:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:受苦心靈轉變經驗之存在現象學研究
作者:盧怡任 引用關係
作者(外文):Yi-Jen Lu
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:輔導與諮商學系所
指導教授:劉淑慧
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:存在現象學受苦經驗受苦轉變歷程現象學心理學諮商與心理治療Existential PhenomenologyExperience of SufferingTransitional Process of SufferingPhenomenological PsychologyCounseling and Psychotherapy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:376
對於人類受苦經驗的關注,一直是諮商與心理治療領域的核心議題。面對受苦者,諮商與心理治療的關注焦點為:人類的受苦經驗從何而來,受苦如何維持,以及脫苦的過程為何。對於上述問題,諮商與心理治療中不同理論也各自提出相對應的解釋。本文首先透過諮商與心理治療理論的爬梳與整理,探討不同理論對於人類受苦及轉變經驗的看法,發現:傳統諮商與心理治療理論視心靈為封閉實體,外在世界與內在心靈乃是相互獨立的實體,受苦經驗乃是來自於人無法符應其外在環境。而後現代治療取向視外在現實為個人或社會建構的結果,主流文化的壓迫乃是人類受苦經驗的來源;對於脫苦過程,傳統諮商與心理治療理論重視內在心靈與外在世界如何相互符應,趨於一致。後現代治療取向則強調個人建構意義之轉化,透過主流文化的解構,發展個人的新意義。面對諮商與心理治療中現代與後現代理論取向的分裂,本研究從存在現象學「在世存有」的觀點出發,提出人與世界之「關聯」才是理解受苦及其轉變經驗的適當方式,並以此理解為不同理論取向尋找從經驗出發的接合點。
本研究以存在現象學研究方法,透過三位訪談者在受苦中的訪談,第一次訪談後一年半的再次訪談,以及第二次訪談後再經過半年的第三次訪談,歷時共二年的三次訪談文本,分析受訪者在二年之中的受苦及轉驗經驗,研究結果如下。(一)受訪者之受苦經驗來自對既有處境的拒絕與期望處境的落空,處於既有處境與期望處境之間的斷裂,也讓受訪者困於其中而受苦;(二)在受苦轉變經驗上,受訪者出現下列的九項處境結構:1. 受苦者寓居於原有某種熟悉的世界中;2. 危機事件的出現改變受苦者原有的處境,使世界呈現為對原有籌劃的威脅;3. 在籌劃受威脅的處境下,受苦者仍堅持原有籌劃的實現,世界成為原有籌劃所拒絕的對象;4. 在與現有處境的持續遭逢中,情緒與身體做為工具,讓受苦者反思原有籌劃之可行性以及世界所呈現之意義;5. 面對自己所不熟悉的世界,受苦者需要一套理論做為幫助自己理解世界的工具;6. 受苦者的轉變經驗包括對原有籌劃的「修正」以及對被視為威脅的世界的「接受」;7. 受苦者視轉變經驗為「學習」的過程,此過程包括:(1)對問題產生解決的期望;(2)在現在力求解決過去與未來的矛盾;(3)對自身過去的重新理解與接受;8. 身體與情緒反應作為工具,讓受苦者確認其處境的改變;9. 受苦者已不再固著於先前的受苦經驗,新的處境或新的可能性已開始呈現在受苦者面前,受苦者已將自己投入新的的未來。
本研究除了從諮商與心理治療理論的觀點針對存在現象學對受苦及轉變經驗的存有描述做討論之外,並對諮商實務工作者與未來研究提出建議,也說明本研究之限制。
The concern for human’s experience of suffering has always been a core issue in counseling and psychotherapy. In face of sufferers, the focus of counseling and psychotherapy includes: where does human’s experience of suffering come from? How does it last? What is the process of unsuffering? To answer these questions, various theories of counseling and psychotherapy proposed corresponding explanation. This article browsed and organized theories of counseling and psychotherapy, investigated perspectives of various theories on human suffering and the transformation of such experience, and found: traditional counseling and psychotherapy theories see mind as a self-contained entity, the outer world and the inner mind are separate entities, experience of suffering is due to an individual’s inadaptable to the outer environment. Postmodern therapy approaches view the outer reality as the outcome of an individual or a social construction, and stress from mainstream culture is the cause of human’s experience of suffering. To unsuffering process, traditional counseling and psychotherapy theories emphasize how the inner mind interact with the outer world and reach harmony. Postmodern therapy approaches emphasize the transformation of individual constructionism, the development of new meaning to an individual through deconstruction of mainstream culture. Dealing with the disagreement between midmodern and postmodern counseling and psychotherapy approaches, this study was based on the viewpoint of “being-in-the-world” in Existential Phenomenology to propose that, the appropriate approach to understand suffering and its transitional experience is to find the “relation” between humans and the world. Base on such understanding, then the experience-based connecting points in various theories could be found.
This study used research methods of existential phenomenology to carry out interviews with three interviewees under suffering. The second interview was conducted one and a half years after the first one; the third one was half year after the second one. The total three interviews took two years, which analyzed the interviewees’ suffering and transitional experience. The results showed: (1) the interviewees’ experience of suffering came from their resistance to existing situation and disappointment of expectated one, being on the breaking points of existing and expected situations also caused suffering to the interviewees; (2) in transitional experience of suffering, the interviewees showed the following nine situated structures: 1. the sufferers lived in their existing familiar world; 2. the appearance of crisis changed their current situations, and the world brought a threat to the original project; 3. when the project was under threat, the sufferers still hung on to accomplishment of their original project, the world became the subject rejected by the original project; 4. encountering struggles in existing situation, emotions and bodies were used as tools to allow the sufferers to reflect feasibility of their original project and meaning shown by the world; 5. facing an unfamiliar world, the sufferers needed a theory to help themselves understand the world; 6. sufferers’ transitional experience included “revision” of the original project, and “acceptance” of the world considered a threat by them; 7. the sufferers saw the transitional experience as a “learning” process, which included: (1) wishing to solve the problems; (2) trying to solve the conflicts between the present and the future; (3) re-understanding and accepting their past; 8. using bodies and emotions as tools to allow the sufferers to recognize the changes in situations; 9. The sufferers no long clung to previous suffering experience, new situation or new possibility appeared, and they could start a brand new future.
This study discussed the existing descriptions of existential phenomenology on suffering and transitional experience from the viewpoint of counseling and psychotherapy, and made suggestions to counseling practitioners and future research. Limits of this study was also mentioned.
一、中文部分

王慶節、陳嘉映譯(2002)。存在與時間。台北:桂冠。Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit.
汪文聖(2001)。現象學方法與理論之反思:一個質性方法之介紹。應用心理研 究,12,49-76。new window
李維倫、賴憶嫺(2009)。現象學方法論:存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學報,25,275-321。new window
李維倫譯(2004)。現象學十四講。台北:心靈工坊。Sokolowski, M. ( 2000). Introduction to phenomenology.
宋文里譯(1990)。成為一個人:一個心理治療者對心理治療的觀點。台北:桂冠。Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy.
余德慧、李維倫、林耀盛、余安邦、陳淑惠、許敏桃、謝碧玲、石世明(2004)。倫理療癒作為建構臨床心理學本土化的起點。本土心理學研究,22,253-325。new window
汪鳳炎、郭本禹譯(2000)。精神分析新論。台北:米納貝爾。Freud, S. (1933). Neue folge der vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse.
易之新譯(2000)。敘事治療-解構並重寫生命的故事。台北:張老師文化。 Freedman J., &; Combs, G. (1999). Narrative therapy.
孟樊、鄭祥福(1990)。後現代學科與理論。台北:生智。new window
孫雲平(2010)。偶然性與事實性-海德格《存有與時間》的「此在」分析。東 吳哲學學報,21,53-80。new window
陳宣良、杜小珍譯(2000)。存在與虛無。台北:貓頭鷹。Sartre, J. P. (1943). L'Etre et le Néant.
陳榮華(2006)。海德格存有與時間闡釋(第二版)。台北:台大出版中心。new window
黃孟嬌譯(2008)。敘事治療的工作地圖。台北:張老師文化。White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice.
彭孟堯(2009)。知識論。台北市:三民。
彭舜譯(2010)。精神分析引論。新北:左岸文化。Freud, S. (1963). Introductory lectures on Psycho-analysis.
楊韶剛、高春申譯(2000)。超越快樂原則。台北:知書房。Freud, S. (1923). Fenseits des Lustprinzips.
廖世德譯(2001)。故事、知識、權力:敘事治療的力量。台北:心靈工坊。White, M., &; Epston, E. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends.
蔡錚雲譯(2005)。現象學導論。新北:桂冠。Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology.

二、英文部分

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: International University Press.
Beck, A. T., &; Weishaar, M. (1989). Cognitive therapy. In Freeman, A., Simon, K. M., Beutler, L. E., &; Arkowitz, H. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of cognitive therapy (pp. 21-36). New York, NY: Plenum Press.


Berndtsson, I., Claesson, S., Friberg, F., &; Öhlén, J. (2007). Issues about thinking phenomenologically while doing phenomenology. Journal of phenomenological Psychology, 38, 256-277.
Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
Churchill, S. D., Lowery, J. E., McNally, O., &; Rao, A. (1998). The question of reliability in interpretive psychological research: A comparison of three phenomenologically based protocol. In R. Valle (Ed.), Phenomenological inquiry in psychology: Existential and transpersonal dimensions (pp. 63-85). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Drefus, H. L., &; Rabinow, P. (1982). Beyond structuralism and hermeneutic. Chicago, II: The University of Chicago Press.
Dupille, L. L. (2002). The psychological foundations of lived truth: An empirical, existential-phenomenological investigation (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3067803)
Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian subject: between language and jouissance. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Fischer, W. F. (1985). Self-deception: An empirical-phenomenological investigation into its essential meanings. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 118-154). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Fischer, W. (1986). On the phenomenological approach to psychopothology. Journal of phenomenological Psychology, 17(1), 65-76.
Freud, S. (1958). Remembering, repeating, and working through. In J. Strachey (ed. and trans.). The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 16). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work Published 1914)
Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235-260
Hansen, J. T. (2004). Thoughts on knowing: Epistemic implications of counseling practice. Journal of Counseling &; Development, 82, 131-138.
Hansen, J. T. (2007). Counseling without truth: Toward a neopragmatic foundation for counseling practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 85, 423-430.
Laplanche, J., &; Pontalis, J. B. (1986). Fantasy and the Origins of Sexuality. In V. Burgin, J. Donald, &; C. Kaplan,(Eds.), Formations of Fantasy (pp. 5-34). London: Methuen.
Layne, C. (1983). Painful truths about depressives’cognitons. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(6), 848-853.
Mcmillan, M. (1997). Freud evaluated : The completed arc. New York, NY: North-Holland.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: design, methodology, and applications. London: Sage.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage.
Quine, W. V. (1992). The pursuit of truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE