:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論〈老子銘〉中的老子與太一
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:劉屹
作者(外文):Liu, Yi
出版日期:2003
卷期:21:1=42
頁次:頁77-103
主題關鍵詞:老子老子銘道教漢代太一LaoziInscription for LaoziTaoismHan dynastyTaiyi
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(3) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:89
     傳統觀點認為在漢代,老子已經被神格化為民間信仰乃至當時所謂「道教」的最高主神,但支持這一結論的幾條關鍵性材料卻面臨著重新定年和辨偽,因而這一觀點現在並非不可動搖。本文繼續了作者對此問題的系列考察,在對〈老子聖母碑〉和〈老子變化經〉做出考察之後,本文將從漢代宇宙生成論、太一在漢代民間信仰中的地位以及民間信仰歌舞祭神的角度,對傳統認為的延熹八年〈老子銘〉裡老子至尊神格地位提出質疑。認為當時的老子還不具備成為最高主神的條件,天神太一仍然是民間信仰的主神。由此還可確認,《老子想爾注》中以老子做為道教的主神「太上老君」,不應該是漢代的觀念。並希望通過這一例個案研究,提出道教形成史上的「天崇拜」與「道崇拜」之區分。
     Tradtionally, Laozi 老子 is seen as having become the most imprtant Taoist god by the end of Han dynasty. There are several pieces of evidence to support this conclusion, including the "Stele of the Holy Mother of Laozi" 老子聖母碑, the "Scripture of the Incarnations of Laozi" 老子變化經, and the "Inscription for Laozi" 老子銘. Recently, however, much of this material has come under re-examination. In this paper, I will follow up on previous studies of the "Stele of the Holy Mother of Laozi" and the "Scripture of the Incarnations of Laozi" and try to answer the question of who was the most important god in the "Inscription", Laozi or Taiyi 太一, by making reference to Han dynasty cosmogony, the role of Taiyi in the popular religion of the time, and folk religion rituals. I shall try to prove that most of the evidence that led scholars to believe that the "Inscription" represented the absolute deification of Laozi can be understood in another way. For example, the "Buddhist influences," which made many scholars think that Laozi had already been compared with Buddha, can actually be explained without any reference to Buddhist theories, using instead resources from ancient China. More importantly, using various sources, we can see that it was Taiyi, not Laozi, who was recognized as the supreme god both officially and unofficially, and especially in popular belief. In other words, Laozi had not yet obtained the status of the new highest god at the end of the Han. This conclusion will be useful in new discussions of the dating of the Xiang'er Commentary 想爾注, which treats Laozi as the supreme Taoist god but which is generally thought to have been produced by the Zhang family at the end of the Han period, and other topics in early Taoist history.
期刊論文
1.王維誠(1934)。老子化胡說考證。國學季刊,4(2),9-16。  延伸查詢new window
2.林富士(19960900)。「巫叩元絃」考釋--兼論音樂與中國的巫覡儀式之關係。新史學,7(3),195-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楠山春樹(1956)。?韶?老子銘????。東方宗教,11,41-60。  延伸查詢new window
4.大淵忍爾(1959)。老子道德經序訣成立(上)。東洋學報,42(1),38。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉屹(2001)。敦煌本老子變化經研究之二:成書年代考訂。敦煌研究,2001(4),138-144。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉國鈞(1936)。老子神化考略。金陵學報,4(2),64。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.歐陽修(1977)。集古錄跋尾。台北市:新文豐出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Maspero, Henri(1978)。道教。東京。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧國龍(1997)。道教哲學。華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.山田利明(1999)。六朝道教儀禮の研究。東京:東方書店。  延伸查詢new window
5.施蟄存(1987)。水經注碑錄。天津:天津古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王昶(1985)。金石萃編。中國書店。  延伸查詢new window
7.趙明誠。金石錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.李昉(1960)。太平御覽。台北:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.胡孚琛(1995)。太上老君、王屋山洞。中華道教大辭典。北京:中國社會科學院出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.安居香山、中村璋八(1994)。緯書集成。河北人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭慶藩、郭象、王孝魚、莊子(1961)。莊子集釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.桓寬、王利器(1992)。鹽鐵論校注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.于吉、王明(1960)。太平經合校。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.洪适(1985)。隸釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.干寶、汪紹楹(1979)。搜神記。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳垣、陳智超、曾慶瑛(1988)。道家金石略。文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.張魯、饒宗頤(1991)。老子想爾注校證。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.Seidel, Anna K.(1969)。La divinisation de Lao tseu dans le taoisme des Han。École française d'Extrême-Orient。  new window
19.王充、黃暉、劉盼遂(1990)。論衡校釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.列禦寇、張湛、楊伯峻(1979)。列子集釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.蕭統、李善(1977)。文選。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
22.墨翟、孫詒讓、孫以楷(1986)。墨子閒詁。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.應劭、王利器(1981)。風俗通義校注。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉安、高誘、何寧(1998)。淮南子集釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.費振剛、胡雙寶、宗明華(1993)。全漢賦。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.王卡(2002)。敦煌本老子節解殘頁考釋。敦煌吐魯番研究(第六卷)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
27.武內義雄(1975)。老子?研究。老子?研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
28.吉岡義豐(1959)。道教?佛教(第一)。道教?佛教(第一)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
29.福井康順(1982)。道教?展開。道教?展開。東京。  延伸查詢new window
30.Kohn, Livia(1998)。God of the Dao: Lord Lao in History and Myth。God of the Dao: Lord Lao in History and Myth。Ann Arbor。  new window
31.劉屹(2000)。敦煌本老子變化經研究之一:漢末成書說質疑。吳其昱先生八秩華誕敦煌學特刊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
32.陳麗桂(1995)。漢代氣化宇宙論及其影響。道家文化研究(第八輯)。上海。  延伸查詢new window
33.福井康順(1962)。《文始內傳》考。東方學會創立十五周年記念東方學論集。東京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(劉宋)范曄。後漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(劉宋)范曄(1980)。後漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(北魏)酈道元(1990)。水經注,上海。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1988)。道藏。  延伸查詢new window
5.(東漢)蔡邕。蔡中郎文集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.史記,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.趙幼文(1984)。趙幼文校注,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(東漢)班固(1992)。白虎通義,長春。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1980)。尚書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1980)。周禮,北京。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1980)。爾雅,北京。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1980)。春秋公羊傳,北京。  延伸查詢new window
13.(東漢)王符。潛夫論。  延伸查詢new window
14.三國志,北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.(唐)釋道宣。廣弘明集。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE