:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生約會暴力受暴經驗之研究:性別與校園生態脈絡分析
作者:顏玉如
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:社會政策與社會工作學系
指導教授:王珮玲
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2020
主題關鍵詞:約會暴力親密關係暴力性別觀點生態系統大學生dating violenceintimate partner violencegender perspectiveecological systemcollege student
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
本研究旨在以性別觀點和生態系統理論為視角,探討大學生遭受約會暴力經驗之內涵與意義,分析個人與校園生態系統互動對約會暴力解釋與揭露之影響。基於社會建構論研究哲學典範,本研究採取解釋性互動論研究方法,深度談訪23位遭受約會暴力之大學生,其中18位女性、5位男性。研究主要發現如下:
一、受暴形態與內涵:受暴大學生遭受到不同形態的約會暴力行為,且存在多重暴力形式結合與性別差異;較諸於一般親密關係暴力,受暴大學生遭受跟蹤騷擾與性脅迫行為之現象更為普遍。
二、對約會暴力的解釋:是一個多重感知與漸進過程,隨著受暴形態、嚴重程度與關係背景而變動。受暴大學生普遍認同「男性對女性」暴力更具傷害性與嚴重性,而對跟蹤騷擾與性脅迫呈現正向與負向的理解;女性對約會暴力的解釋,部分傾向從「控制」、「大男人」觀點詮釋,部分則認為是情緒失控與遷怒;而男性多從關係衝突的角度來理解。
二、對約會暴力的解釋與求助:包含非正式支持與正式資源系統。在非正式親友方面,雖然絕大多數受暴大學生都曾向非正式親友揭露或求助之經驗,但卻傾向對熟悉者隱匿,揭露與求助對象呈現「由遠至內近者親者層遞」;而所獲致的回應有情緒支持、提供安全與法律協助,連結正式資源,但同時也有面臨分手壓力、責備以及不願協助司法作證等負面回應。在正式資源系統方面,學校是女性受暴大學生最少主動揭露與求助單位,但為男性主要運用管道;受暴大學生求助後,少數學校啟動聯合處理機制,而防治中心社工人員則偏重法律諮詢服務。此外,受暴大學生無論是對非正式親友與正式資源系統,都存在避免提及性經驗以及性脅迫隱而不揭的現象。
四、約會暴力性別校園生態系統:(一)鉅視系統:父權性別規範與華人關係主義形塑暴力關係與寬容意識,國家法律帶動社會性別/平等意識與暴力零容忍態度;(二)外部系統:校園旁觀者反應與學校處理態度形塑約會暴力校園氛圍,對揭露與求助具有關鍵影響;(三)居間系統:父母影響力是深層的,透過約會規範與性價值觀的建構,進而影響暴力發生與因應;同儕影響則聚焦於立即層面的暴力問題討論與情緒支持;(四)微視系統:性別化的愛情與性關係是各系統交織作用的結果,對約會暴力解釋亦在父權與平等意識之間擺盪。
根據上述研究發現,本研究建議:首先,在約會暴力處遇服務方面,防治中心社工人員與大學輔導專業人員,可以性別中心生態系統進行多面向評估,再依不同暴力階段發展處遇目標;提高對性脅迫以及與性有關的威脅、跟蹤騷擾等之敏感度,以及相互動暴力與反擊現象,避免落入性別偏見與理想被害人迷思。其次,在學校系統方面,除了落實親密關係防治教育與情感教育之外,亦需積極提升校內相關單位對約會暴力辨與創傷知情能力,並且推動大學旁觀者運動,建立不責備被害人的校園文化。此外,在政策面,應重視科技網路通訊設備助長跟蹤騷擾與其他形式約會暴力手法現象,並且積極發展保護受害者措施與反制策略。
Based on the gender perspective and the ecological system theory, this study aims to explore the connotation and significance of the experience of dating violence among college students, and analyzes the impact of the interaction between individuals and the campus ecological system, based on the interpretations and disclosures of such experience. This study employs the research method of Interpretive Interactionism by conducting in-depth interviews with 23 college students, 18 female and 5 male, who have suffered dating violence. The main findings of this study are as follows:
1. The college students suffered varied forms of dating violence, and sometimes different forms of violence operated together at a single instance. Gender differences had a huge impact on the type of violence suffered by the students. When compared to the typical intimate partner violence, it was seen that it was quite common for students to deal with stalking and sexual coercion.
2. The college students’ interpretation of dating violence was a gradual process involving multiple perceptions, which could change with the form of violence, degree of severity, and relationship background. Generally speaking, they showed support for the view that male to female aggression resulted in greater harm and severity, and held both positive and negative views of stalking and sexual coercion.
3. Post an instance of dating violence, the study reveals that college students disclose the event to formal and informal sources and go on to seek help as well. College students tended to hide from those they knew well, while telling the truth and asking for help from relatives and friends. Parents and colleagues were the main connections to formal sources, while classmates were less proactive in reporting or encouraging them to seek help from formal sources. Also, while schools were the formal sources to whom female students least proactively confided in and sought help from, they were the main channel used by male students. They displayed a tendency of avoiding any mention of sexual experiences and tended to hide experiences of sexual coercion from both informal sources such as relatives and friends, as well as the formal sources.
4. The interpretation and disclosure of dating and the process of seeking help following the violence are deeply affected by the gender-centered ecological system the students are in. The results showed that the affected college students’ interpretations of dating violence were influenced by factors such as patriarchal gender norms, perceptions on gender equality prevalent in the country, legalization of gender violence, college campus dating violence prevention measures, the general campus atmosphere, family and peers, and college students’ attitudes toward love and sex.
Based on the above findings, the researchers provide recommendations pertaining to policy and practice, for formulating dating violence prevention measures in campuses for college students. Every school must be informed of the prevalence of dating violence on campuses, and awareness must be raised among students to develop campus-specific programs for preventing sexual assault and intimate partner violence on campuses.
一、中文部分
刁筱華(譯)(1996)。女性主義思潮(原作者:Rosemarie, T.)。臺北市:時報文化。(原著出版年:1989)
王志弘、許妍飛(譯)(2006)。社會認同(原作者:Jenkins, R.,)。臺北市:巨流。(原著出版年:1996)
王沂釗、陳若璋(2011)。大學生親密關係暴力:其性質與實務工作者處遇能力之分析。家庭教育與諮商學刊,10,1-29。
王秀槐(2015)。從「以我為榮」到「證明自己」:華人文化脈絡下知覺不同父母期待之大學生的生涯因應組型初探研究。輔導與諮商學報,37(1),79-97。
王珮玲(2015)。如影隨形的暴力:親密伴侶跟蹤行為。社會政策與社會工作學刊,19(1),1-44。
王珮玲(2016)。建構校園親密暴力事件評估工具計畫。教育部委託研究報告。臺北市:教育部。
王純娟(2004)。婚姻與親密關係。臺北市:教育部.
王翊涵(2017)。培力社區參與家暴防治預防性工作之經驗初採:以彰化縣政府「社區紮根」模式為例。社會發展研究學刊,專刊(2017 / 11 / 01),1-32。
王雅各(譯)(2002)。不同的語音:心理學理論與女性的發展(原作者:Gilligan, C.)。臺北市:心理。(原著出版年:1993)
王曉丹(2014)。性暴力法制的歷史交織:一個性別批判的觀點。載於陳瑤華 (主編),台灣婦女處境白皮書(275-308頁)。臺北市:女書文化。
王曉丹(2019)。破解二元對立, 改寫能動主體:性暴力受害者脆弱性的正面意義。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,44,77-108.
成令方、王秀雲、游美惠、邱大昕、吳嘉苓(譯)(1997)。性別打結:拆除父權違建(原作者: Johnson, A. G.)。臺北市:群學。(原著出版年:1997)
江文賢(2001)。大學生約會暴力現象與相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
江雅芳(2007)大學生的性態度、性行為與網路交友性行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市
吳芝儀(譯)(2008)。敘事研究:閱讀、詮釋與分析(原作者: Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T.)。嘉義市:濤石文化。
吳書昀、王翊涵、蕭文高(2018)。106年度「我國大眾對暴力侵害婦女之態度信念調查」。衛福部委託研究報告。臺北市:衛福部。
呂玉瑕、周玉慧(2015)。二十一世紀臺灣青少年性別角色態度之形成與變遷。臺灣社會學刊,58,95-155.
宋孟玲(2009)。大學生愛情關係忠誠態度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
宋麗玉(2013)。婚姻暴力受暴婦女之處遇模式與成效:華人文化與經驗。臺北市:洪葉。
李珊、林烝增、林家興、許玉霜(2017)。男性還是女性更具攻擊性? 大學生約會暴力相關因素之探究。諮商心理與復健諮商學報,31,103-130。
李維倫(譯)(2004)。現象學十四講(原著者:Sokolowski, R.)。臺北市:心靈工坊。
沈慶鴻、王珮玲(2018)。家庭暴力及性暴力防治政策規劃與研究「子計畫一:親密關係暴力現況問題暨防治成效研究」。衛福部委託研究報告。臺北市:衛福部。
沈瓊桃(2007)。青年對約會暴力的因應策略及其評量工具之發展。國科會專題研究計劃報告。
沈瓊桃(2013)。大專青年的約會暴力經驗與因應策略初探。中華心理衛生學刊, 26(1),1-31。
卓紋君、顏欣怡(2013)。台灣人愛情風格量表再修訂-以大學生族群為本。諮商心理與復健諮商學報,25,65-87。
卓耕宇(2011)。親愛的大人們,我不是無感的青少年!高中生的情感關係難題與戀愛空間的拉扯。性別平等教育季刊,55,19-22。
周素鳳(譯)(2001)。親密關係的轉變:現代社會的性、愛、慾(原作者:Giddens, A.)。壹北:巨流。(原著出版年:1992)
林永貞(2012)。戀愛中大學生愛情風格、性態度與親密關係滿意度之相關研究-以南部地區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
林孟潔(2014)女大學生性別角色看法之探究。教育研究月刊,248,92-14。
林明傑、方韻、陳慧女(2013)大學生性別平等與健康性知識課程設計與教學之研究。性學研究,4(2),29-54。
邱曉菁(1998)女性遭受婚姻暴力中性強迫經驗之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
姚淑文(2013)。推動高中職及大專院校學生約會暴力三級預防策略之行動研究(未出版之博士論文)。中央警察大學,桃園市。
姚蘊慧(2005)。「第二現代」社會觀點下的親密關係。通識研究集刊,8,149-169。
施盈廷、劉忠博、張時健(譯)(2011)。反身性方法論:質性研究的新視野(原作者:Alvesson & Sköldberg)。臺北:韋伯文化。(原著出版年:2000)
柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力:理論政策與實務。臺北市:巨流。
范世玲(2008)大專女學生對約會暴力容忍度及影響因素之研究—以台北某商業技術學院為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,新北市。
修慧蘭、孫頌賢(2003)。大學生約會暴力行為之測量與調查。教育與心理研究,26(3),471-499。
孫中興(2016)。學著,好好愛:台大超人氣課程精華,六堂愛的必修課,翻轉愛的迷思。臺北市:三采文化。
孫頌賢、李宜玫(2009)。暴力的代間傳遞:原生家庭暴力經驗與依戀系統對大學生約會暴力行為的預測比較。家庭教育與諮商學刊,7,23-43。
孫頌賢、修慧蘭(2005)親子肢體暴力與大學生約會暴力行為之關係-尋找代間傳遞中的危機與轉機。教育與心理研究,28(2),267-296。
徐子宸(2017)台灣大學生性別平等素養調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學, 彰化縣。
晏涵文、馮嘉玉(2014)。大專院校性教育(含愛滋病防治)教學參考教材。教育部委託研究報告。新北市:杏陵基金會
晏涵文、劉潔心、鄭其嘉(2009)。台北市五專五年級學生近三十年約會與性行為變化趨勢研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,25,251-274.
耿瑞琦(2011)。家庭親職功能與同儕影響力對大學生約會暴力自我覺察之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
張正霖(譯)(2017)。第二輪班:那些性別革命尚未完成的事(原作者: Hochschild. A.)。臺北市:群學。(原著出版年:2012)
張君玫(譯)(1999)。 解釋性互動論(原作者:Denzin, N. K.)。臺北市:弘智。(原著出版年:1989)
張春興(2013)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐(三版)。臺北市:東華。
教育部(2017)。校園親密關係暴力事件實務處理手冊。臺北市:教育部
許哲禕(2013)。性雙重標準之外顯與內隱態度測量研究(未出版之碩士論文)。樹德科技大學,高雄市。
郭佳微(2012)。高職學生自尊、人際關係及約會暴力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。
郭麗安、陳宇平、王大維、劉安真、張歆祐(2017)。青少年性教育與情感教育內涵之探究:教師、學生與家長觀點之比較。學生事務與輔導,56(2),28-49。
陳玉華、伊慶春、呂玉瑕(2000)。婦女家庭地位之研究:以家庭決策模式為例。臺灣社會學刊,24,1-58。
陳孟芳(2010)。遭受約會暴力之年輕女性心理歷程之分析研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
陳玫蓁(2016)。女女同性親密關係暴力的多重感知(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學,臺中市。
陳昭如(2013)。基進女性主義的強暴論。思想,23,207-233。
陳美華(2008)。不可告人的秘密? 一個關於性工作研究中的性:性別與知識生產的反思。臺灣社會研究季刊,71,1-39。
陳瑞麟(2010)。科學哲學:理論與歷史。臺北市:群學。
曾淑萍(2013)。大學生依附風格、愛情態度與約會暴力 接受度關聯性之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
馮嘉玉、晏涵文(2007)。臺灣大專院校學生約會與親密行為調查研究。臺灣性學學刊,13(1),87-104。
黃光國(2009)。儒家文化:哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。臺北市:心理。
黃貞蓉(2005)。異性戀大學生的愛情樂章:性別觀點的分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃登月、王文中(2005)。青少年約會衝突因應策略量表之發展。教育與心理研究,28(3),469-494。
黃韞臻、林淑惠、林佳筠(2011)。大學生性別角色、共依附與愛情態度之相關研究。學校衛生,59,105-131。
楊嘉玲(2008)。情,不自禁~遭受伴侶暴力之未婚女性其關係抉擇歷程與影響因素(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
楊嘉玲、趙淑珠(2011)。影響未婚受暴女性關係抉擇之因素。中華輔導與諮商學報,29,37-70。
葉紹國(2009)。想要與需要之間-論大一學生的適應與發展。張雪梅、彭森明(主編),臺灣大學生的學習歷程與表現(141-149頁)。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學教育研究與評鑑中心。
詹毓玫(2013)大學生依附風格、愛情態度與約會暴力 接受度關聯性之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
劉珠利(2005)。台灣年輕女性性別角色特質之研究-以高中高職畢(肄)業女性為例。東吳社會工作學報,13,45-84。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理。
潘淑滿(2007)。親密暴力-多重身分與權力流動。臺北市: 心理。
潘淑滿、游美貴(2012)。親密關係暴力問題之研究。衛福部委託研究報告。臺北市:衛福部。
蔡明璋(譯)(2002)。親密關係:現代社會的私人關係(原作者:Jamieson, L.)。臺北市:群學。(原著出版年:1998)
戴世玫(2014)。台灣婚姻暴力圖像與對策之研究-父權家族系統受暴網的觀點(未出版之博士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法(修訂版)。臺北市:巨流。
羅燦煐(2011)。我國同居親密關係之暴力樣態、歷程及服務需求研究。衛福部委託研究報告。臺北市:衛福部。
蘇倩瑩(2011)。大學生愛情關係信念測量之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
蘇峰山、魏書娥、陳雅馨(譯)(2000)。愛情的正常性混亂(原作者:Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E.)。臺北市:立緒。(原著出版年:1994)
顧燕翎主編(1996)。女性主義理論與流派。臺北市:女書文化。

二、英文部分
Alaggia, R., Regehr, C., & Jenney, A. (2012). Risky business: An ecological analysis of intimate partner violence disclosure. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(3), 301-312. doi:10.1177/1049731511425503
Ali, P. A., & Naylor, P. B. (2013). Intimate partner violence: A narrative review of the feminist, social and ecological explanations for its causation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 611-619.
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology. London: Sage Publications.
Anderson, K. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 655-669.
Anderson, K. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles, 52(11-12), 853-856.
Anderson, K. L. (2007). Who gets out? Gender as structure and the dissolution of violent heterosexual relationships. Gender & Society, 21(2), 173-201.
Anderson, K. M., & Danis, F. S. (2007). Collegiate sororities and dating violence: An exploratory study of informal and formal helping strategies. Violence Against Women, 13(1), 87-100.
Arriaga, X. B., & Foshee, V. A. (2004). Adolescent dating violence: Do adolescents follow in their friends’, or their parents’, footsteps? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(2), 162-184.
Banyard, V. L. (2011). Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 216.
Banyard, V. L., & Cross, C. (2008). Consequences of teen dating violence understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women, 14(9), 998-1013.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women's unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386-397.
Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: an ecological integration. American Psychologist, 35(4), 320.
Black, B. M., Weisz, A. N., Preble, K. M., & Sharma, B. (2015). Parents’ awareness of and anticipated responses to their teens’ reports of dating violence. Journal of Family Social Work, 18(1), 3-20.
Blumer, H. (1969). Fashion: From class differentiation to collective selection. The sociological quarterly, 10(3), 275-291.
Branch, K. A., Richards, T. N., & Dretsch, E. C. (2013). An exploratory analysis of college students’ response and reporting behavior regarding intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration among their friends. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(18), 3386-3399.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. Readings on the Development of Children, 2, 37-43.
Brownmiller, S. (1993). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Ballantine Books.
Buhi, E. R., Clayton, H., & Surrency, H. H. (2009). Stalking victimization among college women and subsequent help-seeking behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 57(4), 419-426.
Callahan, M. R., Tolman, R. M., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Adolescent dating violence victimization and psychological well-being. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18(6), 664-681. doi:10.1177/0743558403254784
Campbell, R., Dworkin, E., & Cabral, G. (2009). An ecological model of the impact of sexual assault on women's mental health. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(3), 1225-246.
Cantalupo, N. C. (2014). Institution-specific victimization surveys: Addressing legal and practical disincentives to gender-based Violence Reporting on College Campuses. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 227-241. doi:10.1177/1524838014521323
Carlson, B. E. (1984). Causes and maintenance of domestic violence: An ecological analysis. The Social Service Review, 569-587.
CDC. (2014). Understanding Teen Dating Violence. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/teen_dating_violence.html
Chan, K. L., Straus, M. A., Brownridge, D. A., Tiwari, A., & Leung, W. (2008). Prevalence of dating partner violence and suicidal ideation among male and female university students worldwide. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 53(6), 529-537.
Chung, D. (2007). Making Meaning of Relationships: Young women's experiences and understandings of dating violence. Violence Against Women, 13(12), 1274-1295. doi:10.1177/1077801207310433
Coker, A. L., Cook-Craig, P. G., Williams, C. M., Fisher, B. S., Clear, E. R., Garcia, L. S., & Hegge, L. M. (2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 777-796.
Corsini, R. J., & Auerbach, A. J. (1996). Concise encyclopedia of psychology (2nd ed.). Wiley New York.
Dardis, C. M., Dixon, K. J., Edwards, K. M., & Turchik, J. A. (2014). An examination of thefactors related to dating violence perpetration among young men and women and associated theoretical explanations: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(2), 136-152. doi:10.1177/1524838013517559
Dardis, C. M., Edwards, K. M., Kelley, E. L., & Gidycz, C. A. (2015). Perceptions of dating violence and associated correlates: A study of college young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(21), 3245-3271. doi:10.1177/0886260515597439
Denzin, N. K. (1984). Toward a phenomenology of domestic, family violence. American Journal of Sociology, 90(3), 483-513.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Prentice Hall.
Dobash, R. E. (1992). Women, violence, and social change: Psychology Press.
Ellis, W. E., Dumas, T. M. (2018). Peers over parents? How peer relationships influence dating violence. Theory Research, & Prevention, 105-124.
Faulkner, G. E., Kolts, R. L., & Hicks, G. F. (2008). Sex role ideology, relationship context, and response to sexual coercion in college females. Sex Roles, 59(3-4), 139-150.
Flood, M., & Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(2), 125-142. doi:10.1177/1524838009334131
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Linder, F., Rice, J., & Wilcher, R. (2007). Typologies of adolescent dating violence identifying typologies of Adolescent Dating Violence Perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(5), 498-519.
Freyd, J., & Birrell, P. (2013). Blind to betrayal: Why we fool ourselves we aren't being fooled. John Wiley & Sons.
Gagné, M.-H., Lavoie, F., & Hébert, M. (2005). Victimization during childhood and revictimization in dating relationships in adolescent girls. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(10), 1155-1172.
Gartner, R. E., & Sterzing, P. R. (2016). Gender microaggressions as a gateway to sexual harassment and sexual assault: expanding the conceptualization of youth sexual violence. Affilia, 31(4), 491-503. doi:10.1177/0886109916654732
Gavey, N. (2013). Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. Routledge.
Gillum, T. L. (2014). Reconceptualizing prevention of violence against women on college campuses: response to victoria banyard’s actualizing the potential of primary prevention: A research agenda. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(4), 352-357. doi:10.1177/1524838014521029
Giordano, P. C., Johnson, W. L., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2016). Parenting in adolescence and young adult intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Issues, 37(4), 443-465.
Gover, A. R., Kaukinen, C., & Fox, K. A. (2008). The relationship between violence in the family of origin and dating violence among college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(12), 1667-1693. doi:10.1177/0886260508314330
Graves, K. N., Sechrist, S. M., White, J. W., & Paradise, M. J. (2005). Intimate partner violence perpetrated by college women within the context of a history of victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(3), 278-289.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications.
Hamby, S., & Jackson, A. (2010). Size does matter: The effects of gender on perceptions of dating violence. Sex Roles, 63(5-6), 324-331.
Hammack, P. L. (2008). Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 222-247.
Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence Against Women: An Integrated, Ecological Framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262-290. doi:10.1177/1077801298004003002
Henton, J., Cate, R., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., & Christopher, S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 4(3), 467-482.
Herman, J. L. (1997). Trauma and recovery. Basic books.
Herrera, V., Wiersma, J., & Cleveland, H. H. (2008). The influence of individual and partner characteristics on the perpetration of intimate partner violence in young adult relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(3), 284-296.
Herres, J., Wang, S. B., Bobchin, K., & Draper, J. (2018). A socioecological model of risk associated with campus sexual assault in a representative sample of liberal arts college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, doi:10.1177/0886260518785376.
Jeffrey, N. K., & Barata, P. C. (2016). “He didn’t necessarily force himself upon me, But...” Women’s lived experiences of sexual coercion in intimate relationships with men. Violence Against Women, 23(8), 911-933.
Jiao, Y., Sun, I. Y., Farmer, A. K., & Lin, K. (2014). College students’ definitions of intimate partner violence a comparative study of three Chinese societies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(7), 1208-1229.
Kast, N. R., Eisenberg, M. E., & Sieving, R. E. (2016). The role of parent communication and connectedness in dating violence victimization among Latino adolescents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(10), 1932-1955. doi:10.1177/0886260515570750
Kaukinen, C. (2014). Dating violence among college students: The risk and protective factors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(4), 283-296. doi:10.1177/1524838014521321
Kaura, S. A., & Lohman, B. J. (2007). Dating violence victimization, relationship satisfaction, mental health problems, and acceptability of violence: A comparison of men and women. Journal of Family Violence, 22(6), 367-381.
Kinsfogel, K. M., & Grych, J. H. (2004). Interparental conflict and adolescent dating relationships: integrating cognitive, emotional, and peer influences. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(3), 505.
Klein, A. R., Salomon, A., Elwyn, L., Barasch, A., Powers, J., Maley, M., . . . Tiffany, J. (2013). An Exploratory Study of Juvenile Orders of Protection as a Remedy for Dating Violence. BJS, Office of Justice Programs.
Krebs, C., Lindquist, C., Berzofsky, M., Shook-Sa, B., Peterson, K., Planty, M., . . . Stroop, J. (2016). Campus climate survey validation study: Final technical report. BJS, Office of Justice Programs.
Leen, E., Sorbring, E., Mawer, M., Holdsworth, E., Helsing, B., & Bowen, E. (2013). Prevalence, dynamic risk factors and the efficacy of primary interventions for adolescent dating violence: An international review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 159-174.
Levy, B. (1998). Introduction. In B. Levy (Ed.), Dating violence: Young women in danger (pp.3-18). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
Lewis, S. F., & Fremouw, W. (2001). Dating violence: A critical review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(1), 105-127.
MacKinnon, C. A. (2016). Rape redefined. Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev., 10, 431.
McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. Guilford Press.
McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). Sage Publications.
McMahon, S., & Banyard, V. L. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(1), 3-14.
McPhail, B. A., Busch, N. B., Kulkarni, S., & Rice, G. (2007). An integrative feminist model: The evolving feminist perspective on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 13(8), 817-841. doi:10.1177/1077801207302039
Melander, L. A. (2010). College students' perceptions of intimate partner cyber harassment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 263-268.
Montalvo‐Liendo, N. (2009). Cross‐cultural factors in disclosure of intimate partner violence: an integrated review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(1), 20-34.
Murray, C. E., & Kardatzke, K. N. (2007). Dating violence among college students: Key issues for college counselors. Journal of College Counseling, 10(1), 79-89.
Nabors, E. L., & Jasinski, J. L. (2009). Intimate partner violence perpetration among college students: The role of gender role and gendered violence attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 4(1), 57-82. doi:10.1177/1557085108325235
Nabors, E. L., Dietz, T. L., & Jasinski, J. L. (2006). Domestic violence beliefs and perceptions among college students. Violence and Victims, 21(6), 779-795.
Naved, R. T., Azim, S., Bhuiya, A., & Persson, L. Å. (2006). Physical violence by husbands: magnitude, disclosure and help-seeking behavior of women in Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine, 62(12), 2917-2929.
Neville, H. A., & Heppner, M. J. (1999). Contextualizing rape: Reviewing sequelae and proposing a culturally inclusive ecological model of sexual assault recovery. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8(1), 41-62.
O'Leary, K. D., Smith Slep, A. M., Avery-Leaf, S., & Cascardi, M. (2008). Gender Differences in Dating Aggression Among Multiethnic High School Students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(5), 473-479.
Oudekerk, B., Blachman-Denmer, D., & Mulford, C. (2014). Teen dating violence: How peers can affect risk & protective factors. National Institute of Justice.
Park, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2017). Who Are the Victims and Who Are the Perpetrators in Dating Violence? Sharing the Role of Victim and Perpetrator. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 0(0), 1524838017730648. doi:10.1177/1524838017730648
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications.
Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Toward a constructivist model. Social work, 45(1), 9-25.
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women's consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 72-88.
Próspero, M., & Vohra-Gupta, S. (2008). The use of mental health services among victims of partner violence on college campuses. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16(4), 376-390.
Purdie, M. P., Abbey, A., & Jacques-Tiura, A. J. (2010). Perpetrators of intimate partner sexual violence: Are there unique characteristics associated with making partners have sex without a condom? Violence Against Women, 16(10), 1086-1097. doi:10.1177/1077801210382859
Raghavan, C., Cohen, S., & Tamborra, T. (2015). Development and preliminary validation of the multidimensional sexual coercion questionnaire (MSCQ). Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 271-289.
Reeves, P. M., & Orpinas, P. (2012). Dating norms and dating violence among ninth graders in Northeast Georgia: Reports from student surveys and focus groups. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(9), 1677-1698.
Risman, B. J. (1999). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. Yale University Press.
Rosenthal, D. A., & Feldman, S. S. (1999). The importance of importance: adolescents' perceptions of parental communication about sexuality. Journal of Adolescence, 22(6), 835-851.
Sabina, C., & Ho, L. Y. (2014). Campus and college victim responses to sexual assault and dating violence: disclosure, service utilization, and service provision. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(3), 201-226. doi:10.1177/1524838014521322
Sanders, S. M. (2003). Teen dating violence: The invisible peril (Vol. 24): Peter Lang.
Scott, K., & Straus, M. (2007). Denial, minimization, partner blaming, and intimate aggression in dating partners. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(7), 851-871. doi:10.1177/0886260507301227
Sharoni, S., & Klocke, B. (2019). Faculty confronting gender-based violence on campus: opportunities and challenges. Violence Against Women, 25(11), 1352-1369.
Shen, A. C.-T. (2011). Cultural barriers to help-seeking among Taiwanese female victims of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(7), 1343-1365.
Shen, A. C.-T. (2014). Dating violence and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in Taiwanese college students: The roles of cultural beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(4), 635-658. doi:10.1177/0886260513505213
Shen, A. C.-T., Chiu, M. Y.-L., & Gao, J. (2012). Predictors of dating violence among Chinese adolescents: The role of gender-role beliefs and justification of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1066-1089. doi:10.1177/0886260511424497
Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L., & Bell, K. M. (2008). A critical review of theoretical frameworks for dating violence: Comparing the dating and marital fields. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(3), 185-194.
Shorey, R. C., Cornelius, T. L., & Strauss, C. (2015). Stalking in college student dating relationships: A descriptive investigation. Journal of Family Violence, 30(7), 935-942.
Simmons, C. A., Farrar, M., Frazer, K., & Thompson, M. J. (2011). From the voices of women: Facilitating survivor access to IPV services. Violence Against Women, 17(10), 1226-1243.
Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575.
Smith, P. H., White, J. W., & Moracco, K. E. (2009). Becoming who we are: A theoretical explanation of gendered social structures and social networks that shape adolescent interpersonal aggression. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(1), 25-29.
Staggs, S. L., Long, S. M., Mason, G. E., Krishnan, S., & Riger, S. (2007). Intimate partner violence, social support, and employment in the post-welfare reform era. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(3), 345-367.
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological review, 93(2), 119.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Love is a story: A new theory of relationships. Oxford University Press.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 75-88.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316.
Sugarman, D. B., & Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (p. 3–32). Praeger Publishers.
Sundin, D., & Fahy, K. (2008). Critical, post-structural, interpretive interactionism: an update on Denzin’s methodology. Nurse Researcher, 16(1), 7-23.
Sylaska, K. M., & Edwards, K. M. (2014). Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(1), 3-21.
Taylor, B. G., & Mumford, E. A. (2014). A national descriptive portrait of adolescent relationship abuse: Results from the national survey on teen relationships and intimate violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(6), 963-988. doi:10.1177/0886260514564070
Teten, A. L., Ball, B., Valle, L. A., Noonan, R., & Rosenbluth, B. (2009). Considerations for the definition, measurement, consequences, and prevention of dating violence victimization among adolescent girls. Journal of Women's Health, 18(7), 923-927.
Tjaden, P. G., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women survey. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
Turner, F. J. (2011). Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches. Oxford University Press.
UN Women (2015). Ending violence against women: From the Beijing Platform for Action to the sustainable development goals: UN Women.
Velonis, A. J., Daoud, N., Matheson, F., Woodhall-Melnik, J., Hamilton-Wright, S., & O’Campo, P. (2015). Strategizing safety: Theoretical frameworks to understand women’s decision making in the face of partner violence and social inequities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(21), 3321-3345. doi:10.1177/0886260515598953
Vezina, J., & Hebert, M. (2007). Risk factors for victimization in romantic relationships of young women: A review of empirical studies and implications for prevention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(1), 33-66.
Weisz, A. N., Tolman, R. M., Callahan, M. R., Saunders, D. G., & Black, B. M. (2007). Informal helpers’ responses when adolescents tell them about dating violence or romantic relationship problems. Journal of Adolescence, 30(5), 853-868.
Wekerle, C., & Wolfe, D. A. (1999). Dating violence in mid-adolescence: Theory, significance, and emerging prevention initiatives. Clinical Psychology Review, 19(4), 435-456.
White, J. W. (2009). A gendered approach to adolescent dating violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(1), 1-15.
White, J. W., & Smith, P. H. (2009). Covariation in the use of physical and sexual intimate partner aggression among adolescent and college-age men a longitudinal analysis. Violence Against Women, 15(1), 24-43.
Wolfe, D. A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., & Straatman, A.-L. (2001). Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 277.
Wood, L., Sulley, C., Kammer-Kerwick, M., Follingstad, D., & Busch-Armendariz, N. (2017). Climate surveys: An inventory of understanding sexual assault and other crimes of interpersonal violence at institutions of higher education. Violence Against Women, 23(10), 1249-1267. doi:10.1177/1077801216657897

三、網路部分
聯合報(2014/07/07)。男友帥又念名校,同居才知是恐怖情人。取自http://blog.udn.com/baogon/14852548,下載日期:2019年12月7日。
蘋果新聞網(2015/11/16)。不滿分手,恐怖情人控制女大生9小時半。取自https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20151116/733892/ ,下載日期:2019年12月7日。

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top