:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區勞力市場分隔之探討:流動表分析
書刊名:臺灣社會學刊
作者:黃毅志 引用關係
作者(外文):Hwang, Yih-jyh
出版日期:2001
卷期:25
頁次:頁157-200
主題關鍵詞:新結構論勞力市場分隔公私部門New structuralismLabor market segmentationPublic and private sector
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(29) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:26
  • 共同引用共同引用:542
  • 點閱點閱:549
本研究根據新結構論的架構,運用1992年「台灣地區社會變遷調查階層組」的資料,以流動表分析,試圖回答下列問題:(1) 台灣是否存在界線分明、互相流動程度很低的雙元或多元勞力市場?(2) 這些勞力市場彼此如何分隔?研究結果顯示:台灣的勞力市場的確存在著分隔的現象,不同勞力市場之間有明顯的流動障礙,而其主要的界線在於公私部門之間。雖然在以行業為分界的核心與邊陲經濟部門、老闆與受雇者的階級分界間,也同樣存在著流動障礙,但不若公私部門之間的流動障礙明顯。同時,我們也發現公司規模並未形成勞力市場分隔的基礎,大公司與小公司之間仍存在著許多流動機會。本文在理論上呼應了新結構論的觀點,將勞力市場引入社會階層化研究。相信此研究取向,可對台灣傳統以地位取得模型為基礎的階層化研究予以補充。
Using the 1992 Taiwan Social Change Survey data (stratification section), we confront the following questions from a New Structuralism perspective: (1) In Taiwan, are there clear-cut dual or multiple labor markets with a low inter-sector mobility rate? (2) How and to what extent is the labor market segmented in Taiwan? The empirical results indicate that segmented labor markets do exist in Taiwan, and that the barriers are quite significant. This is especially true between the public and private sectors. Although there are mobility barriers between core and periphery industries, and between employers and employees, these are not as crucial as those between the public and private sectors. Further, we find that the size of a firm does not affect its reflection of Taiwan's labor market segmentation. Workers flowthrough big and small firms alike. In sum, this paper, which corresponds with the New Structuralism perspective, emphasizes the importance of structural features of the labor market. We believe that this approach should be able to supplement the social stratification research based on the traditional status attainment model in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Kalleberg, A. L.、Barara, F. R.、Ken, H.(2000)。Bad Jobs in America: Standard and Nonstandard Employment Relation and Job Quality in United States。American Sociological Review,65(2),257-278。  new window
2.Sakamoto, Arthur、Powers, Daniel A.(1995)。Education and the Dual Labor Market for Japanese Men。American Sociological Review,60(2),222-246。  new window
3.黃毅志(20011000)。臺灣地區多元勞力市場的事業成就之比較分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,11(4),356-370。  延伸查詢new window
4.Jacobs, Jerry(1983)。Industrial Sector and Career Mobility Reconsidered。American Sociological Review,48,415-421。  new window
5.Snipp, C. Matthew(1985)。Occupational Mobility and Social Class: Insights from Men's Career Mobility。American Sociological Review,50(4),475-493。  new window
6.林忠正、洪財隆(19920400)。臺灣地區勞工流動之研究。企銀季刊,15(4),1-22。  延伸查詢new window
7.Lin, Nan、Bian, Yanjie(1991)。Getting Ahead in Urban China。American Journal of Sociology,97(3),657-688。  new window
8.Villemez, Wayne J.、Bridges, William P.(1988)。When Bigger is Better: Differences in the Individual-Level Effect of Firm and Establishment Size。American Sociological Review,53,237-255。  new window
9.Serensen, Aage B.(1990)。Throwing the Sociologists Out? A Reply to Smith。American Sociological Review,55,842-845。  new window
10.Sakamoto, Arthur、Chen, Meichu D.(1991)。Inequality and Attainment in a Dual Labor Market。American Sociological Review,56(3),295-308。  new window
11.Mare, Robert D.(1991)。Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating。American Sociological Review,56(1),15-32。  new window
12.張苙雲(19890800)。行政組織內的個人事業生涯發展。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,66,1-30。  延伸查詢new window
13.張晉芬(19931200)。企業組織中升遷機會的決定及員工的期望:兼論內部勞動市場理論的應用。人文及社會科學集刊,6(1),205-230。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Wright, E. O.、Perrone, L.(1977)。Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality。American Sociological Review,42(1),32-55。  new window
15.熊瑞梅、黃毅志(19921200)。社會資源與小資本階級。中國社會學刊,16,107-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Hamilton, G. G.、Biggart, N. W.(1988)。Market, Culture, Authority: a Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East。American Journal of Sociology,94(Supplement),52-94。  new window
17.Bluestone, Barry(1970)。The Tripartite Economy: Labor Markets and the Working Poor。Poverty and Human Resources Abstracts,5(4),15-35。  new window
18.Hodson, Randy D.(1978)。Labor in the Monopoly, Competitive, and State Sectors of Production。Politics and Society,8,429-480。  new window
19.Hodson, Randy、Kaufman, Robert L.(1982)。Economic Dualism: A Critical Review。American Sociological Review,47(6),727-739。  new window
20.Kalleberg, Arne L.、Sørenson, Aage B.(1979)。The Sociology of Labor Markets。Annual Review of Sociology,5(1),351-379。  new window
21.Beck, E. M.、Horan, Patrick M.、Tolbert, Charles M. II(1978)。Stratification in a Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Determination。American Sociological Review,43,704-720。  new window
22.Tolbert, C.(1982)。Industrial Segmentation and Men Career Mobility。American Sociological. RevieM,47(4),pp. 457-477。  new window
23.Chang, Chin-Fen、Parcel, Toby L.、Mueller, Charles W.(1988)。Economic Segmentation in Taiwan: A Comparative Study with the United States。Sociological Focus,21(4),349-369。  new window
24.Kaufman, R.、Hodson, R.、Fligstein, N. D.(1981)。Defrocking Dualism: A New Approach to Defining Industrial Sectors。Social Science Research,10,1-31。  new window
25.Tolbert, Charles M. II、Horan, Patrick M.、Beck, E. M.(1980)。The Structure of Economic Segmentation: A Dual Economy Approach。American Journal of Sociology,85,1095-1116。  new window
26.瞿海源(19830600)。勞力市場與出身對成就之影響。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,53,133-153。  延伸查詢new window
27.Rosenfeld, Rachel A.(1992)。Job Mobility and Career Processes。Annual Review of Sociology,18,39-61。  new window
28.謝國雄(19890600)。黑手變頭家--臺灣製造業中的階級流動。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(2),11-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.徐進鈺(19990900)。流動的鑲嵌:新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展。臺灣社會研究季刊,35,75-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.譚令蒂、于若蓉(19960600)。雙元勞動市場模型的應用--兼論臺灣婦女就業結構的改變。經濟論文叢刊,24(2),275-311。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Kerckhoff, Alan C.(1995)。Institutional arrangements and stratification processes in industrial societies。Annual Review of Sociology,21(1),323-347。  new window
32.張晉芬(19990700)。私有化符合誰的利益?:檢視臺灣公營事業所有權移轉的社會效果。臺灣社會學研究,3,115-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.曾敏傑(19980300)。臺灣核心與邊陲產業的分類--一九九○年代初期的靜態測量。東吳社會學報,7,361-394。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Hout, Michael、Sobel, Michael E.、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1985)。Exchange, Structure, and Symmetry in Occupational Mobility。American Sociological Review,91,359-372。  new window
35.Petersen, T.、Morgan, L. A.(1996)。Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap。American Journal of Sociology,102(1),329-365。  new window
36.Smith, M. R.(1990)。What Is New 'New Structuralist' Analyses of Earnings?。American Sociological Review,55,827-845。  new window
37.Hauser, R. M.(1980)。On "Stratification in a Dual Economy": A Comment on Beck, Horan, and Tolbert, 1978。American Sociological Review,45(4),702-712。  new window
38.Bearman, P. S.、Deane, G.(1992)。The Structure of Opportunity: Middle-Class Mobility in England, 1548-1689。American Journal of Sociology,98(1),30-66。  new window
39.Cheng, M. M.、Kalleberg, A. N.(1997)。Labor Market Structure in Japan: An Analysis of Organization and Occupational Mobility Patterns。Social Forces,74(4),1235-1260。  new window
40.Granovetter, Mark(1984)。Small is Bountiful: Labor Markets and Establishment Size。American Sociological Review,49(3),323-334。  new window
41.Guest, A. M.、Landale, N. S.、McCann, J. C.(1989)。Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in the Late 19th Century United States。Social Forces,68(2),351-378。  new window
42.Lincoln, J. R.、Kalleberg, A. L.(1988)。The Structure of Earnings Inequality in the United States and Japan。American Journal of Sociology,94,121-153。  new window
43.Van Buren, M. E.、Kalleberg, A. L.(1996)。Is Bigger Better? Explaining the Relationship between Organization Size and Job Rewards。American Sociological Review,61(1),47-66。  new window
44.Reskin, Barbara F.、McBrier, Debra B.(2000)。Why Not Ascription? Organizations' Employment of Male and Female Managers。American Sociological Review,65(2),210-233。  new window
45.Stier, H.、Grusky, D. B.(1990)。A Overlapping Persistence Model of Career Mobility。American Sociological Review,55,736-756。  new window
46.Stolzenberg, R. M.(1975)。Occupations, Labor Markets and the Process of Wage Attainment。American Sociological Review,40,645-665。  new window
47.Western, Mark、Wright, Erik Olin(1994)。The Permeability of Class Boundaries to Intergenerational Mobility among Men in the United States, Canada, Norway and Sweden。American Sociological Review,59(4),606-629。  new window
會議論文
1.陳志柔(1995)。族群、生涯發展、和工作流動:經濟部門流動過程的族群差異。「變遷中的臺灣社會:第二次台灣地區社會變遷基本調查」國際研討會。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.李誠(1979)。臺灣地區勞動市場功能的實證研究。臺北。935-990。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃毅志(1997)。出身背景、勞力市場分割與事業發展。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.瞿海源(1993)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計劃:第二期第四次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 82-0301-H-001-050-B1)。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gates, H.(1987)。Chinese Working Class Lives。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.。  new window
2.Goldthorpe, John H.、Llewellyn, Catriona、Payne, Clive(1980)。Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
3.Averitt, Robert T.(1968)。The Dual Economy: The Dynamics of American Industry Structure。New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Co., Inc.。  new window
4.許嘉猷(1992)。社會階層化與社會流動。台北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Blau, Peter Michael、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupational Structure。New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
6.陳介玄(19940000)。協力網絡與生活結構:台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。Opportunity and Change。New York:Academic Books。  new window
8.張晉芬(1994)。產業性別職業隔離的檢驗與分析。美國與臺灣社會結構研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭讚源(1995)。連接結構與個人-美國天主教會中組織人口與組織內地位取得之多層級分析。美國與臺灣社會結構研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.林忠正(1989)。威權體制下弱勢團體互相剝削的循環:臺灣經濟體系的解剖。壟斷與剝削:威權主義的政治經濟分析。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.嚴祥鸞(1995)。美國高學歷科技人才的就業型態與薪資報酬:性別差異之分析。美國與台灣社會結構研究。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.周添城(1989)。權力邊陲的中小企業。壟斷與剝削。臺北:臺灣研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫清山、黃毅志(1995)。教育、收入與社會資源和階級取得過程之關連。台灣社會研究的回顧與前瞻。台中:東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫清山、黃毅志(1997)。台灣階級結構:流動表與網絡表的分析。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
5.謝雨生(1994)。臺灣社會地位取得之城鄉差異及變遷。發展與不平等:大陸與臺灣之社會階層與流動。香港:香港中文大學亞太研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭新煌、徐正光(1996)。瞭解臺灣的社會與國家。臺灣的國家與社會。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE