:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:近代中國國族意識中的「野蠻情結」--以1903年日本大阪人類館事件為核心的探討
書刊名:新史學
作者:楊瑞松 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Jui-sung
出版日期:2010
卷期:21:2
頁次:頁107-163
主題關鍵詞:野蠻人類館坪井正五郎纏足鴉片BarbarianWorld's natives buildingTsuboi ShogoroFoot-bindingOpium
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:158
1903年日本大阪第五回內國勸業博覽會開幕前夕,由東京大學人類學家坪井正五郎所策劃的「人類館」,預定將「支那人」和其他如台灣生番等七種人種以活人展出的規劃經新聞披露後,中國留學生憤怒地認定此項展出安排乃是日本人企圖將中國人醜化為野蠻人的計謀,並且斷定坪井要以纏足女性和吸食鴉片者的活人演出,以供世人參觀恥笑中國人的野蠻習俗。在經過留學生的強力抗議和清政府的外交交涉後,有關「支那人」的展出部分在人類館開幕前即被下令中止。此事件不僅引起當時的中國輿論種種評論,並成為日後反纏足運動和民族主義論述的重要歷史記憶。本研究以嚴謹的中日文文本分析入手,重新嚴格檢視留學生關於人類館展出的內容和目的論述,將它們置於當時中國思想文化界的危機意識的脈絡,進而探討這些論述和近代中國國族意識中的「野蠻情結」的密切關連性。本文認為留學生對人類館的指控在相當大的程度上是建立在「稻草人謬誤」的思維基礎上;因此,唯有回到近代中國國族意識中的「野蠻情結」的脈絡上,才能顯現其真正的複雜歷史文化意義。
On the eve of the fifth Industrial Exhibition held in Osaka in 1903, a news report revealed the plans for the "World's Natives Building," which was a brainchild of the anthropology professor Tsuboi Shogoro of Tokyo Imperial University. According to the news report, the building would hold a living exhibition of representatives of seven human races, including Taiwanese aboriginals and the Chinese race. This news infuriated many Chinese students in Japan, who saw the exhibit as a conspiracy by the Japanese to portray the Chinese people as barbarians, especially by showing women with bound feet and opium smokers as typical "barbarian Chinese." Although the Chinese part of the show was cancelled before its opening due to the protests by both Chinese students and Qing diplomats, the cident had already triggered many reactions from the Chinese news media. It thus became an important part of collective memory in the anti-foot-binding movement and nationalist discourse. Most studies of this incident have uncritically treated the Chinese accusations of the "World's Natives Building" exhibit as reasonable and objective statements. They have failed to notice that these accusations were in fact products of the students’ subjective and strong emotions. This study carefully examines documents in Chinese and Japanese in order to analyze the Chinese students' discourse in depth and trace back the possible sources for their construction and imagination of the exhibit's content and purpose. For example, I have discovered that the students built up their accusation regarding footbinding and opium smoking in light of their twisted interpretation of Tsuboi's work Ethnographic Album of the World. This important fact has never been noticed and critically investigated by previous scholarship on this issue. Moreover, after clarifying the sources of the Chinese students' discourse, I have embedded them in the context of the modern Chinese intellectual and cultural sense of crisis, investigating the close relationship between these discourses and the "barbarian complex" of the modern Chinese consciousness. I illustrate that the accusation that Tsuboi planned the exhibit to feature women with bound feet and opium smokers, thus representing the Chinese as "barbarian" was mostly a straw man. The complexity and historical significance of the students' accusations can only be explicated clearly when they are firmly placed in the context of the modern Chinese "barbarian complex."
期刊論文
1.坂元ひろ子(1995)。中國民族主義の神話--進化論.人種觀.博覽會事件。思想,849。  延伸查詢new window
2.苗延威(20070300)。從視覺科技看清末纏足。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,55,1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.(1903)。趣意書。東京人類學會雜誌,203,209。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1903)。日人侮我太甚。新民叢報,25,81。  延伸查詢new window
5.菅野正(1995)。大阪博覽会(一九○三年)と中国。奈良史學,13,124-147。  延伸查詢new window
6.坪井正五郎(1903)。人類館と人種地図。東洋學藝雜誌,20(259),163-166。  延伸查詢new window
7.坂野徹(2000)。好事家の政治学--坪井正五郎と明治期人類学の軌跡。思想,907,163-184。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1903)。論選派游學有裨外交。外交報,40,271。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1903)。日本大阪博覽會中中國福建品移出臺灣館始末記。江蘇,1,147。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1905)。廈門天足會約章敘論。萬國公報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dikötter, Frank、Laamann, Lars、Zhou, Xun(2004)。Narcotic Culture: A History of Drugs in China。Chicago:The University of Chicago。  new window
2.金天翮。女界鐘。女界鐘。  延伸查詢new window
3.吉見俊哉(1992)。博覽会の政治學:まなざしの近代。東京。  延伸查詢new window
4.嚴安生(1991)。日本留学精神史:近代中国知識人の軌跡。東京。  延伸查詢new window
5.松田京子(2003)。帝國の視線--博覽会と異文化表象。東京都:吉川弘文館。  延伸查詢new window
6.孫中山(1981)。覆翟理斯函。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.馮自由(1965)。革命逸史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.郭嵩燾(1983)。郭嵩燾日記。長沙:湖南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.中國國民黨中央委員會黨史史料編纂委員會(196809)。游學譯編。  延伸查詢new window
10.坪井正五郎、沼田賴輔(1901)。世界風俗寫真帖。世界風俗寫真帖。東京。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1903)。博覽會事件。清國留學生會館第二次書信報告。東京。  延伸查詢new window
12.鳥居龍藏(1903)。人種誌。人種誌。東京。  延伸查詢new window
13.(清)康有為(1981)。請禁婦女裹足摺。康有為政論集(上)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.李又寧、張玉法(1975)。恭祝天足會。近代中國女權運動史料 1842-1911(下冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1983)。嗚乎支那人!嗚乎支那人!,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1903)。博覽会彙報。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1903)。大阪博覽會準備彙報。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1903)。臺灣日日新報。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1903)。二月二十六日 博覽会事務局 庶第38號。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1903)。大公報。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1903)。二月二十三日 博覽会支那人風俗陳列に関する件。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1903)。支那人風俗の縱覽差止,大阪。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1903)。東遊聞見錄,上海。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1903)。博覽會と人類學(坪井博士の談),大阪。  延伸查詢new window
11.(清)唐才常(1968)。覺顛冥齋內言,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE