This paper aims to clarify Zhuangzi’s view on how to act appropriately in the world. Based on a general view that Zhuangzi pays attention to “perspective” or even “relativity,” some have argued that Zhuangzi seems to be self-refuting when building up his philosophy—that is, if, as Zhuangzi himself points out, each and every idea is correct under some standards but incorrect under others, then, consequently, his philosophy cannot be generalized due to the fact that what he claims can only be vaild under the standard he himself sets up. Professor Chang-Yuan Liu advances this critique in a paper where he interprets Zhuangzi’s view of Tao using a Perspectivist approach. But, as will be seen, this criticism inappropriately separates Zhuangzi’s emphasis on relativity from his theory of action. To avoid this, this paper argues that Zhuangzi’s view of action should be regarded as being grounded in his arguments concerning relativism. In short, Zhuangzi’s theory of action can be construed as consisting of two theses. The first is that each and every judgment is not itself absolutely fixed as it often varies according to different perspectives or standards. It will be argued that Zhuangzi justifies this thesis by introducing three kinds of judgment, i.e. reference, description, and evaluation, with thesecond type of judgment being based on the first. Just as no judgment can satisfy all standards, there cannot be a way of acting that can be applied to many different circumstances. In other words, just as corresponding judgments should be made according to different perspectives, we should also adopt different types of appropriate actions when facing different problems. From this we can conclude that there is no reason to attack Zhuangzi by saying that he is definitely self-refuting for, as I shall argue, his emphasis on relativity is theoretically responsible for his theory of action.