:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:居家照顧自立生活服務模式:模式建立與評估
作者:江禹嫻
作者(外文):CHIANG, YU-HSIEN
校院名稱:亞洲大學
系所名稱:健康產業管理學系健康管理組
指導教授:徐尚為
徐慧娟
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:居家服務自立生活照顧復原生活能力家庭照顧者在地老化home careself-reliance supportreablementfamily caregiversaging in place
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:6
背景與目的:長期照顧需求隨著人口高齡化成長,如何落實在地老化,提升失能者的能力為長期照顧服務的新趨勢。本研究目的為建構居家服務的自立生活照顧模式,藉由居家服務過程以復原日常生活活動與工具性日常生活能力,以目標導向訓練,提供個別化需求計畫服務,並評估此自立照顧模式之效能。
方法:自立生活照顧模式研究採用準實驗研究法之前後測設計方式進行研究,以居家服務為場域,選取桃園市一家居家支援中心為實驗組,由自立生活照顧服務模式介入居家服務的過程,參與者包含20位居家服務員以及33組服務使用者及其家庭照顧者。對照組則來自苗栗縣某居家支援中心,參與者包含20位居家服務員以及40組服務使用者和家庭照顧者。實驗組的自立支援照顧模式開發由研究者對居家服務員進行自立生活照顧概念訓練及共同討論開發照顧計畫,對照組則採用原本的居家照顧模式。資料收集時間為介入前測一次(106年10月)、後測第一次(107年1 月)、與長照支付新制執行後之後測第二次(107年5月),本研究透過廣義估計方程式進行分析。
結果:分析結果顯示自立生活照顧提升居家服務員的職場滿意度及成就感,服務使用者及家庭照顧者的相互支持及獨立能力上升,服務使用者獨立功能上升及生活品質改善,服務使用者及家庭照顧者的壓力也下降。長照支付政策執行論項目計酬方式改革後,對照組在政策實施後使用者之滿意度和生活品質下降;而實驗組除了居服員在各項指標顯著下降外,實驗組使用者的依賴程度仍持續減少,實驗組家庭照顧者的相互支持也持續上升、壓力下降。
結論:自立生活照顧提升居家服務員成就感以及服務使用者的生活品質,並且降低家庭照顧者的照顧壓力。建議運用政策為誘因,鼓勵自立生活照顧的執行,最終達到獨立及在地老化的目標。
Background and purpose: The needs of long-term care grow as population is aging. The latest trend of providing long-term care to achieve aging in place is by improving the self-care ability of the disabled people. The purpose of this study was to build a home-based self-reliance support care model with reablement concept, which provide goal-oriented training in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental of daily living (IADLs) on personalized needs-based home care plan, and to evaluate the effectivenss of this self-reliance home care model.
Methods: The study used a quasi-experimental research. The experimental group participated in the self-reliant care model, including 20 care attendents, and 33 pairs of home care users and family caregivers from one home-care agency in Taoyuan city. The control group received the usual home care, with participants of 20 care attendents and 40 pairs of home care users and family caregivers from another home care agency in Maiolee city. The experiemental group applied the self-reliance hoem care model, which was built by the training of the researcher on the home care attendants, and discussing of development in self-reliance home care plans. The control group applied the usual home care model. The data were collected by pretest (October 2017), 1st post-test (Janaury 2018), and 2nd post-test (May 2018), when the long-term care payment reform was conducted since 2018. The generalized eatimating equation (GEE) was used for analysis.
Results: Self-reliance home care model improved the occupational satisfaciotn and achievement for home care attedants, improved the mutual support, independence, and quality of life among the users, and reduced the stress of the users and family care. After the long-term care payment reform, the satisfaction and qualife of life reduced after reform for the control group. Regarding to the experimental group, most outcome decline after the reform for the home care attendatns, while the users’ dependence continued to decline, and family caregivers’ mutual support continued to increase and the stress continued to reduce.
Conclusions: Self-reliance care enhances the sense of accomplishment of home attendants and the quality of life of service users, and reduces the care pressure of family caregivers. It is recommended to use policies as incentives to increase the implementation of self-reliance care, and ultimately to achieve the goal of independence and aging in place.
一、中文
1.中華民國家庭照顧者關懷總會(2007)。2007家庭照顧者現況調查。取自http://www.familycare.org.tw/index.php/blog/395-2012-08-10-06-00-24
2.王玠(1991)。老人在宅服務理念與趨勢-鳥瞰我國施行現況。紅心會訊,8,14-15。
3.王玠(2000)。社會工作辭典。台北:內政部社區發展雜誌社。
4.王增勇(1997)。殘補式或普及式福利?-臺北市居家照顧政策的抉擇。社區發展季刊,80,213-232。
5.王秀燕、徐明心、白叙民、王篤強(2016)。居家式照顧服務使用者的服務輸送經驗。社會政策與社會工作學刊,20(1),163-205。
6.王品喬(2008)。家庭女性照顧者需求之探討:以高雄市長期照顧管理中心為例(未發表的碩士論文)。南投:暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系學位論文
7.王育瑜 (2012)。障礙者生活的想像: 照顧與社區生活理念及政策探討。聯合勸募論壇,(1),1-24。
8.內政部統計處(2018)。行政公告:107年第15週內政統計通報。取自https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_detail.aspx?sn=13742
9.內政部統計處(2005)。96年居家服務補助使用者狀況調查報告分析。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/Survey/居家/96年居家服務補助使
用者狀況調查報告分析.pdf
10內政部(2005)。我國長期照顧十年計畫-大溫暖社會福利套案之旗艦計畫。取自http://mit2.meiho.edu.tw/onweb.jsp?webno=
3333333771&webitem_no=293
11.田玟、薛夙君、葉莉莉、吳淑如、宋惠娟、陳淑雯、賈淑麗、蔡馥妃、吳玲娟、郭淑珍、洪秀吉、陳惠津、張萃珉、楊嘉玲(2016)。長期照護。
台中:華格納。
12.行政院(2018)‧長照2.0,照顧的長路上更安心‧取自https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/dd4675bb-b78d-4bd8-8be5-
e3d6a6558d8d
13.行政院經濟建設委員會(2012)‧中華民國2012 年至2060 年人口推計‧取自
http://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Files/policy/2012/ policy_12_037_2.pdf
14.全國法規資料庫(2015)。身心障礙者權益保障法。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/ LawClass/ LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0050046
15.呂寶靜(2005)。支持家庭照顧者的長期照護政策之構思。國家政策季刊,4(4), 25-40。
16.呂寶靜(2001)。老人照顧:老人、家庭、正式服務。台北:五南。
17.李慧玲(2002)。高雄失能老人自費使用居家服務品質之探討(未發表的碩士論文) 。台中:東海大學
18.李宗派(2013)。美國長期照顧體系之發展趨勢。台灣老人保健學刊,9( 1),1-19。
19.李逸、周汎澔、陳彰惠(2011)。家庭照顧者議題─從性別、私領域到公共政策的觀點。護理雜誌,58(2),57-62。
20.吳肖琪、黃敬淳、葉馨婷(2015)。照顧服務員分級可行性之探討。台灣衛誌, 34(6),592-604。
21.吳肖琪(2016)。完善高齡者健康促進與生活品質提升之整合性照顧服務。國土及公共治理季刊,4(1),43-52。
22.林佳靜、王雲東(2011)。探討老人照護人力資本指標之研究:以中部教學醫院護理人力為例。台灣高齡服務管理學刊,1,166-194。
23.林佳靜、羅俐茹(2015)。探討居家服務員職場學習能力與服務績效之研究。台灣高齡服務管理學刊,2(2),51-75。
24.林志遠、陳珮青、李玉春( 2016)。以連帶思想檢視台灣長照政策發展之挑戰與啟發。台灣衛誌,35(4),359-375。
25.林麗嬋、吳肖琪、蔡誾誾、張淑卿 (2010)。 現行長期照護評估工具的問題與因應。長期照護雜誌,14(3),254-265。
26.林金立、余彥儒 (2017)。自立支援照顧的臺灣實踐。長期照護雜誌,21(1),15-18。
27.金國誠(2010)。我國居家照護政策執行之評估。台北:國立台灣大學社會科學院政治學系研究所碩士學位論文。
27.姚開屏(2000)。簡明版及特殊疾病版生活品質量表之發展。國科會專題研究報告(專題計畫編號:NSC89-2320-B-002-128-M56 )。
29.施麗紅(2010)。老人入住長期照顧機構行為初探—以自我決定理論析之。社區發展季刊,132,353-372
30.徐慧娟、葉玲玲、朱僑麗、謝嫣娉、黃英家、張李淑女(2013)。長期照護政策與管理。台北:洪業文化
31.徐錦鋒 (2012) 。對我國自立生活方案的芻議。臺灣社會工作學刊,(10),47-49.
32.莊秀美 (1999)。日本老人福利政策新趨勢: 高齡社會的挑戰。東吳社會工作學報,(5),41-70。
33.陳怡仁(1999)。長期照護制度發展方向之研究(未發表的碩士論文)。台中:逢甲大學保險學系研究所。
34.陳世堅、陳宇嘉、龍紀萱(2005)。失能者需求調查-以中部地區某城市為例。老化社會與健康照顧國際學術與實務研討會,屏東:美和科技大學。
35.陳淑君、莊秀美(2008)。台北市居家服務實施現況與相關議題探討。社區發展季刊,122,183-199。
36.陳正芬、官有垣. (2014)。大臺北地區居家服務區域劃分與居家服務組織定位的歷史分析。臺灣社會福利學刊, 12(1), 121-163.
37.陳芬婷、邱啟潤(2015)。喘息服務方案對家庭照顧者之效益。護理暨健康照護研究,11(1),53–63。
38.陳燕禎. (2008)。福利? 市場? 台灣照顧產業政策之初探。通識研究集刊, (13),77-100。
39.陳靜敏 (2008)。建構長期照顧體系十年計畫: 老人照顧管理的發展與契機。新臺北護理期刊,10(1), 1-5。
40.莊豔妃、宋惠娟、林麗萍 (2005) 。偏遠礦區老人健康狀況及健康醫療資源使用之調查研究。慈濟護理雜誌, 4(1),34-41.
41.葉宏明(2000)。德國老人長期照護研習心得。台灣醫界,43(9),取自http://www.tma.tw/ltk/89430905.htm
42.葉至誠(2011)。老人福利國際借鑑。台北:秀威資訊。
43.葉莉莉(1998)。居家護理服務的再思考--本質、概念架構及角色能力的期待。長期照護雜誌,2(1),21-27
44.黃惠玲、徐亞瑛、徐文俊、黃慈心(2015)。以能力為基礎的失智症衛教師訓練課程模式。長庚科技學刊,23,23 -34 
45.黃志忠(2013)。臺灣家庭照顧者多面向評估與工具建構方向之初探。臺大社會工作學刊,28,137-174
46.黃源協(2009)。社會工作管理(第二版)。臺北市:揚智出版社。
47.黃源協(2004)。正式照顧對非正式網絡互動關係之影響:以原住民部落老人居家/送餐服務爲例。社會政策與社會工作學刊,9(1),163–198
48.董菁菁(2016)。自立生活模式的探究-以社區居住身障者為出發(未發表的碩士論文)。嘉義:南華大學
49.賈淑麗(2001)。長期照護概論。台北:華杏。
50.楊筱慧(2011)。誰來照顧?居家服務方案對服務使用之影響。台灣高齡服務管理學刊,1(2),97–119。
51.鄧素文(2015)。完善我國長照制度:長照服務法之制定及影響。取自http://www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/RelFile/19/725250/ 02731c26-
1992-403e-a0ba-dadcaccabb6c.pdf
52.劉邦富(2006)。台灣貧窮家庭兒童照顧政策落差研究。台中:東海大學。
53.臺北市社會局(2016)。臺北市政府社會局辦理居家服務補助實施計畫。取自http://www.dosw.gov.taipei/ct.asp?xItem=86892600
&ctNode=72373&mp=107001
54.衛生福利部(2007)。96年居家服務補助使用者調查摘要分析。取自http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/Survey/96.pdf
55.衛生福利部國民健康署(2014)。民國一百年台灣地區中老年身心社會生活狀況長期追蹤(第七次)調查成果報告。取自
https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/ Detail.aspx?nodeid=368&pid=1282
56.衛生福利部(2018)。長照政策專區。取自https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp- 3635-42393-201.html
57.盧美秀、陳靜敏、張淑卿、李莉、金美雲、楊雅嵐(2013)。長期照護:護理綜論。台北:華杏
58.盧盈妤(2011)。以案主為中心觀點探討居家服務照顧品質及其相關因素:以南投縣為例。南投:暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系學位論文
59.蔡淑鳳 (2008)。長期照顧管理中心的政策制定與發展.。長期照護雜誌,12(1),1-7。
60.蔡宜蓉(2015)。104 年度衛生福利部委託「生活自立或復健訓練模式之發展與給付制度之規劃」期中報告。臺北市:行政院衛生福利部。
61.蔡啟源(2000)。老人居家服務之探討。社區發展季刊,91,252-265。
62.蔡孟璇、李依軒、劉家勇(2018)。腦中風老年個案實施自立支援成效之評估: 以台南某護理之家為例。台灣老年醫學暨老年學會雜誌,13(3), 181-190。
63.鄭秀容、曾月霞(2008)。居家失智老人家屬照顧者照顧需求及需求被滿足情形之研究。榮總護理,25 ,386-392。
64.鄭淑琪、黃松林(2007)。老人居家服務成效評估研究-以雲林縣為例 。台灣健康照顧研究學刊,3,101-119。
65.鄭欣慧(2014)。身心障礙者自立生活之探討以東部某縣市為例。台東:國立東華大學族群關係與文化學系研究所碩士論文。
66.謝美娥、沈慶盈(2015)。老人居家照顧的服務與治理。台北:五南。
67.謝叔芳 (2008)。從 Williamson 的交易成本觀點論政府事務委外管理。TASPAA 夥伴關係與永續發展國際學術研討會,台中:東海大學行政管理暨政策學系。
68.鍾秉正(2006)。德國長期照護法制之經驗。長期照護雜誌,10 (2),119-135。

二、英文
1.Black, K., & Hyer, K. (2010). Person-centered considerations in practice for persons with dementia and their caregivers across the continuum of care. Best Practices in Mental Health, 6(1), 33-46.
2.Berger, S., Escher, A., Mengle, E., & Sullivan, N. (2018). Effectiveness of health promotion, management, and maintenance interventions within the scope of occupational therapy for community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(4), 7204190010p1-7204190010p10.
3.Cochrane, A., McGilloway, S., Furlong, M., Molloy, D. W., Stevenson, M., & Donnelly, M. (2013). Home‐care're‐ablement'services for maintaining and improving older adults' functional independence. The Cochrane Library.
4.Corcoran, M. A., & Gitlin, F. N. L. (2001). Family caregiver acceptance and use of environmental strategies provided in an occupational therapy intervention. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 19(1), 1-20.
5.Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: how can it be assessed?. Jama, 260(12), 1743-1748.
6.Francis, J., & Netten, A. (2004). Raising the quality of home care: a study of service users’ views. Social Policy & Administration, 38(3), 290-305.
7.Friedemann, M. L., & Buckwalter, K. C. (2014). Family caregiver role and burden related to gender and family relationships. Journal of family nursing, 20(3), 313-336.
8.Graessel, E., Luttenberger, K., Bleich, S., Adabbo, R., & Donath, C. (2011). Home nursing and home help for dementia patients: Predictors for utilization and expected quality from a family caregiver's point of view. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, 52(2), 233-238.
9.Genet, N., Boerma, W. G., Kringos, D. S., Bouman, A., Francke, A. L., Fagerström, C., ... & Devillé, W. (2011). Home care in Europe: a systematic literature review. BMC health services research, 11(1), 207.
10.Glendinning, C., Jones, K., Baxter, K., Rabiee, P., Curtis, L., Wilde, A., ... & Forder, J. (2010). Home care re-ablement services: investigating the longer-term impacts (prospective longitudinal study). York: Social policy research unit, University of York.
11.Hjelle, K. M., Tuntland, H., Førland, O., & Alvsvåg, H. (2017). Driving forces for home‐based reablement; a qualitative study of older adults’ experiences. Health & social care in the community, 25(5), 1581-1589.
12.Jamieson, A., (1991) Home care for older people in Europe: A comparison of policies and practices. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.Knight, S., & Tjassing, H. (1994). Health care moves to the home. World Health, 4, 413-444.
14.Kogan, A. C., Wilber, K., & Mosqueda, L. (2016). Person‐Centered Care for Older Adults with Chronic Conditions and Functional Impairment: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64(1), e1-e7.
15.Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.
16.Litwak, E. (1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. Guilford Press.
17.Levine, C., Halper, D., Peist, A., & Gould, D. A. (2010). Bridging troubled waters: family caregivers, transitions, and long-term care. Health affairs, 29(1), 116-124.
18.Lampley-Dallas, V. T., Mold, J. W., & Flori, D. E. (2001). Perceived needs of African-American caregivers of elders with dementia. Journal of the national medical association, 93(2), 47.
19.Lewin, G., Concanen, K., & Youens, D. (2016). The Home Independence Program with non-health professionals as care managers: an evaluation. Clinical interventions in aging, 11, 807.
20.Lin, L. N., & Wu, S. C. (2014). Measurement structure of the caregiver burden scale: Findings from a national community survey in Taiwan. Geriatrics & gerontology international, 14(1), 176-184.
21.Tokunaga, M., Hashimoto, H., & Tamiya, N. (2015). A gap in formal long-term care use related to characteristics of caregivers and households, under the public universal system in Japan: 2001–2010. Health Policy, 119(6), 840-849.
22.Tuntland, H., Aaslund, M. K., Espehaug, B., Førland, O., & Kjeken, I. (2015). Reablement in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised controlled trial. BMC geriatrics, 15(1), 145. 
23.Montgomery, R. J., & Kosloski, K. D. (2013). Pathways to a caregiver identity and implications for support services. In Caregiving across the lifespan (pp. 131-156). Springer New York.
24.Montgomery, R. J., (2016) .Caregiver Identity Theory Overview. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/265260328_ Caregiver_ Identity_ Theory_Overview.
25.Moe, C., & Brinchmann, B. S. (2017). Tailoring reablement: A grounded theory study of establishing reablement in a community setting in Norway. Health & Social Care in the Community.
26.Moe, C., & Brinchmann, B. S. (2016). Optimising Capacity-A Service User and Caregiver Perspective on Reablement. Grounded Theory Review, 15(2).
27.McCormack, B., & McCance, T. (2011). Person-centred nursing: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
28.Marventano, S., Ayala, A., Gonzalez, N., Rodríguez–Blázquez, C., Garcia-Gutierrez, S., & Forjaz, M. J. (2014). Multimorbidity and functional status in community-dwelling older adults. European journal of internal medicine, 25(7), 610-616.
29.Nolan, M. (2001). Working with family carers: towards a partnership approach. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 11(1), 91-97.
30.Orellano-Colón, E. M., Jutai, J., Santiago, A., Torres, V., Benítez, K., & Torres, M. (2016). Assistive Technology Needs and Measurement of the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Technologies for Independent Living of Older Hispanics: Lessons Learned. Technologies, 4(3), 21.
31.OECD (1996). Caring for frail elderly people: Policies in evolution (No. 19). Organization for Economic.
32.OECD ( 2011) Help wanted? Providing and paying forlong-term care. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/health/longtermcare/helpwanted.
33.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml V. A., & Berry L. L. (1988).SERVQUAL: A multiple- itemscale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.
34.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. the Journal of Marketing, 41-50.
35.Parkatti, T., & Eskola, P. (2004). EUROFAMCARE: National Background Report for Finland. University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.
36.Parsons, J. G. M., Sheridan, N., Rouse, P., Robinson, E., & Connolly, M. (2013). A randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of a model of restorative home care on physical function and social support among older people. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 94(6), 1015-1022.
37.Parsons, M., Senior, H., Kerse, N., Chen, M. H., Jacobs, S., & Anderson, C. (2017). Randomised trial of restorative home care for frail older people in New Zealand. Nurs Older People, 29, 27-33.
38.Qualls, S. H. (2016). Caregiving families within the long-term services and support system for older adults. American Psychologist, 71(4), 283.
39.Rock, P. J. (1988). Independence: what it means to six disabled people living in the community. Disability, Handicap & Society, 3(1), 27-35.
40.Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
41.eid, K. F., & Fielding, R. A. (2012). Skeletal muscle power: a critical determinant of physical functioning in older adults. Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 40(1), 4.
42.Rabiee, P., & Glendinning, C. (2011). Organisation and delivery of home care re‐ablement: what makes a difference?. Health & social care in the community, 19(5), 495-503.
43.Slater, P., & Hasson, F. (2018). An evaluation of the reablement service programme on physical ability, care needs and care plan packages. Journal of Integrated Care, 26(2), 140-149.
44.Sarafino, E. P., & Smith, T. W. (2014). Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions. John Wiley & Sons.
45.Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE)(2013). SCIE guide 49: Maximising the Potential of Reablement. London:SCIE.
46.Sawatzky, J. E., & Fowler‐Kerry, S. (2003). Impact of caregiving: Listening to the voice of informal caregivers. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10(3), 277-286.
47.Schulz, R., & Sherwood, P. R. (2008). Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(sup3), 105-113.
48.Tessier, A., Beaulieu, M. D., Mcginn, C. A., & Latulippe, R. (2016). Effectiveness of reablement: a systematic review. Healthcare Policy, 11(4), 49.
49.Twigg, J. (1992). Carers in the service system. Carers: Research and Practice. London: HMSO, 59-93.
50.Tomita, N., Yoshimura, K., & Ikegami, N. (2010). Impact of home and community-based services on hospitalisation and institutionalisation among individuals eligible for long-term care insurance in Japan. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1), 345.
51.Turjamaa, R., Hartikainen, S., & Pietilä, A. M. (2013). Forgotten resources of older home care clients: focus group study in Finland. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 333-339.
52.Vaarama, M., Pieper, R., & Sixsmith, A. (Eds.). (2007). Care-related quality of life in old age: Concepts, models, and empirical findings. Springer Science & Business Media.
53.van Groenou, M. I. B., & De Boer, A. (2016). Providing informal care in a changing society. European journal of ageing, 13(3), 271-279.
54.Wood, C., & Salter, J. (2012). Housing providers can play a vital role in rehabilitation and reablement.The home cure. In London: Demos.
55.Wellin, C., & Jaffe, D. J. (2004). In search of “personal care”: Challenges to identity support in residential care for elders with cognitive illness. Journal of aging studies, 18(3), 275-295.
56.Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The gerontologist, 52(3), 357-366.
57.Ward-Griffin, C., & McKeever, P. (2000). Relationships between nurses and family caregivers: partners in care?. Advances in Nursing Science, 22(3), 89-103.
58.Whitehead, P. J., Worthington, E. J., Parry, R. H., Walker, M. F., & Drummond, A. E. (2015). Interventions to reduce dependency in personal activities of daily living in community dwelling adults who use homecare services: a systematic review. Clinical rehabilitation, 29(11), 1064-1076.
59.Zwygart-Stauffacher, M., Lindquist, R., & Savik, K. (2000). Development of health care delivery systems that are sensitive to the needs of stroke survivors and their caregivers. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 24(3), 33-42.
60.Zarit, S. H., Femia, E. E., Kim, K., & Whitlatch, C. J. (2010). The structure of risk factors and outcomes for family caregivers: implications for assessment and treatment. Aging & mental health, 14(2), 220-231.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE