中文部分
王永慈（2005）。台灣的貧窮問題：相關研究的檢視[The Phenomenon of Poverty in Taiwan: A Review of Research]。臺大社會工作學刊（10），頁 1-54。 doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2005.10.01
王舒芸、鄭清霞、王正（2013）。兒童津貼之合理性與可行性研究[Study on Rationale and Preliminary Planning of Child Allowance]。臺大社會工作學刊（27），頁 45-92。 doi: 10.6171/ntuswr2013.27.02王德睦、何華欽（2006）。台灣貧窮女性化的再檢視。人口學刊（33），頁 103-131。伊慶春、呂玉瑕（1996）。台灣社會學研究中家庭和婦女研究評介。載於蕭新煌與章英華（主編），兩岸三地社會學的發展與交流。（頁 169-192）。 台北： 台灣社會學社。
艾琳達（1997）。台灣年輕婦女的勞動力。載於 激盪！台灣反對運動總批判。（頁 265-289）。台北：前衛。
行政院主計處（2010）。家庭收支調查歷年報告。取自 http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/result.asp
行政院主計處（2015a）。人力資源調查統計年報。取自 http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc4/manpower/year/year_f.asp?table=21
行政院主計處（2015b）。薪資時間數列資料查詢系統。取自 http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc5/earning/ht456.asp
行政院主計總處（2013）。2012年社會指標統計年報－國民幸福指數專刊。台北：行政院主計總處。
行政院主計總處（2014a）。102年家庭收支調查結果綜合分析。取自 http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/a11.asp?year=102
行政院主計總處（2014b）。103年人力運用調查報告。台北：行政院主計總處。
行政院主計總處（2014c）。就業失業統計資料查詢系統。取自 http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc4/timeser/more_f.asp
行政院主計總處（2014d）。薪資及生產力統計資料查詢系統。取自 http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc5/EarningAndProductivity/Default.aspx
呂玉瑕（2006）。家庭企業女主人的勞動參與因素之分析：家庭策略之考量[Labor Force Participation of the Boss's Wife: Bringing the Family Strategy Back in]。臺灣社會學刊（37），頁 79-131。呂朝賢（1995）。貧窮的性別與婚姻屬性差異。婦女與兩性學刊（6），頁 25-54。呂朝賢（1996）。貧窮女性化與貧窮程度的性別差異。人文及社會科學集刊， 8（2），頁 221-256。呂朝賢、陳俊全、王德睦（2008）。臺灣的社會救助動態：趨勢、型態與成因[Social Assistance Dynamics in Taiwan: Trend, Type and Causes]。人文及社會科學集刊， 20（4），頁 441-479。呂朝賢、鄭清霞（2004）。單親家庭與貧窮。台灣銀行季刊，55（2），頁 120-132。李大正、楊靜利（2004）。台灣婦女勞動參與類型與歷程之變遷。人口學刊， 28，頁 109-134。李美玲、王舒芸、陳玉華、鄭麗珍、呂建德、彭淑華等人（2007）。因應我國少子女化社會對策之研究，內政部委託研究報告。
林金源（1997）。家庭結構變化對台灣所得分配及經濟福利分配的影響。人文及社會科學集刊， 9（4），頁 39-63。林雅容（2006）。臺灣之勞動政策與性別意識: 已婚婦女之勞動參與，國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC95-2412-H-468-001- )。
胡台麗（1985）。台灣農村工業化對婦女地位的影響。載於 婦女在國家發展過程中的角色研討會論文集。（頁 339-353）。台北：台灣大學人口研究中心。
國家發展委員會（2014）。台灣歷次景氣循環峰谷日期。取自 http://www.ndc.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0000161#.VLcfAiuUdic
張晉芬（2011）。勞動社會學。台北：政大出版社。
張清富（1992）。貧窮變遷與家庭結構。婦女與兩性學刊（3），頁 41-58。莊慧玲、林世昌（2006）。台灣婦女勞動供給實證研究之發展[The Evolution of the Empirical Study of Taiwan's Female Labor Supply]。經濟論文叢刊， 34（2），頁 119-172。 doi: 10.6277/ter.2006.342.1許雅惠（2002）。性別、依賴、就業力--臺灣婦女的經濟弱勢與保障。臺大社會工作學刊（6），頁123-173。郭俊巖（2010）。美國工作福利政策的形成與轉化：以AFDC改革爲例[The Formation and Transformation of Workfare: A Case Study of AFDC Reform in the United States]。臺灣社會福利學刊，8（2），頁 329-371。郭俊巖、王德睦（2008）。全球化下脫貧策略的政治經濟背景研究：從Anthony Giddens觀點的探討[On the Political Economy of Removing Poverty in the Context of Globalization: From the Perspective of Anthony Giddens]。東吳社會工作學報（18），頁 105-134。陳建志（2001）。台灣地區女性相對貧窮率之探討。國立政治大學社會學報（31），頁113-137。
勞動部（2015）。基本工資之制訂與調整經過。取自 http://www.mol.gov.tw/topic/3067/5990/13171/19154/
黃乃凡（1995）。台灣貧窮女性化的探討－女性戶長家戶貧窮現象之貫時性研究。嘉義：中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。
黃芳玫（2011）。臺灣人力資本與薪資不均之研究[Human Capital Andwage Dynamics: Evidence Fromtaiwan]。臺灣經濟預測與政策，42（1），頁 1-37。黃芳玫、翁任嬋、黃芳雅（2009）。女性勞動參與之研究－1980-2005[The Analysis of Females' Labor Force Participation in Taiwan: 1980-2005]。臺灣經濟預測與政策，39（2），頁 1-50。黃芳玫、陳唯真、黃芳雅（2006）。臺灣男性勞動市場參與之研究－人口、市場機會及參與行為[The Decline in Males' Labor Market Participation in Taiwan: Population, Market Opportunity, and Participation Behaviors]。臺灣經濟預測與政策， 37（1），頁 1-48。黃建忠（2000）。Socioeconomic Trends in Single-Parent Families in Taiwan, 1980-1995。臺大社會工作學刊（2），頁 217-248。
黃建忠、Garfinkel, I.、韓文瑞（2000）。The Contributing Factors to Divorced and Separated Mothers in Taiwan: A Test of the Economic Independence Hypothesis[臺灣離婚與分居母親增加的因素：經濟獨立假設的檢定]。社會政策與社會工作學刊， 4（1），頁 45-76。
楊靜利、李大正、陳寬政（2006）。台灣傳統婚配空間的變化與婚姻行為之變遷。Journal of Population Studies（33），頁 1-32。劉毓秀（2011）。北歐普及照顧與充分就業政策及其決策機制的台灣轉化[Taiwan's Transformation of Scandinavian Universal Care and Full Employment Policies and Decision-Making Mechanism]。女學學誌（29），頁 1-77。 doi: 10.6255/jwgs.2011.29.1劉鶯釧、張清溪（1995）。妻子勞動報酬對家庭所得分配的影響─台灣個案研究。載於麥朝成與黃鴻（主編），臺灣所得分配論文集。（頁 293-316）。 台北： 聯經出版社。蔡學儀（2004）。台灣經濟論。台北：新文京開發。
鄭清霞（2009）。台灣經濟家戶組成與特性的變遷－1976年至2004年。臺灣社會福利學刊，7（2），頁 47-100。鄭清霞、張國偉、王舒芸、謝玉玲（2010）。1988-2007年台灣單親家戶圖像—性別與世代數的分析。靜宜人文社會學報，4（2），頁 235-268。薛承泰（2000）。台灣地區單親戶之貧窮：以1998年為例。臺大社會工作學刊（2），頁 151-189。薛承泰（2004）。台灣地區貧窮女性化現象之探討：以1990年代為例。人口學刊（29），頁 95-121。謝雨生、周孟嫻、紀玉臨、張明宜（2012）。臺灣有子女家庭所得不平等變遷，1980-2006年[Income Inequality Among Families with Children in Taiwan, 1980 to 2006]。臺灣社會學刊（51），頁 1-61。嚴祥鸞（1996）。台灣勞動市場性別化分工的解析，1951-1994[Gendered Divisions of Labor in Taiwan, 1951-1994]。勞資關係論叢（5），頁 147-176。
英文部分
Bianchi, S. M. (1999). Feminization and juvenilization of poverty: Trends, relative risks, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 307.
Bonoli, G. (2009). Varieties of social investment in labour market policy. In N. Morel, B. Palier & J. Palme (Eds.), What future for social investment (pp. 55-66). Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies.
Breen, R., & Salazar, L. (2011). Educational Assortative Mating and Earnings Inequality in the United States. American journal of sociology, 117(3), 808-843.
Budlender, D. (2003). The Debate about Household Headship. Social Dynamics, 29(2), 48-72.
Burtless, G. (1999). Effects of growing wage disparities and changing family composition on the U.S. income distribution. European Economic Review, 43(4–6), 853-865. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00099-3
Campos-Vazquez, R., Hincapie, A., & Rojas-Valdes, R. I. (2012). Family Income Inequality and the Role of Married Females' Earnings in Mexico: 1988-2010. Latin American Journal of Economics, 49(1), 67-98.
Cancian, M., & Reed, D. (1998). Assessing the Effects of Wives' Earnings on Family Income Inequality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 73-79.
Cancian, M., & Reed, D. (1999). The Impact of Wives' Earnings on Income Inequality: Issues and Estimates. Demography, 36(2), 173-184.
Cantillion, B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state: growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 432-449.
Cattan, P. (1998). Effect of Working Wives on the Incidence of Poverty. Monthly Labor Review, 121, 22.
Chant, S. H. (2007). Gender, generation and poverty: exploring the'feminisation of poverty'in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Daly, M. C., & Valletta, R. G. (2006). Inequality and Poverty in United States: The Effects of Rising Dispersion of Men's Earnings and Changing Family Behaviour. Economica, 73(289), 75-98.
Davies, H., & Joshi, H. (1998). Gender and Income Inequality in the UK 1968-1990: The Feminization of Earnings or of Poverty? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 161(1), 33-61.
de Beer, P. (2007). Why work is not a panacea: a decomposition analysis of EU-15 countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 17(4), 375-388. doi: 10.1177/0958928707081073
DeRiviere, L. (2008). Have we come a long way? Using the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics to revisit the ‘pin money’theory. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2340-2367.
Diamond, N. (1979). Women and Industry in Taiwan. Modern China, 5(3), 317-340. doi: 10.2307/188892
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2007). Sociological Explanations of Changing Income Distributions. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(5), 639-658. doi: 10.1177/0002764206295011
Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women's new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fournier, M. (2001). Inequality decomposition by factor component: a “rank-correlation” approach illustrated on the Taiwanese case. Recherches économiques de Louvain, 67(4), 381-403.
Fritzell, J., & Ritakallio, V.-M. (2010). Societal shifts and changed patterns of poverty. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, S25-S41. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00728.x
Gallin, R. S. (1984). The Entry of Chinese Women into the Rural Labor Force: A Case Study from Taiwan. Signs, 9(3), 383-398. doi: 10.2307/3173710
Gardiner, K., & Millar, J. (2006). How Low-Paid Employees Avoid Poverty: An Analysis by Family Type and Household Structure. Journal of Social Policy, 35(03), 351-369.
Goldin, C. (2006). The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women's Employment, Education, and Family. American Economic Review, 96(2), 1-21.
Gosling, A., Machin, S., & Meghir, C. (1994). What Has Happened to Men's Wages since the Mid-1960s? Fiscal Studies, 15(4), 63-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.1994.tb00210.x
Harkness, S., Machin, S., & Waldfogel, J. (1997). Evaluating the pin money hypothesis: The relationship between women‘s labour market activity, family income and poverty in Britain. Journal of Population Economics, 10(2), 137-158. doi: 10.1007/s001480050035
Kollmeyer, C. (2012). Family Structure, Female Employment, and National Income Inequality: A Cross-National Study of 16 Western Countries. European Sociological Review. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcs060
Larrimore, J. (2014). Accounting for United States Household Income Inequality Trends: The Changing Importance of Household Structure and Male and Female Labor Earnings Inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(4), 683-701. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12043
Maître, B., Whelan, C. T., & Nolan, B. (2003). Female Partner’s Income Contribution to the Household Income in the European Union. EPAG Working Papers 43. Colchester: University of Essex.
Marx, I., Vandenbroucke, P., & Verbist, G. (2012). Can higher employment levels bring down relative income poverty in the EU? Regression-based simulations of the Europe 2020 target. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 472-486. doi: 10.1177/0958928712456577
McCall, L., & Percheski, C. (2010). Income Inequality: New Trends and Research Directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 329-347. doi: 10.2307/25735081
McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging Destinies: How Children Are Faring under the Second Demographic Transition. Demography, 41(4), 607-627. doi: 10.2307/1515222
McLanahan, S., & Percheski, C. (2008). Family Structure and the Reproduction of Inequalities. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 257-276. doi: doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134549
Millar, J. (2003). Gender, Poverty and Social Exclusion. Social Policy & Society, 2(3), 181-188.
OECD. (2014). OECD.StatExtracts. Retrieved 1, 2015, from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode=ALFS_SUMTAB#
Pasqua, S. (2008). Wives’ work and income distribution in European countries. The European Journal of comparative economics, 5(2), 197-226.
Raley, S. B., Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How Dual Are Dual-Income Couples? Documenting Change From 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 11-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00230.x
Reed, D., & Cancian, M. (2001). Sources of Inequality: Measuring the Contributions of Income Sources to Rising Family Income Inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 47(3), 321-333. doi: 10.1111/1475-4991.00020
Ruggles, P. (1990). Drawing the line: Alternative poverty measures and their implications for public policy. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
Sainsbury, D. (1996). Gendering dimensions of welfare state Gender, equality and welfare state. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, C. R. (2010). Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association between Spouses’ Earnings. American journal of sociology, 115(5), 1524-1557. doi: 10.1086/651373
Shin, K.-Y. (2010). The Effect of Labor Force Participation by Women on Family Income Inequality in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Korean Social Science Journal, 37(1), 27-55.
Shirahase, S. (2003). Wives' Economic Contribution to the Household Income in Japan with Cross-naitonal Perspective. Working Paper, No.349.
Soobedar, Z. (2011). A semiparametric analysis of the rising breadwinner role of women in the UK. Review of Economics of the Household, 9(3), 415-428. doi: 10.1007/s11150-010-9095-0
Sotomayor, O. J. (2009). Changes in the distribution of household income in Brazil: The role of male and female earnings. World Development, 37(10), 1706-1715.
Townsend, P. (1962). The meaning of poverty. British Journal of Sociology, 13(3), 210-227.
Vandenbroucke, F., & Vleminckx, K. (2011). Disappointing poverty trends: is the social investment state to blame? Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 450-471. doi: 10.1177/0958928711418857
Wilson, W. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Zelizer, V. A. (1989). The Social Meaning of Money: "Special Monies". American journal of sociology, 95(2), 342-377.