:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:非關上網?臺灣的數位落差與網路使用的社會後果
書刊名:臺灣社會學
作者:林宗弘 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Thung-hong
出版日期:2012
卷期:24
頁次:頁55-97
主題關鍵詞:網際網路數位落差社會網絡所得不平等社會運動InternetDigital divideSocial networkIncome inequalitySocial movement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:603
  • 點閱點閱:370
本文將有關網際網路使用與社會不平等關係的理論區分為三類, 包括:(1)有科技決定論嫌疑、認為上網能夠減少社會不平等的數位烏 托邦論,(2)認為數位落差導致社會不平等惡化的數位控制論(數位反 烏托邦論),以及(3)認為原先的社會不平等塑造數位落差,反之卻不 然的懷疑論(社會形塑論),並且指出這三種理論文獻對上網如何影 響社會網絡、所得差異、政治行為以及社會運動有不同的經驗預測。 本文以2000-2010 年的「台灣社會變遷基本調查」數據為基礎,探討 影響數位落差的因素,以及個人上網時數對社會網絡大小、每月所 得、投票行為與社會運動參與的影響。統計分析結果發現:階級、年 齡與城鄉差異造成數位落差的擴大,而上網時數對社會網絡的大小、 所得高低或投票行為並無重大影響。最後,上網抗議行為而非上網本 身,與實際參與社會運動有關。總之,上網時數對台灣民眾的政治經 濟差異或社交生活的影響似乎有限,本文統計結論更支持懷疑論(社 會形塑論)的觀點,也就是原先的社會不平等塑造了民眾上網時數的 數位落差。
The article examines the relationship between Internet use and social networks as well as social inequality in Taiwan. I divide the literature into three approaches: Cyber-utopian, Cyber-dystopian (control theory), and skeptical (social-shaping aspect) and illustrate their different hypotheses regarding social inequality, social networks, political behavior, and collective action. The Cyber-utopian approach claims that the diffusion of Internet use reduces information cost, equalizes market opportunity, and increases social capital, but the Cyber-dystopian approach claims that Internet use empowered ordinary political and economic elites. Both approaches focus on the social impacts of Internet use and imply technological determinism, while the skeptical approach focuses on the social inequality of Internet use, especially on the digital divide. According to a national survey (TSCS) conducted in Taiwan during the 2000-2010 period, I investigate hypotheses derived from the three approaches. The empirical findings confirm that inequalities still created digital divides of Internet use, but the effect of average time online per day is insignificant or ambiguous on the size of social network, income distribution, voting behavior, and participation in social movements. In sum, most empirical results support the skeptical approach rather than the two forms of technological determinism.
期刊論文
1.Chen, S. Y.、Fu, Y. C.(2009)。Internet use and academic achievement: Gender differences in early adolescence。Adolescence,44(176),797-812。  new window
2.Korupp, S. E.、Szydlik, M.(2005)。Causes and trends of the digital divide。European Sociological Review,21(4),409-422。  new window
3.方念萱、蘇彥豪(19980100)。網路傳播中的對話與對峙--以女性主義連線版的言說為例。新聞學研究,56,183-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林鶴玲、鄭陸霖(20010600)。臺灣社會運動網路經驗:一個探索性的分析。臺灣社會學刊,25,111-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Penard, T.、Nicolas, P.(2010)。Internet Use and Social Capital: The Strength of Virtual Ties。Journal of economic Issues,44(3),569-595。  new window
6.Staiger, Douglas、Stock, James H.(1997)。Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments。Econometrica,65(3),557-586。  new window
7.陳威助(20070700)。臺灣地區資訊教育與數位落差問題探討。資訊社會研究,13,193-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳齊殷(20010400)。網路使用者與非網路使用者的社會意向。圖書館學與資訊科學,27(1),16-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王嵩音(20100700)。臺灣選民媒介使用對於候選人形象與評價之影響:傳統媒介vs.新媒介。傳播與管理研究,10(1),3-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林宗弘(20091200)。臺灣的後工業化:階級結構的轉型與社會不平等,1992-2007。臺灣社會學刊,43,93-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.朱國明(20070400)。網路社群社會資本與成員間助人行為之相關研究。資訊管理學報,14(2),169-202。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.傅仰止(20010400)。網路人口的樣本特性:比較網頁調查追蹤方法與個人網絡抽樣方法。調查研究,9,35-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.DiMaggio, Paul、Bonikowski, Bart(2008)。Make Money Surfing the Web? The Impact of Internet Use on the Earnings of U.S. Workers。American Sociological Review,73(2),227-250。  new window
14.Dimaggio, Paul、Hargittai, E.、Neuman, W. R.、Robinson, J. P.(2001)。Social implications of the Internet。Annual Review of Sociology,27(1),307-336。  new window
15.邱魏頌正、陳嘉駿(20040100)。數位落差現象再探討--多國比較分析。傳播與管理研究,3(2),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王嵩音(20061200)。網路使用與選舉參與之研究--以2004年立法委員選舉為例。臺灣民主季刊,3(4),71-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.林宗弘、胡克威(20110900)。愛恨ECFA:兩岸貿易與臺灣的階級政治。思與言,49(3),95-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.傅仰止(2004)。Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: a single-item survey question and the contact diary。Social Networks,27(3),169-186。  new window
19.李孟壕、曾淑芬(20050700)。數位落差再定義與衡量指標之研究。資訊社會研究,9,89-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.簡文吟(20060200)。臺灣數位落差現況分析。研考雙月刊,30(1)=251,38-46。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.胡克威、林宗弘、黃善國(2010)。階級政治的復興?臺灣的民主轉型與階級投票,1992-2004。2010年度臺灣社會學會研討會,輔仁大學 (會議日期: 2009/12/04-12/05)。臺北:輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Baym, N. K.(2010)。Personal connections in the digital age。Polity。  new window
2.Keen, A.(2007)。The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today's user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values。New York, NY:Doubleday。  new window
3.Shapiro, A. L.(1999)。The control revolution: How the internet is putting individuals in charge and changing the world we know。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Morgan, Stephen L.、Winship, Christopher(2007)。Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research。Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Bell, Daniel(1976)。The Coming of Post-Industrial Society。New York:Basic Books。  new window
6.Braverman, Harry(1974)。Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century。Monthly Review Press。  new window
7.Shirky, Clay(2008)。Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations。Penguin。  new window
8.MacKenzie, Donald、Wajcman, Judy(1999)。The Social Shaping of Technology。Open University Press。  new window
9.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
10.許嘉猷(1994)。階級結構與階級意識比較研究論文集。中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.林南(2001)。Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Merton, Robert King(1968)。Social Theory and Social Structure。Free Press。  new window
13.Wright, Erik Olin(1985)。Classes。Verso。  new window
14.Norris, Pippa、Bennett, W. L.、Entman, R. M.(2001)。Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide。Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Putnam, Robert D.(2000)。Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community。Simon & Schuster。  new window
16.王甫昌(20030000)。當代臺灣社會的族群想像。臺北市:群學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.行政院研究發展考核委員會。97年數位落差調查報告,http://rdec2www.hyweb.com.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4024389&ctNode=11171&mp=100。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2009)。98年數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2010)。99年數位落差調查報告,行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.王佳煌(2003)。資訊科技與社會變遷。  延伸查詢new window
5.行政院研考會(2004a)。93年家戶/個人數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院研考會(2004b)。93年勞工數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
7.行政院研考會(2005a)。94年家戶/個人數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
8.行政院研考會(2005b)。94年勞工數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
9.行政院研考會(2006a)。95年家戶/個人數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
10.行政院研考會(2006b)。95年勞工數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
11.行政院研考會(2007)。96年數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
12.行政院研考會(2008b)。97年勞工數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
13.行政院研考會(2009b)。98年勞工數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
14.行政院研考會(2010b)。99年勞工數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
15.吳淑俊(2010)。網際網路使用行為與選舉參與模式探析。  延伸查詢new window
16.洪貞玲(2008)。當偏鄉社區遇上科技資源:以社會資本檢視九二一重建區數位機會中心的運作。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.張維安(2004)。網路與社會。  延伸查詢new window
18.張臺隆(2004)。中部地區國民小學校長資訊素養(信息文化)與實施資訊科技融入教學情形之研究。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳春敏、陳振宇(2012)。實驗研究法。  延伸查詢new window
20.章英華、林季平(2002)。都市化、階層化和資訊化之關連。  延伸查詢new window
21.曾淑芬、吳齊殷(2002)。台灣地區數位落差問題之研究。  延伸查詢new window
22.曾淑芬、陳啟光、吳齊殷(2003)。台閩地區九十一年數位落差調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
23.潘金谷、曾淑芬、林玉凡(2009)。數位吉尼係數應用之擴充:我國數位落差現況。  延伸查詢new window
24.Castells, Manuel(1996)。The Rise of the Network Society in the Information Age。  new window
25.Franzen, Alex(2003)。Social Capital and the Internet: Evidence from Swiss Panel Data。  new window
26.Fuchs, Christian(2009)。The Role of Income Inequality in a Multivariate Cross-National Analysis of the Digital Divide。  new window
27.Katz, James E., and Ronald E. Rice(2002)。Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement and Expression。  new window
28.Marcuse, Herbert(1991)。One-Dimensional Man: Studies in Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society。  new window
29.Martin, Steven P., and John P. Robinson(2007)。The Income Digital Divide: Trends and Predictions for Levels of Internet Use。  new window
30.Marx, Karl, and Fredrik Engels(1969)。Manifesto of the Communist Party。  new window
31.May, Christopher(2002)。The Information Society: A Sceptical View。  new window
32.Morozov, Evgeny(2011)。The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom。  new window
33.Nam, Taewoo(2012)。Dual Effects of the Internet on Political Activism: Reinforcing and Mobilizing。  new window
34.National Telecommunications and Communications Administration(1995)。Falling through the Net: A Survey of the “Have Nots” in Rural and Urban America。  new window
35.National Telecommunications and Communications Administration(1998)。Falling through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide。  new window
36.Nye, David E.(2004)。Technological Prediction: A Promethean Problem。  new window
37.Nye, David E.(2006)。Technology Matters: Questions to Live With。  new window
38.Peacock, Sylvia(2008)。The Historical Influence of Computer Use atWork on Income in the Late Twentieth Century。  new window
39.Smith, Merritt Roe, and Leo Marx(1994)。Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism。  new window
40.Smith, Tony(2000)。Technology and Capital in the Age of Lean Production: A Marxian Critique of the New Economy。  new window
41.Staudenmaier, S. J., and John M.(1985)。The Debate over Technological Determinism。  new window
42.Wellman, Barry, Anabel Quan-Haase, JamesWitte, and Keith Hampton(2001)。Does the Internet Increase, Decrease or Supplement Social Capital?。  new window
43.Zhao, Shanyang(2006)。Do Internet Users Have More Social Ties? A Call for Differentiated Analyses of Internet Use?。  new window
圖書論文
1.鄭陸霖、林鶴玲(2001)。社運在網際網路上的展現:台灣社會運動網站的聯網分析。臺灣社會學。臺北:臺灣社會學編輯委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bourdieu, P.(1986)。The forms of capital。Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education。Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE