:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:王船山氣論系統中「性體」觀念的涵義及其理論價值
書刊名:淡江中文學報
作者:陳祺助
作者(外文):Chen, Chi-ju
出版日期:2009
卷期:20
頁次:頁93-128
主題關鍵詞:性體性即理ChiHsingNatureLiPrincipleHsing-TiMoral creative realityNature is principle
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:2290
  • 點閱點閱:63
在宋明理學中,主宰宇宙生化的本體乃是「理」或「天理」。「性」字原就「個體」之存在說,後來亦指宇宙本體即「性體」。伊川乃提出「性即理」這一劃時代的理論,成為宋明儒學的基本教義。另一方面,因宇宙萬物的存在基質是「氣」,理學在討論理、氣的關係上,經朱子的發展,造成理氣二元論的性格過於明顯。明代氣論學者羅整庵、王廷相都力主「天地一氣」,然而,卻只承認「氣」才能終古常在,反對「性」無生滅之說;則「性體」義難以成立。本文指出,船山亦即氣言天,其所謂「氣」,乃理、氣「合兩端於一體」的本體。「理」意指本體一「氣」本身乃是一固有主宰生化之「性」的實體,氣終古常在,「性(理)」亦然。渾然一氣,純然一理,亦純然一性,天地本體一「氣」即一「理」體、一「性」體;氣之「性」的義涵,乃「健順」之德、知能之用。最後,在這些問題的基礎上,從四個方面,比較船山與宋明大儒之「性體」觀念的不同,以說明其理論價值。
In the doctrine of the Confucian scholars of the Song-Ming Dynasty, the master asserted that Li (the laws underlying all things and events) constituted the universal substance. The word of 'Hsing (Nature)' originally indicated an individual being, but its significance finally became the universal substance (prima materia). So Cheng I-Chuan brought up the epochal idea of 'Nature is Li (Principle)'. This concept became an essential aspect of the teaching during the development process of the Song-Ming Dynasty Confucianism. In the other hand, Chi had all along been treated as the ultimate element that made up all things. What was the relationship between Li and Chi? As developed by Chu Hsi, it would lead to a conclusion that implies a dualistic relationship between Li and Chi. The Chi theories of Wang Ting-Hsiang and Lo chin-shun in the Ming Dynasty both asserted that the universal substance is the Chi of the ultimate 'One' and that Chi must partake in eternal being, thus opposing the view that 'Hsing (Nature)' can not become extinct. In their theory, the concept of 'Hsing-Ti (Moral Creative Reality)' could not be established. Wang Chuan-Shan asserted that Li and Chi were two aspects opposite to each other and parts of an organic whole. In Wang's theory, Nature is Principle too. In Wang's concept of 'Li (Principle)', Chi itself, as universal substance, constitutes an entity that overrules all of the laws of birth, growth, decay and death, governing all things. The contents of Chi's 'Hsing (Nature)' were the virtues of Jiahn (creativity), Shuhn (receptivity) and Chih (knowing and enlightening), and Neng (accomplishment). The entity of Chi has eternal being, as does the entity of Li (Hsin).
期刊論文
1.陳祺助(20070900)。王船山論本體「純然一氣」下的氣之「體」、「用」關係及其涵義。興大人文學報,39,45-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳祺助(20051200)。論王船山氣論的義理特色--與傳統主要氣論之說比較。鵝湖學誌,35,103-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳榮灼、鄭志健(20090200)。劉蕺山的「生命現象學」。鵝湖,34(8)=404,3-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃懿梅(19840100)。船山「道大善小,善大性小」說之評析。國立臺灣大學哲學論評,7,225-234。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳來(20040200)。船山的「中庸」首章詮釋及其思想(下)。鵝湖,29(8)=344,10-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳來(20040100)。船山的「中庸」首章詮釋及其思想(上)。鵝湖,29(7)=343,11-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.唐君毅(1979)。中國哲學原論(原性篇):中國哲學中人性思想的發展。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.唐君毅(1980)。中國哲學原論(導論篇)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.王夫之(1972)。尚書引義。臺北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.王夫之(1972)。張子正蒙注。臺北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.王夫之(1972)。周易內傳。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王夫之(1972)。詩廣傳。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王夫之(1972)。禮記章句。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.王夫之(1972)。四書訓義。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王夫之(1972)。周易外傳。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.曾春海(1978)。王船山易學闡微。嘉新水泥公司文化基金會。  延伸查詢new window
11.黎靖德(1984)。朱子語類。京都:中文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.王夫之(1972)。讀四書大全說。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.張載(198112)。張載集。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.曾春海(1997)。易經哲學的宇宙與人生。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.王守仁(1979)。傳習錄。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.唐君毅(1979)。中國哲學原論(原教篇):宋明儒學思想之發展。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.牟宗三(1981)。心體與性體。台北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.曾昭旭(1983)。王船山哲學。遠景。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.王廷相(1989)。王廷相集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.彭國翔(2003)。良知學的展開:王龍溪與中晚明的陽明學。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.黃宗羲(1974)。明儒學案。臺北:河洛圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.林安梧(19870000)。王船山人性史哲學之研究。臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.楊儒賓(19960000)。儒家身體觀。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.曾春海(1989)。儒家哲學論集。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
25.羅欽順、閻韜(1990)。困知記。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.朱熹、陳俊明(2000)。朱子文集。臺北:財團法人德富文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
27.陳榮捷(19820000)。朱學論集。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.牟宗三(1980)。才性與玄理。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
29.程頤、程顥、王孝魚(1981)。二程集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
30.勞思光(1980)。新編中國哲學史。友聯。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(明)王夫之(1972)。周易稗疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(明)王夫之(1972)。周易內傳發例,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(明)王夫之(1972)。續春秋左氏傳駁議,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(明)王夫之(1972)。思問錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)王夫之(1972)。老子衍,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(明)王夫之(1972)。莊子通,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)全祖望(1971)。宋元學案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.唐君毅(1990)。張橫渠之心性論及其形上學之根據。哲學論集。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳榮灼(2005)。氣與力:「唯氣論」新詮。儒學的氣論與工夫論。臺北:臺灣大學出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE