:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:視覺故事感特徵與讀者感受之探討
書刊名:藝術教育研究
作者:黃啟梧 引用關係莊妙仙
作者(外文):Huang, Chi-wuChuang, Miao-hsien
出版日期:2013
卷期:25
頁次:頁77-103+105-107
主題關鍵詞:故事敘述視覺故事感視覺構成情感反應Story narrationVisual storytellingVisual compositionEmotional response
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:118
  • 點閱點閱:117
後現代主義特徵如複雜矛盾、遊戲、趣味、歷史感等,一掃現代主義模組化、形隨機能之設計準則,也帶動敘述設計之熱烈討論。設計師們喜歡以作品說故事,而讀者大眾(或產品使用者)地位提升,其想法、感知與情感反應也變得舉足輕重。本研究採開放性譯碼分析、問卷調查法等,探討影像閱讀者對平面設計故事感形成原因。結果發現高故事感具兩大特徵:(1)視覺構成:包含高度視覺認知、典故童話角色、誇張之人物表情、戲劇性豐富細節、手寫塗鴉;(2)情感反應:包含溫馨趣味等正面情感、熟悉感、懷舊、期待故事情節等。本研究亦假設:影像閱讀者對故事感感受程度會有高中低之差異,不同年齡層讀者對故事感之感受亦有差異,以混合設計二因子變異數分析分析獲得證實,實用顯著性亦達中等水準。本研究期望作為往後藝術設計教學之參考,並啟發學子視覺影像創作與思考詮釋之能力。
The features of postmodernism, such as complexity and contradiction, playfulness, fun, and a sense of history, have replaced the modernist design principles of "form follows function", modularization, and rapid production. This study explored how viewers develop a sense of visual storytelling from graphic design and the differences in storytelling perception by using open-coding analysis of grounded theory, a questionnaire survey, and statistical analysis. Analysis results show that a sense of storytelling is derived from two main categories: (1) visual composition that includes strong visual elements, fairytales and allusions, exaggerated facial expressions of characters, dramatic or rich details, and hand-written or diary-style writing; (2) emotional response that comprises interest, warmth, and positive emotions as well as feelings of familiarity, nostalgia and expectation. The study proposed the following hypothesis: Different viewers perceive storytelling to varying degrees (high, medium, or low), and viewers of different age groups also differ in the manner in which they perceive narrative design. This hypothesis was verified using two-way mixed design analysis of variance (ANOVA), Post Hoc, and simple main effect tests. The results of this study could help students to incorporate elements of visual and emotional communication and inspire their humanities thought and exploration when engaging in narrative design. It should encourage designers to consider the age of viewers and how they will perceive storytelling features, to maximize the impact of their works.
期刊論文
1.Jana, R.(2006)。Trend: Storytelling jams。Business Week,40,5。  new window
2.Stern, B. B.(1994)。Classical and Vignette Television Advertising Dramas: Structural Models, Formal Analysis, and Consumer Effects。Journal of Consumer Research,20(4),601-615。  new window
3.李茂能(20100600)。虛無假設顯著性考驗的演進、議題與迷思。測驗統計年刊,18(上),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Escalas, J. E.(2004)。Imagine yourself in the product: Mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion。Journal of Advertising,33(2),37-48。  new window
會議論文
1.楊清田(2005)。台灣當代海報設計的後現代性觀察。新北市:輔仁大學。259-274。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李沂霏(2006)。後現代敘事設計理論應用於平面廣告設計之影像創作研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡孟勳(2007)。敘事性設計理論應用於海報設計之創作研究-以臺北印象海報設計為例(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭致弘(2004)。敘事理論在廣告設計領域之應用與探討--以商業廣告影片為例(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bain, B.、傅士哲(2005)。如何訂做一個好老師。臺北市:大塊。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bergström, B.、陳芳誼(2012)。視覺溝通的文法。臺北市:原點。  延伸查詢new window
3.Duarte, N.、黃怡雪(2011)。視覺溝通的法則。臺北市:大寫。  延伸查詢new window
4.Berger, A.(1989)。Seeing is believing: An introduction to visual communication。Mayfield。  new window
5.Lester, Paul Martin(1995)。Visual Communication: Images with Messages。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing。  new window
6.阿皮格納內西、黃訓慶(1996)。後現代主義。臺北:立緒。  延伸查詢new window
7.Venturi, Robert(1977)。Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture。New York, NY:The Museum of Modern Art。  new window
8.Hollis, Richard、許明潔(1999)。平面設計發展史。新北市:龍溪。  延伸查詢new window
9.Block, Bruce A.(2007)。The visual story: Creating the visual structure of film, TV and digital media。Focal Press。  new window
10.吳明隆(2010)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊裕富、林萬福(2002)。後現代設計藝術:E行銷品味論!N世代流行戰!。臺北:田園城市文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王受之(2000)。世界現代平面設計1800-1999。台北市:藝術家出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
14.Hassan, Ihab Habib(1987)。The postmodern turn: essays in postmodern theory and culture。Ohio State University Press。  new window
15.Pink, Daniel H.、查修傑(2006)。未來在等待的人才。臺北:大塊文化。  延伸查詢new window
16.Barker, Chris、許夢芸(2007)。文化研究智典。韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.Jencks, Charles、吳介禎(1998)。後現代建築語言。臺北:田園城市文化。  延伸查詢new window
18.趙惠玲(2005)。視覺文化與藝術教育。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
19.吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與統計應用分析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.伊莉莎白.弗洛恩德、陳燕谷(1994)。讀者反應理論批評。駱駝。  延伸查詢new window
21.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
22.Norman, Donald A.(2004)。Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) Everday Things。New York:Basic Book。  new window
23.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet、徐宗國(1997)。質性研究概論。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.Kress, Gunther R.、Van Leeuwen, Theo(1996)。Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design。Routledge。  new window
25.楊裕富(19980000)。設計的文化基礎:設計、符號、溝通。臺北市:亞太圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Bloomer, Carolyn(1990)。Principles of Visual Perception。New York, NY:Design Press。  new window
27.Vincent, L.(2002)。Legendary brands:Unleashing the power of storytelling to create a winning marketing strategy。Chicago, IL:Dearborn。  new window
28.Jencks, C.(1987)。What is Post-Modernism?。London, UK:Academy Editions。  new window
其他
1.Norman, D.(20101126)。Why Design Education Must Change,http://www.core77.com/blog/columns/why_design_education_must_change_17993.asp。  new window
2.丁家永(2006)。談廣告與營銷中情感作用與品牌營銷策略,http://www.emkt.com.cn/article/256/25610.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.Holland, L.(2008)。Martha Stewart family tree,http://www.flickr.com/photos/28408249@N07/sets/72157606071157143/detail/。  new window
4.(2013)。Magazine,http://www.us.kohler.com/craftsmanship/magazine.jsp。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE