中文部分
大紀元(2008)。〈親密暴力44%,婦團提CSI三策略〉,2008年8月8日報導。取自http://au.epochtimes.com/b5/8/8/8/n2220404.htm
中央社(2010)。〈2010年女性進步指數,台灣止跌回升〉,2010年3月4日報導。取自http://www.cna.com.tw/
內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會(2012)。〈家庭暴力統計資訊〉。取自http://dspc.moi.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=1401&mp=1
內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會(2008)。《台灣家庭暴力防治大事紀》。台北:內政部。
內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會(2009)。《家庭暴力防治工作人員服務手冊理念篇》。台北:內政部。
內政部(2008年6月)。〈家庭暴力防治法十週年的回顧與展望-從各國經驗談台灣推動家庭暴力防治工作之過去現在與未來〉研討會會議手冊,台北。
內政部(2004)。〈家庭政策〉,2004年10月18日行政院社會福利推動委員會第八次會議通過版。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/20/931018.mht
王怡文、陳亮全、黃光國(2006)。〈華人社會的信任策略〉。《本土心理學研究》,25,199-242。王珮玲(2009)。〈親密關係暴力危險評估:實務操作方法的探討〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,13(1),141-184。王珮玲(2012)。〈台灣親密暴力危險評估表(TIPVDA)之建構與驗證〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,16(1),1-58。
王麗容(1999)。《婦女保護網絡建構之研究》。內政部委託研究計劃。
王麗容、陳芬苓(2012)。《我國性別暴力現況調查之研究》。內政部委託研究計劃。
王叢桂(2004)。〈家暴事件中助人工作者的專業判斷與和諧價值觀的關聯〉。《本土心理學研究》,21,127-161。孔祥明(2001)。〈媳婦﹖女兒﹖妳媽﹖我媽﹖從誰是「自己人」看婆媳關係〉。《本土心理學研究》,16,43-87。台灣立報(2013)。〈家暴法15周年,仍有進步空間〉,2013年6月25日報導。取自http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-130763
民視新聞網(2010)。〈名人怕毀形象 家暴只能忍氣吞〉,2010年3月18日報導。取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/100318/11/229cs.html
行政院Open政府資料回應網(2010)。〈公務出國考察報告〉。瀏覽日期﹕2010年1月10日。取自http://open.nat.gov.tw/OpenFront/report/report_main.jsp
全國法規資料庫(2012)。〈家庭暴力防治法及施行細則〉,瀏覽日期:2012年2月10日。取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/Law/LawSearchLaw.aspx
全國博碩士論文資訊網(2012)。〈家庭暴力相關論文資料搜尋〉,瀏覽日期:2012年4月5日。取自http://etds.ncl.edu.tw/theabs/site/sh/search_adv.jsp
江妙盈(2008)。〈時事評析:113不滿意,打434防暴專線〉,女性電子報第264期,瀏覽日期:2010年3月2日。取自http://forum.yam.org.tw/bongchhi/old/microphone
朱柔若、吳柳嬌 (2005)。〈行動研究、女性主義、社會學與實務界的多元對話:台灣婚姻暴力研究之檢討〉,《南大學報》,39(1),1-16。
林雅容(2003)。〈家庭暴力防治與婦女離婚問題:家庭暴力防治理念與現況之兩難〉,《台灣社會福利期刊》,4,19-52。李易駿(2006)。《社會政策與立法十五講》。大里:許雅惠出版。
李易駿、古允文(2003)。〈另一個福利世界?東亞發展型福利體制初探〉,《台灣社會學刊》,31,189-241。李政賢譯(2006)。《質性研究:設計與計畫書撰寫》。Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B.原著。台北:五南。
李美珍、林維言、郭彩榕(2013)。〈傳承—我國推動性別暴力防治工作回顧與展望〉,《社區發展季刊》,142,3-12。李郁文(2001)。〈對家庭暴力防治應有的基本認識與反省〉,《社區發展季刊》,94,268-276。李欽湧(1994)社會政策分析。台北:巨流。
宋麗玉、施教裕、顏玉如、張錦麗(2006)。〈優點個案管理模式之介紹與運用於受暴婦女之評估結果〉。《社區發展季刊》,113,143-161。沈慶鴻(1997)。《婚姻暴力代間傳遞之分析研究》。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系博士論文。沈慶鴻(2009)。〈弱勢社工服務弱勢案主?!婚暴防治社會工作者實務困境之研究〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,13(2),87-142。沈瓊桃(2008)。〈婚暴併兒虐服務整合的挑戰與模式初探〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,12(1),51-90。周月清(1995)。《婚姻暴力-理論分析與社會工作處置》。台北:巨流。周素鳳譯,Anthony Giddens原著(2003)。《親密關係的轉變:現代社會的性、愛、慾》。台北:巨流。
周倩編著(2011)。《學術研究倫理數位教材》。新竹:國立交通大學出版社。
周詩寧譯,Kevin Browne & Martin Hebert 原著(2004)。《預防家庭暴力》。台北:五南。
邱貴玲(2006)。〈從女性角度分析比較美國、法國、丹麥三種家庭政策發展模式〉,《社區發展季刊》,144,30-42。金耀基(1998)。〈中國人的「公」與「私」觀念〉,喬健、潘乃谷(編),《中國人的觀念與行為》,59-73。高雄:麗文文化。
林文瑛、王震武(1998)。〈刑罰與教化—中國人的素樸心理學分析〉,《輔仁學誌》,26,181-214。
林明傑(2000)。〈美加婚姻暴力犯之治療方案與技術暨其危險評估之探討〉,《社區發展季刊》,90,197-215林明傑、鄭瑞隆、蔡宗晃、張秀鴛、李文輝(2006)。〈家庭暴力案件危險分級管理試辦方案之檢驗〉,《社區發展季刊》,115,290-308。林萬億(2002)。〈台灣的家庭變遷與家庭政策〉,《台大社會工作學刊》,6,37-88。柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。《家庭暴力-理論、政策與實務》。台北:巨流。
胡秀娟(2005)。〈家庭政策面臨的挑戰〉,《網路社會學通訊期刊》,45,2005.03.15。
胡幼慧主編(1996)。《質性研究-理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北:巨流。
胡幼慧、馬淑榮(1989)。〈台灣都市地區已婚及非婚人口組成及社會特質探討,「台灣社會現象的分析」〉,《中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊》,25, 25-55。
胡慧嫈(2013年5月)。〈清官難斷家務事!—兒少保護社會工作者在華人社會文化脈絡下的實務處遇議題與省思〉。「變遷中的社區工作與兒童少年福利學術研討會論文」,台中。
姚淑文主編(2004)。《蛹化-台北市婚姻暴力防治歷史紀事》。台北:台北市政府社會局補助現代婦女基金會編印。
高明士編著(2005)。《東亞傳統家禮、教育與國法(一):家族、家禮與教育》。台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。
高鳳仙(2007)。《家庭暴力防治法規專論(二版)》。台北:五南。財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會(2010)。〈台灣女性圖像〉。瀏覽日期﹕2010年5月15日。取自http://gender.wrp.org.tw/Page_Show.asp?Page_ID=125
孫隆基(1990)。《中國文化的深層結構》。台北:唐山。
陳若璋(1992)。〈台灣婚姻暴力之本質、歷程與影響〉,《婦女與兩性學刊》,3,48-117。陳怡君(2006)。〈從北歐的家庭福利政策談起-反觀我國家庭福利政策〉,《網路社會學通訊期刊》,第52期,2006.01.05。
陳高凌(2001)。〈義與面子在華人家庭暴力裡的運作及其對治療之啟示〉。《本土心理學研究》,15,63-111。陳婷蕙(1997)。〈婚姻暴力阻礙受虐婦女脫離受虐關係的影響因素之探討〉,《社會福利雙月刊》,103,42-48。
陳源湖(2003)。〈婚姻暴力與社會支持之探討〉,《社區發展季刊》,102,277-292。許雅惠(2000)。〈家庭政策的兩難困境—從傳統意識型態出發〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,4(1),237-286。彭泗清(1997)。〈中國人真的對人不對事嗎?〉,《本土心理學研究》,7,340-356。黃光國主編(1988a)。《中國人的權力遊戲》。台北:巨流。
黃光國(1988b)。《儒家思想與東亞現代化》。台北:巨流。黃光國(2009)。《儒家關係主義—哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究》。台北:心理。葉明華、楊國樞(1998)。〈中國人的家族主義:概念分析與實徵衡鑑〉,《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》,83,169-225。葉重新(2004)。《教育研究法(第二版)》。台北:心理。
葉肅柏(2001)。〈家庭暴力理論觀點與防治策略〉,《社區發展季刊》,94,289-305。
游美貴(2009年12月)。〈家庭暴力及性侵害被害人垂直整合服務方案評估研究〉,「98年度家庭暴力、性侵害及性騷擾防治工作有功人士、評鑑績優縣市表揚暨服務模式發表觀摩會論文」,台北。
湯靜蓮、蔡怡佳(1997)。《我痛!走出婚姻暴力的陰影》。台北:張老師。
張德勝(1989)。《儒家倫理與秩序情結—中國思想的社會學詮釋》。台北:巨流。
張錦麗、王珮玲、柯麗評(2003)。〈美國杜魯斯家庭暴力社區介入模式介紹〉,《社區發展季刊》,101,320-330 。張錦麗(2013)。〈以CEDAW內涵與防治困境建構家暴與性侵害網絡檢視指標〉,《社區發展季刊》,142,13-24。楊中芳、高尚仁主編(1991)。《中國人中國心-人格與社會篇》。台北:遠流。楊國樞、余安邦主編(1992)。《中國人的心理與行為—理念與方法篇》。台北:桂冠。費孝通(1991)。《鄉土中國(1947初版) 》。香港:三聯。
潘淑滿(2003)。〈婚姻暴力的發展路徑與模式:台灣與美國的比較〉,《社區發展季刊》,101,276-292。潘淑滿(2007)。《親密暴力—多重身分與權力流動》。台北:心理。臺灣社會工作人員專業協會(2011)。〈社會工作研究倫理守則建議版(2011.7.18)〉。取自http://www.tasw.org.tw/p1-news-detail.php?bgid=1&gid=1&nid=81
劉可屏(1987)。〈虐妻問題〉,《輔仁學誌》,19,375-391。
劉秀娟譯,Richard J. Gelles & Claire P. Cornell原著(1998)。《家庭暴力》。台北:揚智。
簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。《社會工作研究方法》。台北:巨流。簡春安、常宏文(2002)。《家庭暴力被害人保護方案之初探研究》。內政部委託研究計畫。
謝秀芬(2004)。《家庭社會工作:理論與實務》。台北:雙葉書廊。
謝臥龍(1993年12月)。〈被毆婦女之性別角色確認與自尊的研究-探討心理重建與教育策略〉。「特殊境遇婦女研討會論文」,高雄。
戴世玫、楊雅華、郁佳霖(2008年3月)。〈看見心傷兒—實踐以目睹婚姻暴力兒童為主體的服務〉。「追求公平正義社會:社會工作專業的挑戰研討會論文」,台北。
戴世玫、林雅玲(2009)。〈婦女保護庇護安置工作的觀察與詮釋〉,《社區發展季刊》,126,298-308。顏玉如(2013)。〈落實CEDAW之家庭暴力及性侵害防治倡議行動策略〉,《社區發展季刊》,142,25-38。英文部分
Abramovitz, M (2006). Welfare reform in the United States: Gender, race, and class matter. Critical Social Policy, 26(2), 336-364.
Abrahamson, P. & Wehner, C.(2006). Family and/ or Work in Europe? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37(2): 153-171.
Theater of the Oppressed Laboratory(2011, Jan. 30)August Boal and the Theatre of the Oppressed. Retrieved from http://www.toplab.org/boalint.htm
Ahlberg, J, Roman, C. & Duncan, S. (2008). Actualizing “Democratic Family”? Swedish Policy Rhetoric versus Family Practice, Social Politics, 15(1): 79-100.
Almeida, R.V., & Lockard, J. (2005). The cultural context model: A new paradigm for accountability, empowerment, and the development of critical consciousness against domestic violence. In N.J. Sokoloff (Ed.), (2005). Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture (pp. 301-320). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Asian & Pacific Islander Institute on Domestic violence(2012, Jan. 10.). Coiled Spring of Violence. Retrieved from http://apidvinstaapiahf.org/
Berg, B. L.(2007). Qualitative Research Methods for The Social Science(6th ed.).Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bennett L.W. & Williams O.J. (2001). Intervention programs for men who batter. In C.M. Renzetti, J.L. Edleson, & R. Kennedy Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 261-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bettio, F. & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing Care Regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10 (1): 85-113.
Blumer, H. (1971). Social problem as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18, 298-306.
Brennan, D. (2007). Babies, Budgets, and Birthrates: Work/Family Policy in Australia 1996-2006, Social Politics, 14 (1): 31-57.
Bolzendahl, C. & Olafsdottir, S. (2008). Gender Group Interest or Gender Ideology? Understanding U.S. Support for Family Policy within the Liberal Welfare Regime, Sociological Perspectives, 51 (2): 281-304.
Bond, J., & Phillips, R. (2001). Violence against women as a human rights violation. In C.M. Renzetti, J.L. Edleson, & R. Kennedy Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 481-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Boss, P.(1988). Family stress management. CA: Sage.
Bunch, C., & Reilly, N. (1994). Demanding accountability: The global campaign and Vienna Tribunal for Women's Human Rights. New York: UNIFEM.
Conyers, J. (2007). The 2005 reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act. Violence Against Women, 13(5), 457-468
Chamie, J. (2007). Government Policy and Responsibilities Toward the Family: What is Happening to the Family? In S. Loveless & T. B. Holman (eds.) The Family in the New Millennium: World Voices Supporting the ‘Natural’ Clan I. USA: Praeger.
DAIP, Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs, Duluth, MN. (2012, Jan. 15).The Power and Control Wheel. Retrieved from http://www.duluth-model.org/wheelgallery.php
Danis, F.S. (2003). The criminalization of domestic violence: What social workers need to know. Social Work, 48(3), 237-246.
Dobash, R. E. & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. NY: Free pess.
Elworthy, S.(1996). Power and sex. Dorest:Element Books.
Eng, P. (2003). Safety & justice for all: Examining the relationship between the women's anti-violence movement and the criminal legal system. New York: Ms. Foundation.
Esping-Andersen, G.(1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fedders, B. (1997). Lobbying for Mandatory Arrest Policies: race, class, and the politics of the battered women’s movement. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, Vol.23, No. 2., pp. 281-300.
Family Violence Prevention Fund(2012, Feb. 07). Forms of domestic violence that women experience (immigrant women power and control wheel). Retrieved from http://endabuse.org/userfiles/file/ImmigrantWomen/
Fagnani, J.(2007). Family Policies In France And Germany: Sisters Or Distant Cousins? Community, Work and Family, 10( 1):39-56.
Feerick, M. M., & Silverman, G. B. (Eds.)(2006). Children Exposed to Violence. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Publishing.
Fenton, Z. E. (1998). Domestic violence in black and white: Racialized gender stereotypes in gender violence. In Lemon, N. K. D. ed.(2001) Domestic Violence Law. Chap. 3C, pp. 147-151.
Ferraro, K. J. (1996). The dance of dependency: A genealogy of domestic violence discourse. Hypatia, 11(4), 77-91.
Finn, J.L., Jacobson, M. & Campana, J.D. (2004). Participatory research, popular education, and popular theatre: Contributions to group work. In C.G. Garvin, L.M. Gutierrez, and M.J. Galinsky (Eds.), Handbook of social work with groups (pp.326-343). New York: The Guilford Press.
Frye, M.(1983). The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory.Trumansburg, NY: Crossing.
Ghez, M. (2001). Getting the message out: Using media to change social norms on abuse. In C.M. Renzetti, J.L. Edleson, & R.K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 417-437). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. CA: Sociology Press.
Graham, D. L. R., Rawlings, E., & Rimini, N. (1988). Survivors of terror: Battered women, hostages and the Stockholm Syndrome. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 217-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Guba, E. C. (1990) The Paradigm dialog. CA: SAGE.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S.( 1989). Forth generation evaluation. Newbury Park. CA:SAGE
Guo, J. & Gilbert, N.(2007)Welfare State Regimes and Family Policy: A Longitudinal Analysis, International Journal of Social Welfare, 16: 307–313.
Gutierrez, M. & Lewis, E. A. (1999). Empowering Women of Color. NY:Clumbia university Press.
Haj-Yahia, M., & Sadan, E.. (2008) Issues in intervention with battered women in collectivist societies. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(1), 1-13.
Henninger, A., Wimbauer, C., Dombrowski, R. (2008). Demography as a Push toward Gender Equality? Current Reforms of Germen Family Policy, Social Politics, 15 (3): 287-314.
Hiilamo, H.(2004). Changing Family Policy in Sweden and Finland during the 1990s, Social Policy and Administration, 38(1): 21-40.
Imperial, M.L. (1997). Self-sufficiency and safety: Welfare reform for victims of domestic violence. In Lemon, N. K. D. ed.(2001) Domestic Violence Law. (pp. 796-808) St. Paul, MN: West Group.
Jasinski, J.L. (2001). Theoretical explanations for violence against women. In C.M. Renzetti, J.L. Edleson, & R. Kennedy Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 5-22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kasturirangan, A., Krishnan, S. & Riger, S. (2004). The impact of culture and minority status on women’s experiences of domestic violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5(4), 318-332.
Lee, M. Y. (2000). Understanding Chinese battered women in North America: A review of the literature and practice implications. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 8, 215-241.
Lee, Y. S., & Hadeed, L. (2009). Intimate partner violence among Asian immigrant communities: Health/mental health consequences, help-seeking behaviors, and service utilization. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10, 143-170.
Lee, M. Y., & Law, P. F. M. (2001). Perception of sexual violence against women in Asian American communities. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 10(2), 3-25.
Levinson, D. (1987). Cross-cultural perspective. In Lemon, N. K. D. ed.(2001) Domestic Violence Law ( pp. 94-99). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba E. G.(1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. CA:SAGE Publication.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B.(1999). Designing Qualitative Research(3rd ed.). CA: SAGE Publication.
Murray, V. H. (1998). A comparative survey of the historic civil, common, and American Indian tribal law responses to domestic violence. In Lemon,N. K. D. ed.(2001) Domestic Violence Law (pp. 2-7). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
McPhail, B.A., Busch, N.B., Kulkami, S., & Rice, G. (2007). An integrative feminist model: The evolving feminist perspective on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 13(8), 817-841
National Institute of Justice & American Bar Association. (1998). Legal interventions in family violence: Research findings and policy implications. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
New Visions: Alliance to End Violence in Asian/Asian American Communities. (Brochure)
Numan, W. L.(1997). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
OECD -Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012,Oct. 06.) OECD Factbook, Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/publications/factbook/
Pankratz, Curt J. (2009). Cross-National Comparisons of Family Policies: The Relevance of National Approaches to Social Welfare, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Winter Issue: 493-511.
Paymor, M. (2000). Violence no more: Helping men end domestic violence, Andy’s story. In Lemon,N. K. D. ed.(2001) Domestic Violence Law( pp. 73-78) St. Paul, MN: West Group.
Perilla, J.L., Lavizzo, E., & Ibáñez, G. (2007). Towards a community psychology of liberation: A domestic violence intervention as a tool for social change. In Aldarondo, E. (Ed.), Promoting social justice through mental health practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rath, C. (1999). Transforming communities: A model for community organizing. PA: The National Resource Center on Domestic Violence.
Raj, A., & Silverman, J. (2002). Violence against immigrant women: The roles of culture, context, and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8(3), 367-398.
Richie, B. E. (2000). A Black Feminist Reflection on the Antiviolence Movement. Signs. 25(4), 1133-1137.
Rivera, J. (1994). Domestic violence against Latinas by Latino males: An analysis of race, national origin, and gender differential. In Lemon,N. K. D. ed.(2001) Domestic Violence Law (pp. 155-171). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
Saxonberg, S. & Szelewa, D.(2007). The Continuing Legacy of the Community Legacy? The Development of Family Policies in Poland and the Czech Republic, Social Politics, 14(3): 351-379.
Shen, A.C.T.(沈瓊桃) (2010). Cultural Barriers to Help-Seeking Among Taiwanese Female Victims of Dating Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 26( 7) ,P.1343-1365.
Smith, C. W. (1988). The Rule of Thumb," A historic perspective? In Lemon, N. K. D. ed.(2001) Domestic Violence Law (pp. 1-2). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
Smith, A. (2005). Looking to the future: Domestic violence, women of color, the state, and social change. In Sokoloff, N.J. (Ed.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture (Chap. 24, pp. 416-434). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Sokoloff, N. J., (2004). Domestic violence at the crossroads: Violence against poor women and women of color. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 32(3/4), 139-147.
GovTrack, Civic Impulse, USA. (2011,Jan. 18). Summary of H. R. 4594 International Violence Against Women Act of 2010. Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4594&tab=summary
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Strong, B., & DeVault, C. (1992). The marriage and family experience. MN: West.
Tong, R.(1997). Feminist approaches to bioethics: Theoretical reflections and practical applications. Boulder:Westview Press.
Vienna City Government( 2011, Oct. 10). EU-Project: Daphne for families. Fit for life.-Trans-national local support programme to prevent violence against and abuse of children in families. Retrieved from http://www.wien.gv.at/english/magelf/daphne/index.htm
Volpp, L. & Main, L. (1995). Working with Battered Immigrant Women: A Handbook to Make Services Accessible. CA: Family Violence Prevention Fund.
Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. NY: Harper and Row.
Watts, C., & Zimmerman, C. (2002). Violence against women: Global scope and magnitude. The Lancet, 359 (9313), 1232-1237.
Pickup, F. (2001). Human rights and development responses to violence against women. In Pickup F., Ending violence against women: A challenge for development and humanitarian work ( pp. 46-75). London: Oxfam.
Yllo, K.A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R.J. Gelles & D.R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47-62). Newbury Park: Sage.
Yick, A. G. (2007). Role of culture and context: Ethical issues in research with Asian Americans and immigrants in intimate violence. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 277-285.
Yick, A. G., & Agbayani-Siewert, P. (2000). Dating violence among Chinese American and White students: A sociocultural context. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 8, 101-129.
Yick, A. G., Shibusawa, T., & Agbayani-Siewert, P. (2003). Partner violence, depression, and practice implications with families of Chinese descent. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 10, 96-104.
Yick, A. G.& Oomen-Early, J. (2009). Using the PEN-3 model to plan culturally competent domestic violence intervention and prevention services in Chinese American and immigrant communities. Health Education, 109 (2), P. 125-139.
Yoshihama, M. (1998). Domestic Violence in Japan: Research, Program Development and Emerging Movements. In A. Roberts(Ed), Battered Women and Their Families: Intervention and Strategies and Treatment Programs (2nd,pp.405-447). New York: Springer.
Yoshihama, M. (1999). Domestic violence against women of Japanese descent in Los Angeles.Violence Against Women, 5(8), P. 869-897.
Yoshihama, M. (2001). Immigrants-in-context framework: understanding the interactive influence of socio-cultural contexts. Evaluation and Program Planning. 24,P. 307-318.
Yoshihama, M. (2002a).Breaking the Web of Abuse and Silence: Voice of Battered Women in Japan. Social Work, 47(4), 389-400.
Yoshihama, M. (2002b). The Definitional Process of Domestic Violence in Japan: Generating Official Response Through Action Oriented Research and International Advocacy. Violence Against Woman, 8(3), 339-366.
Yoshihama, M.(2005). A web in the patriarchal clan system-Tactics of intimate partners in the Japanese sociocultural context. Violence Against Woman, 11(10),1236-1262.
Yoshihama, M. (2009). Literature on intimate partner violence in immigrant and refugee communities: Review and recommendations. In Family Violence Prevention Fund (Ed.), Intimate partner violence in immigrant and refugee communities: Challenges, promising practices and recommendations (pp.34-64). Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Yoshihama, M., Ramakrishnan, A., Hammock, A.C. & Pasha, M.K. (2012). Intimate partner violence prevention program in an Asian immigrant community: Integrating theories, data, and community, Violence Against Women, 18(7), 763-83.
Yoshihama & Dabby(2009). Facts & Stats: Domestic Violence in asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Homes.CA: APIAHF Health Forum.
Yoshihama, M. & Sorenson, S. B.(1994). Physical, sexual, and emotional abuse by male intimates: Experience of women in Japan. Violence and Victims, 9 , 63-77.
Center for women’s Global Leadership , Rutgers, The State university of New Jersey(2011,Jan. 25). 16 Days of Activism Against Violence Against Women. Retrieved from http://16dayscwgl.rutgers.edu/