:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:檢測臺灣民眾六分類統獨立場:一個測量改進的提出
書刊名:臺灣政治學刊
作者:蕭怡靖 引用關係游清鑫
作者(外文):Hsiao, Yi-chingYu, Ching-hsin
出版日期:2012
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁65-116
主題關鍵詞:統獨立場民意調查測量效度Issue of unification vs. independencePublic opinion surveyMeasurement validity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:436
  • 點閱點閱:127
現階段以統獨立場六分類理解台灣民眾的統獨偏好,大致上是 以單一面向的方式,將統一與獨立分置於面向的兩端,直接詢問民眾的立場位置,此途徑雖然測量語句相當簡潔,但結果卻有相當高比例的民眾選擇「維持現狀」。對此,部分學者提出「條件語句」的測量途徑,在「中共武力犯台」及「兩岸政經落差」的條件設定下,探詢民眾的統獨立場。此法不但能有效拆解「維持現狀」者的真實偏好,也得以釐清民眾在統獨偏好上「理念」與「務實」的考量。但在測量執行與資料處理上則較為複雜,且現實條件的設定極可能隨不同時空環境而改變。對此,本文嘗試在「保持單一面向」又能「有效拆解維持現狀」的前提下,利用「正面追問」及「反面探詢」的方式,重新建構民眾的統獨立場。透過實際的經驗資料檢證,新統獨六分量表不但比原有量表更能有效拆解「維持現狀」者的統獨偏好,呈現出統獨偏好的強弱遞移性,在測量效度的檢測上亦有較佳的結果。在方法論上,本文的嘗試有助於測量方法的改進,在問題本質上,也得以更精確地理解台灣民眾的統獨立場。
It is commonly seen that the citizens’ preferences regarding the issue of “unification vs. independence” are determined by a six-itemed measurement placing unification and independence as the two ends of a one-dimensional continuum and four other related items in between. The citizens are directly asked to pick out one of the six items. This method has an advantage of being easily understood by citizens when answering questions. However, it has also led to a high proportion of citizens choosing the item referred to as “maintaining the status quo.” In responding to this defect, scholars have introduced conditional terms, such as “China’s military invasion” and “political and economic differences between the two sides” to decode the citizen’s real intention to maintain the status quo. The method of adding conditional terms also carries a merit of exploring the citizen’s ideological and pragmatic considerations on the issue of unification vs. independence. Unfortunately, this method might suffer from complicated measurements and variable processes on the one hand, and from failing to add new conditions effectively under changing environments on the other. In order to maintain the advantage of the one-dimension continuum and decoding the citizens’ intention to maintain the status quo at the same time, this essay proposes an improvement by adding two followup questions regarding the citizens’ second preferences and least-desired preferences on the issue of unification vs. independence after the measurement involving six items. The empirical evidence used in this essay would suggest that the new measurement has not only outperformed the previous measurement involving six items in decoding the citizens’ maintenance of the status quo but also the transitivity among the six items. With validity, this new measurement has more explanatory power than the previous measurement. Methodologically, this essay has provided an improvement in the measurement of crucial variables. In essence, this essay has also made the understanding of citizens’ preferences regarding the issue of unification vs. independence more perceptible.
期刊論文
1.Hsieh, John Fun-sheng、Emerson M. S. Niou(1996)。Salient Issue in Taiwan’s Electoral Politics.。Electoral Studies,15(2),219-230。  new window
2.Raftery, Adrian. E.(1995)。Baysian Model Selection in Social Research。Sociological Methodology,25,111-163。  new window
3.Rigger, Shelley.(2001)。Maintaining the Status Quo: What It Means, and Why the Taiwanese Prefer It.。Cambridge Review of International Affairs,14(2),103-114。  new window
4.蕭怡靖(20090500)。「臺灣選舉與民主化調查」之政黨認同測量的探討。選舉研究,16(1),67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡佳泓(20080300)。Making Sense of Issue Position, Party Image, Party Performanc, and Voting Choice: A Case Study of Taiwan's 2004 Legislative Election。人文及社會科學集刊,20(1),1-24。new window  new window
6.王鼎銘(20011100)。The Impacts of Policy Issues on Voting Behavior in Taiwan: A Mixed Logit Approach。選舉研究,8(2),95-123。new window  new window
7.鄭夙芬、陳陸輝(20000500)。臺灣地區民眾參與調查研究態度的變遷:1986~1998。選舉研究,7(1),115-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳玉山(20060300)。Domestic Political Competition and Triangular Interaction Among Washington, Beijing, and Taipei: The U.S. China Policy。Issues and Studies,42(1),1-46。new window  new window
9.Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng、Niou, Emerson M. S.(2005)。Measuring Taiwanese Public Opinion on Taiwanese Independence。China Quarterly,181,158-168。  new window
10.Yun-han Chu(2004)。Taiwan’s National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-Strait Relations。Asian Survey,44(4),484-512。  new window
11.劉嘉薇、耿曙、陳陸輝(20091200)。務實也是一種選擇--臺灣民眾統獨立場的測量與商榷。臺灣民主,6(4),141-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Niou, Emerson M. S.(2005)。A New Measure of Preferences on the Independence-Unification Issue in Taiwan。Journal of Asian and African Studies,40(1/2),91-104。  new window
13.Niou, Emerson M. S.、Paolino, Philip(2003)。The Rise of the Opposition Party in Taiwan: Explaining Chen Shui-bian's Victory in the 2000 Presidential Election。Electoral Studies,22(4),721-740。  new window
14.石之瑜(20050700)。消失的中間選民:2004年總統大選對空間理論的修正。問題與研究,44(4),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.耿曙、劉嘉薇、陳陸輝(20091200)。打破維持現狀的迷思:臺灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難。臺灣政治學刊,13(2),3-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳陸輝、周應龍(20040700)。臺灣民眾統獨立場的持續與變遷。東亞研究,35(2),143-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.吳乃德(19931100)。國家認同和政黨支持--臺灣政黨競爭的社會基礎。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,74,33-61。  延伸查詢new window
18.Niou, Emerson M. S.(2004)。Understanding Taiwan Independence and Its Policy Implications。Asian Survey,44(4),555-567。  new window
19.盛杏湲、周應龍(20080600)。選樣偏誤模型在調查研究中項目無反應問題的應用。臺灣政治學刊,12(1),147-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.盛杏湲(20020500)。統獨議題與臺灣選民的投票行為:一九九〇年代的分析。選舉研究,9(1),41-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.吳乃德(20051200)。麵包與愛情:初探臺灣民眾民族認同的變動。臺灣政治學刊,9(2),5-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.吳乃德(19960700)。自由主義和族群認同:搜尋臺灣民族主義的意識形態基礎。臺灣政治學刊,1,5-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.盛杏湲、陳義彥(20030500)。政治分歧與政黨競爭:二○○一年立法委員選舉的分析。選舉研究,10(1),7-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.王鼎銘(20030500)。政策認同下的投票效用與選擇:空間投票理論在不同選舉制度間的比較。選舉研究,10(1),171-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.莊淑媚、洪永泰(20111100)。特定政黨不認同:臺灣地區民意調查中關於政黨認同的新測量工具。選舉研究,18(2),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Rigger, Shelley(1999)。Social Science and National Identity: A Critique。Pacific Affairs,72(4),537-552。  new window
會議論文
1.俞振華、林啟耀(2010)。模稜兩可的選擇?再論台灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難。2010台灣政治學會年會暨「重新思考國家:五都之後,百年前夕」學術研討會,東吳大學 。台北:東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.游清鑫、陳信安(2011)。統獨的第三條路:初探統獨立場中「維持現狀」的台灣民眾。2011年台灣政治學會年會暨「辛亥百年與兩岸政治發展」學術研討會,國立政治大學 。台北:國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉義周(1998)。從概念到問卷設計:以統獨態度的測量為例。「調查研究方法與應用」學術研討會,中央研究院 。台北:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕭怡靖、鄭夙芬(2010)。左右怎麼分?台灣民眾對左派與右派的認知。2010年台灣政治學會年會暨「重新思考國家:五都之後,百年前夕」學術研討會,東吳大學 。台北:東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Yu, Ching-hsin.(2010)。To Be or Not To Be? An Examination of People’s Preference on Independence in Taiwan。the “International Symposium on Designing Governance for Civil Society” Organized by Center of Civil Society,Keio University Tokyo, Japan (會議日期: 20100306)。Tokyo, Japan。  new window
研究報告
1.游清鑫(2009)。台灣民眾統獨偏好的持續與變遷之研究:測量與應用 (計畫編號:NSC 98-2410-H-004-031-MY2)。台北:行政院國科會。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉義周(2000)。台灣民眾主要政治認同概念之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 89-2414-H-004-049)。台北:行政院國科會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Niou, Emerson M.S.(2008)。The China Factor in Taiwan’s Domestic Politics.。Democratization in Taiwan: Challenges in Transformation。Burlington, VT:Ashgate。  new window
2.Tsang, Steve.(2004)。War or Peace across the Taiwan Strait。Peace and Security across the Taiwan Strait。New York, NY:Palgrave-Macmillan。  new window
3.Long, J. Scott、Freese, Jeremy(2006)。Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata。Stata Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳陸輝、耿曙(2009)。臺灣民眾統獨立場的持續與變遷。重新檢視爭辯中的兩岸關係理論。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳乃德(1993)。省籍意識、政治支持和國家認同--臺灣族群政治理論的初探。族群關係與國家認同。臺北:業強。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE