:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:婦女家庭地位之研究:以家庭決策模式為例
書刊名:臺灣社會學刊
作者:陳玉華伊慶春 引用關係呂玉瑕 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Yu-huaYi, Chin-chunLu, Yu-hsia
出版日期:2000
卷期:24
頁次:頁1-58
主題關鍵詞:婦女家庭地位家庭決策婦女就業型態省籍背景夫妻配對樣本Female's domestic statusFamily decision-makingFemale's employment patternsEthnic backgroundConjugal pair samples
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(28) 博士論文(9) 專書(3) 專書論文(6)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:27
  • 共同引用共同引用:207
  • 點閱點閱:221
本文試圖檢視影響臺灣婦女家庭地位高低之可能因素,並嘗試以夫妻配對樣本為分析單位,以了解相關理論架構在台灣家庭的適用性。婦女之家庭地位以夫妻間的相對權力關係來評估,除了傳統交換論之動態模型以外,現代化理論和邊緣化理論對此議題的適用性亦一併考量。樣本為民國八十四年全省隨機抽樣之五百對夫妻配對樣本。 研究結果指出,夫妻共同決定是台灣多數家庭對重要決策的模式,“子女管教問題” 以及“家用支出分配” 則分別被視為是最重要的家庭決策。分析結果顯示,婦女人力資本快速累積,對於家庭經濟的直接或間接投入,使得婦女在家庭決策過程之角色與地位不同於傳統社會;家庭生命階段的發展亦會導致婦女決策權的逐漸提高;省籍因素更是重要的關鍵,其中,外省背景的丈夫─不論在一致夫妻或不同配對夫妻的家庭中之妻子都享有較高的決策參與。此外,丈夫有現代化之性別角色態度,較傾向非傳統或非夫權之決策模式。 比較邊緣化理論和現代化理論方面,由於非正式就業對於共同決策模式的潛在貢獻有待進一步的驗證,且資源論可拓展到涵蓋結構性與文化性變項的解釋,故本文支持現代化理論的適用性。至於父權社會的規範以及不同族群的次文化所賦予男性決策權的高低,將是未來探討臺灣婦女家庭地位變化不可忽視的兩項關鍵因素。
This paper examines factors accounted for female' s domestic status in Taiwan. Modernization and Marginalization theory serve as the underlying framework and conjugal pair are used as the analyzing unit. Based on the dynamic model of resource-process-outcome derived from the exchange framework, an attempt is made to include structural as well as cultural variables. Samples are 500 married couples randomly selected island-wide in 1995. Results indicate that for the two most valued decisions, namely expense allocation and child discipline, joint decision-making pattern has been widely adopted among Taiwanese couples. Based on the results from multivariate analysis, following the accumulation of human capital in the past decades, women's decision-making power somewhat reflects their potential in the contribution toward family economy. In addition, married women's role in the familial decision-making pattern is also affected both by the advancement in the family life cycle and possible sub-cultural diversity from different ethnic backgrounds. Modern sex-role attitudes, especially husbands', are also related to the non-traditional or pro-wife decision-making patterns. The analyses of conjugal power structure support that modernization theory is probably more applicable in the Taiwanese setting. This is because on the one hand, the resource model has close linkage with the modernization framework. Also,the core argument of the marginalization theory emphasizes the concentration of female's labor force in the informal sector and its consequence of not enhancing female's status. our findings suggest that informal work has its potential contribution to the joint decision-making pattern at home. Therefore, an integrated framework considering both resources exchange process and the social practices of patriarchal system is valid in the exploration of the conjugal power structure in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Greenhalgh, S.(1985)。Sexual stratification: the other side of growth with equity in East Asia。Population Development Review,11(2),265-314。  new window
2.陳玉華、伊慶春、呂玉瑕(20001200)。婦女家庭地位之研究:以家庭決策模式為例。臺灣社會學刊,24,1-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Oropesa, R. S.(1997)。Development and marital power in Mexico。Social Forces,75(4),1291-1317。  new window
4.羅啟宏(1992)。臺灣省鄉鎮發展類型之研究。臺灣經濟月刊,190,41-68。  延伸查詢new window
5.McDonald, Gerald W.(1980)。Family Power: The Assessment of a Decade of Theory and Research。Journal of Marriage and the Family,42(4),841-854。  new window
6.Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina(1970)。The Study of Family Power Structure: A Review 1960-1969。Journal of Marriage and the Family,32(4),539-552。  new window
7.胡台麗(19900600)。芋仔與蕃薯--臺灣「榮民」的族群關係與認同。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,69,107-131。  延伸查詢new window
8.呂玉瑕(19800900)。社會變遷中臺灣婦女之事業觀--婦女角色意識與就業態度的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,50,25-66。  延伸查詢new window
9.Mirowsky, John(1985)。Depression and Marital Power: An Equity Model。American Journal of Sociology,91(3),557-592。  new window
10.王甫昌(19940400)。光復後臺灣漢人族群通婚的原因與形式初探。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,76,43-96。  延伸查詢new window
11.呂玉瑕(19841200)。婦女就業與家庭角色、權力結構之關係。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,56,111-143。  延伸查詢new window
12.伊慶春、楊文山、蔡瑤玲(19921200)。夫妻衝突處理模式的影響因素:丈夫、妻子、和夫妻配對樣本的比較。中國社會學刊,16,25-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蔡淑鈴(19940600)。臺灣之婚姻配對模式。人文及社會科學集刊,6(2),335-371。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Centers, Richard、Raven, Bertram H.、Rodrigues, Aroldo(1971)。Conjugal Power Structure: A Reexamination。American Sociological Review,36,264-278。  new window
15.Stets, Jan(1995)。Modeling Control in Relationships。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57,489-501。  new window
16.Watkins, Susan C.(1993)。If All We Knew about Women Was What We Read in Demography, What Would We Know?。Demography,30,551-577。  new window
會議論文
1.朱瑞玲(1996)。親子與夫妻互動:家庭教化與親子關係研究之檢討。中央研究院民族學研究所小型專題研討會系列之16 : 「親子與夫妻互動」研討會,中央研究院民族學研究所 (主辦) 。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.王思平、莊英章(1999)。婦女家庭決策地位及性別分工:南中國區域性的比較。0。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cheung, Paul、Cabigon, Josefina、Chamratrithirong, Aphichat、McDonald, Peter F.、Syed, Sabila、Cherlin, Andrew、Smith, Peter C.(1985)。Cultural Variations in the Transition to Marriage in Four Asian Societies。Florence, Italy。  new window
4.伊慶春(2000)。Taiwan's Modernization - The Female Chapter。0。  new window
圖書
1.Thornton, Arland、Lin, Hui-Sheng(1994)。Social Change and the Family in Taiwan。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Goode, William J.(1982)。The Family。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Blood, Robert O.、Wolfe, Donald M.(1960)。Husband and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living。Free Press。  new window
4.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Huber, Joan、Spitze, Glenna D.(1983)。Sex Stratification: Children, Housework, and Jobs。New York, N.Y.:Academic Press。  new window
6.Boserup, Ester(1970)。Woman's Role in Economic Development。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
7.莊英章(1994)。家族與婚姻:台灣北部兩個閩客村落之研究。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.呂玉瑕(1998)。經濟發展與婦女工作:以華南農村為例。華南農村社會文化研究論文集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Duvall, Evelyn(1967)。Family Development。Family Development。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
10.寶拉.英格蘭(1997)。The Sex Gap in Pay。Workplace/ Women's Place。Los Angeles, CA。  new window
11.Whyte, Martin King(1995)。From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches in Urban China。Family Formation and Dissolution: Perspectives from East and West。Taipei。  new window
12.伊慶春、楊文山(1995)。The Perceived Conflict and Decision-Making Patterns among Husbands and Wives in Taiwan。Family Formation and Dissolution: Perspectives form East and West。Taipei。  new window
圖書論文
1.朱瑞玲(1989)。親子關係:子女的知覺與解釋及其影響。臺灣社會現象分析。臺北:中央研究院三民主義研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Szinovacz, Maximiliane(1987)。Family Power。Handbook of Marriage and the Family。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
3.Scanzoni, J.(1979)。Social Process and Power in Families。Contemporary Theories about the Family。New York:Free Press。  new window
4.伊慶春、蔡瑤玲(1989)。台北地區夫妻權力的分析:以家庭決策為例。台灣社會現象的分析:家庭、人口、政策與階層。臺北:中央研究院三民主義研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱瑞玲、伊慶春(1993)。華人家庭結構與功能的變遷:臺灣、香港、中國、新加坡華人社會的比較研究。西方社會科學理論的移植與應用。香港:香港中文大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE