:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跨部門及組織間協力關係網之研究: 以多元就業開發方案中彰投區為例
作者:謝杏慧 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Hsing-Hui
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:公共行政暨政策學系
指導教授:陳金貴
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:協力組織間關係弱連帶結構洞社會網絡中心性派系collaborationinterorganizational relationships, IORsweak tiestructure holessocial networkcentralitycliques
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:91
受到新公共管理與治理系絡變遷的影響,跨部門或組織間的界限因而出現交疊、滲透的現象,第三部門組織因此能頻繁地與政府協力,逐漸形成跨部門協力網絡以解決社會問題。本研究以申請多元就業開發方案補助的民間團體為研究對象,透過第三部門組織的自我認知調查,以瞭解不同協力強度下,台灣的跨部門及組織間協力網絡的發展類型與影響因素,以及目前浮現的協力網絡結構。
本研究將協力網絡的類型劃分為協力強度較低的非正式的資訊交換、正式的資訊交換與業務推介等三種一時性協力網絡,以及協力強度較高的資源共享、聯合活動與同盟建立等三類計劃性協力網絡。透過社會網絡問卷調查中彰投區99家多元團體的資料,運用社會網絡分析方法中的中心性、派系、對偶網絡密度檢測與QAP相關分析等方式,分析多元團體與政府之間及多元團體之間的社會關係類型與結構,同時訪談6家多元團體以深入瞭解其連結、整合外部資源的狀況,探究其與政府及其他多元團體的互動方式,同時以弱連帶與結構洞等社會網絡論點分析並驗證調查的結果。
根據本研究的調查結果,有如下之發現:一、多元團體因擴展業務規模與服務社會的使命而申請多元方案的補助;二、多元團體與政府間協力的網絡結構是鬆散的;三、地方政府是多元團體主要的資源分享對象;四、中彰投就服中心掌握資訊交換的權力;五、同屬第三部門的多元團體之間的協力網絡結構鬆散,且在多元方案中也未有多元團體足以擔任中介者或取得資訊控制的利益;六、在多元方案中,無論是跨部門或組織間協力,都沒有任何小派系成員足以影響整體;七、多元團體形式上依賴政府補助,實質上逐漸發展經濟類業務以走向自給自足。
由於協力已是不可避免的趨勢,但本研究的結果卻顯示目前跨部門及組織間的協力都屬於一時性協力,未進展到實質且高強度的計劃性協力,本研究因此提出五項建議:一、由中彰投就服中心扮演協力網絡建構的催化者;二、依據縣市之別推展多元團體的組織間協力;三、將多元方案諮詢輔導團隊的工作轉型於推動組織間協力網絡的建構;四、將社會型與經濟型團體連結起來,以發揮相互學習之效;五、能整合較多民間團體、政府或企業組織之資源者,應能於補助審查獲得額外加分的機會。
Under the impact of the New Public Management (NPM) and governance, the actual boundary has become overlapped and penetrated across sectors and organizations. Consequently, the third sector organizations (TSOs) are able to collaborate intensively with the government, leading to a cross-sectoral collaboration network for social issues.
Utilizing a self-cognition survey by the third sector organization, this study targets at civil groups, subsidized by the government via the Multi-Employment Promotion Program (MEPP). The purpose of the survey is two-fold, on the one hand, to understand how the developmental types and influential factors correlate to different collaboration strengths during the collaboration among sectors or organizations, and on the other to investigate how the current collaboration network is formed.
Two major types of collaboration networks are distinguished in this study based on the strength of collaboration. The first subtype includes informal information exchange networks, formal information exchange networks, and work referral networks, three of which referred to spot collaboration networks. The other type consists of resource sharing, joint activity and alliance establishment as well as planned collaboration networks. The latter type characterizes stronger collaboration strengths than the former.
The social network survey in this study covers 99 multi-civil groups based in Taichung, Changhua and Nantou. Our analysis tools include centrality, cliques, and the test for paired densities as well as QAP correlations under the Social Network Analysis (SNA) in the hope of dissect the social types and structures between civil groups and the government and among civil organizations. Six multi-civil groups were chosen for an in-depth interview, where their interaction with the government is further explored by means of their connection and incorporation with external resources. Survey results are analyzed and examined via weak ties and structure holes under the social network framework.
Results lead to the following findings: (1) the multi-civil organizations have applied for the subsidies due to work expansion and social services; (2) the relation structure between these groups and the government is fairly loose with regard to their network; (3) the resources from the civil groups are mainly shared by the local government; (4) the Employment Services Center of the Taichung-Changhua-Nantou Region controls information exchange; (5) the relationship is also loose among the civil groups, and no broker could be found from the civil groups to receive and control information under the MEPP; (6) there is no clique between governments and multi-civil groups and among multi-civil organizations in the MEPP; and (7) the multi-civil groups receive governmental subsidies, but meanwhile financially have become more independent.
Despite the inevitable trend of collaboration between sectors, this study reveals a rather temporary, low-strength collaboration across sectors and organizations. The implication suggests the following: (1) the Employment Services Center of the Taichung-Changhua-Nantou Region could serve the catalyst role of collaboration network ; (2) the inter-organizational collaboration of TSOs could be developed based on the nature boundary of the region; (3) the MEPP consultancy group would be a good assistor for building collaboration social network; (4) the incorporation of social and economic organizations would be a plus; (5) those who are able to incorporate more resources from private organizations, the government and entrepreneurs should be encouraged when applying for MEPP subsidies.
壹、英文資料
6 Perri, Goodwin, N., Peck, E., & Freeman, T. (2006). Managing Network of Twenty-First Century Organisations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Achrol, R. S. (1997). Changes in the Theory of Interorganizational Relations in Marketing: Toward a Network Paradigm. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 25(1): 56-71.
Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S-W (2000). Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. In Lesseser (eds.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications. (pp. 36-50). London: Routledge.
Agranoff, R. & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
Agranoff, R. (2004). Leveraging Networks: A Guide for Public Managers Working across Organizations. In Kamensky, J. M. & Burlin, T. J. (eds.), Collaboration: Using Networks and Partnerships. (pp. 62-102). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Alcock, Pete (2010). A Strategic Unity: Defining the Third Sector in the UK. The Policy Press, 1(1), 5-24.
Anheier, Helmut K. (2005). Nonprofit Organizations: Theory, Management, Policy. Oxon: Routledge.
Arblaster, L., Conway, J., Foreman, A. & Hawtin M. (1998). Achieving the Impossible: Interagency Collaboration to Address the Housing, Health and Social Care Needs of People able to Live in Ordinary Housing. Bristol: The Policy Press and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Austin, J. E. (2000). The Collaboration Challenge: How Nonprofits and Businesses Succeed Through Strategic Alliances. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bailey, Darlyne & Koney, Kelly Mcnally (2000). Strategic Alliances among Health and Human Services Organizations: From Affiliation to Consolidations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Barringer, Bruce R. & Harrison, Jeffrey S. (2000).Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value through Interorganizational Relationships. Journal of Management, 26(3): pp. 367-403.
Benson, J. Kenneth (1975).The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2): pp. 229-249.
Billis, David (2010). From Welfare Bureaucracies to Welfare Hybrids. In David Billis, (Ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy (pp. 3-24). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bogason, Peter & Zølner, Mette (2007) (eds.). Methods in Democratic Network Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bridge, S., Murtagh, B. & O’Neill, K. (2009). Understanding the Social Economy and the Third Sector. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. & Stone, M. M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66(3): 44-55.
Burt, Ronald S. & Minor, M. J. (1983). Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Burt, Ronald S. (1993). The Social Structure of Competition. In Swedberg, R. (ed.), Explorations in Economic Sociology. (pp. 65-103). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Burt, Ronald S. (1995). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, Ronald S. (1997). The Contigent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly. 42(2): 339-365.
Burt, Ronald S. (1998). The Gender of Social Capital. Rationality and Society. 10(1): 5-46,
Burt, Ronald S. (2001). Structural Holes Versus Network Closure as Social Capital. In Lin, N., Cook, K. & Burt, R. S. (eds.). Social Capital: Theory and Research. (pp.31-56). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Burt, Ronald S. (2002). The Social Capital of Structural Holes. In Guilln, M. F., Collins, R., England, P. & Meyer, M. (eds.). The New Economic Sociology: Developments in an Emerging Field. (pp.148-190). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Campbell, M. (1999). The Third System, Employment and Local Development: Volume 1-Synthesis Report. Policy Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University. From http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/empl_esf/3syst/index_en.htm
Chrislip, David D. (2002). Collaborative Leadership Fieldbook: A Guide for Citizens and Civic Leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Coleman, J. S. (1988) Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology. 94(Supplement): S95-S120.
Commons, John R. (1931). Institutional Economics. American Economic Review. 21: 648-657.
Deakin, Nicholas (2001). Putting Narrow-mindedness out of Countenance: The UK Voluntary Sector in the New Millennium. In Anheier, H. K. & Kendall, J. (eds.), Third Sector Policy at the Crossroads: An International Nonprofit Analysis. (pp. 36-50). London: Routledge.
Donnelly-Cox, G., Donoghue, F. & Hayes, T. (2001). Conceptualizing the Third Sector in Ireland, North and South. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 12(3): 195-204.
ECOTEC Research & Consulting Limited (2001). Evaluation of the Third System and Employment Pilot Action-Final Report. From http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/empl_esf/3syst/final01_en.pdf
Etzioni, Amitai (1973). The Third Sector and Domestic Missions. Public Administration Review. 33(4): 314-323.
European Commission (2003). The New Actors of Employment-Synthesis of the Pilot Action ‘Third system and employment’-(1997-2000) For a Better Understanding of Employment at Local Level. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. From http://europa.eu.int.
Evans, M. & Syrett, S. (2007).Generating Social Capital: The Social Economy and Local Economic Development. European Urban and Regional Studies. 14(1): 55-74.
Evers, A. & Laville, Jean-Louis (2004) (eds.). The Third Sector in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Fleishman, Rachel (2008). To Participate or Not to Participate? Incentives and Obstacles for Collaboration. In O'Leary, R. & Bingham, L. B. (eds). The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-first Century. (pp. 31-52). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Frederickson, H. George(2005). Whatever Happened to Public Administration? Governance, Governance Everywhere. In Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E., Jr., & Pollitt, C. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. (pp. 282-304). New York: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, Linton C. (1992). Social Networks and the Structure Experiment. In Linton C. Freeman, L. C., White, D. R. & Romney, A. K. (eds.). Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. (pp.11-40). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
García, M. S. (2006). The Network Perspective and the Concept of Productive System. In García, M. S., Social Capital, Networks and Economic Development: An Analysis of Regional Productive Systems. (pp. 6-29). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Gibson, J. L. (2001) Social Networks, Civil Society, and the Prospects for Consolidating Russia's Democratic Transition. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), p.p. 51-68.
Goldsmith, S. & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Gow, James Iain & Dufour, Caroline(2000). Is the New Public Management a Paradigm? Does it Matter? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(4): pp. 573-597.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology. 78(6): 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology. 91(3): 481-510.
Hanneman, R. A. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/)
Haugh, H. & Kitson, M. (2007).The Third Way and the Third Sector: New Labour’s Economic Policy and the Social Economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 31: 973-994.
Heide, J. B. (1994). Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing. 58: 71-85.
Henry, N. (2002). Is Privatization Passé ? The Case for Competition and the Emergence of Intersectoral Administration. Public Administration Review. 62(3): 374-378.
Henry, N. (2007). Public Administration and Public Affairs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Hood, Christopher (1991). A Public Management for all Season. Public Administration, 69: 3-19.
Hood, Christopher (1995). The “New Public Mangement” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting organizations and Society, 20(2/3): 93-109.
Huxham, C. & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. Oxon: Routledge.
Huxham, Chris and Vangen, Siv (2001) What makes practitioners tick? Understanding collaboration practice and practising collaborational understanding. In: Effective collaboration: Managing the obstacles to success. Palgrave MacMillan, London, pp. 1-16.
Hyden, G., Court, J. & Mease, K. (2004).Making Sense of Governance: Empirical Evidence from Sixteen Developing Countries. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
Imperial, Mark T. (2005). Using Collaboration as a Governance Strategy: Lessons from Six Watershed Management Programs. Administration & Society. 37(3): 281-320.
Isett, K. P. & Provan, K. G. (2005). The Evolution of Dyadic Interorganizational Relationships in a Network of Publicly Funded Nonprofit Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 15: 149-165.
James, Estelle (1997). Whither the Third Sector? Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Voluntas, 8:1, 1-10
Kamarck, E. C. & Nye, J. S. Jr. (2002) (eds.). Governance.Com: Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Kamensky, J. M., Burlin, T. J., & Abramson, M. A. (2004). Networks and Partnerships: Collaborating to Achieve Results No One Can Achieve Alone. In Kamensky, J. M. & Burlin, T. J. (eds.), Collaboration: Using Networks and Partnerships. (pp. 1-20). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Kearns, K. P. (2003). Accountability in a Seamless Economy. In B. Guy Peters & Jon, Pierre (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration. (pp. 581-589). London: Sage Publications.
Keast, R., Mandell, M. & Brown, K. (2006). Mixing State, Market and Network Governance Modes: The Role of Government in ‘’Crowded’’ Policy Domains. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. 9(1): 27-50.
Kettl, Donald F. (2002). The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kettl, Donald F. (2006).Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(3): 10-19.
Kickert, W. J. M. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Public Management and Network Management. In Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. (pp. 35-61). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing Networks in the Public Sector: Findings and Reflections. In Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. (pp. 166-191). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Klijn, E.-H (1997). Policy Networks: An Overview. In Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. (pp. 166-191). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Knoke, D. & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Knoke, D. & Yang, S. (2008). Social Network Analysis. (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Knoke, D. (1990). Appendix: Some Fundamental of Network Analysis. In Political Network: The Structural Perspectives. (pp. 235-240). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, David (2001).Management of Non-Governmental Organizations: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
Lin, C.-Y., Laratta, Rosario and Y.-H. Hsu. 2011. “The impacts of the Multiple Employment Promotion Program on program participants and NPOs in Taiwan”, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(5), 302-318.
Linden, Russ (2003). Learning to manage horizontally: The promise and challenge of collaboration. Public Management, 85(7): 8-11.
Lloyd, P. (2004). The European Union and its programmes related to the third system. In Evers, A. & Laville, J.-L. (eds.), The Third Sector in Europe. (pp. 188-205). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2006). Public Management: Old and New. New York: Routledge.
Marcussen, Martin. & Torfing, Jacob. (2007) (eds.). Democratic Network Governance in Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
McGill, M. E. & Wooten, L. M. (1975). Management in the Third Sector. Public Administration Review. 35(5): 444-455.
Montjoy, Robert S & O'Toole, O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr (1979). Toward a Theory of Policy Implementation: An Organizational Perspective. Public Administration Review, 39(5): pp. 465-476.
Morgan, G. (1998). Images of Organization. ( the executive ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Moulaert, F. & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social Economy, Third Sector and Solidarity Relations: A Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present. Urban Studies. 42(11): 2037-2053.
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review. 23(2): 242-266.
Nickel, P. M. (2007). Network Governance and the New Constitutionalism. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 29(2): 198-224.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. (2002). Information Technology and Democratic Governance. In Kamarck, Elaine. C. and Nye, Joseph S. Jr. (eds.), Governance.Com: Democracy in the Information Age. (pp. 1-16). Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
O’Toole, L. J. Jr., Hanf, K. I., & Hupe, P. L. (1997). Managing Implementation Processes in Networks. In Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. (pp. 137-151). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
O'Leary, R., Gazley, B., McGuire, M. & Bingham, L. B. (2008). Public Manager Collaboration. In O'Leary, R. & Bingham, L. B. (eds). The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-first Century. (pp. 1-12). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Oliver, Christine (1990). Determinants Of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2): 241-265.
Park, Chisung (2006). Collaboration among Human Service Nonprofit Organizations: Mapping Formal and Informal Networks of Exchange. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Parsons, Wayne (1995).Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Peterson, N. L. (1991). Intergency Collaboration under Part H: The Key to Comprehensive, Multidisciplinary, Coordinated Infant/ Toddler Intervention Services. Journal of Early Intervention, 15(1): 89-105.
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Picot, A., Reichwald, R., & Wigand, R. (2008). Market Dynamics and Competition: The Fundamental Role of Information. In Information, Organization and Management. (pp. 19-64). Berlin: Springer.
Pollitt, Christopher (2002). The New Public Management in international perspective. In McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P. & Ferlie, E. (eds.), The New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. (pp. 274-293). London: Routledge.
Pollitt, Christopher (2003). The New Public Management---revolution or fad? In Pollitt , C., The Essential Public Manager. (pp. 26-51). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Provan, K. G. & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 18: 229-252.
Putnam, 1993: 173-176; Making Democracy Work
Putnam, Robert (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, Robert (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rhodes, R.A.W (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. In Osborne, Stephen P. (eds.) Public Management: Critical Perspectives, Volume Ⅱ: The Plural State. (pp. 208-227). London: Routledge.
Rhodes, R.A.W (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Rhodes, R.A.W (2000a). Introduction: The ESRC Whitehall Programme: A Guide to Institutional Change. In R.A.W. Rhodes (eds.), Transforming British Government (pp.1-22). London: MacMillan Press.
Rhodes, R.A.W (2000b), Governance and Pubic Administration, In J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance (pp.54-90), New York: Oxford University Press.
Salamon, L. M. (2002). The New Tools Approach and the New Governance: Conclusion and Implications. In Salamon, L. M. (ed.), The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. (pp. 600-610). New York: Oxford University Press.
Salamon, L. M. (2003a). The Resilient Sector: the State of Nonprofit America. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S.W. & List, R. (2003). Global Civil Society: An Overview. The Johns Hopkins University. From www.jhu.edu/~ccss.
Schuller, T., Baron, S. & Field, T. (2000). Social Capital: A Review and Critique. In Baron, S., Field, J., Schuller, T. (eds.), Social Capital: Critique Perspectives. (pp. 1-37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seidman, H. (2004). Foreword. In Stanton, T. & Ginsberg, B. (eds.), Making Organization and Management in the Twenty-First Century. (pp. ⅸ-ⅺ). Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Selden, Sally Coleman, Sowa, Jessica E. & Sandfort, Jodi (2006). The Impact of Nonprofit Collaboration in Early Child Care and Education on Management and Program Outcomes. Public Administration Review, 66(3): 412-425.
Selsky, J. W. & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice. Journal of Management, 31(6): 849-873.
Smith, S. R. (2005). NGOs and Contracting. In Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E. Jr., & Pollitt C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. (pp. 591-614). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (2007) (eds.). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sullivan, H. & Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tandon & Mohanty (2003).Civil Society: Issues and Problematics. In Tandon & Mohanty (eds.), Does Civil Society Matter? Governance in Contemporary India. (pp. 9-14). New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.
Taylor, Charles (1990). Modes of Civil Society. Public Culture, 3(1): 95-118.
Taylor, M. & Doerfel, M. L. (2005). Another Dimension to Explicating Relationships: Measuring Inter-Organizational Linkages. Public Relations Review, 31: 121-129.
Thomson, A. M. & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review, 66: 20-32.
Tsai, Lily L. (2007). Accountability without Democracy: Solidarity Group and Public Goods Provision in Rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tschirhart, M., Amezcua, Thomson A. & Anker A. (2008). Resource Sharing: How Resource Attributes Influence Sharing System Choices. In O'Leary, R. & Bingham, L. B. (eds). The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-first Century. (pp. 15-30). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Turk, Herman(1970). Interorganizational Networks in Urban Society: Initial Perspectives and Comparative Research. American Sociological Review, 35(1): pp. 1-19.
Union of International Associations (2005/2006). Volume 5: Statistics, Visualizations and Patterns. Yearbook of International Organizations – Guide to Global Civil Society Networks. From http://www.uia.org/organizations/vol5.php.
Van Til, Jon (2009). A Paradigm Shift in Third Sector Theory and Practice: Refreshing the Wellsprings of Democratic Capacity. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(7): 1069-1081.
Vangen, S. & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing Collaborative Relations: Building Trust in Interorganizational Collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1): 5-31.
Vernis, A., Iglesias, M., Sanz, B., & San-Carranza, À. (2006). Nonprofit Organizations: Challenges and Collaboration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Whittington, Colin (2003). Collaboration and Partnership in Context. In Weinstein, J., Whittington, C. & Leiba, T. (eds.), Collaboration in Social Work Practice. (pp.13-38). Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1985).The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269-296.
Yankey, J. A. & Willen, C. K. (2005). Strategic Alliances. In Herman, R. D. & Associates (eds.), The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management. (pp. 254-273). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Young, D. R. & Salamon L. M. (2002). Commercialization, Social Ventures and For-Profit Competition. In Salamon, L. M. (ed.), The state of nonprofit America. (pp. 423-446). Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.

貳、中文資料
方世杰、方世榮。2008,<組織間統治-回歸組織間關係研究之本質,兼論台灣期刊相關之研究>,《管理評論》,27(1):25-56。new window
王光旭,2006,<政策網絡研究在公共行政領域中的核心地位與方法錯位>,《政策研究學報》,4:61-102。new window
王振寰、渠海源,2003,《社會學與台灣社會》(第二版),台北:巨流圖書公司。
王鳳彬、朱超威等譯,2008,Kilduff, Martin(2003)原著。《社會網絡與組織》,北京:中國人民大學出版社。
丘昌泰,2000,《公共管理-理論與實務手冊》。台北:元照出版社。
史美強,2005,《制度、網絡與府際治理》,台北:元照出版社。
江明修,2001,《第三部門:經營策略與社會參與》,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。new window
行政院研究發展考核委員會,2006,《95年度院管制「多元就業開發方案」查證報告(95管查字第04號) 》。
何增科,2006,<全球公民社會引論>,收錄於鄧正來主編,《國家與市民社會:一種社會理論的研究路徑》(增訂版)(頁511-529)。上海:上海人民出版社。
呂育誠,2006,<網絡治理與治理網絡:政府變革的新課題>,《臺灣民主季刊》,3(3): 207-212。
李樹茁、杜海峰、楊緒松、靳小怡、Feldman, M. W.,2008,《農民工的社會支持網絡》,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
杜念中譯,1997,Galbraith, John Kenneth(1977)原著,《不確定的年代》。台北:時報文化。
狄明德、林桂碧,2001,<從失業現象探討台灣地區發展第三部門(系統)就業方案之需要性>,發表於《生活/社會新視界:理論與實踐的對話學術研討會》(頁1-13)。台北:輔仁大學。
辛炳隆,2003,<積極性勞動市場政策的意涵與實施經驗>,《就業安全》,2(1):9-15。
周雪光,2003,《組織社會學十講》,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
周鴻玲譯,1988,Charles Perrow (1974)原著,《組織社會學》,台北:桂冠版社。
官有垣、呂朝賢、鄭清霞,2008,<台灣第三部門的就業:2005年調查研究資料的分析>,《臺大社工學刊》,16:45-86。new window
官有垣、杜承嶸、王仕圖,2010,<勾勒台灣非營利部門的組織特色:一項全國調查研究的部分資料分析>,《公共行政學報》,37:111-151。new window
林晉寬、陳奇修,2007,<交易成本理論是解釋組織統治決策的有效理論嗎?---台灣之實證研究觀察>,《中華管理評論國際學報》,10(3):1-21。
林鍾沂,2003,《行政學》。台北:三民書局股份有限公司。
林鉦棽、王政智,2005,<從社會交換理論與交易成本理論分析組織內之知識分享行為>,《人力資源管理學報》,5(2):95-119。new window
俞可平,1999,<治理與善治引論>,《馬克思主義與現實》,5:37-41。
唐文慧、王宏仁,2004,《社會福利理論:流派與爭議》。台北:巨流圖書公司。new window
徐木蘭、陳必碩、許金田、蘇建勳,2003,<台灣資訊軟體業的生態軌跡—多元開放性組織理論的觀點>,《人文及社會科學集刊》,15(3):431-474。new window
袁方主編,2002,《社會研究方法》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
張文宏、劉軍、王衛東譯,2008,Freeman, Linton C.(2004)原著,《社會網絡分析發展史:一項科學社會學的研究》,北京:中國人民大學出版社。
張火燦、劉淑寧,2002,<從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享>,《人力資源管理學報》,2(2):101-113。new window
張英陣,2001,<市民社會之實踐:第三部門與政府的互動>,發表於《全球化與社會福利學術研討會》, (4 月 27 ~28 日),台中:靜宜大學。取自2009年12月,http://swat.sw.ccu.edu.tw/downloads/papers/200104270301.pdf
張苙雲,1998,《組織社會學》,台北:三民書局股份有限公司。
曹衛東等譯,2005,Habermas, Jürgen (1962, 1990) 原著,《公共領域的結構轉型》(初版三刷),台北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。
許家豪譯,2002,Giddens, Anthony(2000)原著,《第三條路及其批評》,台北:聯經出版事業公司。
陳金貴,2002,<非營利組織社會企業化經營探討>,《新世紀智庫論壇》,19:39-51。new window
陳金貴,2005,<非營利組織的治理概念>,發表於《歐美政府治理理論與實踐研討會》。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。
陳恆鈞,2008,<協力治理模式之初探>,《T&D飛訊》,69:1-16。
陳恆鈞、張國偉,2006,<組織協力與組織績效之研究:以雲林縣蔬菜產銷班為例>,《公共行政學報》,19:1-54。new window
陳美智、楊開雲,2000,<組織真是「理性」的嗎﹖---一個組織社會學的新制度論觀點>,《東海社會科學學報》,20:27-59。
傅仰止,2002,<個人網絡中他人聯繫強度的結構原理>,《台灣社會學》,3:163-209。new window
勞委會職業訓練局,2009,《多元就業開發方案96年度整體實施效益評估計畫》,2009年6月20日,取自:http://www.evta.gov.tw/
辜振豐,2004,《布爾喬亞:慾望與消費的古典記憶》,長沙:岳麗書社。
馮瑞麒譯,2007,Lewis, David(2001)原著,《非政府組織管理初探》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
馮燕、張英陣,1998,《如何加強委託非營利機構推展福利業務》,行政院研究發展考核委員會委託。
黃俊龍譯,2006,Faulks, Keith(2000)原著,《公民身份》,台北:巨流圖書有限公司。
葉啟政,2000,《進出「結構-行動」的困境---與當代西方社會學理論論述對話》,台北:三民書局。new window
賈西津等譯,2001,Salamon, Lester M. (1999)原著,《全球公民社會-非營利部門視界》,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
趙可金,2008,《全球公民社會與民族國家》,上海:上海三聯書店。
劉軍譯,2007,Scott, John(2000)原著,《社會網絡分析法》,重慶:重慶大學出版社。
劉毓玲譯,1997,Osborne D. & Gaebler T. (1992) 原著,《新政府運動》,台北:天下文化出版有限公司。
劉麗雯,2004,《非營利組織:協調合作的社會福利》,台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
鄭力軒譯,2007,Fligstein,Neil (2001)原著,《市場的構造:21世紀資本主義社會的經濟社會學》,台北:群學出版有限公司。
鄭怡世,2004,<從組織間關係的觀點談社會福利組織跨組織/跨專業服務網絡的建構>,《社區發展季刊》,107:413-426。new window
鄧正來主編,2006,《國家與市民社會:一種社會理論的研究路徑》(增訂版),上海:上海人民出版社。
蕭全政、林鍾沂、江岷欽、黃朝盟譯,2003,Henry, N. (1999)原著,《行政學的世界》,台北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。
蕭娜娜,2008,《行政院勞委會職訓局多元就業開發方案輔導機制之探討─以苗栗區社區觀光產業發展為例》,靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班。
簡惠美譯,2002,Giddens, Anthony(1971)原著,《資本主義與現代社會理論:馬克思、涂爾幹、韋伯》,台北:遠流出版事業
羅家德,2003,《企業關係管理---NQ關係管理智慧》,台北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。
羅家德,2012,《社會網分析講義》,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
羅教講、張永宏等譯,2009,Smelser, Neil J. & Swedberg, R. (2005) 主編,《經濟社會學手冊》(第二版),北京:華夏出版社。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE