:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:地方本位課程中原住民學生學習投入之研究
作者:姚宗威
作者(外文):Yao, Tsung-Wei
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:科學教育研究所
指導教授:王國華
顏瓊芬
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:地方本位教育科學學習課程模組原住民學生族群認同現象學微觀人種誌學學習投入ethnic identityindigenous studentsmicro-ethnographyPhenomenologyPlace-based educationscience learning modulesstudent engagement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
本研究透過現象學及微觀人種誌學(話語分析)的取向,探究在4個原住民地方本位教育(Place-Based Education, PBE)科學學習課程模組中,原住民學生所展現的學習特徵、所獲得的學習成效、影響原住民學生學習投入的因素,以及對原住民學生族群認同的影響。
參與研究的有2所位於台灣中部的原住民國小,每校2班,共48位五年級與六年級的原住民學生,包括泰雅族、布農族及賽德克族。4個PBE科學學習課程模組的教學主題,分別為土石流、編織、植物面面觀與生物多樣性。
研究結果顯示,原住民學生在PBE課程模組中所展現的學習特徵,包括樂於參與實作課程,而且具有「森巴舞學校」的學習社群特徵。這兩項特徵,都對原住民學生具有促進學習投入的效果。3個模組的前後測統計分析中,有2個模組顯示學生具有顯著的進步,1個模組的前後測差異為不顯著。但佐以概念圖的分析及原住民教師的評估,認為原住民學生可以透過PBE課程模組的學習,獲得正向的學習成效。
影響原住民學生學習投入的因素,包括受到教具或耆老所提供地方元素或原住民知識(Indigenous Knowledge, IK)的正向促進,而耆老本身也是促進學生學習投入的因素。授課的原住民籍教師,也會因為同學提出的涉及IK的發問,而改變上課焦點,引導同學深入討論。原住民籍教師具有涵化者(acculturative)的雙認同取向,並且對PBE課程模組中的IK具有正向情感。因而在實踐PBE課程時,可以扮演稱職的文化導遊,成為促進原住民學生學習投入的關鍵因素,提供了協助原住民學生順利跨越IK及西方現代科學(Western Modern Science, WMS)兩個不同世界觀的背景條件。
透過晤談,推測因為原住民學生在實踐課程之前,就已經具有高度的族群認同狀態,所以在實踐PBE課程前後,學生的族群認同狀態改變的程度,無法得到統計上的顯著差異。
Through the orientation of phenomenology and micro-ethnographic (discourse analysis), this study explores indigenous students' learning in four indigenous Place-Based Education (PBE) science learning modules. With the modules, we found the features of the indigenous students' learning, the learning outcomes, the factors of affecting student engagement, and the impact of indigenous students’ ethnic identity.
In the study were two indigenous schools in the middle of Taiwan, each with two classes. There were 48 indigenous fifth and sixth graders, including the Atayal, Bunun and Sediq. The teaching themes of the four PBE modules were about landslide, weaving, botanic and biological diversity.
The findings showed that the learning characteristics of the indigenous students in the PBE module included the willingness to participate in the practical curriculum and the “Samba School” learning community, both of which enhanced the indigenous student engagement. In the three modules pretest-posttest statistical analysis, two of the modules showed that students made significant progress, and one of them was not significant. However, with the analysis of the concept map and the assessment of the indigenous teacher, we found that the indigenous students could learn through the PBE curriculum module to obtain positive learning results.
The factors that affected indigenous students' learning input included the local elements of teaching aids or Indigenous Knowledge (IK) provided by the elderly and even the elderly themselves as well. Indigenous teacher changed the focus in class owing to the questions related to IK raised by the students and guided the students to the in-depth discussion. The indigenous teacher possessed the acculturative dual cultural identity and the positive emotion in the IK of the PBE module. Thus, in the practice of the PBE, the teacher can played the competent cultural guide, became the key factors of enhancing the indigenous student engagement and provided the basic conditions of the indigenous students to cross the boundary of IK and Western Modern Science (WMS).
Through the interview, it assumed that the indigenous students had a high degree of ethnic identity before the course. Therefore, there was no significant difference existed in ethnic identity survey between the before and after the PBE course.
中文部分
中央研究院民族學研究所(譯)(2011)。蕃族調查報告書(第四冊)賽德克族與太魯閣族(原作者:臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會)。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
中央研究院民族學研究所(譯)(2012)。蕃族調查報告書(第五冊)泰雅族前篇(原作者:臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會)。臺北市:中央研究院民族學研究所。
方德隆(譯)(2004)。課程基礎理論(原作者:Allan C. Ornstein & Francis P. Hunkins)。臺北:高等教育。
毛國楠、劉政宏、彭淑玲、李維光、陳慧娟(2008)。能力信念、學業自我價值後效與學業成就對國小學生學習動機與學習情緒之影響。教育心理學報,39(4),569-588。doi:10.6251/BEP.20071213new window
王雅玄(2013)。多元文化科學教育的教學越界語課程轉化。課程與教學,16(3),111-137。new window
江冠榮(2010)。布農族傳統建築家屋選址之智慧。台灣原住民研究論叢,8,85-116。new window
江淑卿、潘于君(2010)。文化取向之科學探究融入圖畫書教學對原住民兒童作用力與反作用力、摩擦力概念學習之影響。高雄師大學報,29,1-25。new window
江淑卿、蕭麗滿、陳淑芳、馬祖琳、鄭芬蘭(2008年5月)。原住民文化取向「生物特性與成長科學圖畫書教學模組」之研發-以山豬、百步蛇、山羊與飛魚活動為例。李暉(主持人),文化,科學,科技與學習的對話。原住民學生數理教育學術研討會,臺東大學。
牟中原(1996)。原住民教育改革報告書。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。
何映虹、陳淑芳(2008年5月)。阿美族野菜文化融入幼稚園植物教學之研究。李暉(主持人),文化,科學,科技與學習的對話。原住民學生數理教育學術研討會,臺東大學。
吳百興、吳心楷(2015)。從族群科學的觀點論原住民科學教育的取徑。科學教育月刊,381,17-36。
呂枝益(2000)。多元文化教育與九年一貫課程發展。中等教育,51(3),28-43。new window
呂煦屏(2010)。自然與生活科技文化回應教學之初探:以一所布農族國小植物單元為例。網路社會學通訊期刊,87。取自http://society.nhu.edu.tw/e-j/87/A16.htm
李秀如(2016)。「我們」都一樣嗎?:談台灣族群價值觀的異同。人文與社會學報,3(5),1-30。new window
李宗薇(1997)。教育研究客觀性的現象學分析。臺北師院學報,10,1-22。
李宜玫、孫頌賢(2010)。大學生選課自主性動機與學習投入之關係。教育科學研究期刊,55(1),155-182。new window
李春慧(2004)。花蓮縣萬榮鄉布農族學生族群認同階段性發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。慈濟大學,花蓮縣。
李暉、蔣佳玲、姚如芬(2011)。部落教室—原住民族小學地方本位數理課程與科普活動之發展與實踐--部落教室:發展地方本位課程以促進原住民族學校科學師資之專業發展(2/4) (報告編號:NSC 99-2511-S-259-001),未出版。
李樹英(2005)。教育現象學:一門新型的教育學-訪教育現象學國際大師馬克斯·范梅南教授。開放教育研究,11(3)。4-7。
沈文吉(2013)。以地方為基礎的教育對國小學童學習成就與環境素養之影響-以蝴蝶生態課程模組為例(未出版之碩士論文)。靜宜大學,臺中市。
官銓輿、曾慶裕、劉佳鎮、劉麗雲(2010)。泰雅族口簧琴舞傳情探討。輔仁大學體育學刊,9,317-329。new window
林永盛、郭李宗文、謝佩芳、高志誠、鄭偉壕(2008年5月)。發展原住民小一學生在地具體化數學課程活動之歷程-以排灣族學童為例。蔣佳玲(主持人),文化,科學,科技與學習的對話。原住民學生數理教育學術研討會,臺東大學。
林妙徽、顏瓊芬、李暉(2008)。原住民族科學學習之困境與未來展望。台灣人文生態研究,10(1),89-112。
林慧年、王俊秀、台邦‧撒沙勒(2016)。以方法目的鏈探討獵人學校傳統生態知識之價值建構。科學教育學刊,24(2),139-165。new window
林寶山,康春枝(譯)(2001)。學校與社會.兒童與課程(原作者:J. Dewey)。臺北:五南。
林益仁、呂欣怡、郭重吉(2010)。部落教室—原住民族小學地方本位數理課程與科普活動之發展與實踐--部落教室:以大學-部落夥伴自然/文化教室為基礎之在地生態知識建構(1/4) (報告編號:NSC 98-2511-S-126-003),未出版。
林益仁、呂欣怡、郭重吉(2011)。部落教室—原住民族小學地方本位數理課程與科普活動之發展與實踐--部落教室:以大學-部落夥伴自然/文化教室為基礎之在地生態知識建構(2/4) (報告編號:NSC 99-2511-S-126-003),未出版。
姚如芬(2013a)。原民數學教材之發展與實踐。科學教育研究與發展季刊,67,73-92。
姚如芬(2013b)。從部落教室看見中年級原民學童的數學學習。屏東教大科學教育,38,2-18。
姚如芬(2014)。部落教室—原住民族小學地方本位數理課程與科普活動之發展與實踐--部落教室:以部落為本位的原住民族數學學習與師資培育(4/4) (報告編號:NSC 101-2511-S-415-001),未出版。
柯志明(2012年10月7日)。家、環境與科學【方濟與狼】。取自http://st-francis-of-assisi-and-the-wolf.blogspot.tw/2012/10/blog-post.html
洪如玉(2013)。「地方」概念之探究及其在教育之啟示。人文社會學報,9(4),257-279。new window
洪如玉(2016)。從地方本位教育觀點探討跨議題融入課程與教學。課程與教學,19(2),83-102。new window
原住民族委員會(2016年11月2日a)。原住民簡介─原住民分布【族群與文化】。取自http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docList.html?CID=6726E5B80C8822F9
原住民族委員會(2016年11月2日b)。原住民簡介─泰雅族【族群與文化】。取自http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docList.html?CID=FAD81C01A21CEFD8
原住民族委員會(2016年11月2日c)。原住民簡介─布農族【族群與文化】。取自http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docList.html?CID=274BE22984C1B432
宮莉虹、丁雪茵(2002)。當漢族老師遇到原住民孩子-看兩位幼稚園教師如何將泰雅文化融入單元課程與教學中。載於陳枝烈(主編)91年原住民教育學術研討會論文集(頁197-224)。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。
馬競松(譯)(2006)。情感的理趣。(原作者:R. d. Sousa)著。臺北,五南。
高俊一(1982)。現象與宗師:胡塞爾。臺北:允晨。
張子樟(1997)。鄉土文學教學的實踐-以《少年噶瑪蘭》為例。師友月刊,362,75-79。
張必瑜(2010)。有國無家的地理想像:戰後初期臺灣小學地理教育中的家鄉與異鄉、我族與他者。臺灣文學研究集刊,8,85-124。new window
張汝倫(1997)。現象學取向的多重含義。哲學雜誌,20,90-115。
張志平(2006)。情感的本質與意義:舍勒的情感現象學概論。上海:上海人民出版社。
張建成(2001)。傳統與現代之間:論台灣原住民的文化認同。載於高淑芳(主編)90年原住民族教育學術論文發表暨研討會論文集(頁558-574)。國立新竹師範學院。
張春興(2007)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華。
張淑美(2002)。原住民中小國教育現場的省思與展望。載於陳枝烈(主編)91年原住民教育學術研討會論文集(頁99-119)。國立屏東師範學院。
張景媛(1997)。國中生之正負向情緒與其後設認知,學習動機關係之研究。教育心理學報,29,51-76。new window
教育部(2003年12月)。科學教育白皮書【科學教育重點推動專案】。取自:https://www.most.gov.tw/sci/ch/list?menu_id=aa20fc35-9772-47b2-b4e2-e39ce049c148
教育部(2005年12月15日)。發展原住民族教育五年中程個案計畫【政策與計畫】。取自:https://indigenous.moe.gov.tw/EducationAborigines/Article/Details/3055
教育部(2008年5月23日)。97年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要【課程綱要】。取自:http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/index_new.phpnew window
盛承堯(1995)。山地兒童自然科學概念的分析研究-能量概念。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC84-2511-S-026-003-N),未出版。
郭玉婷、譚光鼎(2002)。泰雅族青少年學習式態之探討。教育研究資訊,10(3),149-165。new window
郭美女(2014)。原住民傳統祭儀歌謠數位化傳承之價值-以布農族為例。台灣教育,690,4-11。
郭靜姿(2001)。潛藏的才能:原住民學生的學習特質及潛能評估研究。載於高強華、戴維揚(主編),族群融合新境界:原住民教育文化(21-42頁)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。
陳玉玲(2003)。國小學生內、外在動機在數學學業表現中的角色。教育學刊,21,173-193。new window
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的硏究。臺北:五南。
陳枝烈(2002)。文化差異在教室中師生互動的意義。載於陳枝烈(主編),91年原住民教育學術研討會論文集(頁121-138)。屏東縣:國立屏東師範學院。
陳枝烈(2008)。臺灣原住民民族教育,臺北:師大書苑。new window
陳枝烈(2009)。排灣族文化中的科學智慧初探。台灣原住民研究論叢,6,115-156。new window
陳枝烈(2013)。台灣原住民族部落學校發展現況探討。台灣原住民族研究季刊,6(4),147-168。new window
陳柏璋(1997)。原住民教育問題研究規劃。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC 86-2418-H-026- 001),未出版。
陳貞志、裴家騏、梁又仁(2011)。從原住民耆老訪談中彙整野豬的寄生蟲知識。野生動物保育彙報及通訊,15(1),13-26。
陳得文(2008年5月)。多元文化科學課程-科學教育的另類思考。載於黃台珠(主持人),文化,科學,科技與學習的對話。原住民學生數理教育學術研討會,臺東大學。
傅麗玉(1999)。從世界觀探討臺灣原住民中小學科學教育。科學教育學刊,7(1),71-90。new window
傅麗玉(2003a)。原住民生活世界的科學-竹槍篇。原住民教育季刊,32,5-25。
傅麗玉(2003b)。誰的生活經驗?九年一貫課程「自然與生活科技」領域原住民生活經驗教材探討。原住民教育季刊,31,5-25。
傅麗玉(2004a)。原住民生活世界的科學-泰雅染料篇。原住民教育季刊,36,5-27。
傅麗玉(2004b)。原住民生活世界的科學-醃苦花魚篇。原住民教育季刊,35,5-28。
傅麗玉(2004c)。誰的科學教育?中小學科學教育的多元文化觀點。課程與教學季刊,7(1),91-108。
曾華源、李仰慈(2010)。族群和諧與社會發展。社區發展季刊,130,17-33。new window
曾毓芬(2015)。絲竹縱橫下的泛音空間-布農族弓琴、口簧琴與四弦琴/五弦琴田野調查資料析論。關渡音樂學刊,22,39-80。new window
湯仁燕(2001)。差異‧認同與多元:原住民教育的文化認同課題。載於高強華、戴維揚(主編),族群融合新境界:原住民教育文化(43-74頁)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。
黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。臺北:心理出版社有限公司.
葉闖(1996)。科學主義批判與技術社會批判。臺北:淑馨。
裘學賢(1993)。教育研究的現象學分析。載於賈馥茗、楊深坑(主編),教育學方法論(33-121頁)。臺北:五南。
達西烏拉彎●畢馬(田哲益)(2001)。台灣的原住民-泰雅族。臺北:臺原。
達西烏拉彎●畢馬(田哲益)(2003)。台灣的原住民-布農族。臺北:臺原。
鄔昆如(1988)。現象學取向。載於臺大哲學系(主編),當代西方哲學與方法論(1-17頁)。臺北:東大。new window
劉世閔、鄭姿妮(2013)。一位魯凱族校長推展原住民民族教育之個案研究。教育理論與實踐學刊,28,121-153。new window
劉政宏、張景緩、許鼎延、張瓊文(2005)。國小學生學習動機成分之分析及其對學習行為之影響。教育心理學報,37(2),173-196。doi:10.6251/BEP.20051117new window
劉美慧(2002)。多元文化課程轉化-三個不同文化脈絡之課程研究。載於91年原住民教育學術研討會論文集(頁226-246)。國立屏東師範學院。
劉清約(1996)。原住民學前幼兒認知能力研究。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。
劉潔(譯)(2010)。教育的現象學研究手冊(原作者:L. S. Barritt, T. Beekman, H. Bleeker & K. Mulderij)。北京:教育科學。
蔡中涵(1996)。漫談原住民文化與漢文化之差異。教改通訊,21,42-43。
蔡文川(2004)。地方感:科際共同的語言與對台灣的意義。中國地理學會會刊,34,43-64。new window
蔣佳玲、李暉(2016)。西方科學與在地知識的對話:發展具文化底蘊的科學課程。載於吳天泰(主編),原住民族文化的教學研究(109-144頁)。花蓮:國立東華大學。new window
賴文福(譯)(2000)。民族誌(原作者:D. M. Fetterman)。臺北:弘智文化。
戴維揚(2001)。多元智慧中的優勢智能:建構原住民新優質文化的教育。載於高強華、戴維揚(主編),族群融合新境界:原住民教育文化(1-20頁)。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學。
鍾一哲、郭基鼎、田聖愛(2008年5月)。原住民學童在民族植物文化課程中之科學學習之研究。郭金美(主持人),文化,科學,科技與學習的對話。原住民學生數理教育學術研討會,臺東大學。
鍾文萍(2010)。那些土石流教我的事。台北:天下文化。
藍姆路.卡造(2008)。狩獵經驗與地方意涵。台灣原住民族研究季刊,1(4),13-30。
顏瓊芬、林妙徽(2010)。部落教室—原住民族小學地方本位數理課程與科普活動之發展與實踐--部落教室:原住民族小學地方本位生態課程與科普活動之發展與實踐(1/4) (報告編號:NSC 98-2511-S-126-002),未出版。
顏瓊芬、林妙徽(2014)。部落教室—原住民族小學地方本位數理課程與科普活動之發展與實踐--部落教室:原住民族小學地方本位生態課程與科普活動之發展與實踐(4/4) (報告編號:NSC 101-2511-S-126-002),未出版。
顏瓊芬、林妙徽、李暉、蕭戎(2007)。回歸地方的國際趨勢-原住民族科學教育的地方本位(Place-Based Education)觀點。台灣人文生態研究,9(1),1-22。
顏瓊芬、林妙徽、姚如芬(2011)。部落教室—原住民族小學地方本位數理課程與科普活動之發展與實踐--部落教室:原住民族小學地方本位生態課程與科普活動之發展與實踐(2/4) (報告編號:NSC 99-2511-S-126-002),未出版。
顏瓊芬、林淑芬、馬士鈴、蘇秋如、黃馨誼、姚宗威、陳勇全、劉志容、邱玉枝、張凱婷(2013)。製作彩虹衣裳(課本、習作、教師手冊、教師習作)。臺中:白象文化。
顏瓊芬、馬士鈴、沈文吉、陳勇全、林淑芬、黃馨誼、姚宗威、張凱婷(2012)。探索卡度植物園(課本、習作、教師手冊、教師習作)。臺中:靜宜大學。
顏瓊芬、郭重吉、王子華(2010)。部落教室—原住民族小學地方本位數理課程與科普活動之發展與實踐(1/4) (報告編號:NSC 98-2511-S-126-001),未出版。
譚光鼎(2002)。臺灣原住民教育:從廢墟到重建。臺北:師大書苑。new window
譚光鼎、劉美慧、游美惠編著(2001)。多元文化教育。臺北:國立空中大學。
蘇揚期、王柏山 (2005)。「地方感」研究觀點的探討-從人本主義地理學、行為地理學到都市意向學派。社會科教育研究,10,109-136。


英文部分
Acheson, J. M., Wilson, J. A., & Steneck, R. S. (1998). Managing chaotic fisheries. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems. (pp. 390-413). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996) Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001a). Integrating western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337-355.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001b). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180-188.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging cultures: Scientific and indigenous ways of knowing nature. Ontario, Canada, Pearson Education.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539-620.
Aikenhead, G., Calabrese, A. B., & Chinn, P. W. (2006). Forum: Toward a politics of place-based science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 403-416.
Angell, L. R. (2009). Construct validity of the community college survey of student engagement (CCSSE). Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33(7), 564-57.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in The Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Archambault, I, Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to droout. Journal of School Health, 79, 408-415.
Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 821-837.
Avenilla, F. R. (2003). Assessing the links between emotional and behavioral school engagement and academic outcomes among high school students (Unpublished doctoral idssertation). The Pennsylvania State University, PA, America.
Banks, J. A. (2006). Race, culture, and education: The selected works of James A. Banks. New York, NY: Routledge.
Barba, R. H. (1998). Science in the multicultural classroom: A guide to teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyan and Bacon.
Barker, M., & Knapp, C. (2005). Special focus on place-based education. The Journal of Experiential Education, 27(3), 265-266.
Barnhardt, R. (2008). Creating a place for indigenous knowledge in education: The Alaska native knowledge network. In G. Smith & D. Gruenewald (Eds.), Local diversity: Place-based education in the global age (pp. 113–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Basso, K. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the western Apache. Albuquerque. NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and management systems. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251-1262.
Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2004). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
Blumenfeld, P. C., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Task factors, teacher behavior, and students' involvement and use of learning strategies in science. The Elementary School Journal, 88(3), 235-250.
Charnley, S., Fischer, A. P., & Jones, E. T. (2007). Integrating traditional and local ecological knowledge into forest biodiversity conservation in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Ecology and Management, 246(1), 14-28.
Chien, S. J. (1998). Cultural features and math learning: A case of Yami people in the Orchid island. Journal of National Taitung Teachers College, 9, 283-306.
Cobern, W. W. (1996). Constructivism and non-western science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 295-310.
Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2001). Defining “science” in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 50-67.
Conchas, G. (2001). Structuring failure and success: Understanding the variability in Latino school engagement. Harvard Educational Review, 71(3), 475-505.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds. ), Self processes and development (pp. 43-77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Connell, J. P., Halpem-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African American adolescents stay in high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10(1), 41-63.
Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African‐American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65(2), 493-506.
Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers‘ support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103(4), 548-581.
Cuesta, P. M. (2007). A Descriptive Study to Explore and Define what Teacher Behaviors Motivate the Academically At-risk Eleven-to Fourteen-year-old Early Adolescents to Learn. La Verne, CA, University of La Verne.
Dalton, B., Glennie, E., & Ingels, S.J. (2009). Late high school dropouts: Characteristics, experiences, and changes across cohorts (NCES 2009-307). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Preface. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.) (pp. ix-xvi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children's risk for school problems contribute to children's behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36(3), 413.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Fang, W-T., Hu, H-W., & Lee, C-S. (2016). Atayalʼs identification of sustainability: Traditional ecological knowledge and indigenous science of a hunting culture. Sustainability Science, 11(1), 33-43.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.
Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore, L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? (pp. 305-321). New York, NY, Springer.
Fu, L-Y. (1999). Science education for the aboriginal schools in Taiwan: A world view perspective. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 71-90.
Furlong, M. J., & Christenson, S. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in The Schools, 45, 365-368.
Furrer, C. & Skinner E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children‘s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.
Galliano, S. J., & Loeffler G. M. (1999). Place assessment: How people define ecosystem. Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, Oregon, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-462.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 619-654.
Gunn, T., Chorney, D., & Poulsen, J. (2009). High school completion: A comprehensive review of projects directed toward keeping students in school. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 15(1), 17-24.
Harris, L. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 57-79.
Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18, 5-29.
Helme, S., & Clarke, D. (2001). Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 133-153.
Howley, C., & Howley, A. (2010). Poverty and school achievement in rural communities: A social class interpretation. In K. Schafft & A. Jackson (Eds.), Rural education for the twenty-first century: Identity, place, and community in a globalizing world (pp. 34-50). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hung, H-F. (2011). A Hermeneutic Phenomenology Study of Schooling Experiences of Lumbee Indian Students with High Incidence Disabilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina, America.
Hutnik, N. (1991). Ethnic minority identity : A social psychological perspective. New York, NY, Oxford University Press.
Janosz, M., Archambault I., Morizot J., & Pagani L. S. (2008). School engagement trajectories and their differential predictive relations to dropout. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 21-40.
Jenkins, P. H. (1995). School delinquency and school commitment. Sociology of Education, 68(3), 221-239.
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7-27.
Kindermann, T. A. (1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children's motivation in school. Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 970.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationship matters: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273.
Knapp, C. E. (1985). Using valuing and inquiry skills in environmental education. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED263003.pdf
LeDoux, J. (2003). The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23(4-5), 727-738.
Lee, H., Yen, C-F., & Aikenhead, G. S. (2012). Indigenous elementary students’ science instruction in Taiwan: Indigenous knowledge and western science. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1183-1199.
Lee, O., Deaktor, R., Enders, C., & Lambert, J. (2008). Impact of a multiyear professional development intervention on science achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 726–747.
Lee, V. E., & Croninger, R. G. (1994). The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students. American Journal of Education, 286-329.
Lehr, C. A., Johnson, D. R., Bremer, C. D., Cosio, A., & Thompson, M. (2004). Essential tools: Increasing rates of school completion: Moving from policy and research to practice. Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Secondary Education and Transition.
Lewicki, J. (1998). Cooperative ecology and place: Development of a pedagogy of place curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED461461.pdf
Lin, H-P. (1999). Discussion of the dilemma with aborigine's education in elementary school. Aboriginal Education Quarterly, 13, 91-96.
Loschert, K. (2002). It has everything to do with them. NEA Today, 20(7), 24-25.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184.
McMahon, S. D., Parnes, A. L., Keys, C. B., & Viola, J. J. (2008). School belonging among low-income urban youth with disabilities: Testing a theoretical model. Psychology in The Schools, 45(5), 387-401.
Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 981-992.
Mosenthal, P. B. (1999). Understanding engagement: Historical and political contexts. In J. T. Guthrie & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Nagel, N. G. (1996). Learning through real-world problem solving: The power of integrative teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students' motivation to learn. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Newmann, F. M, Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In Fred M. Newmann(Eds.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Novak, J. D., & Gowing, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ogbu, J. (1982). Cultural discontinuities and schooling, Anthropology and Education Quarterly,13(4), 290–307.
Orr, D. W. (1994). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects student. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Perdue, N. H., Manzeske, D. P., & Estell, D. B. (2009). Predicting school commitment at grade five: Exploring the role of students‘ relationships with peers and teachers from grade three. Psychology in The Schools, 46, 1084-1097.
Pinkerton, E. (1998). Integrated management of a temperate montane forest ecosystem through wholistic forestry: A British Columbia example. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience (pp. 363-389). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.
Pittam, J., & Scherer, K. R. (1993). Vocal expression and communication of emotion. Handbook of Emotions, 185-197.
Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supported teachers and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106, 225-236.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London, England : Pion Limited.
Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Roth, W. M. (2007). Emotion at work: A contribution to third-generation cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1-2), 40-63.
Roth, W. M., & Middleton, D. (2006). The making of asymmetries of knowing, identity, and accountability in the sequential organization of graph interpretation. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 11-81.
Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. (2010). Solidarity and conflict: Aligned and misaligned prosody as a transactional resource in intra-and intercultural communication involving power differences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(4), 807-847.
Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social–emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 528.
Sarkar, S., & Frazier, R. (2008). Place-based investigations and authentic inquiry. Science Teacher, 75(2), 29-33.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Scherer, K. R. (1989). Vocal correlates of emotional arousal and affective disturbance. Handbook of Social Psychophysiology, 165-197.
Schram, T. H. (2006). Conceptualizing and proposing qualitative research. Ontario, Canada, Pearson Education.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Semken, S., & Brandt, E. (2010). Implications of sense of place and place-based education for ecological integrity and cultural sustainability in diverse places. In Cultural Studies and Environmentalism (pp. 287-302). Houten, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Semken, S., & Freeman, C. B. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place‐based science teaching. Science Education, 92(6), 1042-1057.
Siegel, H. (2002). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education: In search of common ground. Science Education, 86(6), 803-820.
Sinha, C. (2000). Culture, language and the emergence of subjectivity. Culture & Psychology, 6, 197-207.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571.
Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kinderman, T. (2008). Engagement anddisaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765-781.
Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22.
Smith, G. A. (2002). Place-based education: learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584-594.
Smith, G. A., & Sobel, D. (2014). Place-and community-based education in schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. (Eds.) (1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Smyth, J. (2006). ‘When students have power’: student engagement, student voice, and the possibilities for school reform around ‘dropping out’of school. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 285-298.
Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6-34.
Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Nature Literacy Series Vol. 4. New Patriotism Series 4. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.
Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553–573.
Spradley, J.P., & McCurdy, D.W. (1980): Anthropology. The cultural perspective. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Stairs, A. (1995). Learning processes and teaching roles in Native education: Cultural base and cultural brokerage. In M. Battiste & J. Barman (Eds.), First Nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds.(pp. 139-153), Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British Columbia Press,.
Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78(4), 387-398.
Stephens, S. (2000). Handbook for culturally responsive science curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.ankn.uaf.edu/publications/handbook/
Stevenson, M. G. (1996). Indigenous knowledge in environmental assessment. Arctic, (49)3, 278-291.
Stevenson, M. G. (2005). Traditional knowledge and sustainable forest management. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Sustainable Forest Management Network.
Suzuki, L. A., Ponterotto, J. G., & Meller, P. J. (2001). The New Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.
Theobald, P., & Curtiss, J. (2000). Communities as curricula. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 15(1), 106-111.
Traina, F., & Darley-Hill, S. (Eds.) (1995). Perspectives in bioregional education. Troy, OH: North American Association for Environmental Education.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Turner, J. H. (2002). Face to face: Toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Valeski, T. N., & Stipek, D. J. (2001). Young children's feelings about school. Child Development, 72(4), 1198-1213.
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209.
Wentzel, K. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76-97.
Williams, D. T. (2004). Shaw High School: A case study in rural high school improvement. Henderson, NC: Rural School and Community Trust Capacity Building Program.
Wolcott, H. F. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Walnut Creek, CA, AltaMira.
Woodhouse, J. L, & Knapp, C. E. (2000). Place-based curriculum and instruction: Outdoor and environmental education approaches.ERIC Digest. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED448012).
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2010). Leading for engagement. Principal Leadership, 10(7), 54-58.
You, S., & Sharkey, J. D. (2009) Testing a developmental-ecological model of student engagement: A multilevel latent growth curve analysis. Educational Psychology, 29, 659-684.
Zarry, L. (2002). A multicultural science curriculum: Fact or fantasy? Educational Research Quarterly, 25(4), 3-10.
Zyngier, D. (2007). Listening to teachers - listening to students substantive conversations about resistance, empowerment and engagement. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice Journal, 13(4), 327-347.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE