:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「進步」的理念--二十世紀的挑戰
書刊名:新史學
作者:方志強 引用關係
作者(外文):Fang, Jyh-chyang
出版日期:2001
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁131-172
主題關鍵詞:進步歷史樂觀悲觀後現代世界史ProgressHistoryOptimismPessimismPost-modernismWorld history
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:74
     進步的理念可說是「近代西方思想上最具特色與最普遍的主題」。進步的理念具有雙重性質:歷史的事實與道德的理想。進步的理念是「一種歷史的解釋」,也是塑造歷史的「一種動力」。這種理念所展現的思想體系,顯示了人類最深刻的一種欲望。此理念具有巨大無情的「力量」,它宛如歷史巨流,吞噬了人心,牢籠了對過去的認知、規範了現在的髼為,以及指導了對未來的追來。然而,事實上,從人類長遠的歷史之流來看,此種主導歷史的理念,也是歷史的產物。它的興起與衰退,皆導源於特定的時代的知識與文化基礎。一旦時代的知識與文化發生變遷,主導歷史的理念也就隨之改變,宛如潮汐的潮來潮往般更迭不已。進步的理念大約成於十七世紀,直到十九世紀末達到最高峰。速入二十世紀後,此理念的流行開始走下坡,幾乎被視為是「已破滅的迷思」。本文在對進步理念的研究上,不僅是將其視為是一種過去的歷史現象,也將其視為是研究此種現象的史學,並且偏重它作為歷史的事實與道德的理想間的互動與差距,來綜括此理念的發展過程與意義。本文討論因二十世紀歷史、知識與文化的變遷,進步的理念所面臨的挑戰、進步理念的失據,進步迷思的破壞、以及隨之而生的歷史新視野。
     In modern world, the most influential result of continuing efforts to fashion a historical understanding is the idea of progress. It is perhaps the most characteristic and pervasive theme in modern Western thought. The idea of progress could be revealed both as a historical fact and as a moral ideal. From the aspect of progress as a historical fact, the idea of progress is "an interpretation of history." But from the aspect of progress as a moral ideals, it becomes "a dynamic power." The doctrines of vast ideal forces devoured people by confining their knowledge of the past, by coding their present behavior, and by directing their chase to the future. Accordingly, one the deepest human desires is to find an unitary pattern in which the whole of experience, past, present and future, actual possible and unfulfilled, is symmetrically ordered. However, the idea of progress is itself a product of history. The rise and fall of an idea is caused by the intellectual and cultural transformation in history. The idea of progress has inspirited most of the great political and intellectual movements for two hundred years. But it declines and even becomes an exploded myth in the last century. The idea of progress has inspirited most of the great political and intellectual movements for two hundred years. But it declines and even becomes an exploded myth in the last century. The idea of progress is not only a kind of idea to be study as a historical phenomenon, but also as a category of historiography. The essay discusses both history and historiography, especially emphasizes the tension between the moral ideal and the historical fact in its history. The essay reveals the historical, intellectual and cultural transformations in the twentieth century, the destructive challenge faced by the idea of progress, the disillusion of the progressive myth, and the new perspective of world history.
期刊論文
1.Geyer, Michael、Bright, Charles(1995)。World History in a Global Age。The American Historical Review,100(4),1034-1060。  new window
2.(2001)。歷史:理論與批評。歷史:理論與批評,2,95-104。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fisher, A. L.(1946)。History of European Ideas。History of European Ideas,5。  new window
圖書
1.Brennan, Timothy(1997)。At Home in the World: Cosmopolitanism Now。Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard UP。  new window
2.Stoianovich, Traian(1976)。French Historical Method: The Annales Paradigm。Ithaca。  new window
3.(1987)。觀念史大辭典。觀念史大辭典。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Breisach, Ernst A.(1994)。Historiography: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern。Chicago。  new window
5.Hobsbawm, Eric J.(1996)。極端的年代:1914-1991。臺北:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
6.Popper, Karl R.(1964)。The Poverty of Historicism。New York。  new window
7.Jenkins, Keith(1991)。Re-thing History。London。  new window
8.Evans, Richard J.(1997)。In Defence of History。In Defence of History。London。  new window
9.Carr, E. H.(1961)。What is History?。New York:Vintage Books。  new window
10.Appleby, Joyce、Hunt, Lynn、Jacob, Margaret、薛絢(1996)。歷史的真相。正中。  延伸查詢new window
11.Said, Edward W.、王志弘、王淑燕、郭菀玲、莊雅仲、游美惠、游常山(1999)。東方主義。臺北:立緒文化。  延伸查詢new window
12.Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1996)。The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order。Simon & Schuster Company, Inc.。  new window
13.Fukuyama, Francis、李永熾(1993)。歷史之終結與最後一人。臺北:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.Berlin, Isaiah(1986)。二十世紀的政治理念。自由四論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.Barraclough, G.(1964)。An Introduction to Contemporary History。An Introduction to Contemporary History。London。  new window
16.Pollard, Sidney(1968)。The Idea of Progress-History and Society。The Idea of Progress-History and Society。London。  new window
17.Berlin, Isaiah(1954)。Historical Invitability。Historical Invitability。Oxford。  new window
18.O'Brien, Conor Cruise(1995)。Enlightenment under Threat。History and the Idea of Progress。Ithaca/London。  new window
19.梁漱溟(1983)。《唯識述義》序文。東西文化及其哲學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.Hobsbawm, Eric J.(1997)。Has History Made Progress?。On History。London。  new window
21.Costello, Paul(1994)。World Historians and Their Goals: Twentieth Century Answers to Modernism。World Historians and Their Goals: Twentieth Century Answers to Modernism。Dekalb。  new window
22.Mazlish, Bruce(1998)。Crossing Boundaries: Ecumenical, World and Global History。World History: Ideologies, Structures, and Identities。Massachusetts。  new window
23.McNeill, William H.(1998)。The Changing Shape of World History。World History: Ideologies, Structures, and Identities。Massachusetts。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE