:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:權威、言行關係與仁:論《論語》中的問答形式
書刊名:東吳哲學學報
作者:祝平次 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Ping-tzu
出版日期:2008
卷期:18
頁次:頁23-56
主題關鍵詞:論語問答道德權威言行關係AnalectsQuestion and answerMoral authorityHumanityRelationship between words and deeds
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:443
  • 點閱點閱:54
本文從歸納分析《論語》的問答形式著眼,於文中探討此問答形式與《論語》中兩個重要觀念的聯繫,亦即言行關係與仁;並以此做為基礎,引申出《論語》含具的倫理學意涵及特色。第一節,分析並確認《論語》的問答形式為一種一問一答就已經結束的形式,其中很少看到提問的學生對孔子的回答有進一步的回應。第二節論述這種問答形式突顯出孔子所具有的道德權威,並對這種權威的特性加以解析。第三節分析《論語》中孔子所注重的言行關係,以解釋這種問答形式形成的原因。第四節討論孔子在問答中,如何體踐他所特重的「仁」,並彰顯《論語》中的問答如何具體呈顯仁的意涵。第五節藉著回顧前文討論的議題,以引申討論《論語》的問答形式可能涵具的倫理學意義,並與其它儒家的倫理學型態做一些簡略的比較。第六節為本文的結論。
This paper will use an analysis of the question-answer format of the Analects to explore the connection between this format and two important ideas, namely the relation between words and actions, and humaneness (ren); and will then use this as a basis for extending discussion to the meaning and characteristics of ethics in the Analects. The first section will analyze and confirm that the question-answer format in the Analects is one composed of one question, one answer, and no further discussion. The second section will argue that this question-answer format makes prominent Confucius's moral authority, and analyze the characteristics of this authority. The third section will analyze the relation between words and actions which the Analects emphasizes, and use this to explain the reasons behind the question-answer format. The fourth section will discuss how through the question-answer passages Confucius realizes the humaneness to which he attaches such great importance, and make clear how the question-answer passages in the Analects concretely demonstrate the meaning of humaneness. The fifth section will make use of the subjects and discussion of the previous sections to further discuss the possible ethical significance of the question-answer format in the Analects, and make a brief comparison of this with the ethical styles of other Confucians. The sixth section will draw conclusions from the above.
期刊論文
1.陳啟雲(19921200)。論語正名與孔子的真理觀和語言哲學。漢學研究,10(2)=20,27-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.程祥徽(1986)。論語有關言語風格的記述。China,190,58-60。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡彥仁(1994)。從宗教歷史學看口述《論語》的傳承與特徵。世界宗教研究,1994(3),41-51。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(宋)程顥、(宋)程頤。二程集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.李滌生。荀子集釋。  延伸查詢new window
3.于慎行(1997)。穀山筆麈。臺南:莊嚴文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.余英時(2003)。朱熹的歷史世界:宋代士大夫政治文化的研究。臺北:聯經出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.阿拉斯代爾•麥金太爾、宋繼杰(2003)。追尋美德。北京:譯林。  延伸查詢new window
6.何心隱、容肇祖(1960)。何心隱集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.淺野裕一(1997)。孔子神話--宗教としての儒教の形成。東京:岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
8.任繼愈(1983)。中國哲學發展史:先秦卷。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王守仁、吳光、錢明、董平、姚延福(1992)。王陽明全集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.張載(1979)。張載集。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.勞思光(1981)。中國哲學史。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.Plato、王曉朝(2003)。柏拉圖全集。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳弱水(19780000)。論「成色分兩說」闡釋之流變。臺北:臺灣學生。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Schwartz, Benjamin Isadore、程鋼、劉東(2004)。古代中國的思想世界。江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.祝平次(19940000)。朱子學與明初理學的發展。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Fingarette, Herbert、彭國翔、張華(2002)。孔子:即凡而聖。江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.陳榮捷(1984)。仁的概念之開展與歐美之詮釋。王陽明與禪。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.Heller, A.(1988)。General Ethics。General Ethics。Oxford and New York。  new window
19.Heller, A.(1990)。A Philosophy of Morals。A Philosophy of Morals。Oxford and Cambridge, Mass。  new window
其他
1.(南宋)陸九淵。陸九淵集。  延伸查詢new window
2.(宋)朱熹。朱子語類,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.(西漢)司馬遷。史記,北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.(南宋)朱熹。點校四書章句集注,北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)李汝珍。鏡花緣。  延伸查詢new window
6.(明)凌濛初。二刻拍案驚奇。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)張廷玉。明史。  延伸查詢new window
8.(明)馮夢龍。醒世恆言,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)黃百家(1987)。求仁篇,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(漢)劉劭。人物志。  延伸查詢new window
11.(周)墨子。墨子閒詁。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE