一、中文部分
王秀雄（1990）。美術與教育。臺北市：臺北市立美術館。
王秀雄（1998）。觀賞、認知、解釋與評價─美術鑑賞教育的學理與實務。臺北市：國立歷史博物館。
王雅各（2004）。質性研究導論。載於謝臥龍（主編），質性研究（頁57-80）。台北：心理。
王鍊登（2012）。審美學。臺中市：臺灣科技美學發展學會。
王嬿琪（2014）。運用經典畫作之圖畫書融入視覺藝術教學研究－以國小高年級為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學教師專業碩士學位學程研究所，臺中。
朱光潛（2014）。談美。台中市：晨星出版社。
吳承澤（2011）。現象學觀點下的藝術批評—論海德格《藝術作品的本源》。經國學報，29，119-135。
吳惠娟（2002）。以圖畫書引導兒童審美與表現的教學研究（未出版之碩士論文）。屏東師範學院視覺藝術教育研究所，屏東。
吳靖國（2007）。「視域交融」在生命教育課程中的教學轉化。教育實踐與研究，20（2），129-156。
呂玉環（2005）。國小國語科美育教學之研究─從Maxine Greene美育觀點來分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所，台北。
李敏勇（2016年4月11日）。異端的存在，異質的顯影—追悼黃靈芝。自由時報，7版。
李雅婷（2002）。課程美學探究取向的理論與實踐之研究－以國小藝術統整課程之教育批評為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所，台北。李雅婷（2009）。美感為本課程經驗之理論與實踐途徑建構研究（I）研究成果報告（精簡版）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（計畫編號：NSC96-2413-H-153-011）。2015年4月9日，取自http://140.127.82. 166/
bitstream/987654321/2266/1/962413H153011.pdf
李雅婷（2010）。美感教育之實踐策略探究：以敘事課程為例。教育學刊，35，65-98。李澤厚（1996）。批判哲學的批判─康德述評。台北：三民。
李澤厚（2001）。美學四講。台北：三民書局。
周淑卿（2011）。學習歷程中美感經驗的性質─藝術與科學課堂的探究。課程與教學季刊，14（1），19-40。幸佳慧（1998）。兒童圖畫故事書的藝術探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學藝術研究所，台南。
林曼麗（2001）。台灣視覺藝術教育理念之展開─藝術、人文、新契機。國民教育，41（3），26-34。
林逢祺（1998）。美感經驗與教育。教育研究集刊，41，155-170。林凱胤、 王國華（2007）。實習教師經由觀摩與反思途徑擷取輔導教師內隱知識之研究 。屏東教育大學學報-教育類，27，31-50。花英德（2013）。美感經驗的理論與實踐－國小六年級國語科的行動研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所，彰化。邱崧榕（2014）。鶯歌注漿茶壺生產技藝傳承研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄餐旅大學台灣飲食文化產業研究所，高雄。
施俊名（2012）。挖掘知識冰山下的財富—內隱知識理論及其對中小學教師專業發展之啟示。教育與多元文化研究，7，111-141。洪詠善（2008）。美感經驗觀點的教學再概念化（未出版之博士論文）。國立台北教育大學課程與教學研究所，台北。洪嘉慧（2005）。無字圖畫書應用於幼稚園視覺藝術教學之行動研究－以《樹木之歌》為例（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學視覺藝術研究所，新北市。
胡郁珮（2004）。和孩子擁抱藝術：二至八歲視覺藝術教育的理論與教學實例。新北市：啟英出版社。
胡郁珮（2006）。親子藝術狂想曲。新北市：城邦文化‧新手父母出版社。
胡郁珮（2014）。開啟多元智能的統整性視覺藝術教學方案之研究。教育研究學報，48（2），71-100。胡郁珮（2015）。融合多元智能理論與創造性教學策略的視覺藝術教學方案。德國 ：金琅學術出版社
胡郁珮（2016a）。教科書編纂真的是以學生為中心嗎？—以國小一年級(上)生活課程教科書中的視覺藝術活動為例。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（2），131- 152 。
胡郁珮（2016b）。取徑於SECI知識轉換模式實踐美感教育之初探—以視覺藝術教學為例。教育研究學報，50（2），47-72。胡郁珮（2016c）。畫出美麗新境界—視覺藝術教學融合語文賞析的美感經驗之探究。新竹教育大學學報，33（2），95-144。胡郁珮、魏美惠（2011）。調色盤裡的狂想曲─以創造思考教學為導向的兒童視覺藝術教育之探究。課程與教學刊，14（1），63-89。孫孟儀 （2004）。美術圖畫書應用於國小四年級視覺藝術鑑賞教學之行動研究：以《三角湧的梅樹阿公》和《克利的繪本》為例（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立師範學院視覺藝術研究所，新北市。
國家教育研究院（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—總綱（草案）。2016年4月9日，取自http://www.fssh.khc.edu.tw/UpLoadFiles/E2AEA34.pdf
張妙如（2012）。運用圖畫書賞析教學提升學童繪畫與造形表現之行動研究—以國小中年級為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學美術學系研究所，臺中。
教育部（2008）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要藝術與人文學習領域。2015年2月15日，取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php教育部（2012）。幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱。2015年2月15日，取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000714
教育部（2013）。教育部美感教育中長程計畫第一期五年計畫(103年至107年) 「臺灣‧好美—美感從幼起、美力終身學」。2015年2月15日，取自http: //ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/8/relfile/0/2073
郭正賢（2013）。後現代藝術鑑賞教學趨勢與實踐─以歷史博物館慈禧太后像為例。教師天地，184，61-65。
郭秋梅（2007）。論生活經營學從生活世界的內涵。消費者保護研究，9，73-92。
郭禎祥（1990）。談藝術鑑賞教學與評量的某些理論與實務。師大學報，35，311-324。郭禎祥（1994）。多元文化觀與藝術教育。師大學報，39，545-582。郭禎祥（1999）。二十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育，106，1-9。
陳木金（1999）。美感教育的理念與詮釋之研究。載於「全人教育與美感教育詮釋與對話研討會」學術研討會論文集（頁36-51）。台北：國立臺灣藝術學院教育學程中心。
陳玉婷（2007）。美感教育在藝術與人文學習領域上之運用：一位音樂老師之個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊，3（2），113-136。陳伯璋（2003）。新世紀的課程研究與發展。國家政策季刊，2（3），149-167。
陳伯璋（2006）。課程美學的理論建構與批判。國科會計畫。
陳美玉（2005）。師資生個人知識管理及其對專業學習與發展影響之研究。師大學報：教育類，50（2），181-202。陳錦惠（2005）。教學經驗中的美感特質探討杜威美學的觀點。課程與教學季刊，8（2），15-24。陳瓊花（2004）。台灣民眾美感素養發展與藝術教育改進研究報告。國立臺灣藝術教育館委託之研究成果報告。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
陳瓊花（2012）。藝術概論（增訂三版）。台北：三民。
陳麗文（2008）。閱讀、對話與遊戲：國小綜合活動課程美學之探究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學教育研究所，台北。彭妮絲（2009）。生命關懷視域中之語文教學研究─以隱性知識顯性化為基礎之探究。高雄師大學報，27， 45-66。彭妮絲（2011）。大學校院國語文教學芻議─以隱性知識之轉化為主軸。南台學報 ，36（2），15—30。
彭蓮好（2005）。隱性知識的定義、特徵及分類。咸寧學院學報，25（5），97-99。
曾昭旭（2013）。庖丁解牛的技術層次和藝術層次——莊子與你16。2015年3月16日，取自http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/wlyeh01/post/1326093975
黃壬來（2006）。國際視覺藝術教育趨勢。2006年全國藝術教育展藝術教育專題研討會會議論文。花蓮縣。2015年5月19日，取自http://ed.arte.gov.tw
/uploadfile/periodical/
黃彥文（2010）。邁向一種共鳴的課程美學取向。載於國家教育研究院籌備處與國立編譯館（主編），「美學取向課程與教學之理論建構與應用」學術論壇論文集（頁103-120）。台北：國立編譯館。
黃淑慧、魏美惠（2015）。幼兒園教師不同引導方式對幼兒繪畫內容影響之研究。藝術研究學報，8（1），49-70。楊雅婷（2009）。運用「圖畫書」統整藝術與人文學習領域課程之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺東大學兒童文學研究所，臺東。
溫知穎（2014）。高中美術學科中心教師社群知識管理之研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。臺灣師範大學美術學系，臺北市。
鄒川雄（2005）。生活世界與默會知識─詮釋學觀點的質性研究。載於齊力、林本炫主編，質性研究方法與資料分析（頁21-56）。嘉義：南華大學教育社會學研究所。
廖仁義（2010）。美的覺醒：公民社會美學教育的理論與實踐。載於國家教育研究院籌備處與國立編譯館（主編），「美學取向課程與教學之理論建構與應用」學術論壇論文集（頁1-5）。台北：國立編譯館。
甄曉蘭（2015）。課程理論與實務—解構與重建。台北市：高等教育。
劉思吟（2005）。隱喻能力對內隱知識表達影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。義守大學管理研究所，高雄。
劉秋固（2010）。美學─智慧開門的通識教育。載於國立編譯館（編），「美學取向課程與教學之理論建構與應用」學術論壇論文集（頁25-36）。台北：國立編譯館。
劉梅琴（2007）。論《莊子．人間世》快感．美感．審美境界的現代詮釋。載於國立臺北大學中國語文學系（主編），「第三屆中國文哲之當代詮釋學術研討會」會前論文集（頁215-226）。台北：國立台北大學中國語文學系。
歐用生（2003）。課程典範的再建構。高雄：麗文文化。蔡麗莉、賴鼎銘（2006）。小提琴製作技術的經驗知識傳承與分享。圖書館學與資訊科學，32（2），105 -116。鄭明憲（2003）。兒童對視覺意象意義的建構。藝術教育研究，5，1-22。鄭明憲（2013）。融合內外在因素以理解視覺意象的觀賞活動。國立彰化師範大學文學院學報，7，183-204。鄭麗珍、朱家嶠（2010）。建置行為及社會科學研究倫理審查治理架構：國立臺灣大學的執行經驗。人文與社會科學簡訊，12（1），26-32。
謝戌嘉（2011）。無字圖畫書故事教學融入視覺藝術之行動研究－以國小一年級為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學人資處美勞教學研究所，新竹。
謝攸青（2013）。藝術教學中高達美詮釋學與批判理論之整合應用─以孟克《青春期》為例。屏東教育大學學報，40，31-59。謝朝鐘（2008）。美學與藝術教育。大葉大學與通識教育學報，2，145-156。顏秀倩（2012）。紙本美術圖畫書結合有聲書融入國小二年級視覺藝術鑑賞教學之行動研究：以《三角湧的梅樹阿公》和《認識梵谷》為例（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學視覺藝術教學研究所，新北市。
魏光莒（2006）。「生活世界」─由「視域」理論到「場域」理念。環境與藝術期刊，4，17-23。蘇彥勳（2005）。隱喻特性、理解機制對內隱知識分享影響之研究─以大學生為例（未出版之碩士論文）。義守大學管理研究所，高雄。
Berger, J.（2010）。觀看的方式（吳莉君譯）。台北：麥田。（原著出版年：1972）
Dickinson, E.（2006）。艾蜜莉‧狄金生詩選（董恆秀譯、賴傑威評）。台北：木馬文化。（原著出版年：1951、1955、1979）
Gadamer, H.（1993）。真理與方法：哲學詮釋學基本特徵（洪漢鼎譯）。臺北市：時報文化。（原著出版年：1986）
Schiller, Fr.（2015）。席勒經典美學文論（范大燦等譯）。北京：生活．讀書．新知三聯。（原著出版年：1790）
二、英文部分
Al-Haba, M. A. M. (2013). Reader response theory in the phenomenology of reading with the text and the reader as its focal point. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 8(6), 83-86.
Andreeva, T. & Ikhilchik, I. (2011). Applicability of the SECI model of knowledge creation in Russian cultural context: Theoretical analysis. Knowledge and Process Management, 18(1), 56-66. doi: 10.1002/kpm.351
Argote, L. (1993). Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 31-51.
Aujirapongpan, S., Vadhanasindhu, P., Chandrachai, A., & Cooparat, P. (2010). Indicators of knowledge management capability for KM effectiveness.VINE, 40(2), 183 – 203. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03055721011050677
Ballengee-Morris, C. & Stuhr, P. (2001). Multicultural art and visual cultural education in a changing world. Art Education, 54(4), 6-13.
Barkan, M. (1955). A foundation for art education. New York, NY: Ronald.
Barkan, M. (1966). Curriculum problems in art education.In Mattil, E (Ed.), A Seminar in Art Education for Research and Curriculum Development. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
Barone, T. (1983). Education as aesthetic experience : “Art in Germ”. Educational Leadership, 40(4), 21-26.
Barthes, R. (1973). Mythologies. London : Paladin Books.
Barton, G.M. (2013). The arts and literacy: What does it mean to be arts literate? International Journal of Education & the Arts, 14(18). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v14n18/.
Beardsley, M. C. (1969). Aesthetic experience regained. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 28(1), 3-11. doi: 10.2307/428903
Beardsley, M. C. (1982). The aesthetic point of view: Selected essays. Cornell University Press.
Berns, G. S., Blaine, K., Prietula, M. J., & Pye, B. E. (2013). Short- and long-term effects of a novel on connectivity in the brain. Brain Connectivity, 3(6), 590-600. doi:10.1089/brain.2013.0166
Berry, D. C. & Dienes, Z. P. (1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
Berry, D. C. (1987). The problem of implicit knowledge. Expert Systems, 4(3), 144-150.
Bratianu, C. (2010). A critical analysis of Nonaka’s model of knowledge dynamics. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2), 193-200.
Broudy, H. S. (1981). Arts education as artistic perception. In GW Hardiman & T. Zernich (Eds.), Foundations for Curriculum Development and Evaluation in Art Education (pp. 9-17). Champaign, IL: Stipes.
Broudy, H. S. (1988). Aesthetics and the curriculum. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary Curriculum Discourses (pp. 332-342). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Butterfield, C. L. (2002). Education by imagination: Using nonfiction children’s literature to promote aesthetic connections. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED467522)
Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2002). Situational judgment and job performance. Human Performance, 15(3), 233-254.
Changeux, J. P. (1994). Art and neuroscience . Art and Science Similarities, Differences and Interactions: Special Issue, 189-201.
Cheng, E. C. K. (2014). Knowledge management for school education. Germany: Springer.
Cheng, M. H. (2002). Culture and interpretation: A study of Taiwanese children's responses to visual images. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio State.
Cheng, M. H. (2009). Mapping the approaches of understanding visual images. Paper presented at the 7th Hawaii Inteernational Conference on Education, Honolulu.
Clinard, J. & Foster, L. (1998). Putting art standards into practice with aesthetic literacy. National association of secondary school principals. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 18-24.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Illinois, Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1990). The art of seeing: An interpretation of the aesthetic encounter. Getty Publications. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed. gov/fulltext/ED388602.pdf
Cupchik, G. C., Vartanian, O., Crawley, A., & Mikulis, D. J. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 84-91. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003
Dalkir, K. (2013). Knowledge management in theory and practice. UK: Oxford University Press.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. New York : Dover Publications.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York : Berkley.
Dewey, J. (1938). The Philosophy of the arts. Lecture delivered to the Washington Dance Association, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.google.com.tw/
url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUK
EwiKrv6dkPzJAhXmKKYKHUbJCoEQFgg6MAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fkurtstuke.com%2FFPU%2FTL705%2FThe%2520Philosophy%2520of%2520the%2520Arts.docx&usg=AFQjCNGD71w4Ig7mbEiOJv0jqTf8ZQ2ddA&sig2=uqd_tOVzHhIG3SQlkqyrPA
Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York : The Free Press.
Eaton, M. M., & Moore, R. (2002). Aesthetic experience: Its revival and its relevance to aesthetic education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 36(2), 9-23.
Efland, A. (1992). Ralph Smith's concept of aesthetic experience and its curriculum implications. Studies in Art Education, 33(4), 201-209.
Efland, A. D. (2004). The entwined nature of the aesthetic: A discourse on visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 45(3), 234-251. doi: 10.1080/00393541.2004.11651770
Efland, A., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (1996). Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. Reston, VA: National Art Education.
Eisner, E. (1985). Aesthetic modes of knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing: Eighty-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II, pp. 23-36). Chicago: National Society of the Study of Education.
Eisner, E. (2002). What the arts teach and how it shows. In E. W. Eisner (Ed.), The arts and the creation of mind (pp. 70-92). CT: Yale University Press. Available from NAEA Publications.
Eisner, E. (2006). Does arts-based research have a future? Studies in Art Education :A Journal of Issues and Research in Art Education, 48(1), 9-18. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO: EJ767098)
Eisner, E. (2008). Art and knowledge. Handbook of the arts in qualitative research, 3-12.
Eisner, E. W. (1972). Educating artistic vision. New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1996). Cognition and curriculum reconsidered (2nd ed.). London, Engiand: SAGE.
Eisner, E. W. (1998). The kind of schools we need: Personal essays. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO: ED426466)
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. CT: Yale University Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO: ED482706)
Eisner, E.W. (2004). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education?. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 5(4), 1-13. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO: EJ808086)
Elmorshidy, A. (2016). Tacit knowledge strategic use in organizations: A new model for creation, sharing and success. Academy of Taiwan Business Management Review, 12(1),40-45.
Fish, S. (1994). Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. In J. P. Tompkins (Ed.), Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism (Eighthimpression, paperback ed., pp. 70-100). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Girod, M., Twyman, T., & Wojcikiewicz, S. (2010). Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 801-824.
Grant, K . A. (2007). Tacit knowledge revisited – We can still learn from Polanyi. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 173 – 180.
Greene, M. (1977). Imagination and aesthetic literacy. Art Education, 30(6), 14-20. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO: EJ170961)
Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Greene, M. (2001). Variation on a blue guitar : The Lincoln center institute lectures on aesthetics education. New York : Teachers College Press.
Gulla, Pinhasi-Vittorio, & Zakin (2009). Exploring relationships between aesthetic education and writing across the curriculum using poetry. Across the Disciplines, 6, 6-6. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu//atd/articles/ gullaetal2009.cfm
Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000). Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations. Journal of Intellectual capital, 1(4), 357-365.
Hargreaves, D. H. (2000). The production, mediation and use of professional knowledge among teachers and doctors: A comparative analysis. In Center for Educational Research and Innovation (Ed.), Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: OECD.
Hashweb, M. Z. (2003). Teacher accommodative change. Teaching & Teacher Education, 19(1), 421-434.
Hislop, D. (2013). Knowledge management in organizations: A critical introduction (3th ed.). UK: Oxford University Press.
Hobbs, J. (1985). Response to Smith's “A Right to the Best”. Studies in Art Education, 26(3), 176-178.
Holzer, M. F. (2005). From philosophy to practice: Asking important questions, reating enabling structures. In M. F. Holzer & S.Noppe-Brandon (Eds.), Community in the making: Lincoln center Institute, the arts and teacher education (pp. 3-11). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Holzer, M. F. (2007). Aesthetic education, inquiry, and the imagination. Retrieved from http://www.lcinstitute.org/wps/PA_1_0_P1/Docs/495-AEII.pdf
Hsiao, C. Y. (2010). Enhancing children's artistic and creative thinking and drawing performance through appreciating picture books. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 143-152.
Innis, R. E. (2004). The tacit logic of ritual embodiments. Social Analysis, 48(2), 197-212.
Iser, W. (1974). The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In Iser, W., The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett (pp. 274-294). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Iyengar, S., Grantham, E., Heeman, R., Ivanchenko, R., Nichols, B., & Shingler, T. (2012). How art works: The national endowment for the arts’ five-year research agenda, with a system map and measurement model.Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
Jakobson, B. & Wickman, P. (2008). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 45-65. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8
Jakobson, B. (2015). What difference does art make in science? A comparative study of meaning-making at elementary school. Interchange, 46(4), 323-343. doi: 10.1007/s10780-015-9262-6
Johnson, H. L. (2007). Aesthetic experience and early language and literacy development. Early Child Development and Care, 177(3), 311-320. doi: 10.1080/03004430500495576
Kastely, J. (1991). Review: Protocols of reading by Robert Scholes. Modern Philology, 89(1), 170-173.
Kesson, K. R. (1999). Toward a curriculum of mythopoetic meaning. In J. G. Henderson & K. R. Kesson (Eds.), Understanding Democratic Curriculum Leadership (pp. 84-105). N Y: Teacher’s College.
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377-380. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918
Koskinen, K. U., Pihlanto, P., & Vanharanta, H. (2003). Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 281-290.
Krug, D. H. (2002). Teaching art in the contexts of everyday life. In Y. Gaudelius & P. Spiers (Eds.), Contemporary issues in art education (pp. 180-197). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lacey, S., Hagtvedt, H., Patrick, V. M., Anderson, A., Stilla, R., Deshpande, G., …Sathian, K. (2011). Art for reward's sake: Visual art recruits the ventral striatum. NeuroImage, 55(1), 420-433. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.027
Lankford, E. L. (2002). Aesthetic experience in constructivist museums. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 36(2), 140-153. doi: 10.2307/3333763
Lansing, K. M. (1978).Art artists, and art education. New York, N. Y. :McGraw Hill.
Maivorsdotter, N., & Lundvall, S. (2009). Aesthetic experience as an aspect of embodied learning: Stories from physical education student teachers. Sport, Education and Society, 14(3), 265-279. doi: 10.1080/13573320903037622
Margitay , T. (Eds.). (2010). Knowing and being: Perspectives on the philosophy of Michael Polanyi. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Marković, S. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. i-Perception, 3(1), 1-17.
Martensson, M. (2000). A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3), 204-216.
Mouriki-Zervou, A. ( 2011).The cognitive dimension of art : Aesthetic and education Value. The International Journal of Learning, 18, 1-12.
National Art Education Association (2014). National core arts standards: A conceptual framework for arts learning. Retrieved from http://www. nationalartsstandards.org/content/conceptual-framework
National Standards for Arts Education (2014). The national visual arts standards are part of the ational core arts standards, which were launched in 2014. Retrieved from https://www.arteducators.org/learn-tools/national-visual-arts-standards
Nonaka, I. ＆ Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I. & Toyama, R.(2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice , 1, 2–10. doi:10.1057/ palgrave.kmrp.8500001
O'Brien, M., & Prain, V. (2000). Using postmodern picture books in the art curriculum. Australian Art Education, 23(2), 23 -29.
Pantaleo, S. (2016). Primary students’ understanding and appreciation of the artwork in picturebooks. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(2), 228-255.
Parsons, M. J. (1990). Aesthetic literacy: The psychological context. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 24(1), 135-146. doi : 10.2307/3332861
Pinar, W. F. (2004).What’s curriculum theory? Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Podsen, I. J. & Denmark, V. M. (2000). Coaching & mentoring first-year and student teachers. UK: Eye on Education, Inc.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Polanyi, M. (2005). Personal knowledge-towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library. (Original work published 1958)
Pugh, K. J., & Girod, M. (2007). Science, art, and experience: Constructing a science pedagogy from Dewey’s aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 9-27.
Qwaider, W. Q. (2011). Integrated of knowledge management and E-learning system. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 4(4), 59-70.
Rai, R. K. (2011). Knowledge management and organizational culture: A theoretical integrative framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (5), 779-801.
Ramachandran, V. S. & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6-7), 15-51(37).
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processess of reading (pp. 1036-1398): International Reading Association.
Ruzsits, J. S. (2002). Reconsidering Michael Polanyi’s philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3th ed.). New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1993)
Sallis, E. , & Jones, G.(2012). Knowledge management in education: Enhancing learning & education. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 2002)
Schiller, F. (1967).On the aesthetic education of man. Oxfard: Oxfard University Press.
Scholes, R. E. (1989). Protocols of reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Schultze, U. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 3-41.
Sinclair, N. (2009). Aesthetics as a liberating force in mathematics education? ZDM, 41(1-2), 45-60. doi: 10.1007/s11858-008-0132-x
Smith, R. A. (2005). Aesthetic education: Questions and issues. Arts Education Policy Review, 106(3), 19-34.
Smith, R. S. (1968). Aesthetic criticism : The method of aesthetic education. Studies in Art Education, 9(3), 12-31.
Soundy, C. S., Guha, S., & Qiu, Y. (2007). Picture power: Placing artistry and literacy on the same page. YC Young Children, 62(3), 82-88.
Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 45-62.
Tsoukas, H. (2005). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? Managing Knowledge: An Essential Reader, 107. Retrieved from http://mba.eci.ufmg.br/downloads/
dowereally.pdf
Vallance, E. (1991). Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 155–172). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Venkitachalam, K. & Busch, P. (2012). Tacit knowledge: Review and possible research directions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 357 – 372.
Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E. (2015). The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(2), 105-121. doi:10.1111/jasp.12279
Villarreal, A., Minton, S., & Martinez, M. (2015). Child illustrators: Making meaning through visual art in picture books. Reading Teacher, 69(3), 265-275.
Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transitive memory. Social Cognition, 13(3), 319-339
Yeh, Y. C., Huang, L. Y. & Yeh, Y. L. (2011). Integrated of knowledge management and E-learning system . International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 4 (4), 59-70.
Yohlin, E. (2012). Pictures in pictures: Art history and art museums in children’s picture books. Children's Literature in Education, 43(3), 260-272.
Zaidel, D. W. (2010). Art and brain: Insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution. Journal of Anatomy, 216(2), 177-183. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01099.x
Zeman, A., Milton, F., Smith, A., & Rylance, R. (2013). By heart an fmri study of brain activation by poetry and prose. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(9-10), 132-158.
Zheng, W. , Yang, B. , & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63, 763–771.