Tradtionally, Laozi 老子 is seen as having become the most imprtant Taoist god by the end of Han dynasty. There are several pieces of evidence to support this conclusion, including the "Stele of the Holy Mother of Laozi" 老子聖母碑, the "Scripture of the Incarnations of Laozi" 老子變化經, and the "Inscription for Laozi" 老子銘. Recently, however, much of this material has come under re-examination. In this paper, I will follow up on previous studies of the "Stele of the Holy Mother of Laozi" and the "Scripture of the Incarnations of Laozi" and try to answer the question of who was the most important god in the "Inscription", Laozi or Taiyi 太一, by making reference to Han dynasty cosmogony, the role of Taiyi in the popular religion of the time, and folk religion rituals. I shall try to prove that most of the evidence that led scholars to believe that the "Inscription" represented the absolute deification of Laozi can be understood in another way. For example, the "Buddhist influences," which made many scholars think that Laozi had already been compared with Buddha, can actually be explained without any reference to Buddhist theories, using instead resources from ancient China. More importantly, using various sources, we can see that it was Taiyi, not Laozi, who was recognized as the supreme god both officially and unofficially, and especially in popular belief. In other words, Laozi had not yet obtained the status of the new highest god at the end of the Han. This conclusion will be useful in new discussions of the dating of the Xiang'er Commentary 想爾注, which treats Laozi as the supreme Taoist god but which is generally thought to have been produced by the Zhang family at the end of the Han period, and other topics in early Taoist history.