:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師透過社群運作發展閱讀理解教學專業知能之個案研究
作者:黃智慧
作者(外文):HUANG, CHIH-HUI
校院名稱:國立臺中教育大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:游自達
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:閱讀理解教學專業知能教師專業學習社群reading comprehensionprofession knowledge of reading instructionprofessional learning community
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:163
本研究之目的在於探究國小教師透過閱讀專業學習社群運作,其閱讀理解教學專業知能的發展變化。具體而言,本研究探討下列兩大問題:(一)閱讀專業學習社群的運作歷程,包含社群的組成方式、活動規劃和活動內容;(二)教師在閱讀專業學習社群中,閱讀理解教學之問題意識、教學實踐和教學反思等方面的變化,及教師參與閱讀專業學習社群,其閱讀理解教學之知識、信念和行為的改變。
本研究以臺灣中部地區一所國民小學的閱讀專業學習社群為研究場域,以探討其運作歷程,並選擇其中三位社群參與教師為個案,進行整體性多個案研究。研究者透過觀察社群活動和個案教師教學、非結構性訪談及文件蒐集等方式蒐集資料,並運用Atlas.ti質性分析軟體進行分析。
本研究之主要發現如下:
一、閱讀專業學習社群「討論→實踐→實踐分享」運作歷程,促進並支持參與教師閱讀理解教學專業知能之發展。
二、國小教師在閱讀專業學習社群中,其閱讀理解教學之問題意識、教學實踐與教學反思均呈現由表面而漸深入及由單一而漸多元的變化趨勢。
三、國小教師參與閱讀專業學習社群,提升了其閱讀理解教學專業知能:增加閱讀提問策略知識;鬆動閱讀信念,漸認同「閱讀即思考」;調整國語教學行為,加入高層次提問以促進學生思考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the developmental changes in elementary school teachers’ professional knowledge and competence of reading-comprehension instruction through professional learning community (PLC). Two main aspects of the development of teachers’ professional knowledge and competence of reading-comprehension instruction were explored as follows. Firstly, the operational process of a professional learning community for reading instruction, including its member composition, contents, and achievements were explored. Secondly, teachers’ awareness of their difficulties in reading comprehension instruction was examined. Their teaching practice, and teaching reflection through reading professional learning community were also explored.
This study employed a holistic multiple cases study method. Three teachers in an elementary school’s reading professional learning community in central Taiwan were chosen as the cases. The case teachers’ participations in the PLC and their instruction of reading comprehension were observed. The researcher also collected case teachers professional knowledge through unstructured interview. Data were then analyzed by Atlas.ti qualitative data analysis software.
The main findings of this study were as follows.
a) the operational progress in this reading professional learning community, i.e. “discussion, teaching practice, and practice sharing ” cycle, promoted and supported the participating teachers’ development of teaching profession knowledge in reading comprehension.
b) elementary school teachers’ problem awareness, teaching practice and teaching reflection in reading comprehension all showed the variation trends from simplicity toward multiplicity in the reading professional learning community.
c) elementary school teachers, getting involved in reading professional learning community, promoted their teaching professional knowledge in reading comprehension. Enhancing the higher level questioning strategies in reading instruction rendering as well as related teaching knowledge, teachers loosened up their original belief which is followed by identifying “reading is thinking.” Besides, teachers should adjust Chinese class by increasing the number of higher-level question to guide students’ thinking in the reading class.
壹、中文部分
丁一顧(2012)。教師專業學習社群運作的核心:以學生為本。教育研究月刊,215,5-16。new window
方麗娟(2011)。國小教師專業學習社群互動與教師專業實踐關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。雲林科技大學,雲林縣。
方秋雅(譯)(2010)。嬰幼兒的讀寫發展-0~8歲的反省式語文教學(原作者:B. Otto)。臺北市:華騰(原著出版年:2008)。
王瓊珠、陳淑麗編(2010)。突破閱讀困難:理念與實務。臺北市:心理。
王瓊珠(2004)。故事結構教學加分享閱讀對增進國小閱讀障礙學童讀寫能力與故事結構概念之研究。台北市立師院學報,35(2),1-22。new window
任金杰、周成海(2010)。建構主義教師教育範式的特徵及其理論基礎。通化師範學院學報,31(9),71-74。
江志正(2000)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校發展策略與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window
江嘉杰(2014)。偏鄉小學教師專業學習社群組成、運作及影響之探究。學校行政雙月刊,89,142-163。
何福田(1998)。教師在職進修現況與展望。海峽兩岸教師在職進修教育研討會論文集,國立屏東師範學院。
何琦瑜、濱靜蓀、陳雅慧(2013)。翻轉教育。臺北市:親子天下。
吳明芬(2013)。雲嘉地區國小教師專業學習社群與教師教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
吳振東(2006)。課例研究:值得推廣的一種園本教研形式。教育導刊:下半月,7, 18-20。
宋萑(2007)。校本教師發展與教師專業學習共同體的建構。集美大學學報,8(1),37-42。
李咏吟 (1998)。維高斯基的認知學說在教學上的應用。教師天地,93,17-22。
李俊湖(1999)。學校發展與教師發展的策略。國教學報,11,17-31。
李昱瑩(2014)。國民中學校長知識領導對教師專業學習社群運作影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李婉玲 (2005)。促進教師發展活動之一:校本發展。教育科學研究,2005(5),18-20。
李曉萱(2001)。華語文教師教學專業知能之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
李桂芝、劉永明 (2012)。有機化學教學中學生問題意識的培養研究。內蒙古師範大學學報(教育科學版),25(7),131-133。
李玉貴(2011)。一些重要、細瑣卻長期被忽略的語文教學思辯。載於教育部主編,在職教師閱讀教學增能研習手冊,(頁45-49)。臺北市:教育部。
林清山(譯)(1991)。教育心理學:認知取向(原作者:R. E. Mayer)。臺北市:遠流。(原著出版年:1987)。
林秀玲(2008)。發問策略教學對學童提問能力與閱讀理解之影響—以國小四年級國語科教學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
林忠仁(2009)。國民小學校長分佈領導、灰猩猩效應與教師專業學習社群關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台北教育大學,臺北市。new window
林明煌(2009)。日本小學新《學習指導要領》的修訂與其內容之探討。教育資料集刊,41,61-96。new window
周海濤、李永賢、張蘅(譯) (2009)。個案研究設計與方法(原作者:R. K. Yin)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2003)。
科技部(2016)。科技部與教育部聯合記者會新聞資料--PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現。取自:https://www.most.gov.tw/folksonomy/detail?subSite=&l=ch&article_uid=57b7c383-4064-4300-b481-1a6231dfac3e&menu_id=9aa56881-8df0-4eb6-a5a7-32a2f72826ff&content_type=P&view_mode=listView
柯華葳(1993):語文科的閱讀教學。載於李永吟主編,學習輔導,(頁307-350)。臺北市:心理。。
柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅 (2009)。臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養 (PIRLS 2006 報告) 第二版。2013年4月14日,取自: http://www.dorise.info/DER/download_PIRLS2006/PIRLS_2006_National%20Report(2nd%20Edition).pdf
柯華葳、詹益綾、丘嘉慧(2013)。PIRLS 2011報告 臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養。 2015年3月8日,取自: http://www.dorise.info/DER/image_pirls/country_icon_2006/pirls_2011%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf
柯華葳、幸曼玲、陸怡琮、辜玉旻(2010)。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。臺北市:教育部。
柯慶輝(2014)。國小教師閱讀教學專業能力指標建構(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。new window
施淑蓮(2011)。南投縣國民小學教師專業學習社群與教師專業表現之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
柳雅梅譯(2006)。學校是專業學習社群:專業發展的合作活動與策略(原作者:S. M. Roberts & E. Z. Pruitt)。臺北市:心理。(原著出版年:2003)
范良火(2003)。教師教學知識發展研究。上海市:華東大學。
孫志麟(2010)。專業學習社群:促進教師專業發展的平台。學校行政雙月刊,69,138-158。
徐綺穗(2007)。行動學習理論及其在大學教學的應用─ 建構 [行動一反思] 教學模式。課程與教學,10(4), 49-62。new window
張文祺(2011)。桃竹苗地區國民小學教師專業學習社群、學校組織文化與教師專業成長關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育,新竹市。
張世忠(2002)。協同教學之研究與省思:以兩位國中初任教師為例。教育研究資訊 (雙月刊),10(4),139-158。new window
張吉良(2011)。中彰地區國民小學教師專業學習社群運作與教師效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
張春興(1989)。心理學。臺北市:東華。
張春興(1991)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華。
張春興(1994)。教育心理學 ─ 三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
張紹勳(2008)。研究方法:理論與統計。臺中市:滄海。
張雁婷(1998)。教師學科教學知識之研究﹣以國中英語科為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅(2009)。規劃中小學教師專業學習社群實施方案。教育部委託專案計畫成果報告。高雄市:國立高雄師範大學。
張新仁、馮莉雅、潘道仁、林美惠、李美穗、張清茂、... 莊博雯(2011)。教師專業學習社群--領頭羊葵花寶典。臺北市:教育部。
張毓仁、柯華葳、邱皓政、歐宗霖、溫福星(2011)。教師閱讀教學行為與學生閱讀態度和閱讀能力自我評價對於閱讀成就之跨層次影響:以PIRLS2006 為例。教育科學研究期刊,56(2),69-105。new window
張德銳、王淑珍(2010)。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。台北市立教育大學學報,41(1),61-90。new window
張靜儀、戴翠華(2003)。國小學童感知自然老師PCK量表之效化研究。國立台北師範學院學報,16(2),187-212。new window
張靜嚳 (1995)。何謂建構主義? 建構與教學,3,1-4。
張寶志(2014)。中小學教師專業成長的有效路徑。現代中小學教育,3,126。
教育部(1995)。中華民國教育報告書--邁向二十一世紀的教育遠景。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2008)。97年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要 (100 學年度實施)。取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.phpnew window
教育部(2009)。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊-再版。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2010)。我國參與國際學生能力評量計畫(PISA)2009結果。取自http://www.eycc.ey.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=614F8F19C9F3A886&sms=114B66117B4BF117&s=D0C45A32CD5F9B3B
教育部(2011)。在職教師閱讀教學增能研習手冊。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2015)。教育部國民及學前教育署補助辦理十二年國民基本教育精進國民中學及國民小學教學品質要點。2016年12月18日,取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=FL041262&KeyWordHL...
教育部(2016)。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=GL000567&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=1 1050904
脱中菲(2008)。小學校本课程開發的創新模式。中國教育學刊,2008(9),34-36。
郭美滿(2012)。多人共榮的教育之美--國民小學教師專業學習社群之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學,臺中市。
郭進隆(譯)(1994)。第五項修練(原作者:P. M. Senge)。臺北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:1990)。
陳佩英(2009)。一起學習、 一起領導:專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育,60(3), 68-88。new window
陳欣希等(2011)。問好問題。臺北市:天衛文化。
陳欣希等編輯(2012)。閱讀理解-問思教學手冊。臺北市:教育部。
陳國泰(2006)。國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師實務知識的發展之個案研究。國立台北教育大學報,19(2),31-64。new window
陳淑貞(2012)。教師專業學習社群閱讀教學之行動研究—國小三年級國語科文本閱讀理解策略之分析(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
陳淑鈴(2013)。國民小學教師參與專業學習社群心路歷程與專業成長之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
陳雅文(2004)。國小高年級學生閱讀理解策略量表編製研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
陳昭珍、簡馨瑩、林菁、賴苑玲、陳海泓 (2011)。圖書教師手冊。臺北市: 教育部。
曾國鴻、陳榮宗、巫銘昌、羅希哲(2004)。國民小學教師知識取得的可行策略及其障礙因素之研究-以臺南縣國民小學為例。師大學報,49(2),65-88。new window
湯艷鳳(2013)。臺北市國小教師專業學習社群與教學效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
黃永和(1996)。國小實習教師數學科學科教學知識之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。
黃冠達、張純、幸曼玲(2015)。國小教師參與閱讀理解教學實踐社群與其專業成長之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,11(1), 57-80。new window
黃政傑(1996)。從課程的角度看教師專業發展。教師天地,83,13-17。
黃桂妮(1997)。國中數學教師的數學教學知識之分析:關於文字符號的使用(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃瑞珍(1999)。故事結構分析法在語言學習障礙兒童教學之應用。國小特殊教育,27,4-10。new window
黃貞錦 (2015)。教師專業學習社群發展歷程之個案研究: 以一所國中教師閱讀社群為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹縣。
楊立群(2008)。國小職前教師在自然領域學科教學知識成長之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
楊惠燕(2013)。高中教師專業學習社群與專業成長之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。南台科技大學,臺南市。
楊馥如(2014)。非藝術專長教師的藝術與人文專業增能:教師專業學習社群的個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。
楊深坑(2000)。迎向二十一世紀新專業主義之建構。新世紀的教育願景(頁41-56)。臺北市:臺灣書店。
楊振富(譯) (2002)。學習型學校(上)-第五項修練教育篇(原作者: P. M. Senge)。臺北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:1990)。
萬發 (2014)。小學教師學科教學知識發展方式调查與建議。河南教育學院學報: 哲學社會科學版,33(3),57-60。
葉碧琦(2011)。一位國中科學教師進行自我反思促進學科教學知識成長之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
廖淑霞(2012)。一個「自主性」教師專業學習社群發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
趙金婷(2000)。學習社群理念在教學上的應用。教育資料與研究,35,60-66。new window
劉怡亭(2000)影響學科教學知識的發展來源。國教輔導,4,48-52。
劉咨廷(2012)。衣帶漸寬終不悔 ~「快樂總鋪師」教師專業學習社群創新教學之敘事研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
劉興郁、蔡瑞敏(2006)。組織變革知覺、學習動機對學習成效之影響。朝陽商管評論,5(S),63-88。new window
臺灣PISA國家研究中心 (2010)。臺灣 PISA 2009 精簡報告。取自 http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/data/1207_2009PISA_REPORT.pdf
臺灣PISA國家研究中心 (2014)。臺灣 PISA 2012 精簡報告。取自http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/data/TaiwanPISA2012ShortReport.PDF
歐用生(1996)。教師專業成長。臺北市:師大書苑。
潘麗珠(2009)。打造台灣的56號國語文教室:朗讀與提問技巧的運用。教育部閱讀教學策略開發與推廣計畫成果發表會教學示例彙編。臺北:國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
蔡美雲(2013)。教師專業學習社群提升教師專業成長—以「電子白板繪本教學」社群為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
蔡敏燕 (2008)。行動學習理論在高職應用寫作教材編寫中的應用。南通航運職業技術學院學報,7(4),98-100。
蔡進雄(2012)。中小學教師校內進修研習的省思。國家教育研究院電子報第48期(2012-09-15)。取自http://epaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=48&content_no=1345
蔣佳穎(2008)。自我發問、問題答案關係策略教學對國小六年級學童閱讀理解與閱讀動機之影響研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
鄭婉敏(2000)。社會認知取向的教與學。臺中師院學報,14,145-158。new window
鄭詩釧(2005)。國民中小學組織文化與教師專業發展關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。new window
鄭嘉璇(2009)。四、五年級學生提問表現與閱讀理解的比較研究─以澎湖一所國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺東大學,臺東縣。
盧乃桂、鍾亞妮(2006)。國際視野中的教師專業。比較教育研究,2006(2),71-76。
謝寶梅(2003)。台灣教師參與行動研究之趨勢與評析。教育資料集刊:教師專業發展專輯,28,389-405。
謝建國(2001)。國小實習教師國語科學科教學知識之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。
謝臥龍(1997)。優良教師特質之德懷術分析。教育研究資訊,5(3),14-28。new window
羅清水(1998)。終生教育在國小教師專業發展的意義。研習資訊,15(4),11-14。
羅德勇(2013)。構建校本教研“反思生態”助力教師專業成長。教學與管理。2013(12),43-44。
譚彩鳳(2011)。有效能教師學習社群之發展:香港個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊,7(2),213-246。new window
蘇姿鳳(2011)。國小自然科專家教師學科教學知識之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
蘇永明(2000)。我國中小學追求「學校自主」在組織上的困境:從英國的「學校管理委員會」談起。桃縣文教,14,17-21。
饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展—理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
嚴淑華、馬軍 (2005)。問題意識與大學生潛能開發。河北工程大學學報(社會科學版),22(3),70-71。

貳、英文部分
Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., Osborn, J. (2003). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read: Kindergarten through grade 3. Jessup, MD: Partnership for Reading.
Aschner M.J. (1961). Asking questions to trigger thinking. NEA Journal, 50,44–46.
Baker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp.353-394). New York: Longman.
Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon:Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics.The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397.
Barchers , S. I . (1998) . Reading from process to practice . New York ,NY: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS quarterly,11(3),369-386.
Blankstein, A. M. (2004). Failure is not an option : Six principles that guide student achievement in high-performing schools. Thousand Oaks,CA California: Corwin Press, Inc.
Block, C. C., Parris, S. R., Reed, K. L., Whiteley, C. S., & Cleveland, M. D. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (2), 262-281.
Bredeson,P. V. (2003). Designs fo r learning: A new architecture. Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press, Inc.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1992). A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics. In E. Von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of research in education, 24, 249-305.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, 18, 32-42.
Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2002). A comparative study of the attitudes of teachers at special and educationally inclusive schools towards learners with little or no functional speech using communication devices. South African Journal of Education, 22(3), 213-218.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Policy for Restructuring. In A. Lieberman (Ed.) The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up (pp. 157-175). New York,NY: Teachers College Press.
Downing, J . & Leong C. K. (1982) . Psychology of reading. New York, NY : Macmill am.
DuFour , R. & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work. Bloomington , IN: Solution Tree.
DuFour, R. (2004).What is a “Professional learning community? Education Leadership,61(8), 6-11.
Durkin, D.(1993) Teaching them to read (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (pp. 147-164).New York, NY: Macmillan.
Forsyth, D. A. (1990). A novel algorithm for color constancy. International Journal of Computer Vision, 5(1), 5-35.
Fullan, M. G., & Hargreaves, A.(1992).Understanding teacher development. New York, NY: Teacher College, Columbia University , Cassell.
Gallagher, J. J. (1965). Expressive thought by gifted children in the classroom. Elementary English, 42(5), 559-568.
Goodman, K. S. (1986) . What ’s whole in whole language . Port smouth , NH: Heinemann.
Grossman, P. L., & Richer, A. E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4(1), 53-62.
Gunning, T.G. (2004) . Creating literacy instruct ion for al l children in grades pre -K to 4. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. London : Cassell.
Hargreaves, A.,& Fullan, M. (1992). Understanding teacher development. London: Cassell ; New York, NY : Teachers College Press.

Harris , A. J . , & Sipay , E. R. (1980) . How to increase reading ability:A guide to developmental and remedial methods . New York,NY : Longman.
Haslam, M. B. (2008). Maryland Teacher Professional Development Evatuation Guide. http://www.mdk12.org/share/pdf/Maryland Teacher Professional Development Evaluation Guide . pdf
Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, 127-150.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Breyfogle, L. M. (2005). Questioning our patterns of questions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(9), 484-489.
Holly,M.L.H.(1989). Teacher professional development: Perceptions and practices in the USA and England. In M.L. Holly & C.S. McLoughlin (Eds.), Perspectives on the Teacher Professional Development. New York,NY:The Falmer Press.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: communities o f continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Hord, S. M. (Ed.). (2004). Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (Eds.). (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Corwin Press.
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. A. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities.Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press
Hunkins, F. P. (1972). Questioning strategies and techniques. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Hyde, A. A. & Pink, W. T. (1992). Thinking about effective staff development. In W.T. Pink & A. A. Hyde (Eds.), Effective Staff Development for School Change. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Pub. Corporation.
Idol, L., & Croll, V. J.(1987).Story-mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(3), 214-229.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together. Handbook of cooperative learning methods, 51, 65.
Jonassen, D. H. (2003). The Vain Quest for a Unified Theory of Learning. Educational Technology, 43(4), 5-8.
Kennedy, M., & Barnes, H.(1994). Implications of cognitive science for teacher education. In J. N. Mangieri & C. C. Block(Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives(pp. 196-212). Orlando, Fla: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.
Kinnucan-Welsch, K”8c Jenlink, P. (1998). Challenging assumptions about teaching and learning:Three case studies in constructivist pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(4),413-427.
Koehler, M. S., & Grouws, D. A. (1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (pp. 115-125). New York,NY: Macmillan.
Kruse, S., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis, S. Kruse & associates(Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23-44). Thousand Oaks,California: Corwin Press, Inc.
Kuhs, T. M. and B. L. Ball. 1986. Approaches to mathematics: Mapping the domains of knowledge, skills and dispositions. East Lancing:Michigan State University, Center on Teacher Education.
Kuzborska, I. (2011) . Links between teachers ’beliefs and practices and research on reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23 (1), 102-128.
Laberge , J. R., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
Lave, J. W., & Wenger, E. E.(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
Lerner, J. W. (1997). Learning disabilities. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Leung, F. K. S. (1995). The mathematics classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong and London. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 297-325.
Lieberman, A. (1996). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.). Teacher learning: New Policies, new Practices. New York,NY: Teachers College Press.
Little, J. W. (1987). Staff development in California: Public and personal investments, programs,patterns and policy choices. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory and Policy Analysis for California Education.
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917-946.
Megarry (Eds), World yearbook of education 1980: Professional development of teachers.London: Kogan Page.
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2002). Teachers' beliefs and behaviors: What really matters? The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 3-15.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative reserach: A guide to design and implementation. Sacramento, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Morris, P. & Adamson, B. (2010). Curriculum, schooling & society in Hong Kong. Hong Kong:The Hong Kong University Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Reading Panel (2000) . Teaching children to read: An evidence based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: Author .
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(2009). A Metric for the Big Picture: The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.Retrieved September 4, 2016, from http://www.theedadvocate.org/a-metric-for-the-big-picture-the-national-board-for-professional-teaching-standards-2/
Newell, G., Wilsman, M., Langenfeld, M., & Mclntosh, A. (2002). Online professiondevelopment: Sustained learning with friends. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8,505-509.
Noddings, N., & Enright, S. (1983). The promise of open education. Theory into Practice, XXII(3),182-189.
OECD (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematicsand science. Paris: Author.
Ormrod, J. E., & Cole, D. B. (1996). Teaching content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: A model from geographic education. Journal of Teacher education, 47(1), 37-42.
Palincsar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1987). Enhancing instructional time through attention to meta cognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(2), 66-75.
Parkay, F. W., & Stanford, B. H.(2000). Becoming a teacher. Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon.
Penso, S. (2002). Pedagogical content knowledge: How do student teachers identify and describe the causes of their pupils learning difficulties. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 25-37.
Perry, P. (1980). Professional development: The inspectors in England and Wales. In E. Hoyle & J. Megarry (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 1980: The professional development of teachers (p.p.143-146). London, England: Routledge.
Posner. G. J. (1989). Field experience: Method of reflective teaching. New York, NY: Longman.
Pressley, M. (1998) . Reading ins t ruct ion that works —The case for balanced teaching. New York,NY: The Guilford Press .
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr, (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research Volume III (pp.545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
Professional learning. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.). Teacher learning: New Policies, new Practices. New York,NY: Teachers College Press.
Roberts, M. S., & Pruitt Z. E. (2003). School as professional learning communities :Collaborative & activities and strategies for professional development. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press Inc.
Rogoff, B.(1990). Apprenticeship in thinking:Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N (1991).Managing organizational behavior(4th ed.). New York, NY :John Wiley & Sons.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2001). Mathematics education in the twentieth century. In L. Corno (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume. (pp. 239-278). Chicago, Ill.:National Society for the Study of Education, University of Chicago Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill.
Schussler, D. L.(2003). Schools as learning communities: Unpacking the concept. Journal of School Leadership, 13, 498-528.
Selma K. R. ed. (1978) . Children ’s Services of Public Libraries .Urbana Champaign, Illinois : University of Illinois Graduate School of Library Service, 25-26.
Senge, P, M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice o f the learning organization. New York ,NY: Doubleday.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sencibaugh, J. M., & Sencibaugh, A. M. (2015). The effects of questioning the author on the reading comprehension of middle school students. Reading Improvement, 52(3), 85-92.
Shen, J. P., Zhen, J. Z., Poppink, S. (2007). Open lessons: A practice to develop a learning community for teachers. Educational Horizons, 85(3), 181-191.
Shen, J. P., Zhen, J. Z., Poppink, S. (2007). Open lessons: A practice to develop a learning community for teachers. Educational Horizons, 85(3), 181-191.
Shulman, L, S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective , Journal of curriculum studies, 36(2), 257-271.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher,15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform,Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Sirotnik, K. A. (1988). The meaning and conduct of inquiry in school-university partnerships. In J. I. Goodlad. (Ed)., School-university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases and concerns. New York,NY: Teacher College Press.
Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), 241–256.
Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: elaborating newapproaches. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis(Eds), Professional learning communities(pp.1-14). Berkshire England: McGraw-Hill Education
Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Elaborating new approaches. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis(Eds), Professional learning communities(pp.1-14). Berkshire England: McGraw-Hill Education.
Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Elaborating new approaches. Professional learning communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas, 1-13.
Strauss, A & Corbin, J.(1990).Basics of Qualitative Research:Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.Newbury Park,CA:Sage.
Turner-Bisset, R. (2001). Expert teaching: Knowledge and pedagogy to lead the profession. London: David Fulton.
Turner-Bisset, R. (2001). Expert teaching: Knowledge and pedagogy to lead the profession. London: David Fulton.
Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205-228.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34-41.
Van Der Sandt, S. (2007).Research Framework on Mathematics Teacher Behaviour: Koehler and Grouws Framework Revisited. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2007, 3(4), 343-350.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Wlodkowski, R. J. (1990). Strategies to enhance adult motivation to learn. In M. W. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods: A guide for effective instruction (pp. 97-117). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Wood,T.( 1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing . In S. Heinz & G. Maria (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp.167–78).Reston, VA.:NCTM.
Wright, T. (2000). Teacher development: A personal view. Caves ELT 25, 38-43.



 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE