:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師對學校目標結構知覺、教學成就目標取向、自我效能與教學行為調整之關係研究
作者:林彩雲
作者(外文):LIN, TSAI-YUN
校院名稱:國立臺中教育大學
系所名稱:教育學系
指導教授:楊銀興
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:學校目標結構知覺教學成就目標取向教師自我效能教學行為調整Perceptions of school goal structuresTeaching goal orientationsTeacher efficacyTeaching behavior regulations
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:10
本研究旨在探討國小教師對學校目標結構知覺、教學成就目標取向、自我效能與教學行為調整之間的關係。以104學年度全國公立國小之正式教師為母群體,採用分層比例立意抽樣進行問卷調查,以學校所在地及學校規模做為分層標準,以「國民小學教師對學校目標結構知覺、教學成就目標取向、自我效能和教學行為調整之關係研究調查問卷」作為本研究之研究工具,共得有效樣本1045人。以電腦套裝軟體SPSS 20 For Windows及Amos 18.0進行統計分析與整理。以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、結構方程模式等統計方法考驗假設。研究結果如下:
一、在「精熟目標結構知覺」上,兼行政之教師高於級任及科任教師,6班(含)以下的學校教師高於25-48班的學校教師,北、中、南部的教師高於外島的教師;在「表現目標結構知覺」上,科任教師高於兼行政及級任教師,6班(含)以下的學校教師高於25-48班的學校教師,中、南部的教師高於北部教師,外島的教師高於北、中、南、東部的教師。
二、在「追求精進目標」上,年資在26年以上者高於6~15年的教師;在「追求表現目標」上,具研究所以上學歷之教師高於具教育大學學歷的教師,兼行政的教師高於級任教師;在「避免無能目標」上,6班(含)以下的學校教師高於49班(含)以上的學校教師。
三、在「個人教學效能」上,男性教師高於女性教師,具研究所以上學歷的教師高於具教育大學學歷的教師,年資16~25年的教師高於5年(含)以下的教師,年資26年(含)以上的教師高於5年(含)以下及6~15年的教師;在「工作情境效能」上,年資26年(含)以上的教師高於6~15年的教師,兼行政的教師高於級任教師;在「一般教學效能」,兼行政的教師高於級任教師,6班(含)以下的學校教師高於49班(含)以上的學校教師。
四、在「適應性教學行為調整」上,女性教師高於男性教師;在「不適應性教學行為調整」上,男性教師高於女性教師,7~12班、13~24班、25~48班、49班(含)以上的學校教師高於6班(含)以下的學校教師。
五、學校目標結構知覺、教學成就目標取向、教師自我效能與教學行為調整彼此間具有相關。但是,表現目標結構與追求精熟目標、工作情境效能、一般教學效能之間的相關未達顯著。追求表現目標、避免無能目標與不適應教學行為調整間的相關亦未達顯著。
六、學校目標結構知覺對教學行為調整沒有直接效果。
七、教學成就目標取向對教學行為調整具有正向的直接效果。
八、教師自我效能對教學行為調整沒有直接效果。
九、學校目標結構知覺對教學成就目標取向沒有直接效果。
十、學校目標結構知覺對教師自我效能沒有直接效果。
十一、教學成就目標取向對教師自我效能具正向的直接效果。
十二、教師自我效能在學校目標結構知覺與教學行為調整之間不具中介效果。
十三、教師自我效能在教學成就目標取向與教學行為調整之間不具中介效果。
十四、教學成就目標取向在學校目標結構知覺與教學行為調整之間不具中介效果。
十五、本研究所提之教學行為調整模式,經實證資料驗證分析後,無法與原先模式相符。
最後,根據研究結果,研究者提出建議,以供教育行政機關、學校、教師及未來研究參考。
關鍵詞:學校目標結構知覺、教學成就目標取向、教師自我效能、教學行為調整
The purpose of this study was to examine the relations among perceptions of school goal structures, teaching goal orientations, teacher efficacy and teaching behavior regulations by elementary school’s teachers. The research was conducted by questionnaire survey. By means of stratified proportional sampling, the study collected 1045 valid samples from elementary school’s teachers in Taiwan. The instrument was used in this study included Teacher’s perceptions of school goal structures scale, Teacher’s teaching goal orientations scale, Teacher efficacy scale and Teacher’s teaching behavior regulations scale. Afterward, the collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, structural equation modeling with SPSS 20 and AMOS 18.0.
The findings of the study were summarized as follows:
1. There were significant differences on gender of teachers for the personal teaching efficacy, the adaptive and maladaptive teaching behavior regulations.
2. There were significant differences on different education degree of teachers for the approach - performance goal and the personal teaching efficacy.
3. There were significant differences on different years of experience of teachers for the approach - mastery goal, the personal teaching efficacy and the contextual teaching efficacy.
4. There were significant differences on different task of teachers for the perceptions of school mastery goal structures, school performance goal structures, the approach - performance goal, the contextual teaching efficacy and the general teaching efficacy.
5. There were significant differences on different class numbers of school for the perceptions of school mastery goal structures, school performance goal structures, the avoidance - performance goal, the general teaching efficacy and maladaptive teaching behavior regulations.
6. There were significant differences on different residence of schools for the perceptions of school mastery goal structures and school performance goal structures.
7. There were significant correlations among most dimensions of perceptions of school goal structures, teaching goal orientations, teacher efficacy and teaching behavior regulations.
8. The perceptions of school goal structures could not significant predict teaching behavior regulations.
9. Teaching goal orientations had a positive effect on teaching behavior regulations.
10. Teacher efficacy could not significant predict teaching behavior regulations.
11. The perceptions of school goal structures could not significant predict teaching goal orientations.
12. The perceptions of school goal structures could not significant predict teacher efficacy.
13. Teaching goal orientations had a positive effect on teacher efficacy.
14. Teacher efficacy wasn’t the mediator between the perceptions of school goal structures and teaching behavior regulations.
15. Teacher efficacy wasn’t the mediator between teaching goal orientations and teaching behavior regulations.
16. Teaching goal orientations wasn’t the mediator between the perceptions of school goal structures and teaching behavior regulations.
17.The empirical data couldn’t verify the model of teachers’ teaching behavior regulations.
The researcher provided recommendations based on the findings as references for educational administrative institutions, schools, teachers and further studies.
Keywords: Perceptions of school goal structures, Teaching goal orientations, Teacher efficacy, Teaching behavior regulations
壹、中文部分
王文科、王智弘(2009)。教育研究法(增訂第十三版)。臺北:五南。new window
朱陳翰思(2002)。國民小學教師自我效能感與專業知能關係之研究國民小學教師自我效能感與專業知能關係之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所,臺中。
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北:高等教育。
吳明隆(2008)。SPSS操作與應用問卷統計分析實務。臺北:五南。
吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式AMOS 的操作與應用(第二版)。臺北:五南。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2007)。SPSS與統計應用分析(修訂版)。臺北:五南。
吳璧如(2004a)。幼兒職前教師效能感之測量。教育心理學報,36(2),165-184。new window
吳璧如(2004b)。幼稚園職前教師的教師效能感與任教承諾之關係。教育學刊,23,207-230。new window
宋秋美、程炳林、周啟葶(2010)。課室目標結構對個人目標導向的調節效果。教育心理學報,42(1),99-122。new window
李幸(2001)。國民中學學習型組織、教師自我效能與學校效能關係之研究。未出版碩士論文,高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄。
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體 AMOS 之簡介與及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北:心理。
李新民、陳密桃(2007) 。實用智能、目標導向、教師自我效能對工作表現之影響探析:以幼兒教師為例。教育學刊,28,63-99。new window
林三維(2005)。桃園縣國民中學體育教師自我效能與教學效能之相關研究。未出版碩士論文,國立體育學院體育研究所,桃園。
林易慧、程炳林(2006)。課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之影響。教育心理學報,37(3),231-255。new window
林秋榮(2006)。特殊教育教師自我效能與教學行為調整之研究。未出版博士論文,國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系,彰化。new window
林倚萱(2012)。中學實習教師自我調整學習歷程及其教師自我效能之研究。未出版博士論文,國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系,彰化。new window
林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報,38(4),173-194。new window
林啟超(2009)。高職學生之未來時間觀、成就目標與適應性學習行為間徑路模式之檢驗。教育實踐與研究,22(1),81-112。new window
林惠珍(2009)。國民小學初任教師自我效能之個案研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺北教育大學政策與管理研究所,臺北。
侯玫如、程炳林、于富雲(2004)。國中生多重目標導向與其自我調整學習之關係。教育心理學報,35(3),221-248。new window
柯安南(2004)。國小教師專業能力知覺與教師自我效能感之研究-教師資格檢定觀點。未出版碩士論文,國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義。
孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為調整的關係-實徵取向的分析。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,109-140。new window
孫志麟(2002)。教師效能-三元模式的建構與應用。教育研究月刊,104,44-54。new window
孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報,34(2),139-156。new window
孫志麟(2005)。跨越科層:學校組織對教師自我效能的影響。國立臺北師範學院學報:教育類,18(1),29-61。new window
徐綺穗(2008)。一位實習教師自我調整學習之研究。教育資料與研究,85,151-174。new window
張宇樑、吳樎椒(2009)。影響臺中縣市公立國小數學領域初任教師效能感發展因素之個案研究。科學教育學刊,17(1),27-48。new window
張芳全(2010)。問卷就是要這樣編。台北:心理。
張裕程(2005)。中部四縣市國民小學校長轉型領導、互易領導與教師自我效能關係之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義。
張簡俊彥(2004)。國小實習教師於教育實習中自我調整學習之分析。未出版碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學諮商與教育心理研究所,臺中。
符碧真、黃源河(2016)。實地學習:銜接師資培育理論與實務的藥方?教育科學研究期刊,61(2),57-84。new window
許育齡(2006)。教師效能感研究的取向及限制:邁向變動教師效能感的探究。慈濟大學教育研究學刊,2,109-137。
郭明德(1998)。國小教師自我效能、班級經營策略與班級經營成效關係之研究。未出版博士論文,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄。new window
郭明德(2002)。教師教學效能之探討與量表之編制。國立台灣體育學院學報,11,61-91。new window
郭淑珍(2003)。國民小學教師專業自主與教師效能之研究。新竹師院學報,17,23-50。new window
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2009)。多變量分析方法統計軟體應用(5nd ed)。臺北:五南。
陳玉樹、郭銘茜(2013)。四向度成就目標對教師創意教學表現之影響:創意教師自我效能的中介效果與團隊學習行為的跨層級調節效果檢定。教育科學研究期刊,58(3),85-120。new window
陳美娟(2004)。國民小學教師評鑑與教師自我效能之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所,臺中。
陳嘉成(2008)。調節假設或適配假設?-二個相競假設的檢驗與知覺目標結構變化對學習組型影響之研究。教育與心理研究,31(2),27-58。new window
彭淑玲、程炳林(2005)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。師大學報:教育類,50(2),69-95。new window
曾玟瑜(2013)。教學目標導向、求助態度與求助行為之關係。未出版碩士論文,國立成功大學教育研究所,臺南。
程炳林(2002)。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心理學報,33(2),79-102。new window
程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48(1),15-40。new window
黃鈺雯(2013)。國小教師目標導向、自我調整策略與教師效能之相關研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班,臺南。new window
黃儒傑(2007)。初任教師成就目標導向及其教學承諾之研究:以幼稚園教師為例。臺東大學教育學報,18(1),1-28。new window
黃儒傑(2008)。新手教師成就目標導向、自我調整策略及其教學承諾之研究:以臺中縣市幼稚園為例。國民教育研究學報,21,31-62。new window
黃儒傑(2009)。初任教師教學承諾及其相關因素:心理取向之探討。臺北:高等教育。
熊淑蘭(2006)。幼兒教師目標導向、教師自我效能與工作表現之相關研究。未出版碩士論文,樹德科技大學幼兒保育系碩士班,高雄。
劉佩雲(1998)。兒童自我調整學習之研究。未出版博士論文,國立政治大學教育學系研究所,臺北。new window
劉佩雲(2009)。目標導向與趨向或逃避行為之關係探討。課程與教學,12(3),213-240。new window
潘義祥(2003)。國民小學健康與體育學習領域教師自我效能、教學承諾與教學實踐。未出版博士論文,國立體育學院體育研究所,桃園。new window
鄭文實(2007)。國小組織氣氛、教師自我效能感與專業評鑑意願之相關研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺東大學,臺東。
簡紅珠(2006)。以學習成就為主的教師效能研究與教師評鑑。教育資料與研究,73,75-90。new window

貳、英文部分
Ames, C. (1984). Achievement attributions and self-instructions under competitive and individualistic goal structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 478-487.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1984). Goal structure and motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 39-52.
Ames, C., & Ames, R.(1981). Competitive versus individualistic goal structures: The salience of past performance information for causal attributions and affect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 411-418.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. A. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 369-390). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Armor, D., Conry-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 130243)
Ashton, P.T. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.
Ashton, P.T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. doi: 10.1177/009207038801600107
Bandura, A. (1977 ). Social learing theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21-41.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents:Vol. 5. ( pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/Windows user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54 (2), 199–231.
Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2003). A test of the factorial validity of the teacher efficacy scale. Research in Education, 69, 67-79.new window
Butler, R. (2012). Striving to connect: Extending an achievement goal approach to teacher motivation to include relational goals for teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 726-742.
Butler, R. (2007). Teachers' achievement goal orientations and associations with teachers' help seeking: Examination of a novel approach to teacher motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 241-252.
Butler, R., & Shibaz, L. (2008). Achievement goals for teaching as predictors of students' perceptions of instructional practices and students' help seeking and Cheating. Learning and Instruction, 18, 453-467.
Capa-Aydin, Y., Sungur, S., & Uzuntiryaki, E. (2009 ). Teacher self-regulation: Examining a multidimensional construct. Educational Psychology, 29(3), 345-356.
Cho, Y., & Shim, S. S. (2013). Predicting teachers’ achievement goals for teaching: The role of perceived school goal structure and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 12-21.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences ( 2nd ed. ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Covington, M.V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
Denham, C.H., & Michael, J. J. (1981). Teacher sense of efficacy: A definition of the construct and a model for further research. Educational Research Quarterly, 6 (1), 39-61.
Denzine, G. M., Cooney, J. B., & McKenzie, R. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of the teacher efficacy scale for prospective teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75( 4), 689-708.
Dickhäuser, O., Butler, R., & Tönjes, B. (2007). That just shows I can’t do it: Goal orientation and attitudes concerning help among preservice teachers. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 39, 120-126. doi:10.1026/0049-8637.39.3.120
Dowson, M., & McInereny, D.M. ( 2003 ). What do students say about their motivational goals? : Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 91–113.
Dresel, M. , Fasching, M. , Steuer, G. , Nitsche, S., & Dickhäuser, O. (2013). Relations between teachers’ goal orientations, their instructional practices and students’ motivation. Psychology, 4(7), 572-584.http://dx. doi.org/10.4236/psych. 2013.47083
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Elliot, A. J. (1997). Intergrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 143-179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: a mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648.
Emmer, E., & Hickman, J. (1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 755-765.
Fasching, M. S.,Dresel, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Nitsche, S. (2010). Goal orientations of teacher trainees: Longitudinal analysis of magnitude, change and relevance. Journal for Educational Research Online, 2, 9-33.
Fatemeh, M., & Shahla, O. ( 2012 ). Validation of the english version of the teacher self-regulation scale in an EFL context. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12 (6), 774-782. doi: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.12.6.2478
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E.(2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63-69.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. ( 2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638-645.
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330–358.
Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behavior. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191-211.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Kumar, R. (2006). Students’ experiences of home/school dissonance: The role of school academic culture and perceptions of classroom goal structures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 253-279.
Lau, S., Liem, A. D., & Nie, Y. (2008). Task- and self-related pathways to deep learning: The mediating role of achievement goals, classroom attentiveness, and group participation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 639-662. doi: 10.1348/000709907X270261
Lemos, M. S. (1996). Students’ and teachers’ goals in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(2), 151-171.
Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97( 2), 197-213. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197-
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31( 3), 313-327.
Luo, W., Hogan, D., & Paris, S. G. (2011). Predicting singapore students’ achievement goals in their English study: Self-construal and classroom goal structure. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 526-535.
Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 61-75.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., Gheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M. J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R., & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 432-447.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346.
Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nitsche, S., Dickhäuser, O., Fasching, M. S., & Dresel, M. (2011). Rethinking teachers' goal orientations: Conceptual and methodological enhancements. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 574-586.
Papaioannou, A., & Christodoulidis, T. (2007). A measure of teachers’ achievement goals. Educational Psychology, 27, 349-361.
Patrick, H., Kaplan, A., & Ryan, A. M. ( 2011). Positive classroom motivational environments: Convergence between mastery goal structure and classroom social climate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 367-382.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goal, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000c). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92-104.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Polychroni, F., Hatzichristou, C., & Sideridis, G. (2012). The role of goal orientations and goal structures in explaining classroom social and affective characteristics. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 207-217
Retelsdorf, J., Butler, R., Streblow, L., & Schiefele, U. (2010). Teachers' goal orientations for teaching: Associations with instructional practices, interest in teaching, and burnout . Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 30–46.
Roeser, R., Marachi, R., & Gehlbach, H. (2002). A goal theory perspective on teachers' professional identities and the contexts of teaching. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goal orientations, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning(pp.204-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., and Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation(pp. 631–649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: Cuilford Press.
Self-Brown, S. R., & Mathews, S. (2003). Effects of classroom structure on student achievement goal orientation. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(2), 106-111.
Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47.
Shaughnessy, M. F. (2004). An interview with Anita Woolfolk: The Educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 153-176.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching:Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teachers’ feeling of belonging, exhaustion, and job satisfaction: The role of school goal structure and value consonance. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 24, 369–385.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2013). Teachers' perceptions of the school goal structure: Relations with teachers' goal orientations, work engagement, and job satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 199-209.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Leinhardt, S. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology(pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1996). Teacher efficacy: Toward the understanding of a multi-faceted construct. Teaching & Teacher Education, 12(4), 401-411.
Swackhamer, L. E., Koellner, K., Basile, C.,& Kimbrough, D. (2009). Increasing the self-efficacy of inservice teachers through content knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, Spring, 63-78.
Throndsen, I., & Turmo, A. (2012). Gender differences in teachers' beliefs and primary school children's achievement in mathematics. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 39, 159-170.
Throndsen, I., & Turmo, A. (2013). Primary mathematics teachers' goal orientations and student achievement. An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 41(2), 307-322.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944-956. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
Urdan, T. (2004a). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.251
Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 115–138. doi:10.1023/A:1009061303214
Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101–122. doi:10.3102/00028312035001101
Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(2), 170-182.
Van Eekelen, M., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Vermunt, D. J. (2005). Self-regulation in higher education teacher learning. Higher Education, 50(3), 447-471.
Walker, C. O. (2012). Student perceptions of classroom achievement goals as predictors of belonging and content instrumentality. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 97–107.
Wolters, C. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224-235.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 179-187.
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structure and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250.
Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and their association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 181-193.
Wolters, C. A., Fan, W., & Daugherty, S. G. (2011). Teacher reported goal structures: Assessing factor structure and invariance. Journal of Experimental Education, 79, 1-29.
Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91.
Yost, D.S. (2006). Reflection and self-efficacy: Enhancing the retention of qualified teachers from a teacher education perspective. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 59-77.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81( 3), 329-339.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulatory learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 284-290.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE