:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:女性居家照顧服務員工作中遭受性騷擾之經驗探討
書刊名:臺大社會工作學刊
作者:楊培珊 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Pei-shan
出版日期:2000
卷期:2
頁次:頁97+99-149
主題關鍵詞:性騷擾居家服務員質性研究焦點團體象徵互動論Sexual harassmentHome makersQualitative studyfocus groupSymbolic interactionism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(20) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:20
  • 共同引用共同引用:295
  • 點閱點閱:437
居家服務員由於必須進入服務對象的私生活領域中工作,工作時間有時較長,且服務內容有些涉及肢體接觸,因此不少服務員都曾有過被性騷擾的經驗,本硏究乃針對北部地區四家居家服務單位的服務員及督導(或社工員),經立意抽樣後,進行訪談,共計進行一次一對一訪談,一次一對二訪談,及三次焦點團體訪談。訪談內容應用「象徵互動論J為基礎,進行質性分析後有下列幾點主要發現: 1. 性騷擾是充滿雙方當事人主觀詮釋及處理的互動過程,並受到情境中各種象徵及訊息的影響。 2. 性騷擾也可能發生於同性之間,但比異性間的性騷擾更不易獲得他人的瞭解與支持。 3. 居家服務員工作中的騷擾者絕大多數為案主本身,但也可能是案主家屬,或有接觸機會的鄰居。 4. 居家服務員可能遭遇的性騷擾內容是多樣化的,本硏究中分析出語言的、非語言的、肢體動作的、挑逗或誘惑的行為、性的資料、私領域的侵犯、性賄賂、性別的騷擾等八個層次。 5. 居家服務員對性騷擾的反應無論在感受及行為上都包含相當多的層次,顯示他們對性騷擾的處理是相當複雜、細緻的過程。 6. 騷擾者並不是全然的「壞傢伙」。他們的行為也受到文化、早年習慣、目前的身心困境所影響。本硏究並提出「互動失衡模型」來解釋性騷擾的動態過程。
This study intends to explore the home makers' experiences of work-related sexual harassment. The author used purposeful sampling to find study subjects from four home care service agencies in a northern city of Taiwan. One 1 to 1 interview, one 1 to 2 interview, and three focus group interviews were conducted and taped. Interview data was analyzed qualitatively, using a symbolic interactionist approach. Results showed: 1. Sexual harassment is a dynamic process full of subjective interpretation and usage of symbols. 2. Sexual harassment may occur between two persons of the same sex, but it is even harder to get support from others. 3. The harassers in this case may be the clients, family of the clients, or their neighbors. 4. Content of sexual harassment was multidimensional, including verbal, non-verbal, physical, seductive behaviors, sexual materials, intrusion of privacy, sexual bribery, and gender harassment. 5. Home makers' reactions to sexual harassment were also multi-dimensional, indicating their complex process of coping with the experiences. 6. The harassers were not totally "bad guys", for their inappropriate behaviors were influenced by the local culture, their own earlier behavioral patterns, and their current physical and emotional difficulties. A "loss of interaction balance" model was proposed to explain the process of sexual harassment.
期刊論文
1.胡月娟(19921200)。護理人員所承受到的病人性騷擾與其處理--初步調查。醫院,25(6),403-414。  延伸查詢new window
2.焦興鎧(19971200)。美國雇主對工作場所性騷擾事件之法律責任及預防之道。歐美研究,27(4),85-197。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Gruber, J. E.(1992)。A Typology of Personal and Environmental Sexual Harassment: Research and Policy Implications for the 1990s。Sex Roles,26(11/12),417-464。  new window
4.張玉佩(19970700)。拒絕電視性騷擾:看週末晚間大型綜藝節目。傳播文化,5,225-245。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林文香、夏萍絗(19981000)。女性護理人員面對男病患性騷擾及其看法。公共衛生,25(3),167-180。  延伸查詢new window
6.林文香、夏萍絗(19981200)。護理人員面對病患性騷擾及因應之初探。榮總護理,15(4),386-395。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林明鏘(19951000)。論德國工作場所性騷擾保護法--兼論我國立法政策與立法草案。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,25(1),69-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.羅燦煐(19980100)。她的性騷擾?他的性騷擾?--試論性騷擾的性別差異建構。兩性平等教育季刊,1,51-54。  延伸查詢new window
9.呂寶靜(19950600)。工作場所性騷擾之研究:臺灣地區案例探討。國立政治大學學報,70(下),131-158。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ormerod, Mimi、Gold, Yael、Swecker, Janice、Richards, Margaret、Bailey, Nancy、Weitzman, Lauren、Fitzgerald, Louise F.、Shullman, Sandra L.(1988)。The Incidence and Dimensions of Sexual Harassment in Academia and the Workplace。Journal of Vocational Behavior,32(2),152-175。  new window
11.王秀紅、謝臥龍、駱慧文(1994)。醫療行爲中「性騷擾」的界定與預防--德懷研究。公共衛生,21(1),1-11。  延伸查詢new window
12.王淑芬(1997)。婦女與公共空間--公車上的性騷擾。性別與空間硏究室通訊,4,276-281。  延伸查詢new window
13.尹章華(1994)。性自主、性騷擾及性犯罪法理關係之探討。法律與你,150-153。  延伸查詢new window
14.Pryor, J. B.、La Vite, C. M.、Stoller, L. M.(1993)。A Social Psychological Analysis of Sexual Harassment: The Person/Situation Interaction。Journal of Vocational Behavior,42,68-83。  new window
15.陳宇平、唐子俊(1998)。某大專護理科女生性行爲與性騷擾經驗之前趨研究。台灣性學學刊,4(1),28-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃碧芬(1993)。處理工作場所性騷擾之申訴管道的建立。勞資關係,11(10),31- 32。  延伸查詢new window
17.畢達(1997)。車上有狼!公車上的性騷擾。性別與空間研究室通訊,4,282-285。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊茹憶(1999)。職場中的性別歧視與性騷擾。福利社會,23-31。  延伸查詢new window
19.簡淑媛(1997)。女性田野工作者與性騷擾。性別與空間研究室通訊,4,300- 301。  延伸查詢new window
20.Berger, R. M.、Anderson, S.(1984)。The In-home Worker: Serving the Frail Elderly。Social Work,29(5),456-461。  new window
會議論文
1.王增勇(1999)。居家服務的規訓機制。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hewitt, John P.(1991)。Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology。Needham Heights, Mass.:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1984)。Naturalistic inquiry。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
3.簡春安、鄒平儀(19980000)。社會工作研究法。臺北:巨流圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Gherardi, S.(1995)。Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures。  new window
5.Gutek, B. A.(1996)。Sexual Harassment at Work: When an Organisation Fails to Respond。Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Perspectives, Frontiers, and Response Strategies \\ M. S. Stockdale (Ed.)。London。  new window
6.Hanisch, K. A.(1996)。An Integrated Framework for Studying the Outcomes of Sexual Harassment: Consequences for Individuals and Organizations。Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Perspectives, Frontiers, and Response Strategies \\ M. S. Stockdale (Ed.)。London。  new window
7.Saal, F. E.(1996)。Men's Misperceptions of Women's Interpersonal Behaviors and Sexual Harassment。Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Perspectives, Frontiers, and Response Strategies \\ M. S. Stockdale (Ed.)。London。  new window
8.Stockdale, M. S.(1996)。What We Know and What We Need to Learn About Sexual Harassment。Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Perspectives, Frontiers, and Response Strategies \\ M. S. Stockdale (Ed.)。London。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE