:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:職業訓練成效之研究-以訓練類別為干擾變數
作者:許格嘉
作者(外文):HSU, KO-CHIA
校院名稱:南華大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系管理科學碩博士班
指導教授:黃國忠
范惟翔
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2023
主題關鍵詞:學習動機學習策略學習態度學習滿意度學習成效Learning MotivationLearning StrategyLearning AttitudeLearning SatisfactionLearning Effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
  職業訓練計畫長久以來被各國政府視為施政的重點方針,為求能更深入了解剖析影響職業訓練學習滿意度與學習成效的各項影響因素;並促進企業重視人力資本發展,提升勞工素質。因此本研究以勞動部勞動力發展署雲嘉南分署2022~2023年度之間曾參與失/待業者或在職者職業訓練計畫之學員為對象,數據資料蒐集係採用問卷調查方式進行,依據文獻探討與專家討論來設計產出研究問卷提供受訪者填答,共計取得337份網路有效樣本用於後續統計分析,包括:描述性統計分析、單一樣本T檢定、效度分析、信度分析、相關分析與迴歸分析等統計分析方法。
  研究結果發現:(1)內在動機對學習成效、教學品質滿意度對學習成效及學習態度對學習環境滿意度並不具有解釋力之外,其餘4個構面間因果關係均達顯著正向影響關係;(2)干擾效果的驗證發現在5個因果關係與2個干擾變項所構成的13條可能的干擾效果中,有10條干擾效果達顯著水準。
  Vocational training programs have long been regarded as a key administration policy by governments worldwide. Governments have attempted to gain a more profound understanding of the factors influencing learning satisfaction and the learning effectiveness of vocational training. They aim to promote enterprises’ emphasis on human capital development and labor quality. As such, this study enrolled the participants of vocational training programs for the unemployed/non-employed or working people of the Yunlin-Chiayi-Tainan Regional Branch of Workforce Development Agency between 2022 and 2023 as the research subjects. A survey questionnaire was used for data collection. The literature review findings and expert discussion were employed to design the research questionnaire that the study subjects were asked to complete. A total of 337 valid samples were obtained on the Internet for subsequent statistical analysis, including descriptive statistical analysis, a one-sample t-test, effectiveness analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis.
  This study's results reveal the following: (1) Intrinsic motivation has no explanatory power for learning effectiveness, teaching quality satisfaction, learning effectiveness and learning attitude, and learning environment satisfaction. The causal relationship among the other four dimensions has a significant positive influence relationship. (2) The interference effects validated that among the 13 possible interference effects consisting of five causal relationships and two interference variables, there are 10 interference effects reaching a significant level.
1.王典謨(1987),職業訓練研究,台北市:工商教育出版社。
2.王家通(1995)。教育導論。高雄:麗文。
3.王嘉祐、杜崇勇(2019)。學生參與校外實習之學習態度及學習成效之研究-以康寧大學北部校區為例。中華創新發展期刊,4(4),19-33。
4.皮連生(1995)。教育心理學。臺北市:五南。
5.白玥淳、洪惠娟(2017)。電腦輔助造型設計課程學生學習態度對 學習滿意度影響之研究。美容科技學刊,14(1),14-1-03。
6.池進通、李鴻文、劉慶湘、許志賢(2007)。員工學習態度與學習滿意度關係之研究。生物與休閒事業研究,5(1),58-76。
7.李咏吟(2001)。學習輔導-學習心理學的應用。臺北:心理。
8.李亭儀(2014)。有氧舞蹈學習態度、學習成效與課程滿意度之實證研究。運動 與遊憩研究,9(2),50-66。
9.李勇輝(2017)。學習動機、學習策略與學習成效關係之研究-以數位學習為例,經營管理學刊,14,68-86。
10.汪瑞芝、廖玲珠(2008)。會計習作課程之學習行為與學習成效。當代會計,第9卷第1期,105-130。
11.余煥模(1983),職業訓練在未來經社發展中的角色,職業與訓練月刊,第4卷第2期,31-35頁。
12.吳婉如(1993)。台灣地區長青學苑教師教學型態與學員學習滿意度研究。社會教育學刊,22,211-225。
13.吳武典(2000)。輔導原理。臺北市:心理。
14.吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。台北市:知城數位科技。
15.吳佳玲(2007)。大學生禮儀課程之學習動機與學習滿意度調查研究。遠東學報, 25(4)。
16.吳銘達、鄭宇珊(2010)。教師教學行為、學生學習動機對學習成效之影響:階層線性模式分析。中等教育,61(3),32-51。
17.吳思達、林安南(2005),提升與健全職訓品質之策略-TQM觀點2006-2010年國家職訓中程策略規劃專案-職訓發展分區座談會,45-58頁。
18.周菡苹、宋靜怡、吳玫瑩、謝齊莊(2020)。國小學童教師支持、學習態度及學習成效之相關性-以新北市某國小高年級生為例。管理實務與理論研究,14(1),33- 49。
19.林聰明(1998),我國職業訓練與就業服務之現況與展望,職業訓練雙月刊, 16(2),26-33。
20.林孟眉、涂鵬斐、楊子孟、林東興(2017)。空中學院學生之學習動機與學習成效相關研究。數位與開放學習期刊,7,80-93。
21.林季佳、邱紹一(2022)。技術型高中學生之學習動機、學習態度及學習滿意度之研究,育達科大學報,50,159-184。
22.涂金堂(2012),SPSS與統計應用分析(二版),台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
23.秦夢群(1999)。教育行政。台北市:五南。
24.張春興(1996) :教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
25.張春興、林清山(1989)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
26.張春興(2003):教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華。
27.張志傑、黃希庭、崔麗弦(2004),大學生時間管理傾向與學習滿意度:遞增效度的分析,西南大學學報,人文社會科學版,第4期,42-45頁。
28.張弘勳、郭洛伶,(2017)。台南市國中生表演藝術課程的學習態度與學習滿意度。學校行政雙月刊,119,31-68。
29.康自立(1987),企業內之職業訓練,就業與訓練,5(1),5-11。
30.陳武雄、黃敏雄(2005),技職教育與職訓整合發展趨勢,2006-2010年國家職訓中程策略規劃專案-職訓發展分區座談會,19-31。
31.陳聰勝等著(2007),各國職業訓練制度,台北:五南圖書公司。
32.陳勇祥(2012),反思提問在輔導管教的應用,師友月刊,540,68-72。
33.陳春安(2021)大學體育課學生學習動機、學習滿意度與學習成效之研究。臺大體育學報, 41,19-31。
34.陳正昌等著(2011),多變量分析方法:統計軟體應用(6版),台北:五南圖書公司。
35.黃良志(2005),政府與企業在職訓的角色與分工議題背景資料說明,2006-2010年國家職訓中程策略規劃專案-職訓發展分區座談會,7-10頁。
36.曾妙音、王雅玲、李瓊雯、張恬瑜(2011)。父母社經地位與國中生學習動機、學業成就之相關性研究。家庭教育雙月刊,32,6-27。
37.葉子明、白凢芸、張維茜(2022)。校外教育教學的認知、學習態度、學習滿意度對國小學童學習成效之影響。運動與遊憩評論,第十期,1~29。
38.鄭麗媛、李思賢、陳政友(2009)。合作學習與訊息回饋策略對修習健康與體育 教材教法之學生學習成效的影響。健康促進與衛生教育學報,32,65-86。
39.樊祖燁、潘博宇(2021)。雙因子理論對學生學習成就之影響-以學習態度作為中介變數。商管科技季刊,22(2),257-297。
40.盧昆宏、洪純福(2005),國內人力培訓之現況與發展策略之探討,2006-2010年國家職訓中程策略規劃專案-職訓發展分區座談會,69-88。
41.錢昭萍、梁麗珍,(2017)。認知風格和多元智能對學習動機與學習成效之影響-以科技大學大一國文課數位化教學為例。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報, 13(4),325-58。
42.韓美文(2014)。從課程與證照結合探討課程學習動機、證照取得動機及學習態度對學習成效之影響。慈濟技術學院學報,23,137-153。
43.顏佩如、劉健慧、葉又菱,(2021)。教專生學習動機與學習滿意度之研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(7),85-92。
44.藍俊雄、呂怡萱(2020)。探討國中生英語補習經驗與學習成果之研究。管理資訊計算,9(1),27-38。
1.Abraugh, J. B. (2000). How Classroom Environment and StudentEngagement Affecting in Internet-based MBA Courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 4, 9-26.
2.Ashton, D., Green, F., Sung, J., & James, D. (2002). The evolution of education and training strategies in Singapore, Taiwan and S. Korea: A development model of skill formation. Journal of Education and Work, 15(1), 5-30.
3.Afzal, H., Ali I., Khan, M.A., & Hamid, K. (2010). A study of university students’ motivationand its relationship with their academic performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 80-88.
4.Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
6.Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988), On the Evaluation fo Structural Equation 77 Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
7.Binner, P. M., Dean, R. S. & Millinger, A. E. (1994), Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction, The American Journal of Distance Education, 4, 232-238.
8.Block, L., Jesness, R., & Schools, M. P. (2013). One-to-One Learning with iPads: Planning & Evaluation of Teacher Professional Development. College of Education, Leadership & Counseling. University of ST.Thomas Minnesota.
9.Chu, T.-H., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2016). With good we become good: Understanding e-Learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Computers & Education, 92, 37-52.
10.Domer, D., Carswell, J., & Spreckelmeyer, K. (1983). Understanding educational satisfaction. The University of Kansas School of Architecture and Urban Design. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 600).
11.Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227- 268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
12.Elliott, K. M. (2003). Key determinants of student satisfaction. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(3), 271-279.
13.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of personality & Social Psychology, 21, 1-9.
14.Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, An Introduction to Theory and Research, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
15.Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981), Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of 81 Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
16.Flammger, D. M. (1991), Nontraditional Students and Postsecondary School Satisfaction, Master Thesis, Niagara University, Niagara, NY.
17.Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1984). Looking in classrooms. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
18.Guilford, J. P., Fundamental statistics in psychology and education, 4th ed., New York: Mc Graw-Hill (1965).
19.Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2340-2350.
20.Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland: World Pub. Co.
21.Ismail, A., Hasan, A., & Sulaiman, A.Z. (2010). Supervisor’s role as an antecedent of training transfer and motivation to learn in training programs. Acta Universitatis Danubius, 2, 18-37.
22.Im, I., Hong, S., & Kang, M. S. (2011). An international comparison of technology adoption testing the UTAUT model. Information & Management, 48(1), 1-8.
23.Jaemjan, S., Praweenya, S., Pimpan, D. (2015). Virtual Field Trips with Inquiry learning and Critical Thinking Process: A Learning Model to Enhance Students’ Science Learning Outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1721-1726.
24.Knowles, M. S. (1970), The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus earning and the learning organization: Examining the connection between the individual and the learning environment, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(4), 365-375.
25.Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-6.
26.Koff, L., & Mullis, R. (2011). Nutrition Education and Technology: Can Delivering Messages via New Media Technology Effectively Modify Nutrition Behaviors of Preschoolers and Their Families? Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 43(4), S40-S40.
27.Long, H. B. (1989), Contradictory expectations? Achievement and satisfaction in adult learning, Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 33(3), 10-12.
28.Murdick, R. G., Moor, R. C., & Eckhouse, R. H. (1989). Business Policy and Atrategy: An Action Guide. Columbus, Ohio: Pub. Horizons.
29.Marzano, R. J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom: Teaching with Dimensions of Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
30.Merrill, M. D.,andD.Twitchell. (1994). Instrctional design theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational TechnologyPublications.
31.McInerney, D. M., Cheng, R. W. Y., Mok, M. M. C., & Lam, A. K. H. (2012). Academic self-concept and learning strategies: Direction of effect on student academic achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(3), 249-269.
32.Mosher, B. (2016). 3 Ways to Flip the Classroom. Chief Learning Officer, 15(1), 12.
33.Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory (2nd ed ). New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.Oliver, R. L. (1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315700892
35.Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., & McKeachie, W.J.(1989). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire(MSLQ). Mich:National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning (NCRIPTAL). School of Education, The University Michigan.
36.Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813.
37.Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives B. (2001). Web-Based Virtual Learning Environment: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic IT Skill Training, MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
38.Sears, D.O., Peplau, L.A. and Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
39.Stipek, D. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young 26 children’s achievement and motivation. Child Development, 66(1), 209-223.
40.Story, P. A., Hart, J. W., Stasson, M. F., & Mahoney, J. M. (2009). Using a two-factor theory of achievement motivation to examine performance-based outcomes and selfregulatory processes. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 391-395.
41.Tough, A. M. (1979). Major learning effects: recent research and future .Psychology, 56(2), 173-176.
42.Towle, M. (1982). Learning how to be a student when you have a learning disability. Journal of Learning Disability, 15(2), 90-93.
43.Tough, A. (1982). Some major reasons for learning. Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED, 33, 251.
44.Tai, C.-F., Chen, R.-J., & Lai, J.-L. (2003). How technological and vocational education can prosper in the 21st century. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, 19(2), 15-51.
45.Ulrich, R., Katharina, K. (2016).Why leave the classroom? How field trips to the church affect cognitive learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 41, 106-114
46.Young, J. L., Dongjoo, L. (2015). Factors Influencing Learning Satisfaction of Migrant Workers in Korea with E-learning-Based Occupational Safety and Health Education. Safety and Health at Work, 6(3), 211-217.
47.Yuchuan, W., Lungfar, H., Jungjei, L. (2015). What’s The Relationship between Learning Satisfaction and Continuing Learning Intention? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2849-2854.
48.Yaling, W., Jiajen H. (2015). Skill learning attitudes, satisfaction of curriculum, and vocational self-concept among junior high school students of technical education programs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2862-2866.
三、網站資料
1.勞動統計查詢網(2019)。檢自:https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/evta/jspProxy.aspx?sys=100&kind=10&type=1&funid=wqrymenu2&cparm1=wq13&rdm=qViiicbp
2.勞動部勞動統計網(2022)。統計報告。檢自:https:// reurl.cc/2b8kpO。
3.行政院主計總處(2022)。檢自: https://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Attachment/01210175434J9NJE4Q.pdf
4.全國法規資料庫職業訓練法。檢自: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=N0080001
5.勞動力發展署職能基準。檢自: https://www.wda.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=83376F561B7165E6
6.全國法規資料庫。就業服務法。檢自: http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawContentIf.aspx?PCODE=N0095
7.全國法規資料庫。職業訓練法。檢自: http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawContentIf.aspx?PCODE=N0080001
8.全國法規資料庫。職業訓練法施行細則。 http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawContentIf.aspx?PCODE=N0080002
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 資訊科技融入國小英語教學對於學生學習成效及滿意度之分析
2. 素養導向教學對國中生之地理科的學習成效、動機與多元文化素養之影響
3. 以混合方法探討心流經驗的中介效果對技術型高中學生專業英文詞彙競賽學習動機與學習成效之影響
4. 五專學生知覺學習動機、學習策略與自我導向學習成效關係之研究--以彈性學習課程為例
5. ARCS動機模式及專題導向學習應用於社會心理學通識課程及學生學習動機與學習成效之探討
6. 大學新生選校因素與學習適應、學習成效之關聯分析--以東部某科技大學醫務暨健康管理系為例
7. 多元教學模式之設計--以經濟學課程為例
8. 大學劇本寫作課程融入遊戲化視訊會議Gather Town之研究:學習動機及個人、團隊寫作成效
9. 探究ARCS動機模式結合「配對合作學習」與「實作範例學習」對學習者學習動機與成效之影響
10. 軍校合唱團教唱品質、學習態度與學習滿意度之研究--以復興崗校區為例
11. 第二外語學習者的人格特質與日語學習--探討其與學習策略及學習成效的關連
12. 雙語學習動機的成效評估:以ACT為架構
13. 分組合作學習對大專生之學習動機與學習成效之影響--以電路學課程為例
14. 人格特質與學習滿意度對於緊急救護訓練學習成效之影響
15. 差異化教學對大學統計學課程學生學習態度與學習成效之影響
 
1. 技術型高中生物產業機電科學生虛實整合學習動機、學習滿意度與學習成效之關係研究
2. 博物館防災教育參觀民眾學習動機、情境學習與學習成效之關係研究—以自然科學博物館地震防災教育特展為例
3. 博物館使用AR及VR對學習動機與學習成效之相關影響
4. 翻轉教學與創客教育應用於會展解說導覽之研究
5. 使用影片教學時加入情緒辨識的效果研究--情緒回饋對互動式解謎影片學習之影響
6. 技術型高級中等學校資源班學生修習實習課程現況之探討
7. 警專生實習課程實作、學習滿意度與學習成效之研究-以警專教育訓練與警察勤務接軌為例
8. PAAR翻轉教學模式在電腦遊戲動畫課的學習成效之研究
9. 公立技術型高級中等學校專題實作課程學生學習動機、學習態度與學習成效之關係研究
10. 臺灣大學生學習越南語動機、成就 、滿意度與策略之研究
11. 越南語為第二外語臺灣學習者學習策略與科技輔助之研究
12. 資訊科技融入管理領域教學與翻轉教學對學習成效的影響-以學習滿意度為雙重中介變項
13. SPOC結合翻轉教室對大學生旅遊日語學習成效、學習態度和學習滿意度之探究
14. 邏輯思考能力與問題解決能力對問題導向合作學習程式設計學習成效影響之研究-以數位原民程度為調節變項
15. 技術型高中商管群專題製作課程應用翻轉學習教學模式之研究
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE