:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:對娶外籍與大陸媳婦的態度:社會接觸的重要性
書刊名:臺灣社會學
作者:伊慶春 引用關係章英華 引用關係
作者(外文):Yi, Chin-chunChang, Ying-hwa
出版日期:2006
卷期:12
頁次:頁191-232
主題關鍵詞:社會接觸社會距離外籍通婚族群態度政治態度Social contactSocial distanceCross-border marriagesEthnic attitudesPolitical attitudes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(26) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(6)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:26
  • 共同引用共同引用:655
  • 點閱點閱:590
本文擬檢視台灣新興族群關係中的外籍婚配現象,並以兒子娶外籍媳婦為例,藉由所表達對不同族群之外籍媳婦的社會距離,說明影響民眾族群親近感差異的重要因素。鑑於近年來族群關係的研究報告紛紛指出政治因素的優勢影響,甚至超越個人接觸機會所可能產生的效果,故本文主旨在釐清社會接觸相對於政治態度的影響效果。本文提出社會距離概念的適用性之後,即深入檢視社會接觸的理論基礎,強調影響族群接觸的不同效應之個人、團體和社會脈絡因素,進而比較社會接觸相對於政治態度對族群通婚態度之可能影響。研究假設指陳在考量社會接觸的不同類型後,應能證明對不同之族群通婚或婚姻社會距離會造成不同影響。本文分析資料取自2004年社會意向電話調查,該次調查一共訪問1,217 位20歲以上的成人樣本。以目前台灣人數最多的四類外籍新娘— 大陸人、東南亞華僑、越南人、越南以外的其他東南亞籍—為對象之分析結果顯示,政治態度雖然對通婚之社會距離感有重要影響,但社會接觸的顯著性亦同時得到證實。此外,個人社會接觸與政治態度的交互作用並不顯著,表示二者對族群態度皆有獨立的作用。回應本文主旨方面,一般表面的社會接觸經驗或是個人網絡中的實質接觸經驗,對於減低社會距離或促進族群親近感,仍然有其顯著效果,且視不同婚配對象而產生相應的效果,證實通婚對象之文化親近性和社會發展程度的重要性。本文最後強調社會接觸對影響個人族群態度—尤其是通婚接受度—的重要性,某種程度上呼應了傳統社會學的信念。
This paper examines an important aspect of the emergence of cross-border marriage in Taiwan. The social distance expressed toward four major types of foreign brides--Mainland Chinese, South East Asian Chinese, Vietnamese, and other countries in South East Asia--is examined in the hypothetical context of a son marrying the specified foreign bride. Since marriage in typical Chinese culture has been an important family matter, having a foreign daughter-in-law from the parents' perspective is a culturally significant situation. The theoretical framework is derived from the classical contact hypothesis with an intention to compare the relative importance between political factors versus social contact in explaining the marital social distance revealed. Data are taken from the 2004 Social Image Telephone Survey with a random, island-wide sample of 1,217 adults. Based on Bogardus's and Allport's hypothesis, social contact is categorized into general contact and true contact. The results indicate that, consistent with previous findings, political attitudes such as political inclination and ethnic evaluation are most salient, but both types of social contact significantly reduce the social distance toward different types of foreign brides. No possible negative effect from casual contact in terms of widening social distance is found. The importance of social contact in reducing ethnic antagonism is thus supported. Furthermore, the interaction between political factors and social contact does not reach significance for all types of foreign bride, and adding the interaction effect also does not alter significant relations found with various political indicators. The paper argues that the larger political social atmosphere provides opportunities of social contact between different ethnic groups and will thus serve as an effective mechanism contributing to better ethnic relations in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Zajonc, R. B.(1968)。Attitudinal effects of mere exposure。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,9(2)2,1-27。  new window
2.Bogardus, Emory S.(1926)。Mutations of Social Distance。Journal of Applied Sociology,10,77-84。  new window
3.Messick, D. M.、Mackie, D. M.(1989)。Intergroup relations。Annual Review of Psychology,40(1),45-81。  new window
4.趙彥寧(20040600)。現代性想像與國境管理的衝突:以中國婚姻移民女性為研究案例。臺灣社會學刊,32,59-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.釋自淳、夏曉鵑(20031200)。識字與女性培力--以「外籍新娘識字班」為例。臺灣教育社會學研究,3(2),41-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳端容、陳東升(20010600)。跨族群的社會連結:工具理性行動邏輯與社會結構的辯證。臺灣社會學刊,25,1-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張茂桂、蕭新煌、章英華(19871010)。大學生的「中國結」與「臺灣結」:自我認定與通婚觀念的分析。中國論壇,25(1)=289,34-55。  延伸查詢new window
8.王甫昌(19931200)。族群通婚的後果:省籍通婚對於族群同化的影響。人文及社會科學集刊,6(1),231-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.伊慶春、高淑貴(1986)。有關已婚婦女就業的性別角色態度。中央研究院三民主義研究所專題選刊,70,1-27。  延伸查詢new window
10.藍佩嘉(20050600)。階層化的他者:家務移工的招募、訓練與種族化。臺灣社會學刊,34,1-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.趙彥寧(20050900)。社福資源分配的戶籍邏輯與國境管理的限制:由大陸配偶的入出境管控機制談起。臺灣社會研究季刊,59,43-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王甫昌(20021200)。族群接觸機會?還是族群競爭?:本省閩南人族群意識內涵與地區差異模式之解釋。臺灣社會學,4,11-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Amir, Y.(1969)。Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations。Psychological Bulletin,71(5),319-342。  new window
14.王甫昌(19940400)。光復後臺灣漢人族群通婚的原因與形式初探。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,76,43-96。  延伸查詢new window
15.夏曉鵑(20010900)。「外籍新娘」現象之媒體建構。臺灣社會研究季刊,43,153-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王宏仁、張書銘(20031200)。商品化的臺越跨國婚姻市場。臺灣社會學,6,177-221。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳志柔、于德林(20051200)。臺灣民眾對外來配偶移民政策的態度。臺灣社會學,10,95-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王宏仁(20010300)。社會階層化下的婚姻移民與國內勞動市場:以越南新娘為例。臺灣社會研究季刊,41,99-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.蔡淑鈴(19940600)。臺灣之婚姻配對模式。人文及社會科學集刊,6(2),335-371。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.夏曉鵑(20000900)。資本國際化下的國際婚姻--以臺灣的「外籍新娘」現象為例。臺灣社會研究季刊,39,45-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Pettigrew, Thomas F.(1998)。Intergroup Contact Theory。Annual Review of Psychology,49(1),65-85。  new window
22.Powers, Daniel A.、Ellison, Christopher G.(1995)。Interracial Contact and Black Racial Attitudes: The Contact Hypothesis and Selectivity Bias。Social Forces,74(1),205-226。  new window
23.Jackman, Mary R.、Crane, Marie(1986)。'Some of My Best Friends Are Black...' Interracial Friendship and Whites' Racial Attitudes。Public Opinion Quarterly,50,459-486。  new window
24.章英華、伊慶春(2004)。從社會距離看臺灣的族群關係。香港社會學學報,5,119-137。  延伸查詢new window
25.Blau, Peter M.、Beeker, Carolyn、Fitzpatrick, Kevin M.(1984)。Intersecting Social Affiliations and Intermarriage。Social Forces,63(3),585-606。  new window
26.Bogardus, Emory S.(1925)。Social Distance and Its Origins。Journal of Applied Sociology,9,216-226。  new window
27.Cook, Stuart W.(1978)。Interpersonal and Attitudinal Outcomes in Cooperating Interracial Groups。Journal of Research and Development,12,97-113。  new window
28.Davis, James A.(1975)。Communism, Conformity, Cohorts, and Categories: American Tolerance in 1954 and 1972-73。American Journal of Sociology,81(3),491-513。  new window
29.Ford, W. S.(1986)。Favorable Intergroup Contact May Not Reduce Prejudice: Inconclusive Journal Evidence 1960-1984。Sociology and Social Research,70,256-258。  new window
30.Hamberger, J.、Hewstone, M.(1997)。Inter-ethnic Contact as a Predictor of Prejudice: Tests of a Model in Four West European Nations。British Journal of Social Psychology,36(2),173-190。  new window
31.Kinloch, G. C.(1981)。Comparative Race and Ethnic Relations。International Journal of Comparative Sociology,22,257-271。  new window
32.Kinloch, G. C.(1991)。Inequality, Repression, Discrimination and Violence: A Comparative Study。International Journal of Contemporary Sociology,28,85-98。  new window
33.Lieberson, Stanley、Waters, Mary(1985)。Ethnic Mixtures in the United States。Sociology and Social Research,70(1),43-52。  new window
34.Pagnini, Deanna L.、Morgan, S. Philip(1990)。Intermarriage and Social Distance among U.S. Immigrants at the Turn of the Century。American Journal of Sociology,96(2),405-432。  new window
35.Photiadis, John D.、Biggar, Jeanne(1962)。Religiosity, Education, and Ethnic Distance。American Journal of Sociology,67(6),666-672。  new window
36.Raden, David(1998)。American Blacks' and Whites' Preferred Social Distance from Jews。The Journal of Social Psychology,138(2),265-270。  new window
37.蔡瑞明、巫麗雪(2006)。Marrying Someone from an Outside Group: An Analysis of Boundary-crossing Marriages。Current Sociology,54(2),165-186。  new window
38.Wilson, Thomas C.(1996)。Cohort and Prejudice: Whites' Attitudes toward Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and Asians。Public Opinion Quarterly,60(2),253-274。  new window
會議論文
1.章英華、黃毅志(1999)。婚配與朋友核心網絡之變遷 : 1970與1990年代的比較。臺灣社會的個人網絡 : 第三次社會變遷基本調查研討會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.唐文慧、蔡雅玉(2000)。全球化下的臺灣越南新娘現象初探。全球化下的社會學想像:國家、經濟與社會學術研討會,國立臺灣大學社會學系 。臺北:國立臺灣大學社會學系。  延伸查詢new window
3.伊慶春、章英華、楊文山、呂玉瑕、吳齊殷(2005)。家庭研究組綜合報告。0。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊靜利、陳寬政(2004)。臺灣教育擴張與婚姻變遷。0。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳玉華(2006)。For Love or for Bread? Reproductive and Productive Roles Experienced by Non-Taiwanese Wives。0。  new window
6.Tepperman, Lorne、伊慶春(2005)。The Social Basis of Mate Selection in Taiwan: A Changing Trend in Three Decades。0。  new window
7.Yang, Wen-San(2006)。Gender Imbalances and Trends in Marriage and Family Household Composition in Taiwan。0。  new window
學位論文
1.鄭雅雯(2000)。南洋過台灣:東南亞外籍新娘在台婚姻與生活探究--以台南市為例(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳美惠(2002)。彰化縣東南亞外籍新娘教養子女經驗之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉秀燕(2003)。跨文化衝擊下外籍新娘家庭環境及其子女行為表現之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bogardus, Emory S.(1959)。Social Distance。Antioch Press。  new window
2.Allport, Gordon W.(1979)。The Nature of Prejudice。Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Inc.。  new window
3.Triandis, Harry C.(1994)。Culture and Social Behavior。McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Aronson, E.、Patnoe, S.(1997)。The Jigsaw Classroom: Building Cooperation in the Classroom。Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc。  new window
5.Hsu, Francis L. K.(1948)。Under the Ancestors' Shadow: Chinese Culture and Personality。London:New York:Routledge & Kegan Paul:Columbia University Press。  new window
6.Gordon, Milton Myron(1964)。Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Whyte, Martin King(1995)。From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches in Urban China。Family Formation and Dissolution: Perspectives from East and West。Taipei。  new window
8.Miller, Delbert Charles(1983)。Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement: A Text and Reference Book for the Social and Behavioral sciences。Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement: A Text and Reference Book for the Social and Behavioral sciences。New York, NY。  new window
9.伊慶春(2004)。面對家庭與社會失序的衝擊:如何重建家庭與社區的凝聚力。面對公與義:建構宏觀、包容與分享的社會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.伊慶春、傅仰止(2006)。臺灣性容忍態度的結構背景:人口組成、都市性與全球化效果。社會發展的趨勢與挑戰:香港與臺灣的經驗。香港。  延伸查詢new window
11.章英華(2003)。臺灣民眾的文化取向:兼論臺灣的族群關係。文化、族群與社會的反思。高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳玉華、伊慶春(2005)。Taiwan's Families。Handbook of World Families。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
13.Davis, James A.、Smith, T.(1990)。General Social Surveys Cumulative Codebook。General Social Surveys Cumulative Codebook。Chicago, IL。  new window
14.Hewstone, Miles、Brown, Rupert(1986)。Contact Is Not Enough: An Intergroup Perspective on the 'Contact Hypothesis'。Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounter。Oxford。  new window
15.Pettigrew, Thomas F.(1971)。Racially Separate or Together?。Racially Separate or Together?。New York:MaGraw-Hill。  new window
16.Pettigrew, Thomas F.(1986)。The Contact Hypothesis Revisited。Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounter。Oxford。  new window
17.Russell, M. J.(1961)。Study of a South African Inter-racial Neighbourhood。Study of a South African Inter-racial Neighbourhood。Durban, South Africa。  new window
18.Schwarzwald, J.、Amir, Y.(1984)。Interethnic Relations and Education: An Israeli Perspective。Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation。Orlando, FL。  new window
19.Seeman, Melvin(1981)。Intergroup Relations。Social Psychology: Sociological Perspective。New York。  new window
20.Stephan, W. G.(1987)。The Contact Hypothesis in Intergroup Relations。Group Processes and Intergroup Relation。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
21.伊慶春(2002)。Taiwan's Modernization - Women's Changing Roles。Taiwan's Modernization in Global Perspective。Westport, CT。  new window
圖書論文
1.章英華、伊慶春(2006)。社會距離態度反映的族群關係:台灣資料再探。社會發展的趨勢與挑戰:香港與台灣的經驗。香港:香港中文大學亞太研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.林忠正、林鶴玲(1993)。臺灣地區各族群的經濟差異。族群關係與國家認同。台北:業強出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Brewer, Marilynn B.、Miller, Norman E.(1984)。Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspectives on Desegregation。Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
4.Amir, Y.(1976)。The Role of Intergroup Contact in Change of Prejudice and Ethnic Relations。Toward the Elimination of Racism。New York:Pergamon。  new window
5.Stephan, W. G.、Stephan, C. W.(1984)。The Role of Ignorance in Intergroup Relations。Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation。Orlando, FL:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE