臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：新聞中的「偽科學」內容分析研究
書刊名：新聞學研究
作者：鄭怡卉 引用關係
作者(外文)：Cheng, I-huei
出版日期：2013
卷期：116
頁次：頁47-90
主題關鍵詞：內容分析；科學傳播；偽科學新聞；Content analysis；Science communication；Pseudoscience
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:221
  • 點閱點閱:73
科學傳播領域早已累積相當數量之文獻討論科學新聞，但新聞中呈現的「偽科學」（pseudoscience）內容仍少探討。一般來說，「偽科學」指表面上是科學性資訊，實質上卻是違反科學規律或邏輯的論述。本研究即在探討「偽科學」新聞的內容，檢視台灣報紙新聞報導後發現，最常見的偽科學主題為超自然之靈異現象，其他與偽科學相關的新聞議題包括：療效未經證實的偏方、非正規醫學建議的減肥偏方、占卜算命或星座運勢分析、風水地理、民俗／民間傳統療法、能量或磁場對人體健康的影響，以及外星人與地球末日預言等主題。本研究之發現有助於了解目前相關報導之呈現方式，也初步確立偽科學的新聞編碼類目可行性，包含其主題分類以及論點與論述呈現方式。
The purpose of this study is to explore the rarely addressed topic of pseudoscience in news stories. Pseudoscience refers to claims that are presented as scientific but lack supporting evidence or do not adhere to a valid scientific methodology or plausibility. The analysis of major Taiwanese newspapers reveals that the news topics most often involving pseudoscience claims include paranormal (or weird things) and (herbal) therapies that are not formal medical practices. In summary, the current study identifies and describes the categories of pseudoscience news, which sets forward the discussion of pseudoscience for future research in journalism and mass communication.
期刊論文
1.Norris, S. P.、Phillips, L. M.(1994)。Interpreting Pragmatic Meaning When Reading Popular Reports of Science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，31(9)，947-967。  new window
2.Pellechia, M. G.(1997)。Trends in Science Coverage: A Content Analysis of Three US Newspapers。Public Understanding of Science，6(1)，49-68。  new window
3.謝瀛春(19920900)。全國科技會議新聞之分析。新聞學研究，46，131-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林秀玉(20090400)。科學不迷信--能量水、磁化水的迷思。科學月刊，40(4)=472，312-313。  延伸查詢new window
5.林基興(20000800)。科學家的認知與責任--評《難以置信--科學家探索神秘信息場》。科學月刊。  延伸查詢new window
6.邱玉蟬(20090600)。看誰在說話？--醫療糾紛的新聞報導分析。中華傳播學刊，15，217-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.郝柏林(2002)。偽科學與贗科學33(8)，725-726。  延伸查詢new window
8.郭中一(19970400)。偽科學及反科學的教育環境是教改當務之急。科學月刊，28(4)=328，268-269。  延伸查詢new window
9.蘇蘅、陳憶寧(20100100)。公共衛生危機中政府與媒體如何共舞：檢視產生不實新聞的影響因素。廣告學研究，33，1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.馮建三(1995)。科技新聞是意識型態嗎50，41-59。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃俊儒(20030500)。科學素養與課程統整在通識課程設計中的意涵--以「科學新聞」的應用為例。弘光通識學報，2，1-9。  延伸查詢new window
12.葉李華(2001)。怪力亂神的迷思。科學月刊，32(2)，98-99。  延伸查詢new window
13.詹定宇、龔昶元、金海濤(20060600)。菸害相關新聞報導內容之分析：以臺灣報紙為例。中華傳播學刊，9，239-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Bader, R. G.(1990)。How science news sections influence newspaper science coverage: A case study。Journalism Quarterly，67(1)，88-96。  new window
15.Baum, C.(2009)。It’s time to teach the controversy: Since creationism isn’t going away, let’s use it in the classroom to teach the difference between science and pseudoscience。Skeptic，15(2)，42-46。  new window
16.Connolly-Ahern, C.、Broadway, S. C.(2008)。"To booze or not to booze?" Newspaper coverage of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders。Science Communication，29(3)，362-385。  new window
17.Eve, R. A.(2007)。Science education and belief in pseudoscience。Skeptic，13(3)，14-15。  new window
18.Francis, L. J.、Robbins, M.、Williams, E.(2006)。Believing and implicit religion beyond the churches: Religion, superstition, luck, and fear among 13-15 year-old girls in Wales。Implicit Religion，9，74-89。  new window
19.Francis, L. J.、Williams, E.(2007)。Drawing back the veil: Paranormal belief among adolescents。Christian Parapsychology，17，170-185。  new window
20.Gropp, R. E.(2003)。Evolution activists organize to combat pseudoscience in public schools。Bioscience，53(8)，700。  new window
21.Gunter, B.、Kinderlerer, J.、Beyleveld, D.(1999)。The media and public understanding of biotechnology: A survey of scientists and journalists。Science Communication，20(4)，373-394。  new window
22.Hijmans, E.、Pleijter, A.、Wester, F.(2003)。Covering scientific research in Dutch newspaper。Science Communication，25(2)，153-176。  new window
23.Irwin, H.(1985)。A study of the measurement and the correlates of paranormal belief。Journal of American Society of Paranormal Belief，79(3)，301-326。  new window
24.Jasperson, A. E.、Shah, D. V.、Watts, M.、Faber, R. J.、Fan, D. P.(1998)。Framing and the public agenda: Media effects on the importance of the Federal budget deficit。Political Communication，15(2)，205-224。  new window
25.Kirschner, P. A.(1992)。Epistemology, practical work and academic skill in science education。Science and Education，1(3)，273-299。  new window
26.Lacy, S.(1996)。Sampling error and selecting intercoder reliability samples for nominal content categories: Sins of omission and commission in mass communication quantitative research。Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly，73，969-973。  new window
27.Lupton, D.、McLean, J.(1998)。Representing doctors: Discourse and images in the Australian press。Social Science and Medicine，46(8)，947-958。  new window
28.Maier, Scott R.(2005)。Accuracy matters: A cross-market assessment of newspaper error and credibility。Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly，82(3)，533-551。  new window
29.Martin, F.(1990)。Science teachers confront pseudoscience。The Skeptical Inquirer，15(1)，19-20。  new window
30.Martin, M.(1994)。Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education。Science & Education，3(4)，357-371。  new window
31.Meyer, P.(1988)。A workable measure of audition accuracy in newspaper。Newspaper Research Journal，10(1)，39-51。  new window
32.Morrison, D.(2009)。2012 and counting: A NASA scientist answers the top 20 questions about 2012。Skeptic，15(2)，47-53。  new window
33.Nucci, M. L.、Kubey, R.(2007)。We begin tonight with fruits and vegetables: Genetically modified food on the evening news 1980-2003。Science Communication，29(2)，147-176。  new window
34.Powers, A.、Andsager, J. L.(1999)。How newspapers framed breast implants in the 1990s。Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly，76(3)，551-564。  new window
35.Reis, Raul(2008)。How Brazilian and North American newspapers frame the stem cell research debate。Science Communication，29(3)，316-334。  new window
36.Riffe, D.、Aust, C.、Lacy, S. R.(1993)。The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructive week sampling in newspaper content analysis。Journalism Quarterly，70(1)，133-139。  new window
37.Shermer, M.(2003)。Why smart people believe weird things。Skeptic，10(2)，62-73。  new window
38.Semetko, H. A.、Valkenburg, P. M.(2000)。Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news。Journal of Communication，50(2)，93-109。  new window
39.Steinke, J.、Lapinski, M. K.、Crocker, N.、Zietsman-Thomas, A.、Williams, Y.、Kuchibhotla, S.(2007)。Assessing media influences on middle school-aged children’s perceptions of women in science using the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST)。Science Communication，29(1)，35-64。  new window
40.Williams, E.、Francis, L. J.(2009)。Contacting the spirits of the dead: Paranormal belief and the teenage worldwide。Journal of Research on Christian Education，18，20-35。  new window
41.鄭宇君(20030100)。從社會脈絡解析科學新聞的產製--以基因新聞為例。新聞學研究，74，121-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Mazzolini, R. G.、Bucchi, M.(2003)。Big Science, Little News: Science Coverage in the Italian Daily Press, 1946-1997。Public Understanding of Science，12(1)，7-24。  new window
43.Miller, J. D.、Augenbraun, E.、Schulhof, J.、Kimmel, L. G.(2006)。Adult science learning from local television newscasts。Science Communication，28(2)，216-242。  new window
44.Entman, R. M.(1993)。Framing: Toward Clarification of Fractured Paradigm。Journal of Communication，43(4)，51-58。  new window
45.Norris, S. P.、Phillips, L. M.、Korpan, C. A.(2003)。University students' interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty。Public Understanding of Science，12(2)，123-145。  new window
46.徐美苓、陳瑞芸、張皓傑、賴奕帆、林佳韻(20060400)。愛滋新聞閱讀與對感染者與病患的態度：以針對年輕族群的訊息設計實驗為例。新聞學研究，87，1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.Heath, L.(1984)。Impact of newspaper crime reports on fear of crime: Multimethodological investigation。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，47(2)，263-276。  new window
48.Weigold, M. F.(2001)。Communicating science: A review of the literature。Science Communication，23(2)，164-193。  new window
49.徐美苓、丁志音(20040400)。小病微恙的真實再現--以「感冒」的新聞論述為例。新聞學研究，79，197-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20101000)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究：從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究，105，127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.McCombs, Maxwell E.、Lopez-Escobar, Estenban、Llamas, Juan Pablo(2000)。Setting the Agenda of Attributes in the 1996 Spanish General Election。Journal of Communication，50(2)，77-92。  new window
52.徐美苓、黃淑貞(19980100)。愛滋病新聞報導內容之分析。新聞學研究，56，237-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
53.許良榮、李田英(19950400)。科學史在科學教學的角色與功能。科學教育，179，15-27。  延伸查詢new window
54.靳知勤(20071200)。科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養--臺灣學術精英的看法。科學教育學刊，15(6)，627-646。new window  延伸查詢new window
55.邱玉蟬(20071000)。醫病形象的媒體建構--醫療糾紛抬棺抗議新聞分析。新聞學研究，93，41-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
56.陳憶寧(20111000)。電視新聞戲劇化效果研究：由議題設定與收視動機角度來看。新聞學研究，109，78-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
57.黃俊儒、簡妙如(20060100)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈：構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究，86，135-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
58.徐美苓、吳翠松、林文琪(20030600)。愛滋陰影下的情慾規範：新聞論述中的他／她者建構。臺灣社會研究季刊，50，81-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
59.王泰俐(20060100)。電視新聞「感官主義」對閱聽人接收新聞的影響。新聞學研究，86，91-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
60.徐美苓(19990100)。愛滋病報導的議題與消息來源設定。新聞學研究，58，171-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
61.Brossard, D.、Shanahan, J.(2006)。Do They Know What They Read? Building a Scientific Literacy Measurement Instrument Based on Science Media Coverage。Science Communication，28(1)，47-63。  new window
62.Chew, F.、Mandelbaum-Schmid, J.、Gao, S. K.(2006)。Can health journalists bridge the state-of-the-science gap in mammography guidelines?。Science Communication，27(3)，331-351。  new window
學位論文
1.王貞懿(2011)。從新聞中的偽科學報導看大學生的科學素養與媒體識讀能力(碩士論文)。政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.古安廷(2009)。國內報紙對於隆乳議題之報導型態及新聞品質研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.許晏瑜(2010)。高齡產婦生育風險之新聞內容分析(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.竹內薰、夏淑怡(2009)。黑白假說--看穿偽科學的19個思考實驗。白い仮説・黒い仮説：ニセカガクを見破る思考実験。台北：城邦文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Radner, Dasie、Radner, Michael、張松林、安寶明(1991)。科學與偽科學。台北：久大。  延伸查詢new window
3.松永和紀、森田草(2009)。健康新知都是對的嗎？。台北：商周。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hines, T.(2002)。Pseudoscience and the paranormal。New York, NY：Prometheus Books。  new window
5.Magendie, F.、John Revere(1843)。An elementary treatise on human physiology。New York, NY：Harper & Brother。  new window
6.McCombs, Mexwell E.、Shaw, Donald L.、Weaver, David H.(1997)。Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
7.Shermer, M.(1997)。Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time。New York, NY：W. H. Freeman and Company。  new window
8.Nelkin, Dorothy(1995)。Selling science: How the press covers science and technology。W. H. Freeman and Company。  new window
9.林照真(2009)。收視率新聞學：台灣電視新聞商品化。台北：聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.謝瀛春(1991)。科學新聞的傳播：理論與個案。臺北市：黎明文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Duschl, R. A.(1990)。Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development。New York, NY：Teacher College Press。  new window
12.Bennett, W. Lance(1996)。News: The politics of illusion。New York, NY：Longman。  new window
13.Neuendorf, K. A.(2002)。The Content Analysis Guidebook。Sage。  new window
14.Shoemaker, Pamela J.、Reese, Stephen D.(1996)。Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content。Longman。  new window
其他
1.National Science Foundation(2006)。Science and Engineering Indicators 2006，http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/。  new window
圖書論文
1.McCombs, M. E.、Ghanem, S. I.(2001)。The convergence of agenda setting and framing。Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
2.McCombs, M.、Bell, T.(1996)。The agenda-setting role of mass communication。An integrated approach to communication theory and research。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
3.Millar, R.(1997)。Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve?。Science today: Problem or crisis?。London：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：823（臺灣：752，外國：71） ／ 本年度總使用人次：928275 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：66735344
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上