知識經濟與政府施政」學術研討會。臺北市:財團法人國家政策研究基金會。
李長宴(2009)。〈從協力治理模式探討淡水河流域的管理〉,《中國地方自治》,第26期第10卷,頁3-19。
李長晏(2005)。〈組建地方策略性夥伴關係之合作機制〉,《中國地方自治》,第58期第4卷,頁4-32。
李建村(2001)。《公私部門協力關係之研究:以臺北市文湖國小社區、學區安全聯防為例》。臺北市:國立中央警察大學行政管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李貞宜(2002)。《從社會資本觀點探討非營利組織資源連結過程之研究:以「財團法人伊甸社會福利基金會附設中區服務中心」為例》。臺中市:東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文,未出版。
李雅慧(2011)。《高美濕地經營管理之探討:協力夥伴關係的觀點》。臺北市:國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
阮奕婷(2008)。《知識網絡屬性對團隊績效之影響:以社會資本異質性與人力資本同質性為干擾效果》。臺北市:國防管理學院後勤管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
周海娟(2005)。〈老人福利政策與社會資本建構〉,《社區發展季刊》,第110期,頁205-215。new window
房樹梅(2004)。《醫院策略聯盟與社會資本關係之研究》。南投縣:國立暨南國際大學國際企業學系碩士論文,未出版。
松下啓一(2002)。《新しい公共と自治体》。東京:信山社。
林天祐(1996)。〈認識研究倫理〉,《教育資料與研究》,第12期,頁57-63。new window
林玉華(2004)。〈公私夥伴關係的治理:理論的初探兼論英國的第三條道路〉,《公共服務改革與民營化的現代課題》,第5期,頁199-221。
林廷南(2006)。《組織社會資本對組織績效及R&D之影響》。臺北市:銘傳大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林信廷、莊俐昕、劉素珍、黃源協(2012)。〈社會資本與社區參與關聯性之研究〉,《台灣社會福利學刊》,第10期第3卷,頁161-210。new window
林南(2001)。〈社會資本:爭鳴的範式和實證的檢驗〉,《香港社會學學報》,第2期,頁1-38。
林南(2004)。〈教育制度與社會資本〉,《教育研究集刊》,第50期第4卷,頁1-16。new window
林南、傅仰止、陳志柔、朱敬一、熊瑞梅、黃毅志(2003)。《社會資本的建構與效應》。中央研究院主題計畫。
林美華(2003)。《政府與非營利組織夥伴關係之研究:以中部三縣市生活重建服務中心為例》。南投縣:國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林祐聖、葉欣怡譯,N. Lin原著(2005)。《社會資本》。臺北縣:旭昇圖書有限公司。
林淑馨(2005)。〈非營利組織與政府夥伴關係之析探:以日本為例〉,《公共事務評論》,第6期第1卷,頁25-50。new window
林淑馨(2009)。〈日本公私協力推動經驗之研究:北海道與志木市的個案分析〉,《公共行政學報》,第32期,頁33-67。new window
林惠華(2003)。《公私協力機制運用於都市更新政策之研究:士林夜市之個案模擬》。臺北市:國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版。
林靜玟(1998)。《公私部門協力關係在地方公共管理的運用:以高雄市「市政區政化、區政社區化、社區協力化」為例》。高雄市:國立中山大學政治研究所碩士論文,未出版。
邱皓政(2004)。《量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析》。臺北:五南文化事業股份有限公司。
姚瀛志(2011)。《社區組織理論與實務技巧》。臺北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
胡俊雄(2001)。《地方政府社會福利機構公設民營協力互動關係之研究:以高雄縣政府為例》。高雄市:國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
胡訓立(2008)。《從社會網絡理論探討社會資本對創新績效之影響:跨層次觀點下價值觀共識度的中介干擾效果》。臺北市:國防管理學院後勤管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。new window
韋淑娟(1997)。《公私部門委託關係之研究:以台北市公設民營兒童福利機構為例》。臺北市:中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版。
徐偉恆(2011)。《以社會資本論公益勸募的施行:以辦理莫拉克風災勸募活動之非營利組織為例》。新竹市:國立清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
高俊一譯,L. Kolakowski原著(1988)。《理性的異化:實證主義思想史》。臺 北:聯經出版社。
張德永(2010)。〈高齡志工志願服務與社區參與之社會資本意涵〉,載於中華民國社區教育學會(主編),《高齡志工與社區學習》,頁19-36。臺北市:師大書苑。
張瓊玲(2009)。〈探討非營利組織與政府互動的課責機制:以托育服務為例〉,《競爭力評論》,第13期,頁27-74。
許道然(2001)。〈組織信任之研究:一個整合性觀點〉,《空大行政學報》,第11期,頁253-296。new window
郭生玉(1993)。《心理與教育研究法》。 臺北:精華出版社。
郭靜晃、曾華源(2000)。〈建構社會福利資源網絡策略之探討:以兒少福利輸送服務為例〉,《社區發展季刊》,第89期,頁107-118。new window
陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。臺北:五南文化事業股份有限公司。new window
陳佩君(1999)。《公私部門協力理論與應用之研究》。臺北市:國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳孟君譯,S. Lieberson原著(1996)。《量化的反思:重探社會研究的邏輯》。臺北市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。
陳恆鈞、張國偉(2006)。〈組織協力與組織績效之研究:以雲林縣蔬菜產銷班為例〉,《公共行政學報》,第19期,頁1-54。new window
陳浩(2011)。〈工作要求與創新工作行為關係的研究〉,《技術經濟與管理研究》,第1 期,頁41-45。
陳敦源,(1999)。〈透明之下的課責:台灣民主治理中官民信任關係的重建基礎〉,《文官制度季刊》,第1期第2卷,頁21-55。new window
陳敦源、張世杰(2010)。〈公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭〉,《文官制度季刊》,第2期第3卷,頁17-71。new window
陳景霖(2008)。《公私協力夥伴關係之治理模式:以花蓮縣豐田社區總體營造為例》。花蓮縣:國立東華大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版。
陳雅芬(2008)。《社會資本與社會網絡的交互關係:以全球華人乳癌病友公益網絡為例》。臺中市:逢甲大學合作經濟學所碩士論文,未出版。
隋廣軍、蓋翊中(2002)。〈城市社區社會資本及其測量〉,《學術研究》,第7期,頁21-24。
黃光國(2003)。《社會科學的理路(二版)》。臺北市:心理出版社。
黃美容(2008)。《客家社區非營利組織治理原則之研究:以新竹縣某協會為例》。臺北市:國立中央大學客家學院客家研究碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版。
黃源協(2005)。〈民主觀點社會服務品質的內涵與管理措施之探討〉,《臺大社會工作學刊》,第11期,頁45-88。new window
黃源協、吳來信、張英陣、王雲東(2007)。《社會工作研究方法》。臺北市:國立空中大學出版中心。
黃源協、莊俐昕、劉素珍、林信廷(2012)。〈社區特性與社區社會資本之研究〉,《臺大社會工作學刊》,第25期,頁209-254。new window
黃源協、劉素珍、莊俐昕、林信廷(2010)。〈社區社會資本與社區發展關聯性之研究〉,《公共行政學報》,第34期,頁29-75。new window
黃源協、劉素珍、蕭文高(2011)。〈英國社區新政對台灣社區工作的啟示與借鏡:社區治理觀點的分析〉,《臺大社會工作學刊》,第23期,頁1-45。new window
黃源協、蕭文高、劉素珍(2007)。〈社區意識及其影響因素之探索性研究〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,第11期第2卷,頁1-33。new window
楊信洲(2006)。《公私協力應用於閒置空間再利用之研究:以花蓮縣七星柴魚博物館為例》。花蓮縣:國立東華大學環境政策研究所碩士論文,未出版。
詹志禹、吳璧純(1992)。〈邏輯實證論的迷思〉,《思與言》,第30期第1卷,頁101-121。new window
廖俊松(2006)。〈公私協力:重建區社區總體營造計畫之案例觀察〉,《社區發展》,第115期,頁324-334。new window
趙善如(2009)。〈兒童少年福利服務資源網絡連結現況與影響因素之探討:以屏東縣為例〉,《台灣社會工作學刊》,第7期,頁86-128。new window
劉玲腕(2004)。《政府資訊業務委外的夥伴關係與成效之關聯》。臺北市:世新大學行政管理學系碩士論文,未出版。
劉淑瓊(2007)。〈教恐龍跳芭蕾?論兒童保護服務之網絡協同合作〉,《兒童及少年福利期刊》,第11期,頁49-76。new window
劉銀丹(2011)。《以公私協力推動客家文化發展之研究:平鎮客家書院之經驗》。臺北市:國立中央大學客家學院客家研究碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版。
劉麗雯、邱瑜瑾、陸宛蘋(2003)。〈九二一震災的救災組織動員與資源連結〉,《中國行政評論》,第12期第2卷,頁139-178。new window
潘明宏譯,D. Nachmias and C. Frankfort-Nachmias原著(1999)。《社會科學研究方法》上、下冊。臺北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
鄭勝分(2006)。〈營利組織與企業夥伴關係類型及其風險之探討:以社福類基金會為例〉,《第三部門學刊》,第6期,頁1-33。
鄭讚源(1998)。〈既競爭又合作、既依賴又自主:社會福利民營化過程中政府與民間非營利組織之角色與定位〉,《社區發展季刊》,第80期,頁79-87。new window
蕭明輝、吳長勝、蔡恩子(2011)。〈衛生福利夥伴關係的建立:談醫院與老人福利機構的協調與合作〉,《社區發展季刊》,第136期,頁115-121。new window
賴世培、丁庭宇、莫季雍(2000)。《民意調查》。臺北市:國立空中大學出版中心。
謝儒賢(2005)。福利混合供給模式部門互動關係之研究:以老人安養機構為例。南投縣:國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系博士論文,未出版。new window
簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。《社會工作研究法》。臺北市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。new window
簡春安、趙善如(2008)。《社會工作哲學與理論》。臺北市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。
嚴秀雯(2002)。《政府與非營利組織夥伴關係之研究:以臺北市獨居老人照顧為例》。臺北市:國立臺北大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版。
蘇先啟(2004)。《社會福利機構公設民營協力關係之研究:以基隆市政府為例》。臺北市:國立政治大學行政管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
蘇洺賢(1999)。《我國非營利組織之跨組織合作關係類型及管理機制探討》。臺中市:靜宜大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版。

【英文部分】
Adler, P. S. and S. Kwon (2002). ‘Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept’, Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.
Agranoff, R.(2012). Collaborating to Manage: A Primer for the Public Sector. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University press.
Andrews, R. (2012). ‘Social Capital and Public Service Performance: A Review of the Evidence’, Public Policy and Administration, 27: 49-67.
Andrews, R. and G. A. Brewer (2010). ‘Social Capital and Fire Service Performance: Evidence from the U.S. States’, Social Science Quarterly, 91: 576–591.
Appuhami, R., S. Perera and H. Perera (2011). ‘Management Controls in Public-Private Partnerships: An Analytical Framework’, Australian Accounting, 56(21): 64-79.
Atkinson, R. (2003). ‘Addressing Urban Social Exclusion through Community Involvement in Urban Regeneration’, in M. Raco and R. Imrie (eds.), Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy, pp. 101-119. Bristol: Policy Press.
Audit Commission (1998). A Fruitful Partnership: Effective Partnership Working. London: Audit Commission.
Bache, I. and M. Flinders (eds.) (2005). Multi-level Governance: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Backer, T. E. (2003). ‘Evaluating Community Collaborations: An Overview’, in T. E. Backer (eds.), Evaluating Community Collaborations. NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Bagchus, R. (1998). ‘The Trade-off between Appropriateness and Fit of Policy Instruments’, in B. G. Peters and F. K. M. van Nispen (eds.), Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration, pp. 46-68. Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar.
Bain, K. and N. Hicks (1998). ‘Building Social Capital and Reaching Out to Excluded Groups: The Challenge of Partnerships’, paper presented at CELAM meeting on The Struggle Against Poverty Towards the Turn of the Millennium. Washington D.C.
Balloch, S. and M. Taylor (2001). Partnership Working Policy and Practice (eds.). Bristol: Policy Press.
Banks, P. (2002). Partnerships Under Pressure. London: King’s Fund.
Barrett, G., D. Sellman and J. Thomas (2005). Interprofessional Working and Social Care: Professional Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Berger, R. (1985). ‘Private Sector Initiatives in Reagan Era: New Actors Rework an Old Theme?’, in L. Salamon and M. Lund (eds), The Regan Presidency and the Governing of Americ, pp.181-211. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
Beveridge, W. (1948). Voluntary Action: A Report on Methods of Social Advance. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Blue-Banning, M., J. A. Summers, L. L. Nelson, C. Frankland and G. P. Beegle (2004) . ‘Dimensions of Family nd Professional Partnerships: Constructive Guidelines for Collaboration’, Exceptional Children, 70(2): 167-184.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). ‘The Forms of Capital’, in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241-260. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). ‘The Forms of Capital’, in A. H. Halsey, H. Launder, P. Brown and A. S. Wells (eds.), Education, Culture, Economy and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brinkerhoff, D. W. and J. M. Brinkerhoff (2011). ‘Public–private Partnerships-Perspectives on Purposes, Publicans, and Good Governance’, Public Administration and Development, 31(1): 2-14.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). ‘Assessing and Improving Partnership Relationships and Outcomes: A Proposed Framework’, Evaluation and Program Planning, 25: 215-231.
Burt, R. S. (1997). ‘The Contingent Value of Social Capital’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2): 355-373.
Butterfoss, F. and M. Kegler (2002). ‘Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Community Coalitions: Moving from Practice and Research’, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA:157-193.
Cairns, B. and M. E. Harris (2011). ‘Local Cross-Sector Partnerships: Tackling the Challenges Collaboratively’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21(3): 231-334.
Childs, S. and S. Dobbins (2003). ‘The Research: Practice Spiral’, Vine, 33(2): 51–64.
Cigler, B. A. (1999). ‘Pre-conditions for Emergence of Multicommunity Collaboration Organizations’, Policy Studies Review, 16(1): 86-102.
Clark, C. (2002). The Step by Step Guide to Successful Partnership Working for Voluntary and Community Organisations. Guildford: RAISE (Regional Action and Involvement South East), Available from: http://www.raise-networks.org/inform/ docDisplayy.cfm?iDocID=165.
Clarke, J. and J. Newman (1997). The Managerial State. London: Sage.
Colebatch, H. K. (2002). ‘Government and Governmentality: Using Multiple Approaches to the Analysis of Government’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 37(3): 417-435.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). ‘The Creation and Destruction of Social Capital: Implications for Law’, Notre Dame J. Law, Ethics, Public Policy, 3: 375-404.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1998). ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’, American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
Commission on Global Governance (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood. Oxford: oxford University Press.
Comte, A. (1856). A General View of Positivism. Available from: http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/comte/1856/general-view.htm
Considine, M., and J. M. Lewis (2003). ‘Bureaucracy, Network, or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand’, Public Administration Review, 63 (2): 131-140.
Côté, S. (2001). ‘The Contribution of Human and Social Capital’, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1): 29-36.
Cox, E. (2000). ‘Creating a More Civil Society: Community Level Indicators of Social Capital’, Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy, (19/20): 100-107.
Crawford, A. and E. Peck (2002). ‘Musings, Mechanisms and Models: Exploring Partnerships in Health and Social Care’, Mental Health Review, 7: 6-14.
Crawford, K. (2012). Interprofessional Collaboration in Social Work Practice. London: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Denhardt, R. B. and J. Denhardt (2000). ‘The New Public Service-serving Rather than Steering’, Public Administration Review, 60(6): 549-559.
DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (2000). New Deal For Communities: Developing Delivery Plans. London: DETR.
Dickinson, H. (2006). POET: Partnership Outcomes Evaluation Toolkit. Health Services Management Centre of University of Birmingham.
Dickinson, H. and J. Glasby (2010). ‘Why Partnership Working Doesn't Work: Pitfalls, Problems and Possibilities in English Health and Social Care’, Public Management Review, 12(6): 811-828.
DoH (Department of Health) (1998). Modernising Social Service: Promoting Independence, Improving Protection, Raising Standards. Cmnd. 4169 . London: Her Majestry’s Stationery Office.
Dowling, B., M. Powell and C. Glendinning (2004). ‘Conceptualising Successful Partnerships’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 12(4): 309-317.
Evans, P. (1996). ‘Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy’, World Development, 24(6): 1119-1132.
Farr, J. (2003). ‘Social Capital: A Conceptual History’, Political Theory, 31(X): 1-28.
Feiock, R., M. J. Moon and H. J. Park (2008). ‘Is World Flat or Spiky? Rethinking the Governance Implications of Globalization for Economic Development’, Public Administration Review, 28(1): 23-35.
Finkelstein, L. S. (1995). ’What is Global Governance’, Global Governance, 1(3): 367-372.
Flores, J., S. Montgomery and S. Lee (2006). ’Organization and Staffing Barriers to Parent Involvement in Teen Pregnancy’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(3): s108-114.
Forsyth, T. (2010). ‘Panacea or Paradox?: Cross-sector Partnerships, Climate Change, and Development’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1 (5): 683-696.
Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and D. Nachmias (1996). Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: Melbourne.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1998). ‘Immigrants and Family Values’, Commentary, 95(5): 26–32
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gilchrist, A. (2004). The Well-connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development. Bristol: Polity Press.
Gilchrist, A. (2009). The Well-Connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development (2ed.). Bristol: Policy Press.
Gittell, R. and A. Vidal (1998). Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. California: Sage.
Glasby, J. and H. Dickinson(2008). Partnership Working in Health and Social Care. Btistol: Policy Press.
Glendinning, C. (2002). ‘Partnerships between Health and Social Services: Developing A Framework for Evaluation’, Policy and Politics, 30: 115–27.
Goetz, K. H. (2008). ‘Governance as A Path to Government’, West European Politics, 31(1-2): 258-279.
Granner, M. L. and P. A. Sharpe (2004). ‘Evaluating Community Coalition Characteristics and Functioning: A Summary of Measurement Tools’, Health Education Research Theory and Practice, 19(5): 514–532.
Granovetter, M. (1983). ‘The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited’, Sociological Theory, 1: 201-233
Granvoetter, M. (1973). ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Josey Bass.
Gray, B. H. (1998). ‘Sources Used in Health Policy Research and Implications for Information Retrieval Systems’, Journal of Urban Health, 75(4): 842-852.
Green, G. P. and A. Haines (2008). Asset Building and Community Development. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Grootaert, C. (1998), ‘Child Labor in Cote d’Ivoire’, in C. Grootaert and H. A. Patrinos (eds.), The Policy Analysis of Child Labor: A Comparative Study. London: St Martin’s Press, forthcoming.
Guba, E. C. (1990). The Paradigm Dialog. CA: Sage.
Hafford-Letchfield, T. (2009). ‘Management and Leadership: from Strategy to Service Delivery’, in J. Mckimm and K. Phillips (eds.), Leadership and Management in Integrated Services, pp. 35-56. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd.
Halpern, D. (2005). Social Capital. Cambridge: Polity.
Hardy, B., B. Hudson and E. Waddington (2000). What Makes a Good Partnership?: A Partnership Assessment Tool. Leeds: Nufeld Institute for Health.
Harrell, A., D. Stolle and E. Quintelier (2007). ‘Network Diversity and Political Participation : A omplication or an Asset ?’, paper presented at ECPR. General Conference. Pisa, 5-9 August 2007.
Hassard, J. (1993). Sociology and Organization Theory: Positivism, Paradigms, and Postmodernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hastings, A. (2003). ‘Strategic, Multilevel Neighbourhood Regeneration: An Outward-looking Approach At Last?’, in M. Raco and R. Imrie (eds.), Urban Renaissance? New Labour. Community and Urban Policy, pp. 85-100. Bristol: Policy Press.
Health Service Funding (2001). Health and Social Care Act 2001. Available from: http://www.christie.com/en/documents/22
Herreros, F. (2004). The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust?. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hick, S. (1998). Important Themes in the Rise of Social Work. Available from: http://www.socialpolicy.ca/cush/index.htm
Hirst, P. (2000), ‘Democracy and Governance’, in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hood, C. (1986). The Tools of Government. Chatham: Chatham House.
Hudson, B. (2002). ‘Interprofessionality in Health and Social Care: the Achilles’ Heel of Partnership?’, Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16: 7-17.
Hudson, W. W. (1982). ‘Scientific Imperatives in Social Work Research and Practice’, Social Science Review, 56: 246-258.
Huxham, C. (1996). Creating Collaborative Advantage (eds.). London: Sage.
Jelphs, K. and H. Dickinson (2008). Working in Teams. Bristol: Policy Press.
Jessop, B. (1998). ‘The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: the Case of Economic Development’, International Social Science Journal, 155: 29-45.
Jochum, V. (2003). Social Capital: Beyond the Theory. NCVO Research Team.
Johnson, N. (1989). ‘The Privatization of Welfare’, Social Policy and Administration, 23: 17-30.
Johnston, G. and J. Percy-Smith (2003). ‘In Search of Social Capital’, Policy and Politics, 31(3): 321-34.
Jurik, N. C., G. Cavender and J. Cowgill (2006). ‘Searching for Social Capital in U.S. Microenterprise Development Programs’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 33(3): 151-170
Kay, A. (2006). ‘Social Capital, the Social Economy and Community Development’, Community Development Journal, 41(2): 160-173.
Kay, A., J. Pearce and M. Evans (2004). The Contribution of Social Capital in the Social Economy to Local Economic Development in Western Europe (Research Project 2000-2003). Middlesex: Institute of Social Science Research, School of Social Science, Middlesex University.
Kearns, A. (2003). ‘Social Capital, Regeneration and Urban Policy’, in M. Raco and R. Imrie (eds.), Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy, pp. 37-60. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ken, C. (1994). ‘Gaining Competitive Advantage through Partnering’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53(2): 6-13.
Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-society Interactions. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.
Laforest, R. (2011). Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication. Vancouver/ Toronto: UBC press.
Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Loorbach, D. (2010). ‘Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework. Governance: An International Journal of Policy’, Administration, and Institutions, 23(1): 161-183.
Markwell, S., J. Watson, V. Speller, S. Platt and T. Younger (2003). The Working Partnership. London: Health Development.
Mattessich, P. W. (2009). ‘Social Capital and Community Building’, in R. Phillips and R. H. Pittman (eds.), An Introduction to Community Development , pp.49-57. London: Routledge.
Mattessich, P. W., M. Murray-Close and B. R. Monsey (2001). Collaboration: What Makes It Work. Available from: http://www.wilder.org/index.html (Amherst H. Wilder Foundation) and http:// www.wilder.org/pubs/collab_bibliography/ collaboration_bibliography.htm (collaboration resource list).
McGregor-Lowndes, M. and M. D. Turnour (2003). ‘Recent Developments in Government Community Service Relations: Are You Really My Partner?’, Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 9(1): 31-42.
McLaughlin, K. (2004). ‘Stressing Vulnerability: Stress Discourse in the Public Sector’, Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, 4(4): 223-231.
McQuaid, R. W. (2000). ‘The Theory of Partnership: Why Have Partnership?’, in S. P. Osborne (eds.), Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective. London: Routledge 13.
Middleton, A., A. Murie and R. Groves (2005). ‘Social Capital and Neighbourhoods that Work’, Urban Studies, 42(10): 1711-1738.
Mignone, J. (2009). ‘Social Capital and Aboriginal Communities: A Critical Assessment’, The Journal of Aboriginal Health, 5 (3): 100-147.
Monette, D. R., T. J. Sullivan and C. R. DeJong (2005). Applied Social Research: Tool for Human Services (6th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Learning.
Murphy, M. (2011). ‘Does Interagency Training Matter?’, paper presented at Promoting Inter-Agency Training (PIAT), 5-6 Dec 2011: Leicester.
Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal (1998). ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266.
Narayan, D. (1999). Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Newman, J. (2001). Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage.
Newman, L. and A. Dale (2005). ‘The Role of Agency in Sustainable Local Community Development’, Local Environment, 10(5): 477-486.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
O’Leary R., and L. B. Bingham (2009). ‘Surprising Findings Paradoxes, and Thought on the Future of Collaborative Public Management Research’, in R. O’Leary and L. B. Bingham (eds.), The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty: First Century, pp. 255-269. Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
OECD (2001). The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD.
Office for National Statistics (2001). Social Capital: A Review of the Literature. London: Social Analysis and Reporting Division, Office for National Statistics.
Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Onyx, J. and P. Bullen (2000). ‘Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1): 23-42.
Passey, A. and M. Lyons (2006). ‘Nonprofits and Social Capital: Measurement through Organizational Surveys’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16: 385-508.
Patti, R. J. (2000). ‘The Landscape of Social Welfare Management’, in R. J. Patti(ed.), The Handbook of Social Welfare Management, pp. 3-26. London: Sage.
Peck, E., P. Gulliver and D. Towell (2002). Modernising Partnerships: An Evaluation of Somerset’s Innovations in the Commissioning and Organisation of Mental Health Services. London: Institute for Applied Health Social Policy.
Peters, B. G. (1997). ‘With a Little Help from Our Friend: Public-private Partnerships as Institutions and Instruments’, in J. Pierre (eds.), Partnerships in Urban Governance: European and American Experience, pp. 11-33. Houndmills: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Piachaud, D. (2002). Capital and the Determinants of Poverty and Social Exclusion, ACSE paper 60. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LES.
Pierre, J. and B. G. Peters (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan.
Pierson, J. (2008). Going Local: Working in Communities and Neighbourhoods. Oxon: Routledge.
Poortinga, W. (2006). ‘Social Relations or Social Capital? Individual and Community Health Effects of Bonding Social Capital’, Social Science and Medicine, 63(1): 255-270.
Pope, J. and J. M. Lewis (2008). ‘Improving Partnership Governance: Using A Network Approach to Evaluate Partnerships in Victoria’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(4): 443-356.
Portes, A. (1998). ‘Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1-24.
Powell, M. and B. Dowling (2006). ‘New Labour’s Partnerships: Comparing Conceptual Models with Existing Forms’, Social Policy and Society, 5(2): 305-314.
Powell, M. and C. Glendinning (2002). ‘Introduction’, in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds.), Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 1-14. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Powell, M. and M. Exworthy (2002). ‘Partnership, Quasi-networks and Social Policy’, in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds.), Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 15-32. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Powell, M., M. Exworthy and L. Berney (2001). ‘Playing the Game of Partnership’, in R. Sykes, C. Bochel and N. Ellison (eds.), Social Policy Review: Developments and Debates, 2000–2001, pp. 39-61. Bristol: Policy Press.
Pratt, J., P. Gordon and D. Plamping (1999). Working Whole Systems: Putting Theory into Practice in Organisations. London: King's Fund.
Preston-Shoot, M. (2009). ‘Repeating History? Observations on the Development of Law and Policy for Integrated Practice’, in J. Mckimm and K. Phillips (eds.), Leadership and Management in Integrated Services, pp. 20-34. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd.
Putnam, R. D. (1993a). ‘The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life’, The American Prospect, 4(13): 1-11.
Putnam, R. D. (1993b). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). ‘Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America’, Political Science and Politics, 28(4): 664-683.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Blowing Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rawsthorne, M. (2005). ‘Community Development Activities in the Context of Contracting’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 40(2): 227-240.
Reichardt, C. S. and M. M. Mark (1998). ‘Quasi-experimentation’, in L. Bickman and D. J. Rog (eds.), Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, pp. 193-228. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1981). Control and Power in Central and Local Relations. Farnborough: Grower.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). ‘The New Governance: Governing Without Government’, Political Studies, 44: 652-667.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). ‘Governance and Public Administration’, in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, pp. 54-90. New York: Oxford.
Rosenau, J. N. and E. O. Czempeil (1992). Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, P. V. (2000). Public-private Policy Partnerships. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Rubin, A. and E. Babbie (2005). Research Methods for Social Work (5th Edition). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thompson Learning.
Rummery, K. (2002). ‘Towards a Theory of Welfare Partnerships’, in C. Glendinning, M. Powell and K. Rummery (eds.), Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 229-246. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Rupasingha, A., S. J. Goetz and D. Freshwater (2006). ‘The Production of Social Capital in US Counties’, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35: 83-101.
Rydin, Y. and N. Holman (2004). ‘Re-evaluating the Contribution of Social Capital in Achieving Sustainable Development’, Local Environment, 9(2): 117-133.
Salamon, L. M. (1987). ’Partners in Public Service: Toward a Theory of Government-nonprofit Relations’, in W.W. Powell(eds.), The Non-profit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Saves, E. S. (2000). Privatization and Public-private Partnerships. New York: Versa Press, Inc.
Scharpf, F. W. B. (1997). Games and Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalsm in Policy Resaerch. Boulder. Co.: Westview.
Schuller, T., S. Baron and J. Field (2000). ‘Social Capital: A Review and Critique’, in S. Baron, J. Field and T. Schuller (eds.), Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, pp. 1-38. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sharma, S. (2007). ‘Exploring Best Practices in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in e-Government through Select Asian Case Studies’, The International Information and Library Review, 39(3-4): 203-210.
Smith, S. R. and M. Lipsky (1993). Non-profit for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sobel, J. (2002). ‘Can we trust social capital’, Journal of Economic Literature, 40: 139-154.
Starr, P. (1990). ‘The New Life of the Liberal State: Privatization and the Restructuring of State-Society Relation’ in J. Waterbury and E. Suleiman (eds.), Public Enterprise and Privatization, pp. 22-54. Boulder: Westview Press.
Stoker, G. (1998). ‘Governance as Theory: Five Propositions’, International Social Science Journal, 50(155): 17-28.
Stoker, G. (ed.) (2000). The New Politics of British Local Governance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Stolle, D. (2003). ‘The Sources of Social Capital’, in M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds.) , Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective, pp. 19-42. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Sullivan, H. and C. Skelcher (2002). Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Service. London: Palgrave.
Szreter, S. (1998). ‘A New Political Economy for New Labour: the Importance of Social Capital’, Policy Paper, 15. Sheffield: Political Economy Research Centre.
Teorell, J. (2003). ‘Linking Social Capital to Political Participation’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(1): 49-66.
Thomas, K. W. (1976). ‘Conflict and Conflict Management’, in M. D. Dunnette (ed.), Handbook of Lndustrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 889-935. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Thompson, G., J. Frances, R. Levačić and J. Mitchell (eds.) (1991). Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: The Coordination of Social Life. London: Sage.
Thomson, A. M. and J. L. Perry (2006). ‘Collaboration Process: Inside the Black Box’, Public Administration Review, 66(6): 20-32.
Thyer, B. A. (2008). ‘The Quest for Evidence: Based Practice? We Are All Positivists’, Research on Social Work Practice, 18(4): 339-345.
Titmuss, R. (1974). Social Policy : An Introduction. London: Unwin Hyman.
Wallace, A. (2007). ‘We Have Had Nothing for So Long that We Don’t Know What to Ask for: New Deal for Communities and Regeneration of Socially Excluded Terrain’, Social Policy and Society, 6(1): 1-12.
West, M. and L. Markiewicz (2006). The Effective Partnership Working Inventory. Birmingham: Aston Business School (Working Paper).
White, L. (2002). ‘Connection Matters: Exploring the Implications of Social Capital and Social Networks for Social Policy’, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(3): 254-269.
Whittington, C. (1999). ‘Modernising the Social Care Workforce Consultation’, in Support of Partnership of Social Care and Health. Leeds: TOPSS England.
Whittington, C. (2003). Learning for Collaborative Practice with Other Professions and Agencies: A Study to Inform the Development of the Degree in Social Work. London: Department of Health (research report).
Wildrige, V., S. Childst, L. Cawthra and B. Madge (2004). ‘How to Create Successful Partnerships: A Review of the Literature’, Health Information and Libraries Journal, 21: 3-19.
Williams, P. (2012). Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Boundary Spanners. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Wilson, A. and K. Charlton (1997). Making Partnerships Work: a Practical Guide for the Public, Private, Voluntary and Community Sectors. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York Publishing Services.
Woolcock, M. (2001). ‘The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcome’, in J. F. Helliwell (eds.), The Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-being: International Symposium Report, pp. 65-88. Québec City: Human Resources Development Canada and OECD.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE