我國行政程序法第96條第1項第4款之「大量行政處分」、第97條第3款之「大量作成之同種類行政處分」與第103條第1款之「大量作成同種類之處分」，其意義均相當於德國公法學上「不真正之公眾程序」(unechte Massenverfahren)所作成之處分，概念上可以「大量行政處分」稱之。我國訴願法第78條所規定之「程序合併」、行政訴訟法第37條第1項第3款規定之「普通共同訴訟」，其程序標的即為大量行政處分，該等制度之目的，即在於克服大量訴願與大量行政訴訟之程序不經濟與可能的決定不一致問題。反之，我國行政程序法第27條規定之「多數共同利益當事人程序」、訴願法第21條規定之「共同訴願」及行政訴訟法第39條規定之必要共同訴訟，如程序當事人﹙特別是原告與參加人﹚數量不尋常之大，即相當於德國公法學上「真正之大眾程序」(echte Massenverfahren)，在概念上可以「大眾程序」稱之，有關制度之目的，即在於克服「大眾訴願」與「大眾行政訴訟」﹙有別於民眾或公眾訴願與行政訴訟﹚應踐行程序之過巨所導致之負擔過重與不經濟問題。 我國法制對於大量行政處分，分別採取機關首長簽章、理由說明與當事人陳述意見等之減省制度；對於大眾程序，即分別採取選定或指定當事人、程序合併、共同訴願與共同訴訟與參加等制度。德國法制對於學說所稱「真正之大眾程序」，分別採取「聽證減省」、「公告代替送達」、「擬制共同代表人」、「選任共同代表人」與「指定共同代表人」之制度，訴訟上並採取「範例訴訟」 (Musterprozes)之制度，以克服大量程序所生之勞費。

Abstract The massive administrate act ( abr. as maa in following) has been one concept of our positive administrative law. There are many different names used for this concept. Maa can be divided into two kinds, one is the real maa , the other is the unreal maa . The general administrative act and the administrative act against many opposites belong to the real maa , whereas the administrative act with same kind of regulation in tremendous number belongs to unreal maa . The issuing of a maa will confront the economy and concurrence, the additional period for non local residents etc. For the sake of maa , the federal administrative procedural law (Bundesverwaltungsverfahrensgesetz, VwVfG) of Germany established the system of selection & appointment of general representative and the administrative litigation law (Verwaltungsgerichts- ordnung, VwGO) of the same nation also introduced the same system, the model litigation pattern (Musterprozes) and the form of public publication (Veroffentlichung als Bekanntgabe) as a special form of notice to the party in order to conquer the difficulties out of the massive administrative behavior(it does not limited to maa ).The administrative procedural law of the R.O.C. stipulates not only the system of selection and appointment of the party, but also the systems of exemption of signature, reasoning and the bestowal of oral statement to the parties for the administrative acts issued by automatic establishments. There is a system of selection and appointment of general representatives in the administrative appeal law and administrative litigation law in R.O.C. too. However, there is discrepancy between the theory and the practice concerning the permission of model litigation against the maa . Although I don't worry about its constutionality, but I think a literal regulation will be welcomed and would be better.