Probably the most famous Canadian female writer, Margaret Atwood has produced eight novels, ten books of poetry, three short story collections, in addition to an important book of literary criticism and numerous essays and reviews. Students who major in English in Taiwan are likely to encounter Atwood in either a survey course on the short story or a course on feminist writers. In either case, the first work by Atwood that they probably read and discuss in class is "Rape Fantasies", which was written in 1975 and is found in many an anthology (such as Longman's An Introduction to Literature and Norton's The Norton Anthology of Literature by Women). Interestingly enough, this is probably one of the first stories, if not the first story, produced in Canada that Taiwanese students in literature read. For all of the above reasons, I have chosen to discuss the reception of Atwood's story by English majors. "Rape Fantasies" is Atwood's most widely read story here and is an excellent example of a modern short story by a feminist writer. I have also selected "The Female Body" mainly because it is related to the theme of sexual politics, which repeats Atwood's constant theme, as in the case with "Rape Fantasies". Moreover, since the stories were written almost twenty years apart, I will attempt to demonstrate the author's evolution in dealing with the issue of feminism. Even though Atwood has been criticized for "the triple handicap of being a token "feminist" author, a Canadian, and a poet," ironically that "triple handicap" spells out the distinctive marks of her fiction. Therefore, in teaching the above two stories, it is necessary to discuss this "triple handicap" of atwood and show not only how her writing is grounded in a strong sense of her own cultural identity as a white, English speaking, Canadian female, but also how she challenges the limits of such categories by questioning the stereotypes of nationality and gender, exposing cultural fictions and the artificial limits they impose on our understanding of ourselves and others as human beings. Regardless of the questions an Asian, non-English-speaking student might raise in reading these two stories by Atwood, the ultimate answer would be that, in her insistently ironic vision, Atwood challenges her reader's complacent acceptance of easy definitions about anything.