The decade before prior to the outbreak of war with Japan was the golden age of Chinese education, particularly higher education. This article seeks to explore the higher education reform measures implemented by the Nationalist government, and thereby understand the foundation on which modern Chinese education developed. The Nationalist government established its capital at Nanjing in 1927 and drafted its Three principles of the People educational policy. This policy instituted a reform program for higher education, and proposed concrete reform measures for higher education Under the Three Principles of the People educational policy, in the decade before the outbreak of war higher education emphasized "practical science" related to the needs of national development, sought to improve the quality of higher education, and attempted to develop departments of the sciences, agriculture, engineering, and medicine. The following major reform measures were undertaken:(1) The enactment of university and college organic laws and regulations reformed the institutional system of higher education. (2) Restrictions on departments of literature and law, and the addition of more practical courses, balanced the department of departments and graduate institutes at universities. (3) Poorly-functioning institutes were closed or merged with other schools, subsidies provided to outstanding private schools, and money taken from the Boxer Rebellion indemnity payments used to expand higher education funding and improve quality of education. (4) The government drafted higher education graduation standards, stipulated instructor qualifications and teaching hors, and permitted universities to establish graduate institutes and expand their facilities and library collections, thereby improving teaching and research performance. Following the implementation of the government's higher education improvement measures, Chinese higher education achieved the following progress during the decade prior to the outbreak of war with Japan:(1) The enactment of relevant laws and regulations gave higher education a sound foundation for development. (2) A balance was achieved between the subjects of the sciences, agriculture, engineering, and medicine on one hand and literature, law, commerce, and education on the other. (3) Public and private higher education gradually achieved normal funding and subsidies. (4) The quality of education at private universities gradually came under government oversight. Nevertheless, the establishment of institutions of higher education during this period was still biased in favor of urban areas, particularly the in the eastern and northern parts of the country. Furthermore, there was a widespread lack of funding for national institutions of learning prior to 1933, and the resulting student unrest severely affected public order and the educational environment. Finally, curriculum planning paid little attention to the planning of curriculum and equipment within individual university departments, which affected teaching quality in higher education.