:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區民眾參與調查研究態度的變遷:1986-1998
書刊名:選舉研究
作者:鄭夙芬陳陸輝
作者(外文):Cheng, Su-fengChen, Lu-huei
出版日期:2000
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁115-138
主題關鍵詞:調查研究研究方法訪問參與失敗樣本敏感性問題Survey researchMethodologySurvey participationNonrespondentSensitive qustion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:55
  • 點閱點閱:97
目前國內學界雖然大量地採用以調查研究方法所蒐集的資料來進行研究分析、理論建構與假設驗證,卻鮮少注意到在以調查研究法蒐集資料過程中可能會發生的問題。本文從調查研究的方法論角度,檢視1986至1998年間台灣地區民眾參與訪問的態度及其變遷。本研究發現:隨著台灣的政治民主化與社會開放,民眾有愈來愈不願接受訪問的傾向。訪問失敗有四分之一左右是因為「接觸不到受訪者」、四分之一是「接觸但失敗」,而「拒訪」的比例有緩慢上升的現象。在「選舉」及「兩岸關係」主題的兩類訪問中,「兩岸關係」類主題的拒訪率高於「選舉」類主題。受訪者對敏感性問題的回答意願,也因為受訪者的背景以及本身所具備的資訊而出現差異。當我們以受訪者是否透露其投票對象當作測量對敏感性問題回答意願時發現:男性、年輕、外省籍、高教育程度以及具有政黨認同者,較傾向願意回答敏感性問題。選舉的類型對受訪者回答敏感性問題的意願也有影響。我們發現總統以及省市長選舉,因為選區幅員較大,參選人數少,使得選民不願意回答投票對象的比例降低許多。本文中,也對訪問參與這個主題的研究,提出若干建議。
In Taiwan, researchers and scholars widely use survey data to conduct research analysis, construct theories and test hypotheses. However, problems came from process of data collection seldom been noticed. From the perspective of survey research methodolo-gy, this paper examined people's attitudes on survey participation in Taiwan between 1986 and 1998. This research showed that, in Tai-wan, people became less likely to participate in survey interview even political environment became more democratic and open in the last decade. Among people who did not participate in survey, one quarter of them can not be reached by interviewers, and one out of four can be reached but refused to participate in survey. Worthy to be noticed is that the ratio of "refuse to be interviewed" increased gradually. Compared with survey on "election studies", sur-vey topic on "relation between Taiwan and Mainland China" re-ceived higher refuseal rate. The paper indicated that the response rate of sensitive questions was influenced by respondents' demo-graphic background and level of information they had. Men, youths, mainlanders, high-educated and party identifiers were more likely to answer the sensitive question-whom did you vote for- in this research. Type of elections also playd a role on re-sponse rate. In the survey on presidential election and gubernator-rial/mayoral election, nonresponse rates on reporting preferential candidates were lower than nonresponse rates in legislative elec-tions. Therefore, the difference of electoral system between sin-gle member district and SNTV might affect nonresponse rates. Several methodological suggestions are also presented for future sur-vey participation research.
期刊論文
1.劉義周(19961000)。測不到的誤差:訪員執行訪問時的偏誤。調查研究,2,35-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳陸輝(19990500)。「固定樣本連續訪談法」(panel studies)樣本流失問題之探討。選舉研究,6(1),175-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳齊殷(19971000)。受訪者之訪答效應:施測方法、問卷型式與問題性質。調查研究,4,5-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Brady, Henry E.、Verba, Sidney、Schlozman, Kay Lehman(1995)。Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation。The American Political Science Review,89(2),271-294。  new window
5.瞿海源(19940900)。受訪者合作與可靠程度對問卷調查結果之影響。調查研究,試刊號,37-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.劉義周(19851200)。調查研究中「不知道」選項問題之分析。國立政治大學學報,52,65-90。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳義彥(1994)。選舉行為與台灣地區的政治民主化:從八十二年縣市長選舉探討(台南市) (計畫編號:NSC83-0301-H-004-041)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳義彥(1993)。選舉行為與台灣地區的政治民主化--從第二屆立法委員選舉探討 (計畫編號:NSC82-0301-H-004-034-B2)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝復生(1996)。總統選舉選民投票行為之科際整合研究 (計畫編號:NSC85-2414-H-004-017-Q3)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳義彥(1995)。選舉行為與臺灣地區的政治民主化 : 從八十三年省市長選舉探討。行政院國家科學委員會:國立政治大學選舉研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳義彥(1996)。選舉行為與臺灣地區的政治民主化-從八十四年立法委員選舉探討。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳義彥、洪永泰、包宗和、歐陽新宜、劉義周、黃德福、鄭夙芬(1944)。大陸政策與兩岸關係民意調查報告書。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳義彥、包宗和、趙建民、張五岳、劉義周、黃德福、洪永泰(1996)。大陸政策與兩岸關係民意調查報告書。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳義彥、包宗和、高安邦、張五岳、吳玉山、劉義周、盛杏湲、洪永泰、游清鑫(1997)。大陸政策與兩岸關係民意調查報告書。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳義彥、包宗和、趙建民、張五岳、劉義周、黃德福、洪永泰(1999)。大陸政策與兩岸關係民意調查報告書。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fowler, Floyd J. Jr.、Mangione, Thomas W.(1990)。Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error。Sage。  new window
2.Babbie, Earl R.(1990)。Survey Research Methods。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Pub. Co.。  new window
3.Groves, Robert M.、Couper, Mick P.(1998)。Nonresponse in household interview surveys。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
4.Schuman, H.、Presser, S.(1981)。Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
5.Sudman, Seymour、Bradburn, Norman M.(1982)。Asking Question--A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass Inc.。  new window
6.洪永泰(1996)。戶中選樣之研究。臺北:時英出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Brehm, John(1993)。The Phantom Respondents-Opinion Surveys and Political Representation。Ann Arbor, Michigan:The University of Michigan Press。  new window
8.Litwin, Mark S.(1995)。How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
9.Zaller, John R.(1992)。The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.雷飛龍、陳義彥、劉義周(1986)。臺灣地區選民對增額中央民意代表選舉意見之調查研究。臺灣地區選民對增額中央民意代表選舉意見之調查研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
11.Backstrom, Charles H.、Gerald Hursh-Cesar(1981)。Survey Research。Survey Research。New York, NY。  new window
12.Groves, Robert M.(1989)。Survey Error and Survey Cost。Survey Error and Survey Cost。New York, NY。  new window
13.Survey Research Center(1988)。Interviewer's Manual。Interviewer's Manual。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
14.Fowler, F. J.(1993)。調查研究方法。調查研究方法。Newbury Park, CA。  延伸查詢new window
15.Sudman, Seymour、Bradburn, Norman M.、Schwarz, Norbert(1996)。Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE