:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:三國外交使節之研究
書刊名:逢甲人文社會學報
作者:胡志佳
作者(外文):Hu, Chih-chia
出版日期:2001
卷期:2
頁次:頁159-186
主題關鍵詞:三國外交使節Diplomatic envoysThe three kingdomsDiplomacy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:26
外交與戰爭是國家處理國與國之間政治問題兩個主要的工具,前者是以談判來處理國與國之間的關係,而戰爭的爆發,則是象徵外交的失敗。三國鼎立之初,如何確保各領轄地之完整,如何強化內部之整頓與建設,是當務之急。於是各國之間的和平相處,是企望,也是必須的。在此考量之下,三國之間外交發展更勝於戰爭。 一般言,外交政策的發展與各政權內部發展情況有密切的關係,如曹魏政權,不論在曹操時期的挾天子以令諸侯,或曹丕以後掌握北方,擁有三國中最多的土地及資源,這些優勢使得曹魏在發展其外交策略時姿態較高,也因為實力雄厚,使其往往捨外交而直接取決於戰爭。反觀吳、蜀,在土地、人口甚至政治資本都不如曹魏的情勢下,往往必須透過結盟來制衡曹魏。但在曹魏勢力趨弱,或吳、蜀本國國勢強大的情況下,這種因現實政治利益而結合的盟約,很容易出現變化。 無論是例行性或是有特殊目的的交聘,其中最重要的就是「使節」的選派。一位優秀的使者,往往能為出使國爭取最大的利益。由於三國分合不定,使節在處理外交事務時充滿著困難與危險,所擔負的責任亦較重,是以三國所選派的使臣皆一時之選,口才、反應、文采以及對時局的瞭解為必備條件。自赤壁戰後,在魏、蜀、吳三個勢力互動中,有不少極佳的外交人才在三政權間縱橫。 本文希望透過對三國時期交聘史料的爬梳,一方面分析三國的外交背景,另一方面則展現三國時期使節所擔負的外交任務及使節選派的特色。
Diplomatic manipulation and wars were the two main tools that were used in dealing with political problems between two countries during the disunited period of the Three Kingdoms. The former was used to negotiate the conflict between kingdoms and the breakout of war was a symbol of diplomatic failure. During the earlier years of the Three Kingdoms, the priority for each kingdom was to ensure the complete control of its territories as well as to strengthen its internal construction and consolidation. Therefore, peace keeping was necessary and expected as well. Under these considerations, diplomacy was far more important than war. Generally speaking, for each kingdom there was a close relationship between the development of diplomatic policy and its internal stability. For example, Tsao Tsao and his son Tsao Pe had the control of the most fertile lands and bounteous resources among the Three Kingdoms. This advantageous position provided Tsao Wei with a higher hand in handling diplomatic policy with its rivalries. With solid backup behind them, Tsao Wei would go to war instead of seeking diplomatic solutions. On the other hand, without the abundant resources in land, population, and political power as Tsao Wei, Wu and Shu had to form an alliance to oppose Tsao Wei. However, this alliance, which was formed as a result of political gain and practicality, could change quickly whenever Tsao Wei lost its power or Wu and Shu gained strength. Whether the purpose was routine or goal-oriented diplomacy, the chosen diplomat would strive for the best interest of the country. Especailly during the period of disunity, most diplomats would face and deal with dangerous and difficult situations. Therefore, the diplomats during that period were very witty, talented, and literary gifted. Since the Battle of the Red Cliffs, the power struggle among Wei, Su, and Wu provided many skillful envoys with the opportunity to seek various allegiances among the Three Kingdoms. The purpose of this paper is, through the detailed research of the historical documents in diplomacy of the Three Kingdoms, to analyze the diplomatic background of the Three Kingdoms and to reveal the mission of the diplomats as well as the characteristics of choosing the proper envoys for the job.
期刊論文
1.尹韵公(1981)。從荊州爭奪看三國前期的外交鬥爭。文史哲,1981(5),37-42。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙國華(1997)。三國時期的吳蜀關係。華中師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),125,113-119。  延伸查詢new window
3.黎虎(1994)。孫權對遼東的經略。北京師範大學學報(社會科學版),1994(5)=125,41-47。  延伸查詢new window
4.黎虎(1999)。魏晉南北朝尚書主客曹及其外交管理職能。漢學研究,17(2),187-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.盧華語(1991)。蜀國兵力與諸葛亮北伐用兵考。北京師範學院學報,1991(2)=97,30-34。  延伸查詢new window
6.簡修瑋、莊輝明(1991)。東吳的基本國策與孫權的戰爭謀略。學術月刊,1991(2)=261,62-68。  延伸查詢new window
7.魏殿文(1997)。蜀漢將領東征探微。文史哲,1997(5)=112,123-125。  延伸查詢new window
8.矢野主稅(1976)。魏吳蜀の政治的社會的獨自性について。長崎大學教育學部社會科學論叢,25,1-27。  延伸查詢new window
9.谷口房男(1973)。三國時代の蠻について--孫吳の武陵蠻對策を中心として。白山史學,15/16,81-99。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭欽仁(19610331)。宋魏交聘表。大陸雜誌,22(6),18-23。  延伸查詢new window
11.朱紹侯(1991)。吳蜀荊州之爭與三國鼎立的形成。史學月刊,1991(1),14-24。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.司馬光、胡三省、楊家駱(1980)。新校資治通鑑注。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳壽(1974)。三國志。台北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.王仲犖(1979)。魏晉南北朝史。上海:古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄒文海(1970)。政治學。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.房玄齡(1979)。晉書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.常璩、劉琳(1984)。華陽國志。巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.錢儀吉(1991)。三國會要。上海:古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.傅啓學(1980)。中國古代外交史料彙編。台北:國立編譯館中華叢書編審委員會。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃寶實(1969)。中國歷代行人考。台北:台灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.韓國磐(1985)。魏晉南北朝史綱。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.盧弼(1981)。三國志集解。台北:漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.趙翼(1977)。廿二史劄記。台北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.傅樂成(1977)。荊州與六朝政局。漢唐史論集。聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄒雲濤(1986)。試論三國時期南北均勢的形成及其破壞。魏晉南北朝史研究。成都:四川省社會科學院出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE