:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:清代濁水溪中游漢「番」勢力的消長與漢人社會的建立
書刊名:臺灣文獻
作者:張永楨
作者(外文):Chang, Yung-chen
出版日期:2011
卷期:62:2
頁次:頁31-63
主題關鍵詞:郭百年事件水沙連社丁首開山撫番Guo Bae-Nian IncidentShuei Sha LianAboriginal cultivation headsExploiting-mountains-pacifying-aborigines policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:352
  • 點閱點閱:39
濁水溪中游地區本是原住民活動之區域,但自明末清初以後,由於漢人前來拓墾,漢人在濁水溪流域的拓墾路線是由西而東,溯溪而上,由下游、中游、再往上游拓墾。濁水溪中游的拓墾是由最西方之今竹山、名間、進而集集、鹿谷,最後才拓墾至水里、日月潭地區。清廷治臺初期採取消極之統治政策,一切以國防及治安為考量,禁止人民往原屬生番地界之濁水溪中游地區拓墾;而且採取劃界、立石之隔離漢番政策;乾隆末年,更採取「以熟番制生番」之隔離漢番政策,設「番屯」以隔離漢番。不過此一隔離政策不但無效;而且加速原住民之土地流失。因為漢人不斷地潛入番地拓墾,清政府通常採姑息之默許態度;即使偷墾被查獲,往往因治安考量,大多採就地合法之政策。因此漢人有恃無恐,一再勾結通事、土目、社丁首或官府人員偷墾番地禁區。嘉慶年間,漢人又違法進入水里及日月潭地區拓墾,終於引發郭百年事件。事件結束後,官府將漢人全部逐出界外番地,並立碑禁止再偷入拓墾,但水沙連原住民遭此事件之迫害,乃招引臺灣西部平埔族進入埔里共同抵禦漢人之侵擾,但「漢人卻陰持其後」,跟著平埔族之腳步,又潛入濁水溪中游界外禁區偷墾。一直到光緒元年(1875年)官府推動「開山撫番」政策,漢人才合法地進入濁水溪中游拓墾。 濁水溪中游地區經過明鄭及清代200餘年之拓墾,至清末臺灣改隸日本前夕,可耕地已被漢人拓墾殆盡,而居住於此地之原住民也因漢人之入侵而退居山中,原住民的部落被漢人的街庄所取代。不但經濟繁榮,交通四通八達,而且宗教蓬勃發展,寺廟如雨後春筍先後設立,整個的社會型態已由早期的原住民社會轉變成漢人的社會。
From the late Ming Dynasty and the early Chin Dynasty on, the Chinese cultivated the middle reach areas of Zhuoshui River, in which the aborigines had originally lived. The cultivation route along Zhuoshui River went from the west to the east, from the lower reaches to the middle reaches, and from the middle reaches upward to the upper reaches. The cultivated areas in the Zhuoshui River middle reaches extended from westernmost today’s Jhushan to Mingjin, and from Jiji to Lugu; and Shuei-Li and Sun Moon Lake areas were finally cultivated. The Chin government ruled Taiwan with the passive policy in the early stage. For the purpose of the defensive and social security, the civilians were not allowed to cultivate the Zhuoshui River middle reach land; besides, a demarcation policy was adopted to separate the Chinese and the aborigines. In the end of the reign of Emperor Chien-Lung, the civilizedaborigines-control-uncivilized-aborigines policy was implemented, and, on the basis of the policy, the civilized aborigines were given the land to cultivate. However, the policy not only was ineffective, but also accelerated the loss of land of the aborigines. The Chin government usually appeased the Chinese who cultivated the aborigines’land stealthily and illegally. Even if the stealthy and illegal cultivation was found out, it was legalized for the purpose of the social security. Therefore, the Chinese illegally collaborated with interpreters, aboriginal chiefs, aboriginal cultivation heads, or civil servants to cultivate the aboriginal land. During the reign of Emperor Chia-Chin, the Chinese illegally cultivated the land in Shuei-Li and in Sun Moon Lake, which resulted in the Guo Bae-Nian incident. After the incident, the government expelled all the Chinese from the aboriginal land, and prohibited the Chinese from cultivating the aboriginal land by making a demarcation with a law tablet. The aborigines in Shuei Sha Lian, after the Guo Bae-Nian incident, invited Pingpu in western Taiwan to Puli to jointly resist the Chinese invasion. Following Pingpu people stealthily, the Chinese illegally cultivated the aboriginal land in the Zhuoshui River middle reach areas. The legal cultivation by the Chinese occurred in the first year of Emperor Guang Shiun’s reign, the year 1875 in the western calendar, in which the government performed the exploiting-mountains-pacifying-aborigines policy. Land cultivation in the Zhuoshui River middle reach areas by the Zheng government and the Chin government lasted for more than 200 years, and the arable land there was fully occupied by the Chinese on the eve when Japan ruled Taiwan. The aborigines living in those areas were forced to evacuate from the occupied land to mountain ranges; as a result, the aboriginal tribes turned into the Chinese street-store villages. In the villages, the transportation systems were well-developed and convenient, and various kinds of temples were constructed one after another. Consequently, the early aboriginal society became the Chinese-style society.
期刊論文
1.陳哲三(19980600)。「水沙連」及其相關問題之研究。臺灣文獻,49(2),35-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.(1987)。Traval among the aborigines of Formosa。Journal of the American Geographical Society of New York,6。  new window
圖書
1.高拱乾(19930630)。臺灣府志。臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.曹士桂、雲南省文物普查辦公室(1988)。宦海日記校注。昆明:雲南人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.余文儀(1962)。續修臺灣府志。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
4.丁曰健、台灣銀行經濟研究室(1997)。治台必告錄。南投:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃叔璥(1996)。臺灣使槎錄。臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.倪贊元(1993)。雲林縣采訪冊。臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.周璽、臺灣省文獻委員會(1993)。彰化縣志。南投市:臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.林文龍(1998)。社寮三百年開發史。南投縣:社寮文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
9.柯志明(20010000)。番頭家:清代臺灣族群政治與熟番地權。臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.集集古誌。  延伸查詢new window
11.慶桂(1964)。大清清高宗純皇帝實錄。臺北:華聯出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.南投縣立文化中心(1998)。竹的故鄉--前山第一城。南投。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.竹山郡役所,陳鳳儀(1932)。竹山郡管內概況,竹山。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.臺灣總督府(1904)。臺灣現住人口統計,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE