:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:證照持有及學校類型對大學畢業生薪資所得之影響 - 以反事實分析
作者:鄭博文
作者(外文):Po-Wen Cheng
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:工業教育與技術學系
指導教授:陳清檳
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:反事實分析傾向分數配對法證照學校類型薪資所得Counterfactual AnalysisPropensity Score MatchingCertificationsSchool TypesWages
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
本研究目的旨在探討大學畢業生持有證照及就讀不同學校類型對於薪資所得之影響性。本研究應用傾向分數配對法(Propensity Score Matching, PSM)估算實驗平均處理效果(Average Treatment Effect on the Treated, ATT)。本研究分析樣本取自「臺灣高等教育整合資料庫」之94學年度大學畢業後一年問卷調查資料,有效樣本數共計32,296人。本研究發現:( 一)持有證照與無證照之大學畢業生,其影響薪資所得之個體基準條件具有差異性;(二)當控制了影響薪資所得之個體基準線差異性之後,證照對薪資所得不全然有正面影響, 亦可能有反效果現象;(三)證照張數對於薪資所得具有不同之累積效應,亦即張數愈多薪資所得不一定愈高;(四)證照等級對於薪資所得具有正面影響,高階證照相較於低階證照在提昇薪資所得擁有絕對之優勢;(五)學校類型具有影響薪資所得效應,普通大學提高薪資所得效應比技職校院來的明顯;(六)持有證照條件之下,普通大學在薪資所得效應仍顯著高於技職校院。
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of certificate holders and various school types on the wages of university graduate students. In this study, it tended to use the Propensity Score Matching method (PSM) to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). All analyzed samples used in this study were drawn from a large national database, Taiwan Integrated Postsecondary Education Database (TIPED), and in addition, the subjects were chosen because they were just one year after graduation since 2005, wherein, a total of 32,296 valid samples were collected.
The major findings are as follows: (1) Among university graduate students, there are significant differences between the impacts of individual baselines on the wages of individuals with or without certificates; (2) When controlling the differences between the impacts of individual baselines on the wages, the certificate does not at all have a positive effect on the wages, it may have the negative effect instead; (3) The number of certificates has a different accumulative effect on the wages, that is, an increase in the number of certificates, it will not necessarily lead to higher wages; (4) The level of certificates has a positive impact on the wages, the higher level of certificates has an absolute advantage of increases with the wages; (5) The school type has a positive impact on the wages, that is, the general university graduates normally have higher wages than that of technological and vocational colleges and universities; (6) The wages of general university graduates are significantly higher than that of technological and vocational colleges and universities among certificate holders.
壹、中文部分
田弘華、田芳華(2008)。誰升學?誰就業?誰失業?大學畢業生出路之探討。教育政策論壇,11(4),33-62。new window
江豐富(2012)。台灣公私部門薪資差異問題之研究。中央研究院經濟所學術研討論文,No. 12-A012,1-88。
行政院青年輔導委員會(2006)。95青輔會大專畢業生就業力調查報告完整版。臺北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。
行政院勞工委員會(1998)。就業安全辭典。台北市:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
吳明鋗、李隆盛(2011)。證照協助大學畢業生就業之效益分析:以企管類科系為例。商管科技季刊,12(2),145-173。new window
吳清山、簡惠閔(2008)。臺灣高等技職教育改革分析:1996-2007年。教育研究月刊,167,47-67。new window
吳慧瑛(2003)。二十年來教育發展之經濟評估,1978-2001。臺灣經濟預測與政策,33(2),97-130。new window
李敦義(2010)。綜合高中分流政策對學生學習成就的影響:以 TEPS 資料分析為例(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。new window
李敦義(2011)。綜合高中分流政策對學生學習成就的影響:以 TEPS 資料分析為例。教育科學研究期刊,56(2),107-135。new window
李隆盛、李信達、陳淑貞(2010)。技職教育證照制度的回顧與展望。教育資料與研究,93,31-52。new window
李隆盛、賴春金(2007)。技職教育現況及其未來發展。國家菁英季刊,3(1),35-45。
辛炳隆、江哲延(2011)。專業證照對薪資影響之淺析。T&;D 飛訊,124,1-13。
林大森(2011)。教育與勞力市場之連結:分析臺灣專業證照的市場價值。社會科學論叢,5(1),39-84。new window
林大森(2013)。檢視大學畢業生薪資取得之決定因素:人力資本論與訊號理論的對話。教育政策論壇,16(1),1-37。new window
林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元、張文貞(2008)。憲法權力分立。臺北市:新學林。
邱皓政、孫國勛(2011)。調查數據的事實與反事實研究:以商管學生就學滿意度為例。教育與心理研究,34(3),1-35。new window
秦夢群、莊清寶(2010)。大專生求學經歷與就業力關係。教育資料與研究,94,85-112。new window
張吉成、饒達欽(2010)。技職教育職業證照化發展之反思。教育資料與研究,93,15-30。new window
張芳全(2012)。勞動者教育收益與影響薪資因素之研究。臺東大學教育學報,23(1),91-124。new window
張晉芬(2002)。找回文化:勞動市場中制度與結構的性別化過程。臺灣社會學刊,29,97-125。new window
教育部(2009)。技職教育再造方案。台北市:作者。
陳建州(2011)。女性的教育成就與大學畢業後初期位置之關係。教育研究集刊,57(3),75-121。new window
陳清檳、鄭博文、賴慧敏、蕭錫錡(2015)。大學畢業生取得證照與薪資所得-傾向分數配對法之分析。當代教育研究季刊,23(1),71-111。new window
陳淑敏(2012)。大學應屆畢業生的背景變項、職場能力與其初職位置取得之相關研究。教育研究集刊,58(3),33-71。new window
陶宏麟、蕭富方(2013)。女性商學大學畢業生金融證照持有與初期職涯表現之關係。應用經濟論叢,93,209-252。new window
陶宏麟、簡維萱(2011)。女性學士、碩士教育與工作不對稱及其對薪資影響之比較。教育研究集刊,57(4),43-79。new window
彭台臨(1993)。如何審慎推動職業證照制度:技能檢定與職業證照制度的實施與影響。技職雙月刊,17,7-12。
游秋怡(2008)。台灣地區大專校院畢業生證照持有對初職與薪資之影響。佛光大學社會學系所碩士論文,未出版,宜蘭縣。
湯堯、徐慧芝(2011)。台灣地區大學生就讀學校與學門對其 畢業後薪資水準之關聯性研究。教育政策論壇,14(1),61-84。new window
黃心怡(2004)。對人力資本論的再省思:資訊技能訓練與資訊證照取得在勞動市場中的角色。資訊社會研究,7,255-270。new window
黃松元(2004)。美國衛生教育專業人員培訓以及證照制度之研究。學校衛生,44,77-98。
黃紀(2008)。因果推論與觀察研究:「反事實模型」之思考。社會科學論叢,2(1),1-22。new window
黃紀(2010)。因果推論與效應評估:區段識別法及其於「選制效應」之應用。選舉研究,17(2),103-134。new window
黃雅容(2008)。台灣第一代大學生的背景和特質:台灣和美國的發現一樣嗎?。師大學報:教育類,53(2),111-130。new window
黃毅志(2008)。如何精確測量職業地位?改良版台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表之建構。台東大學教育學報,19(1),151-160。new window
黃毅志(2009)。國際新職業量表在臺灣教育研究中的適用性:本土化與國際化的考量。教育科學研究期刊,54(3),1-27。new window
黃毅志(2011)。臺灣的教育分流、勞力市場階層結構與地位取得。臺北市:心理。new window
廖年淼、劉玲慧、賴靜瑩、楊家瑜(2012)。科技校院畢業生職場就業現況與相關影響因素之探究。教育與社會研究,25,33-72。new window
蒙志成(2014)。「92共識」對2012年台灣總統大選的議題效果:「傾向分數配對法」的應用與實證估算。選舉研究,21(1),1-45。new window
蔡瑞明、林大森(2002)。滾石不生苔?台灣勞力市場中的工作經驗對薪資的影響。台灣社會學刊,29,57-95。
蕭博仁(2008)。探究教育程度與學校素質對薪資所得之影響─以臺灣的高等教育為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
蕭錫錡(1993)。從技術士證照的特質談職業教育應有的理念。技術與職業教育雙月刊,17,24-27。
蕭錫錡(2007,10月)。落實國家專業技能標準之探討。論文發表於考選部、國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系聯合舉辦之「96年度考選制度研討會系列四-建立國家專業技能標準制度研討會」,台北市。
蕭錫錡(2009)。從學校觀點談推廣證照的規劃與發展。訓練與研發,5,50-57。
譚克平(2010)。隨機化試驗在教育研究中的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),69-95。new window
關秉寅、李敦義(2008)。補習數學有用嗎?一個「反事實」的分析。臺灣社會學刊,41,97-148。new window
關秉寅、李敦義(2010)。國中生數學補得愈久,數學成就愈好嗎?傾向分數配對法的分析。教育研究集刊,56(2),105-139。new window
貳、英文部分
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research Press.
Becker, S. O., &; Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358-377.
Brewer, D. J., Eide, E. R., &; Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). Does It Pay to Attend an Elite Private College? Cross-cohort Evidence on the Effects of College Type Earnings. Journal of Human Resources, 35, 104-123.
Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual capital. London, England: International Thomson Business Press.
Caliendo, M., &; Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31-72.
Cohn, E. (1979). The economics of education (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Dehejia, R. H. &; Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1053-1062.
Dehejia, R. H. &; Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151-161.
from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html
Guo, S., &; Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hodson, R., &; Kaufman, R. L.(1982). Economic Dualism: A Critical Review. American Sociological Review, 47(6), 727-739.
Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945-960.
Holland, P. W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 18, 449-484.
Johlke, M. C. (2006). Sales Presentation Skills and Salesperson job Performance. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 21(5), 311-319.
Kagaari, J. R. K. (2007). Evaluation of the effects of vocational choice and practical training on students' employability. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(6), 449-471.
Kerckhoff, A. C., &; Bell, L. (1998). Hidden capital: Vocational credentials and attainment in the United States. Sociology of Education, 71(2), 152-174.
Klees, S. (2008). Reflections on theory, method, and practice in comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review, 52(3), 301-328.
Leuven, E., &; Sianesi, B. (2003). Psmatch2: Stata module to perform full mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing.
Light, A. (1998). Estimating returns to schooling: when does the career begin? Economics of Education Review, 17(1), 31-45.
Loury, L. D., &; Garman, D. (1995). College Selectivity and Earnings, Journal of Labor Economics, 13, 289-308.
Morgan, S. L., &; Harding, D. J. (2006). Matching estimators of causal effects Prospects and pitfalls in theory and practice. Sociological Methods and Research, 35(1), 3-60.
Morgan, S. L., &; Todd, J. J. (2008). A diagnostic routine for the detection of consequential heterogeneity of causal effects. Sociological Methodology, 38, 231-281.
Morgan, S. L., &; Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal analysis: Methods and principles for social research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B., &; Boudett, K. P. (1995). Do High School Dropouts benefit from obtaining a GED? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 133-147.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Polachek, S., &; Yoon, B. (1987). A Two-Tier Earnings Frontier Estimation of Employer and Employee Information in the Labor Market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 296-302.
Polachek, S., &; Yoon, B. (1996). Panel Estimates of a Two-Tier Earnings Frontier. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 169-178.
Retrieved September 27, 2014,
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies. New York: Springer.
Rosenbaum, P. R., &; Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
Rosenbaum, P. R., &; Rubin, D. B. (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33-38.
Rotundo, M. &; Sackett, P. (2004). Specific versus General Skills and Abilities: A Job Level Examination of Relationships with Wage. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(2), 127-148.
Rubin, D. B. (1973). Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics, 29(1), 159-183.
Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
Rubin, D. B. (1977). Assignment of Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1-26.
Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34-58.
Rubin, D. B. (2004). Direct and indirect causal effects via potential outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 31, 161-170.
Sanchez, J. R., &; Laanan, F. S. (1997). "What Is It Worth? The Economic Value of Obtaining a Certificate or Associate Degree from California Community Colleges". Paper presented at the annual conference of the California Association for Institutional Research, San Francisco, November 1997. (ED 413941)
Shimberg, B. (1980). Occupational licensing: A public perspective. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Sianesi, B. (2004). An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labour market programmes in the 1990s. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 133-155.
Smetherham, C. (2006). First among equals? Evidence on the contemporary relationship between educational credentials and the occupational structure. Journal of Education and Work, 19(1), 29-45.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
Stauffer, E. J., Dolan, J. A., &; Newman, R. (2008).Fire Debris Analysis, Academic Press, Boston, MA, USA.
Weeden, K. A. (2002). Why do some occupations pay more than others? Social Closure and Earnings Inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 55-101.
Winship, C., &; Morgan, S. L. (1999). The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology. 25, 659-706.
Winship, C., &; Sobel, M. (2004). Causal inference in sociological studies. In M. Hardy (Ed.), The handbook of data analysis (pp. 481-503). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2006). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, OH: Thomson South Western.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE