本文將從〈色，戒〉的歷史背景如何構成張愛玲的小說開始談起，進一步觀看李安眼裡的張愛玲，以及探討經由他重新闡釋後的《色｜戒》所展現的面貌。〈色，戒〉在幾經轉手後，描寫的對象和關注主題已經和刺丁案的歷史事件大異其趣，又小說和電影無論在人物性格、情節發展上也有相當程度的差異。透過不同媒介文本的相互作用，分析文學〈色，戒〉和電影《色｜戒》彼此間的滲透影響，交叉閱讀後更能理解作者在文中的未盡之言。李安透過電影全方面詮釋張愛玲的想法，展現她在小說中隱藏未表述的部份，並且經由改編小說劇情，使所有人物在情感變化和情節發展更合乎正當性和邏輯性，讓整體故事更加流暢。本文最終將跳脫〈色，戒〉的歷史包袱及情色謬論，回到張愛玲關注的人性議題，期望透過梳理還原隱藏在文章背後的複雜情感，並探討〈色，戒〉中人性矛盾不可名狀的一面。

In this article, we will first start from how the historical background affects Eileen Chang's Novel "The Spy Ring", and from which angle that director Ang Lee's sees Eileen Chang so as to discuss further the film which he has interpreted-"Lust, Caution". The characters and focused issues, after several interpretations, "Lust, Caution" have been diverged from the true story "the assassination of the spy Ting"; meanwhile, both the personality and the plot development are also quite different between the film and the novel. To understand subtle meaning in Chang's Novel "The Spy Ring" and analyze the infiltration between the literary work "The Spy Ring" and the film "Lust, Caution", We will adopt interaction with texts in Intertextuality theory and break boundary between studies. Moreover, except for the protagonists Mr. Yee and Wang Jiazhi, the supporting roles such as Kuang Yu Min and Mrs. Yee have been often ignored by researchers; nevertheless, Lee pictures interactions between the above supporting roles and Wang Jiazhi, which is one of the issues among this article. Besides portrayal of the characters, what Lee brings about in "Lust, Caution", human nature and betrayal, are also points in the following article. By filming "Lust, Caution", Lee reveals those parts the writer might imply but didn't show in the novel; by adapting the story, Lee makes characters’ emotion change and plot development become reasonable and logical, and thus the plot goes smoothly. In the end, we expect to return what Chang focuses, human nature, presenting human's indescribable contradiction, restoring complicated emotions beyond the novel by discarding history and sexual fallacy.