:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師執行語文教學活動施為歷程之個案研究
作者:賴如足
作者(外文):Lai, Ju-Tsu
校院名稱:國立臺中教育大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:游自達
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:施為教師施為專業成長agencyTeacher agencyProfessional development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:26
本研究係透過個案研究的方式,運用Bandura人類施為的觀點,針對教師執行教學活動的施為歷程進行探究,旨在了解教師施為變化的歷程及其影響因素,以求提供未來推動教師專業發展能力的相關建議。
為達上述目的,本研究以長時間觀察與訪談收集相關資料,以6段故事來描寫教師在執行語文教學的施為脈絡,從而分析出個案教師的9種施為表現,再從其施為表現中歸納出「優先保全自身」及「積極解決困難」2種施為運作歷程,最後,研究者提出個案教師在施為運作時,其內在存有一施為運作的基本樣態。本研究依據研究發現,歸納重要結論如下:
一、 從個案教師的施為表現呈現出優先保全自身與積極解決困難兩種施為運作歷程變化;並驗證施為、自我效能信念與外在訊息三者間交互作用後,會影響施為的變化。
二、 自我效能信念、施為者的認知、情緒感受對個體內在施為意圖與反應,具有重要影響力。
三、 隨著個案教師認知轉變,其預思廣度、行動的堅持度、處理教學困難的類化能力以及施為行動策略等,呈現自單一到週全的變化歷程。
四、 個案教師的專業成長呈現出從優先保全自身的依賴期到積極解決困難的獨立期,展現個人成功的歷程。
五、 教師對專業領域的興趣與熱情、專業領域學習的成功經驗、心中所形塑的教師楷模形象等,是支持他不斷創新施為的重要個人因素。
This research is a case study that aimed to investigate teacher’s agency processes based on Bandura’s human agency perspective. Findings and research results would provide implications and suggestions on enhancing teacher’s professional development.
To achieve the research goals, long-term observation and interview data were collected. Six vignettes of the participating teacher’s language arts teaching practice were illustrated to show the context of teacher agency. Nine agency performances were identified from these vignettes. Based on the agency performances, two different agency processes were proposed: “seeking self-protection” and “active problem solving”. The researcher suggested that there was a basic pattern in agency processes. Research findings and important conclusions are summarized below.
1. The participating teacher first showed a seeking self-protection agency process and later demonstrated an active problem solving agency process. This research also confirmed the influences of the interaction among agency, self-efficacy beliefs, and external information on teacher agency.
2. Self-efficacy beliefs, perceptions, and emotions exerted important impact on the agencist’s internal agency intention and responses.
3. As the participating teacher’s cognitive transformation, the width of her fore thought, persistence of action, transformative ability in solving teaching difficulties, and agency strategies also became more comprehensive.
4. The participating teacher demonstrated a successful professional development from a dependent stage of seeking self-protection to an independence stage of active problem solving.
5. Factors what supported the participating teacher’s continuous and innovative agency included her passion in language arts education, successful past experiences in language arts teaching profession, and her perceived image of a model teacher.
中文文獻
王渝華(2005)。國小教師工作的異化現象與成因(碩士論文)。取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=xP2yt3/registry
王萬清(1997)。國語科教學理論與實際。台北:師大書苑。
王嘉燕(2006)。臺北市國小教師國語文寫作教學實施之調查研究---運用 SWOT 分析(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所,未出版。
何玉芬(2006)。流沙上的朝聖足跡---從教師口述個案看教育承傳與教改。香港:進一步出版。
吳明清(1992)。教育研究。台北市:五南。
吳璧如(2000)。教師效能感之內函分析。研習資訊,17(5),57-66。
李宜蓁(2003)。教師,請你要保重。《康健雜誌》59,130-135。
周淑卿(2004)。我是課程發展的專業人員?--教師專業身分認同的分析。教育資料與研究,57,9-16。new window
林明元(2012)。廖玉蕙教授語文競賽之我見。桃園縣政府E教育電子報。http://163.30.192.132/list_detail.asp?e_paperid=3159
姜添輝(2010)。影響結構與施為之間互動關係的媒介物:小學教師的專業 認同與文化知覺的分析。臺灣教育社會學研究,10(1),1-44。new window
洪瑞璇(2008)。國中教師專業認同之研究:游走在「結構─能動」之間(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
范信賢(2003)。課程改革中的教師轉變:敘事探究的取向(未出版之博士論文)。國立台北師院學院,台北市。new window
孫志麟(2010)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係-實徵取向的分析。國立台北師範學院學報,14,109~140。new window
高申春(2001)。人性輝煌之路-班杜拉的社會學習理論。台北:貓頭鷹出版社。
高淑清(2000)。現象學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所 主編,質的研究方法(頁 95-132)。高雄:麗文。
張芬芬(2007)。後現代質性研究:特徵及其對課程研究的蘊義。課程與教學,10(3),31-48。new window
張俊紳(1996)。國民小學教師教學效能之研究-不同教學效能信念類型教師的教學表現及其教學生產力(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄市。new window
張新仁(2008)。台灣地區中文寫作研究的回顧與展望。本文原刊登於單文經主編(2004 年)。課程與教學新論,245-308。台北市:心理出版社。後經更新, 以原有架構收錄並回顧分析 2008 年 10 月止台灣地區的寫作研究。並發表於 2008 年 11 月 22 日發表於 澳門大學教育學院主辦之「華人社會的課程與教學改進研討會」。
教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖-總綱。檢索日期 103.10.19。取自http://masterplan.educities.edu.tw/conference/total.shtml
教育部(2011)。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點修正發布(全文)。截取自http://140.111.34.34/docdb/files/dma7db0b07090d0d0c9.pdf,擷取日期:2012.02.02
教育部(2013.03.14)。教育部國民及學前教育署國民中小學圖書館閱讀推動教師實施計畫。取自:http://163.21.26.20/enable01/uploads/49/33478700A00_attch1.pdf
教育部(2013.11.13)。教育部國民及學前教育署補助國民中小學閱讀推動計畫作業要點。取自:http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=FL038195&KeyWordHL=%E9%96%B1%E8%AE%80&StyleType=1
教育部(2014.03.28)。教育部國民及學前教育署「增置國民中小學圖書館閱讀推動教師實施注意事項」。取自:www3.cmsh.tc.edu.tw/mediafile/1903/.../2014-3-28-16-36-16-nf1.doc
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。new window
陳美如(2009)。看見教師的教學故事。教育研究月刊,179,112-115。
黃聲儀(2006)。課文朗讀教學在國小低年級實施之現況研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,未出版。
黃騰(2003)。紀登斯全球化理論及其對課程研究之啟發(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所,未出版。
楊巧玲(2008)。教育改革對教師專業認同之影響:五位國中資深教師的探索性研究。師大學報,教育類,53(1),25-54。new window
楊茂秀(1999)。我們教室有鬼。台北:遠流。
葉明政(2014)。國小教師實施重大議題課程政策:釋義理論的多重個案研究(博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,台中市。
廖玉蕙(2011)。精英特訓的語文競賽。聯合報2011.12.22
廖玉蕙(2012)。再論「教育部全國語文競賽」。聯合報2012.02.20
潘士銓、黃繼仁(2010)。國小教師國語文教學實際知識之敘述探究。國民教育研究學報,24,113-128。new window
聯合新聞網(2011.6.22)。家長訂教師守則?教師大反彈。擷取自http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=326112
謝琇羽(2011)。國小學童朗讀訓練之個案研究 (碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,未出版。
Ayera, W.,(2006)。教學:一位老師的心路歷程。(陳正乾譯)台北:文景。(原著出版於2001)
Covey, S. R.,(2014)。與成功有約-高效能人士的七個習慣。(8版)(顧淑馨譯)。台北市:遠見天下文化。(原著出版於2014)。
Palmer, P.J.,(1998)。教學的勇氣:探索教師生命的內在視界。(藍雲、陳世佳譯)。台北:心理出版。(原著出版於2009)。
Yin, R. K.,(2009)。個案研究:設計與方法。(周海濤、李永賢、張蘅譯)。台北:五南。(原著出版於1994)。


西文文獻
Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist V37 (2). 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, V44 (9), 1175-1184.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164-180.
Bandura, A. (2008). Social cognitive cognitive thery of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (2nd Eds.) Media effects: Advances in theory and research. (pp.121-153), Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the life course: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.
Billett, S. (2006). Work, subjectivity and learning. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning. Understanding learning through working life (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, J. S. (2011). Conceptualizing agency: Preservice social studies teachers thinking about professional decisions. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Indiana University.) ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (UMI No. 3488046).
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45-65.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E.(1996). How to design and evaluate research in education. (3rd. ed,). New York. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Fu, G., (2014). Physics teachers and China’s curriculum reform: The interplay between agency and structure. (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). Retrieved from http://www.esera.org/doctoral-studies/countries-outside-europe/guopeng-fu/
Gayle, Y. J. (2014).A contextual analysis of secondary home economic teachers' agency in a time of mandatory curriculum change. (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology). Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/76340/
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Green, J., & Thorogood, N., (2004). Qualitative methors for health research. London: Sage.
Haggerson, N. L. (2000). Expanding curriculum research and understanding: A mytho-poetic perspective. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday & Company.
Hayes, D. (1998). Walking on eggshells: the significance of sociocultural factors in the mentoring of primary school students, Mentoring and Tutoring, 6(2), 67–76.
Hayes, D. (2001). The impact of mentoring and tutoring on student primary teachers’ achievements: a case study, Mentoring and Tutoring, 9(1), 5–21.
Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H. (2007). Time, self and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 170–191.
MacLure, M. (1993). Arguing for your self: Identity as an organizing principle in teachers’ jobs and lives. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 311-322.
Martinez, K. (1998) Supervision in pre-service teacher education: Speaking the unspoken, Leadership in Education, 1(3), 279–296.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative reserach: A guide to design and implementation. Sacramento, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Nsamenang, A. B. (2008). Culture and human development. International Journal of Psychology, 43 (2), 73–77
Priestley, M., Biesta, G.J.J. & Robinson, S. (2012, April). Understanding teacher agency: The importance of relationships. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191 – 214.
Priestley, M., Robinson, S., & Biesta G. J .J. (2011, September). Mapping teacher agency: an ecological approach to understanding teachers’ work. Paper presented at the Oxford Ethnography and Education conference.
Ray, J. M. (2009). A template analysis of teacher agency at an academically successful dual language school. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 110-141.
Redestam, K. E., & Newton, R. R. (1992). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Robinson, S.,(2012). Constructing teacher agency in response to the constraints of education policy: adoption and adaptation. Curriculum Journal, 23:2, 231-245
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Seidman, S. & Wagner, D. G. (1992). Introduaction. In S. Seidmen, & D. G. Wagner, Postmodernism theory & social theory (pp.1-14). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY: Knopf.
Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of Qualitative research. (3rd ed., pp.433-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
Tuckman, B. W. (1994). Conducting educational research (4th ed.), Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Turnbull, M. (2005). Student teacher professional agency in the practicum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. V33 (2), 195–208.
Vähäsantanen, K., & Eteläpelto, A. (2009). Vocational teachers in the face of a major educational reform: Individual ways of negotiating professional identities. Journal of Education and Work, 22(1), 15–33.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed,). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE