:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:典範的選擇--論王夫之學術地位的升降
書刊名:國立彰化師範大學文學院學報
作者:黃忠慎 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Zhong-shen
出版日期:2004
卷期:3
頁次:頁1-16
主題關鍵詞:清代三大儒王夫之船山先生典範船山全書經學史詩經學史漢學宋學Three great confucians of the early QingWang FuzhiChuanshan XianshengParadigmThe complete works of Wang ChuanshanHistory of the confucian classicsHistory of Shijing learningHan learningSong learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:632
  • 點閱點閱:19
王夫之在世時遠居山林,埋首著述,聲名不出於鄉里。但是在許多學者的推介與闡述之下,王夫之在學術史上的地位越昇越高,由一位鄉野學人,至清末已經成為所謂清初三大家之一典範學者。至今,王夫之的學術地位依舊崇隆,尤其是在大陸學界更將王夫之視為清朝哲學發展的高峰。我們不能否認王夫之本身的學術研究成績是形成其崇高學術地位與聲譽的主因,但是或許有其他的因素或環境影響學術史對王夫之的描述、建構與定位。 在觀察過學術史上對王夫之的意見論述之後,我們對王夫之學術地位的升降提出另一種思考角度:王夫之的學術地位會因為學術風氣趨重差異,而有或昇或降的情況出現。也就是說當後代學者選擇學術研究的「典範」時,王夫之龐雜的治學領域與分立並治的研究方式,會讓學者很容易因其所重,而擇其所愛。因此,本文認為,王夫之學術地位的變動應該受到當時學術風氣與學者主觀偏愛的因素所影響。
Wang Fuzhi dedicated his life to writing. However, during his lifetime, he led such a reclusive life that his learning was virtually unknown beyond his hometown. It was only later, when scholars began introducing and expounding his works, that Wang's place in the history of Chinese scholarship attained its stature. By the end of the Qing Dynasty, Wang, the former unknown local scholar, had become one of three paradigmatic Confucian scholars of the early Qing Period. At present, Wang Fuzhi remains to be held in high esteem, especially by mainland Chinese scholars who see Wang as the climax of the development of philopsophy during the Qing dynasty. We cannot deny that Wang's own body of achievements is the major reason for his scholarly greatness and prestige. However, there were perhaps other reasons or environmental factors involved that influenced the description, construction and appreciation of Wang Fuzhi's place in intellectual history. Upon looking into the various accounts on Wang Fuzhi in history, we offer another perspective on the rise and fall of his prestige in scholarly estimation. We suggest that academic climate (that is, the prevailing scholarly emphasis of certain periods) was a determining factor in the rise and fall of Wang's prestige. In other words, as scholars of later generations selected a research “paradigm,” Wang's multifarious area of research and methodology would tend to lead them to be selective and narrowly focused on their personal research interest. This paper holds that the changing scholarly standing of Wang Fuzhi in history had been influenced by the varying academic climates and the subjective preferences of different scholars.
期刊論文
1.錢穆、王兆麟(1959)。晚明諸儒之學風與學術(續)--「明清學術」第四講。新亞生活雙周刊,2(13)。  延伸查詢new window
2.何冠彪(19900600)。顧炎武、黃宗羲、王夫之合稱清初三大儒考--兼說清初四大儒及五大儒之成員。故宮學術季刊,7(4),71-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.何冠彪(19910600)。顧炎武、黃宗羲、王夫之入祀文廟始末。漢學研究,9(1)=17,71-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.曾國藩、唐浩民(1987)。曾國藩全集。嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王闓運(1973)。湘綺樓日記。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱一新、呂鴻儒、張長法(2000)。無邪堂答問。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Barbour, Ian G.(1974)。Myths, Models and Paradigms: A Comparative Study in Science and Religion。London:SCM。  new window
5.王彬(1999)。清代禁書總述。北京:中國書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘宗洛(1996)。船山先生傳。長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.張岱年、劉鄂培(1992)。張岱年文集。清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gadamer, Hans-Georg、insheimer, Joel We、Marshall, Donald G.(1994)。Truth and Methods。New York:Continuum。  new window
9.周中孚(1965)。鄭堂讀書記。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.唐鑒(1985)。國朝學案小識。臺北:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.江藩、方東樹、錢鍾書(1998)。漢學師承記(外二種)。香港:北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
12.支偉成(1970)。清代樸學大師列傳。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
13.侯外盧(1992)。中國思想通史。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.張舜徽(1982)。清人文集別錄。臺北:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.本田成之(2001)。中國經學史。台北:廣文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.紀昀、永瑢(1974)。四庫全書總目。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.章太炎、朱維錚(1998)。訄書。三聯書店(香港)有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉獻廷、汪北平、夏志和(1957)。廣陽雜記。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.勞思光(1992)。新編中國哲學史。臺北市:三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.錢穆(1995)。中國近三百年學術史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
21.蔡尚思(1985)。王船山思想體系。湖南長沙:湖南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.梁啟超(1995)。中國近三百年學術史。臺北:里仁書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.張岱年(1982)。中國哲學史史料學。生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
24.周予同、朱維錚(1996)。周予同經學史論著選集。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.朱漢民(2004)。湖湘學派史論。湖南長沙:湖南大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林正弘(1988)。卡爾波柏與當代科學哲學的蛻變。伽利略.波柏.科學說明。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.余英時(1976)。近代紅學的發展與紅學革命。歷史與思想。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Massterman, Margaret(1970)。The nature of a paradigm。Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.全祖望(1979)。二曲先生乏石文。鲒埼亭集。台北:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.王之春。船山公年譜。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
6.錢林。文獻徵存錄。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭嵩燾(1968)。船山祠碑記。養知書屋文集。台北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.郭嵩燾(1970)。請以王夫之從祀文廟疏。道咸同光四朝奏議。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.俞樾(1968)。曲園襍纂。春在堂全書。台北:環球出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.嵇文甫(1987)。船山哲學。王船山學術論叢。台北:谷風出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.譚嗣同(1977)。三十自述。譚嗣同全集。台北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.魏源(1976)。詩古微序。魏源集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.葉德輝(1983)。致繆荃孫信。藝風堂友朋書札。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.王敔。薹齋公行述。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
15.章太炎(1977)。王夫之從祀與楊度參機要。章太炎政論選集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.譚嗣同(1977)。仁學。譚嗣同全集。台北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE