:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:綠能科技與在地使用:台灣太陽光電的社會技術網絡分析
作者:陳惠萍
作者(外文):Hui-Ping Chen
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:社會學研究所
指導教授:吳嘉苓
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:太陽光電再生能源使用者社會技術網絡公民參與PhotovoltaicRenewable EnergyUserSocio-Technical NetworksPublic Participation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:70
本文的核心主旨在於考察太陽光電科技如何轉化、納入現有能源結構、電力系統與社會世界的歷史進程,並從中探索不同階段的相關行動者(特別是常民使用者),如何共同形構太陽光電應用的獨特樣貌。在研究方法上,本文採用多場址民族誌,透過二手文獻檔案分析、田野觀察和深度訪談等資料蒐集管道,描繪台灣太陽光電的在地使用概況。
在「多重社會技術網絡」的分析架構下,首先,本文指出國內太陽光電發展可區分為:離網試驗、示範推廣、普及應用等三大歷史進程,並形成一種既彼此關聯、又旨趣各異的結構內涵。其次,本文進一步以屏東養水種電計畫為例,闡述綠能科技的地方治理及公民參與經驗,並藉此呈現太陽光電邁入在地使用的階段開展。簡言之,本文所提出的「多重社會技術網絡」概念,主要涉及兩種層次:一個是貫穿整體科技發展的歷史時期,另一層次則是邁向在地使用的階段過程。研究結果也發現,台灣太陽光電的社會技術網絡不僅具有「多重性」、「斷裂性」,此外更是一種蘊含權力關係的多層次網絡。由此本文認為,若要擴展太陽光電的在地使用,我們必須同時處理使用者、推廣單位、新/舊能源產業、地方/中央政府之間的權力關係,才能理解公民參與科技發展所面臨的實際問題與制度限制。
總結而言,本研究貢獻主要在於:(一)理論層面:從在地使用的社會技術網絡出發,整合太陽光電發展的巨觀結構與微觀行動,並提出科技使用及公民參與的重要性。(二)經驗層面:透過台灣太陽光電發展的在地經驗考察,提出當代適當科技的理念與實踐參考。(三)政策層面:本文也針對國內再生能源政策提出建言。其中明白指出,政府若要促進太陽光電系統的普及設置,必須重視使用者經驗、提出促進公民參與的規劃設計,以作為邁向能源民主化的政策方針。
This study primarily aims to examine the historical progress of converting and including photovoltaics technology into the existing energy structure, power system, and social world. Through this examination, I investigated how relevant actors (particularly lay users) in different stages worked together to configure the unique appearances of photovoltaic applications. I used multi-site ethnography and depicted the local use of photovoltaics in Taiwan through secondary literature analysis, field observation, in-depth interviews, and other data collection channels.
Using “multiple socio-technical networks” as the analytical framework, the study first suggests that the development of domestic photovoltaics can be divided into three major historical processes—off-grid testing, demonstration, and popular applications—and that these processes form a structural connotation that is correlated but different in terms of purpose. Second, the study considers the aqua solar farm project in Pingtung County as an example to elaborate on the experiences of local governance and public participation in green technology, thereby demonstrating the stages of implementing photovoltaic applications. In brief, the proposed concept of multiple socio-technical networks in the study mainly involves two levels. The first level is the historical period that runs throughout technological development, and the second level is the staging process that moves toward local use. The results show that the photovoltaic socio-technical networks in Taiwan are not only multiple and disruptive but also more like a multilevel network containing power relations. Based on this, the study argues that to expand the local use of photovoltaics, we must deal with the power relations among users, promotional organizations, new/old energy industries, and local/central governments to gain an understanding of the practical problems and system constraints faced by public participation in technological development.
In conclusion, the main contributions of this study are as follows. (1) The theoretical aspect: starting from the local use of socio-technical networks, the study integrates the macroscopic structure and microscopic actions of photovoltaic development and notes the importance of technology usage and public participation. (2) The experience aspect: through empirical investigation on photovoltaic development in Taiwan, the study proposes the concept of appropriate technology as well as practical reference. (3) The policy aspect: the study also proposes recommendations for domestic policies on renewable energy and clarifies that in order to promote the popularization of photovoltaic systems, the government must focus on user experience and advance planning and design that encourage greater public participation. This could serve as a policy approach toward the democratization of energy.
工業技術研究院,1991,《太陽電池發展與應用講習會》。新竹:工業材料研究所。
工業技術硏究院,2000-2004,《太陽光電示範推廣計畫》。台北:經濟部能源委員會。
工研院太電中心,2008年,〈全台第一戶電力自給自足的家庭〉,《科學人雜誌》第82期,頁7-8。
Drummond, Allan著,劉潔如 譯,2013,《綠色能源島》。台北:天下雜誌。
Rogers, Everett M. 著、唐錦超 譯,2006,《創新的擴散》。台北:遠流。
Friedman, Thomas L.著,丘羽先等譯,2008,《世界又熱、又平、又擠-全球暖化、能源耗竭、人口爆炸危機下的新經濟革命》。台北:天下文化。
王振寰,2011,《追趕的極限:台灣的經濟轉型與創新》。台北:巨流。
王宏升,2010,《嘉南地區國小校園使用太陽光電之現況分析與未來改善策略之探討》。台南:台灣首府大學工業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
王士榮,2006,《示範區民眾對太陽能發電系統之接受程度及使用行為影響因素之研究》。屏東:國立屏東商業技術學院行銷與流通管理系碩士論文。
王花蘭,2008,《生態意識消費與新奇追求對太陽光電採用意願的影響》。新竹:國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班經營管理組碩士論文。
王俊秀,2012,〈日本的能源民主與人民發電廠〉。2012全國NGOs環境會議專題演說稿,http://e-info.org.tw/node/76250
――2013,〈能源民主與人民發電廠:311之後〉。《生態台灣期刊》,第40期,頁12-15。
王聰榮、劉師源,2008,〈探討現今台灣再生能源應用之阻力與挑戰〉,《台灣經濟研究月刊》,第31期(4),頁102-114。new window
王耀村、莊才德、李建冬、吳緯峻,2011,〈分散式再生能源發電併聯配電系統實務分析〉。《台電工程月刊》,第753期,頁1-20。
尤如瑾、洪傳獻、鄒應嶼,2004,《綠色潮流下我國太陽光電產業發展策略研究》。新竹:工業技術研究院。
台大環境規劃研究室,2002,《太陽能應用基本教材》。台北:台灣環保文教基金會。
朱記民、黃裕煒,1998,〈太陽能發電技術探討〉,《台電工程月刊》,第60期,頁26-34。
行政院研究發展考核委員會,1995,《我國、日本與美國能源政策及其成效之比較研究》。台北:行政院研考會。
行政院經濟建設委員會,2012,《因應全球競爭環境下提升我國太陽光電產業優勢策略之研究》。台北:行政院經建會。
江易峰,2012,《台灣養水種電計畫商業模式分析》。台北:國立政治大學國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程碩士論文。
何孟穎,2012,《2012年太陽光電市場與產業技術發展年鑑》。台北:光電科技工業協進會。
杜文苓,2007,〈審議民主與社會運動:民間團體籌辦新竹科學園區宜蘭基地公民會議的啟發〉,《公共行政學報》,第23期,頁67-93。new window
――2009,〈高科技汙染的風險論辯—環境倡議的挑戰〉,《台灣民主季刊》,第6卷,第4期,頁101-139。
李彥璋,2012,《我國再生能源政策執行之研究─以屏東縣養水種電計畫為例》。台北:臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
林國明、陳東升,2003,〈公民會議與審議民主—全民健保的公民參與經驗〉,《台灣社會學》,第6期,頁61-118。new window
林國明,2007,〈審議民主實踐的多元模式〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,第4卷,第3期,頁191-95。
――2009,〈國家、公民社會與審議民主—公民會議在台灣的實踐經驗〉,《台灣社會學》,第17期,頁161-217。
林子倫、曾棠君 ,2010,〈公民參與風力發電計畫—匈牙利Vep市推動之經驗〉。《能源報導》2010年11月:23-26。
林子倫,2014,〈公民參與再生能源發展:社區風電的運作模式初探〉,頁106-119,收錄於范玫芳、林宗德、李河清、陳永平、陳榮泰主編,《公民能不能—能源科技、政策與民主》。新竹:國立交通大學出版社。
林崇熙,2001,〈沈默的技術──嘉南平原上的拼裝車〉《科技、醫療與社會》1:1-42。new window
林靜怡,1999,《我國核能政策之經濟分析》。台中:國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。
松井耶依 著、趙淑伶、翁秀綾 譯,1993,〈日本環境運動中婦女扮演的角色〉。(引自主婦聯盟會訊105期)。http://taiwan.yam.org.tw/womenweb/s8.htm.new window
周子筠,2009,《消費者對家庭用太陽光電系統之租與購願付價格與相關影響因素探討》。台南:國立成功大學資源工程學系碩士論文。
周桂田、凌主悅,2012,邁向永續?低碳社會、核能與治理創新,2012科技與社會學會年會研討會。
吳嘉苓,2007,〈STS與科學治理─評Brian Wynne and Ulrike Felt,嚴肅面對歐洲知識社會〉,《台灣民主季刊》,第4卷,第3期,頁185-189。
――2011,〈編排風險:多胚胎孕育的多重社會技術網絡〉,《台灣社會學》,22:111-156。
吳政憲,2005,《台灣來電:近代能源開發的故事》。台北:向日葵文化。
吳再益、林唐裕、侯仁義、柯亮群、黃永慧,2012,〈我國能源政策發展模式及其未來方向探討〉。《臺灣銀行季刊》,63(2),頁34-87。new window
吳文欣,2008,《推廣型使用者的社會創新:常民專家如何改寫台灣衛生棉條科技的社會腳本》。台北:國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
吳浩然,2005,《大與小的抉擇:從「適當科技」看「風場」》。新竹:清華大學歷史研究所碩士論文。
吳挺超,2004,《打造一個綠色烏托邦?!潭南協力造屋的空間生產與文化政治》。台北:台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
哈溫海,2010,《台灣的住戶太陽能市場:障礙、解決辦法與發展遠景》。台北:國立政治大學亞太研究英語碩士學位學程碩士論文。
洪靖,2009,《永續建築與適當科技:如何重塑使用者與現代社會》。新竹:清華大學歷史研究所碩士論文。
范玫芳,2008,〈科技、民主與公民身份:安坑灰渣掩埋場設置爭議之個案研究〉,《台灣政治學刊》,第12卷,第1期,頁185-227。new window
――2013,〈能源決策困境與參與式科技評估之展望〉,《國家發展研究》,第13卷,第1期,頁1-40。
凌主悅,2013,《全國能源會議之核能風險論述分析》。台北:國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
莊衍松,2009,〈再生能源發展條例立法進度〉,《電子時報》,2月3日。
高橋恭平,2011,《台灣與日本太陽光電系統普及政策之比較研究》。台南:成功大學政治經濟學研究所碩士論文。
徐仁全,2007,〈向太陽巨人取經-弗萊堡的成就 20萬鎮民做綠能巨人〉,《遠見雜誌》第251期:頁
許志義、陳澤義,1993,《能源經濟學》。台北:華泰書局。
郭志榮,2005,《高雄市國民中小學太陽能發電系統應用之研究》。屏東:屏東科技大學環境工程與科學系碩士論文。
張國暉,2011,〈對技術的社會建構論之挑戰:建構東亞技術研究主體性的一個契機〉。《科技、醫療與社會》,13:171-222。new window
――2013,〈當核能系統轉變為科技政體:冷戰下的國際政治與核能發展〉,《科技、醫療與社會》,16:103-160。
康志堅、張蕎韻,2009,《2010-2012年全球太陽光電市場商機探索》。台北:經濟部技術處。
.葉宏志,2006,《電業自由化下之發電與購電成本策略分析資訊系統建構與輸電權研究》。嘉義:國立中正大學電機工程研究所碩士論文。
陳信行,2003,〈從適當科技運動角度看921震後協力造屋運動〉,《技術、文化與家:潭南協力造屋之省思研討會論文集》,頁84-105。高雄:國立科學工藝博物館。
――2014,〈適當科技:如何讓科技適合此時此地的人?〉,頁227-251,收錄於范玫芳、林宗德、李河清、陳永平、陳榮泰主編,《公民能不能—能源科技、政策與民主》。新竹:國立交通大學出版社。
陳文樹、員眷,2009,〈德國使用太陽能最著名的市鎮--弗萊堡〉。《台電月刊》第555期:頁30-33。
陳東升,2006,〈審議民主的限制—台灣公民會議的經驗〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,第3卷,第1期,頁77-104。new window
陳彥豪,1995,〈德國太陽光電市場分析與預測〉,《能源季刊》,第35卷,第4期,頁93-113。
張力宇,2009,〈永續的太陽光電〉,《台電月刊》,第560期,頁5-15。
――2010,〈太陽光電 全球興起〉,《台電月刊》,第568期,頁6-15。
黃國榮,2009,《台灣地區太陽能潛力評估》。台南:立德大學資源環境研究所碩士論文。
黃東益,2008,〈審議過後—從行政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策連結〉,《東吳政治學報》,第26卷,第4期,頁59-96。new window
黃德源,2001,《台灣地區核能發展之政治經濟分析(1945- 2001)》。台北:台北大學公共行政暨政策研究所碩士論文。
黃秉鈞,2014,〈太陽光電可以替代核電〉,頁32-46,收錄於范玫芳、林宗德、李河清、陳永平、陳榮泰主編,《公民能不能—能源科技、政策與民主》。新竹:國立交通大學出版社。
曾稚尹,2013,《產業永續性轉型之社會資本與政府效能之分析:以屏東縣「養水種電計畫」為例》。台中:東海大學行政管理暨政策學系碩士論文。
傅大為,2006,〈STS的實踐,與台灣的新適當科技運動?〉,STS之構思、教學與實踐研習營。
――2011,〈大海嘯、福島核災、與東亞的科技與社會〉,《科 技、醫療與社會》13: 9-14。
楊中傑、周維忠,2008,《綠色能源當道—全球太陽能電池市場與產業發展趨勢分析》。台北:資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所。
.楊士炫,2008,《我國推動電業法修正案合法化過程之研究》。台中:東海大學行政管理暨政策學系碩士論文。
楊豐碩,2001,〈我國電業自由化架構之研討〉,國家政策研究基金會電業自由化座談會引言報告。
網址:http://old.npf.org.tw/Symposium/s90/900428-TE-1.htm(取用日期2010年4月28日)
楊森 主編,2006,《太陽鍊金術:透視全球太陽光電產業》。台北:財訊。
楊弘任,2002,〈看不見的技術:蓮霧變成黑珍珠的技術發展史〉。《科技、醫療與社會》第2期,頁1-57。new window
――2010,〈專家系統下的地方知識:嘉邑行善團的造橋實作〉,《科技、醫療與社會》,第10期,頁129-190。
――2012,〈技術物的政治性〉,頁220-228。收錄於王文基、王秀雲、郭文華 編,《意外多重奏:STS如何重組真相》。台北:行人出版社。
經濟部能源委員會 編,2004,《源起不滅:臺灣能源發展軌跡》。台北:經濟部能源會。
經濟部能源局,2010,《能源產業技術白皮書》。台北:經濟部能源局。
――2014,《能源統計年報》。台北:經濟部能源局
經濟部能源局陽光屋頂百萬座計畫推動辦公室,2015年,《能源報導》,104年七月號,頁36-37。
鄒智純,2011,《我國再生能源發展條例立法過程與法案內容之研究》。國立台灣大學政治學系碩士論文。
趙靜宜,2007,《台灣與先進國家太陽光電推廣策略之研究》。彰化:國立彰化師範大學電機工程學系電機工程所碩士論文。
劉佳怡,2006,《從全球價值鏈探討臺灣太陽光電產業發展契機》。新竹:工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心。
劉淑娟,2011,《加速再生能源市場化之分析-以太陽光能為例》。高雄:國立高雄第一科技大學運籌管理系所碩士論文。
劉佩恆,2011,《德國推動再生能源政策與產業發展之研究》。台北:淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士班碩士論文。
劉明德、徐玉珍,2012,〈臺灣亟需有遠見的再生能源政策與做法-德國經驗的啟示〉,《公共行政學報》,第43期,頁127-150。new window
鄧宗業、吳嘉苓,2004,〈法人論壇:新興民主國家的參與模式〉,《台灣民主季刊》,第1卷,第4期,頁35-56。new window
蔡岳勳,2009,〈跛腳的能源法案-評析再生能源發展條例〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,第174期,頁69-87。
蔡旻霈、范玫芳,2014,〈科學民主化與水資源開發爭議—高屏大湖之個案研究〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,第11卷,第1期,頁1-40。new window
蔡文献,2010,《由科技接受模式(TAM)探討消費者對選購住宅型太陽能發電系統之行為意向》。台南:成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
鄭美玲,2006,《校園永續能源系統之建構:南興國小太陽光電系統應用之案例分析》。台南:立德管理學院研究所碩士論文。
鄭西顯、季昀,2012,《全球與我國太陽光電產業環境趨勢與我國產業競爭優勢來源及策略建議分析報告》,新竹市:清華大學能源產業科技策略研究中心。
賴宜君,2014,《德國太陽能政策的發展歷程及現況之研究-以弗萊堡為例》。嘉義:南華大學歐洲研究所碩士論文。
蘇怡靜,2011,《以TAM模型探討台灣民眾使用住宅型太陽能發電系統之態度與行為》,台南:國立台南大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
羅運俊、何梓年、王長貴、張勝雄、林乃陽、梁財春,2007,《太陽能發電技術與應用》。台北:新文京。

Acker, R. H., & Kammen, D. M. , 1996, “The quiet energy revolution: Analysing the dissemination of photovoltaic power systems in Kenya”. Energy Policy (24): 8 1-111.
Akrich, M., 1992, “The de-scription of technical objects.” Pp.205-224 in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Akrich, M. and Latour, B., 1992, “A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies.” Pp.259-264 in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Amsden, A., 1985, “The state and Taiwan''s economic development.” Pp.78-106 in Bringing the state back in, edited by Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, D., Pettigrew, T., Costanzo, M., Iritani, B., Walker, I., & White, L. T., 1987, “Energy conservation and public policy: Mediation of individual behavior.” Pp. 69-92 in Energy Efficiency: Perspectives on Individual Behavior, edited by W. Kempton & M. Neiman. Washington, DC: ACEEE Press.
Argue, Robert, Emanuel, Barbara and Graham, Stephen, 1978, The Sun Builders: A People''s Guide to Solar, Wind and Wood Energy in Canada. Toronto: Renewable Energy in Canada.
Bartlett, W. and Le Grand, J., 1993, Quasi-markets and Social Policy. London: MacMillan.
Bartlett, W., Jennifer A. Roberts and Julian Le Grand .1998, A Revolution in Social Policy: Quasi-market reforms in the 1990s. British, Bristol: University of Bristol.
Beise M., 2004, “The International Adoption of Photovoltaic Energy Conversion: Is Japan a Lead Market? “International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy 2(3):272-83.
Bijker, W., 1995, Of Bicycles, Bakerlites and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
――2003, “The need for public intellectuals: A space for STS.” Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 28, No. 4: 443-450.
Bijker, W. E. and Bijsterveld, K. (2000). “Women walking through plans: Technology, democracy, and gender identity.” Technology and Culture, Vol. 41, No. 3: 485-515.
Bordenave, Juan Diaz., 1976, “Communication of Agricultural Innovations in Latin America:The Need for New Models.” Communication Research 3(2):135-154.
Bourdieu, P., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
Brown, Lawrence(1981)Innovation Diffusion. Methuen, New York.
Brown, J. and Hendry, C., 2009, “Public Demonstration Projects and Field Trials: Accelerating Commercialisation of Sustainable Technology in Solar Photovoltaics.” Energy Policy 37(7):2560-2573.
Brunnschweiler, Christa N., 2010, “Finance for Renewable Energy: An Empirical Analysis of Developing and Transition Economies”, Environment and Development Economics 15 (3): 241-274.
Cesta, J. R. and Decker, P. G., 1978, “Speeding Solar Energy Commercialization: A Delphi of. Marketplace Factors.” Journal of Business Research 6: 311-328.
Corburn, Jason,2005, Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hua-Mei Chiu, 2010, Ecological Modernisation Or Enduring Environmental Conflict?: Environmental Change in the Development of Taiwan''s High-tech Industry. The University of Essex.
Corburn, Jason, 2005, Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cowan, R. S., 1976, The Industrial Revolution in the Home: Household Technology and Social Change in the 20th Century. Technology and Culture, 17, 1-23.
――1983,. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic Books.
――1987, “The Consumption Junction: A Proposal for Research Strategies in the Sociology of Technology.” Pp.261-280 in The social construction of technological system, edited by W. E. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Chowdhury, S.; Sumita, U.; Islam, A.; Bedja, I., 2014, “Importance of policy for energy system transformation: Diffusion of PV technology in Japan and Germany.” Energy Policy, 68: 285–293.
Devine‐Wright, P., 2005, “Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy”.Wind energy, 8(2): 125-139.
――,2011, “Public engagement with large‐scale renewable energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2(1):19-26.
DiMoia, John, 2010, “Atoms for Sale? Cold War Institution-Building and the South Korean Atomic Energy Project, 1945-1965”. Technology and Culture 51: 589-618.
Duke, R. and Kammen, D. M., 1999, “The Economics of Energy Market Transformation Programs.” The Energy Journal 20 (4):1-50.
Edgerton, David., 1999, “From Innovation to Use: Ten Eclectic Theses on the Historiography of Technology.” History and Technology 16:111-136.
Elzen, B.; Enserink, B. and Smit, W. A., 1996, “Socio-technical Networks: How a Technology Studies Approach May Help to Solve Problems Related to Technical Change. Social Studies of Science 26:95-141.
Epstein, Steven, 1996, Impure Science. Aids, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scheer, Hermann, 1999, The Solar Economy:Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Global Future. London: Earthscan.
Faiers, A., Cook, M. and Neame, C., 2007, “Towards a Contemporary Approach for Understanding Consumer Behaviour in the Context of Domestic Energy Use. Energy Policy 35(8): 4381-4390.
Fischer, C. S.(1988). “Gender and the residential telephone, 1890-1940: Technologies of sociability.” Sociological Forum, Vol. 3: 211-233.
Fligstein, N., 2001, The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Fujigaki, Yuko and Togo Tsukahara, 2011, “STS Implications of Japan’s 3/11 Crisis”. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 5(3): 381-394.
Granovetter, M., 1985, “Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91:481-93.
Guidolin, M., Mortarino, C., 2010, “Cross-country diffusion of photovoltaic systems: Modelling choices and forecasts for national adoption patterns”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 77(2):279-296.
Hankins, M., 1993, Solar Rural Electrification in the Developing World. Four Country Case Studies: Dominican Republic, Kenya, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. Solar Electric Light Fund, Washington, D.C..
――1995, Solar Electric Systems for Africa: A Guide for Planning and Installing Solar Electric Systems in Rural Africa, Commonwealth Secretariat.
Hayes, Denis, 1977, Rays of Hope: The Transition to a Post-Petroleum World. New York: W.W. Norton.
Hess, D. J., 2005, “Technology- and Product-Oriented Movements: Approximating Social Movement Studies and STS”. Science, Technology, and Human Values 30(4):515-535.
Heymann, M., 1998, “Signs of hubris: the shaping of wind technology styles in Germany, Denmark, and the United States.” Technology and Culture 39(4): 641–670.
Hong, Sungook, 2011, “Where Is the Nuclear Nation Going? Hopes and Fears over Nuclear Energy in South Korea after the Fukushima Disaster”. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 5(3): 409-415.
Hughes, Thomas P., 1983, Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
——1987, “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems,” in The Social Construction of Technological Systems, eds. W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes & T.P. Pinch, The MIT Press, USA, pp. 51-82
——1989, American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm. NY: Viking.
Irwin, A., 1995, Citizen Science: A study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge
Irwin, A., 2001, “Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences”, Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 10, No.1:1-18.
Jacobson, Arne , 2007, “Connective Power: Solar Electrification and Social Change in Kenya.” World Development 35(1):144-162.
Jacobsson, S., and Johnson A., 2000, “The Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and Key Issues for Research,” Energy Policy 28(9): 625-640.
Jacobsson, S. and Bergek, A., 2004, “Transforming the Energy Sector: The Evolution of Technological Systems in Renewable Energy Technology.” Industrial and Corporate Change13(5):815–849.
Jacobsson, S.; Lauber, V., 2006, “The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology”. Energy Policy 34(3): 256-276.
Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim, 2009, “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47: 119-146.
Kempton, W. and Layne, L., 1988, “The Consumer’s Energy Information Environment.” Pp.50-66 in Proceedings of the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. Washington, DC: ACEEE Press.
Keirstead, J., 2007, “The UK Domestic Photovoltaics Industry and the Role of Central Government.” Energy Policy 35(4): 2268-2280.
Kline, R., & Pinch, T. J.(1996). “Taking the Black Box off its Wheels: The Social Construction of the Automobile in Rural America.” Technology and Culture , Vol. 37: 776-795.
Kurokawa K. and Ikki, O., 2001, “The Japanese Experience with National PV System Programmes.” Solar Energy 70(6):457–66.
Labay, D.G., Kinnear, T.C., 1981, “Exploring the Consumer Decision Process in the Adoption of. Solar Energy Systems.” The Journal of Consumer Research 8(3): 271-278.
Lerman, N., Mohun, A., & Oldenzeil, R., 1997, Versatile tools: Gender analysis and the history of technology. Technology and Culture, Vol. 38(1): 1-8.
Lesnick, Peggy C.(2000) Technology Transfer in the Dominican Republic: A Case Study of the Diffusion of Photovoltaics. Ph.D. diss., Union Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Lovins, Amory B., 1977, Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable Peace. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
Lutzenhiser, Loren, 2002, “Greening the Economy from the Bottom up? Lessons in Consumption from the Energy Case.” Pp.345-356 in Readings in Economic Sociology, edited by Nicole Woolsey Biggart. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
McEachern, M. and Hanson, S., 2008, “Socio-geographic perception in the diffusion of innovation: Solar energy technology in Sri Lanka.” Energy Policy, 36(7 ):2578-2590.
Miller, Damian, 2011, Selling Solar: The Diffusion of Renewable Energy in Emerging Markets. London: Earthscan.
Nemet, Gregory F., 2006, “Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics.” Energy Policy 34(17):3218-3232.
Nye, David E., 1990, Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
――1998, Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Oudshoorn, Nelly, 2003, The Male Pill: A Biography of a Technology in the Making. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Oudshoorn, Nelly and Pinch, Trevor, 2005, “ How Users and Non-Users Matter.” Pp.1-25 in: How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Technologies and Users, edited by N. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press..
Pernick, R. and Wilder, C., 2008, The Clean Tech Revolution: Discover the Top Trends, Technologies, and Companies to Watch. New York: Collins Business.
Pinch, T. and Bijker, W., 1987, “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Pp.17-50 in The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pursell, Carroll, 1993, “The rise and fall of the appropriate technology movement in the United States, 1965-1985”, Technology and Culture 34(3): 629-637.
――2001, “Feminism and the Rethinking of the History of Technology”. Pp. 113-127 in Feminism in Twentieth-Century Science, Technology, and Medicine, edited by Angela N.H. Creager, Elizabeth Lunbeck & Londa Schiebinger. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rogers, Everett M., 1962, Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, Everett M. and Shoemaker, Floyd F., 1971, Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, J. C., Simmons, E. A., Convery, I., & Weatherall, A., 2008, “Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects”. Energy Policy 36(11): 4217-4226.
Sawyer, S. W., 1982, “Leaders in change: solar energy owners and the implications for future adoption rates”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 21(3): 201-211.
Scarpa, R. and Willis, K. G.., 2010, “Willingness-to-Pay for Renewable Energy: Primary and Discretionary Choice of British Households’ for Micro-Generation Technologies. Energy Economics 32(1):129-136.
Schumacher, E. F., 1973, Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Harper & Row.
Silverstone,R. and Hirsch, E., 1992, Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge.
Simon, Herbert A., 1976, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Free Press.
Sovacool, B. K., 2009, “Rejecting Renewables: The Socio-Technical Impediments to Renewable Electricity in the United States.” Energy Policy 37(11):4500-4513.
Sovacool, B.K., D''Agostino A.L. and Bambawale, M. J., 2011, “The Socio-Technical Barriers to Solar Home Systems (SHS) in Papua New Guinea: Choosing Pigs, Prostitutes, and Poker Chips over Panels.” Energy Policy 39(3):1532-1542.
Spaargaren, G., 2003, “Sustainable Consumption: A Theoretical and Environmental Policy Perspective.” Society and Natural Resources 16:687-701.
Stern, Paul C., 1986, “Blind Spots in Policy Analysis: What Economics Doesn’t Say about Energy Use.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5(2) 200-227.
Stern, P C. et al., 1986, “The Effectiveness of Incentives for Residential Energy Conservation”. Evaluation Review 10:147-176.
Upreti, B. R., & van der Horst, D., 2004, “National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant”.Biomass and bioenergy 26(1):61-69.
Von Hippel, Eric (1986) Lead Users: a Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science 32(7): 791–805.
――(2005)Democratizing Innovation. London: MIT Press.
Wajcman, Judy , 1991, Feminism confronts technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Walker, G., 1995, “Renewable energy and the public.” Land Use Policy 12(1):49-59.
Walker, G., & Cass, N., 2007, “Carbon reduction,‘the public’and renewable energy: engaging with socio‐technical configurations”.Area 39(4):458-469.
Wang, T.J.; Liu, S., 2010, “Shaping and Exploiting Technological Opportunities? The Case of Technology in Taiwan.” Renewable Energy 35(2):360-367.
Watanabe, C., Wakabayashi, K., Miyazawa, T., 2000, “Industrial Dynamism and the Creation of a “Virtuous Cycle” between R&D, Market Growth and Price Reduction: The Case of Photovoltaic Power Generation (PV) Development in Japan.” Technovation 20(6): 299-312.
Watanabe, C., Nagamatsu, A. and Griffy-Brown, C., 2003, “Behavior of Technology in Reducing Prices of Innovative Goods: An Analysis of the Governing Factors of Variance of PV Module Prices.” Technovation 23: 423-436.
Winner, Langdon, 1986, The Whale and the Reactor:A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wolsink, M., 2000, “Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support”. Renewable Energy 21(1): 49-64.
Woolgar, S., 1991, “Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials.” Pp.58-99 in A Sociology of Monsters:Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by J. Law. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wustenhagen, R and Bilharz, M., 2006, “Green Energy Market Development in Germany: Effective Public Policy and Emerging Customer Demand.” Energy Policy 34(13): 1681-1696.
Wynne, B., 1996, “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-LayKnowledge Divide.” In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds.). Risk, Environment and Modernity (pp.44-83). London: Sage.
Wynne, Brian, Rlrike Felt, etc., 2007, Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Yoo, S. H. and Kwak, S. Y., 2009, “Willingness to Pay for Green Electricity in Korea: A Contingent Valuation Study.” Energy Policy 37(12): 5408-5416.
Yuan, X., Zuo, J. and Ma, C., 2011, “Social Acceptance of Solar Energy Technologies in China: End Users'' Perspective.” Energy Policy 39(3):1031-1036.
Zoellner, J., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Wemheuer, C., 2008, “Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany”. Energy Policy 36(11): 4136-4141

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE