:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:玉山國家公園塔塔加地區垃圾分類資源回收調查研究
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:林明瑞 引用關係吳忠宏 引用關係詹聖惠
作者(外文):Lin, Min-rayWu, Homer C.Chan, Shen-hui
出版日期:2001
卷期:15
頁次:頁101-134
主題關鍵詞:垃圾分類資源回收生態旅遊區國家公園Solidwastes sortingResources recyclingEcotourismNational park
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:23
     旅遊區的垃圾問題一直是最為人所詬病的環境衛生問題。塔塔加地區為重要的自然生態旅遊區之一,故若垃圾分類、資源回收工作法有做好,將有損國家的形象,更甚而影響自然生態之安危。本研究主要是探討玉山國家公園塔塔加地區之垃圾產生量、資源垃圾種類、垃圾分類及資源回收之情形,並提出有效的對策,供有關單位參考。研究方法主要以各種資源垃圾量之搜集、遊客問卷調查及實地訪查等方式來進行。研究結果發現,遊客中經常接觸環保知識者高達44.7%,而在家經常從事垃圾分類、資源回收者,亦高達58.3%,超過九成的遊客贊成或非常贊推動垃圾分類、資源回收的工作;前來玉山國家公園塔塔加地區的遊客,所從事的遊憩活動則多為欣賞大自然、登山健行及休閒遊憩;所攜帶的食物中,以寶特瓶及塑膠瓶(罐)飲料為最多;遊客對產生垃圾之處理方式以分類丟棄於資源回收桶最;而資源垃圾主要回收的種類為寶特瓶、塑膠瓶(罐)及塑膠餐具最多;被認為是解決該區垃圾問題之最有效方法,第一為「垃圾分類、資源回收」,其次為「垃圾減量」及「加強教育宣傳」;再者,約有八~九成之\遊客對塔塔加地后之資源品收設施感到滿意或非常滿意;至於垃圾分類、資源回收工作該由何處做起之部份,則以「由每個人做起」最為重要。根據玉山國家公園管理處所提供之資源回收報表,其回收量比率有逐漸增加之趨勢,故在垃圾分類、資源回收之工作已達一定之成效。本研究小組建議應增加此地及每一分區處資源回收桶之數量,使每一個遊憩點至少都有一組資源回收桶,以暢通遊客之資源回收管道;考慮加強宣導風景區之遊客「垃圾自行帶回家處理」之觀念,以確保自然生態環境及環境整潔之維繫,並藉以達到垃圾減量之目的;對於塔塔加地區地圾分類及資源回收實施策略及方法,可再研究改善,並研擬更好的方案斿行之。
      Trash is one of the critical environmental hygiene issues in Taiwna's recreational areas. Ta-Ta-Chia area is an important natural area for ecotourism at Yushan National Park, if classification and recycling of the slid waste were not properly handled, it would be a shame to our country and a crisis for our natural environment. The research was intended to study the quantities and categories of the solid waste, as well as the practices of the resources recycling at Yushan National Park, so that effective strategies could be proposed. Date-collecting of solid waste in the field, visitor questionnaires, and personal interview were conducted in the research. The survey revealed 44.7% of the visitors are constantly in contact with environmental-protection knowledge, and 58.3% of the respondents are constantly practicing of the resources recycling at home. More than 90% of the visitors favored or very solid waste sorting and resource recycle. Most visitors participated in the activities such as sightseeing, climbing and hiking, and leisure or recreational events at the park. PET bottles and plastic bottles were the most seen beverages carried by the visitors. It was frequently taken by the visitors that solid wastes sorted and put into various kinds of resources-recycling tanks. Most of the food carried by visitors were the beverages contained by PET bottles, plastic bottles (cans). The effective way to handle the solid waste in the Ta-Ta-Chia area were as follows: First of all, sorting and recycling; Secondly, solid waste reduction and education enhancement. More than 80% of the respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with practices of recycling resources in the area. As to the responsibility for recycling, most visitors recognized individual is the most important factor. According to the resources recycling reports by Yushan National Park Headquater, the recycling ration was significantly increased after the program implement, the current programs of solid waste sorting and resources recycling have achieved certain effectiveness. The following recommendations are proposed to promote the effectiveness of solid wastes sorting and resources recycling at Yushan National Park. 1.To increase the numbers of resources recycling tanks at the park. 2.To place at least one set of resources recycling tanks at each recreational precinct. 3.To advocate the concept of "All Pack In and All Pack Out". 4.To evaluate the suitability of the resources-recycling program currently implemented in the Ta-Ta-Chia area.
期刊論文
1.呂理德(19980500)。垃圾問題面面觀。環境教育季刊,36,44-49。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳永仁(19980500)。回收標誌與環境教育。環境教育季刊,36,58-62。  延伸查詢new window
3.杜瑞澤(19960100)。綠色設計資源回收系統之研究。工業設計,25(1)=92,10-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.車參賢、葉國樑(19961200)。臺北市國中生資源回收的知識、態度、行為相關研究。學校衛生,29,62-73。  延伸查詢new window
5.方伊驛(19961100)。與垃圾為伍的工作者--資源回收業者。經濟前瞻,11(6)=48,129-134。  延伸查詢new window
6.方伊驛(19961100)。與資源回收業者座談:業者要求落實回收政策。經濟前瞻,11(6)=48,136-137。  延伸查詢new window
7.呂理德(19970100)。立法院加速修法--廢棄物清理法內容翻新。環耕,5,28-29。  延伸查詢new window
8.林致信、姚臺珍(19960600)。大專校園實施資源回收垃圾減量之研究--以大仁藥專為例。學校衛生,28,15-26。  延伸查詢new window
9.柏雲昌、錢玉蘭(19970300)。資源回收面面觀--「一般廢棄物資源回收清除處理辦法系列座談會」。經濟前瞻,12(2)=50,129-137。  延伸查詢new window
10.柏雲昌、錢玉蘭(19970100)。維護臺灣環境清潔的尖兵--地方政府清潔隊。經濟前瞻,12(1)=49,125-133。  延伸查詢new window
11.胡孝年、阮琦雯(19960100)。資源回收業者看我國回收體系--專訪臺灣省廢棄物運銷合作社吳總經理招治[吳招治]。臺灣經濟研究月刊,19(1)=217,12-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳永仁(19960100)。我國資源回收現況。臺灣經濟研究月刊,19(1)=217,15-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳永仁、劉崑山(19980500)。我國垃圾處理課題及政策。環境教育季刊,36,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
14.蔡惠民(19970500)。垃圾資源回收(焚化)廠興建工程推動之回顧與展望。環境工程會刊,8(2),29-42。  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡惠民(19980500)。垃圾資源回收(焚化)廠興建工程。環境教育季刊,36,23-31。  延伸查詢new window
16.鄭一青(19961000)。資源回收--垃圾堆裡的大事業。天下雜誌,185,210-214+217。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄭宜媛、鄧嘉宛(19960900)。臺灣的綠點公司在那裡?專訪廢管處處長陳永仁。環耕,3,75-78。  延伸查詢new window
18.羅光達(19960100)。老莫的第二春在哪裡?--談我國資源回收的努力方向。臺灣經濟研究月刊,19(1)=217,55-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.羅興雍(19960900)。迎接21世紀,臺灣如何擘畫環保大計﹖--專訪環保署署長蔡勳雄。環耕,3,58-61。  延伸查詢new window
20.沈志修(19980500)。資源回收工作推動策略。環境教育季刊,36,32-36。  延伸查詢new window
21.葉國樑、楊冠政、汪靜明(19980500)。輔導國民中小學配合資源回收四合一計畫之探討。環境教育季刊,36,63-73。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.熊毅(1999)。佛教慈濟慈善事業基金會基隆地區推展資源回收之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃尹鏗(1996)。綠島地區生態觀光之發展:居民與遊客之態度分析(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.徐國士、黃文卿、游登良(1997)。國家公園概論。臺北市:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.推動「特定風景區資源回收管道推動計劃」成果報告,http://www.recycle.org.tw/polynews/poly14-1.htm。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE