:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:生育津貼對我國生育率的影響:以1998~2010年為例
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:林妏蓁陳國樑 引用關係黃勢璋 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Wen-chenChen, JoeHuang, Shih-chang
出版日期:2013
卷期:17:2
頁次:頁259-297
主題關鍵詞:生育率生育津貼Panel迴歸模型內生性問題Total fertility rateMaternity allowancePanel regression modelEndogeneity problem
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:77
  • 點閱點閱:189
近年來整體生育率持續下跌,少子化問題已成為社會關注的焦點,也是諸多社會安全相關政策改革時的重要變數。針對少子化問題,直至2012年止,政府尚無提出完整的應對及配套方案。在中央政府方面,主要的作法有2011年啟動之「5歲幼兒免學費教育計畫」以及2012年起適用之「幼兒學前特別扣除額」。各地方政府雖然陸續提出相對較多元的生育政策,主要的作法是以一次性之「生育津貼」現金補助,期能刺激民眾生育意願、提升各地生育率。然而,生育津貼是否真能提高民眾的生育意願,達成提升生育率的政策目標,並沒有相關研究成果可供參考。本研究根據Panel迴歸模型的計量方法,探討1998-2010年間各縣市政府生育津貼的發放與育齡婦女總生育率之關聯性。實證估計上最大的問題在於處理縮減式(reduced-form)迴歸估計所面臨的內生性問題。由於縣市政府會因其財源決定是否發放生育津貼,但縣市財政狀況一般而言與生育率無關。故本研究選取歲入作為工具變數,來處理以生育津貼發放作為解釋變數所存在的內生性問題。研究結果發現,生育津貼與生育率之間雖是正向關係,但是效果並不大。對於本來就想生育的育齡婦女來說,地方政府每發放生育津貼新台幣1,000元,將有提前懷孕的刺激效果,但也僅增加整體生育率0.0057。此外,其他國家的經驗也鮮少僅靠生育津貼就能提升生育率之案例;因此,臺灣若要有效解決少子化問題,各級政府應積極思考更完整的應對方案。
The decreasing total fertility rate has been a major public concern in Taiwan. Except the ”5-year-old Children Education Subsidy” (starting from 2011) and the ”Special Deduction for Preschool Children” (starting from 2012), the central government has failed to provide a complete and effective measure to boost the dropping birth numbers. On the other hand, local governments, however, promote child births with policies of a wider variety. Among them, the most popular and welcome policy is to distribute cash maternity allowance to child births in the jurisdictional area. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of using one-time-allowance to promote birth rate has never been seriously studied. With data from 23 jurisdictional area of Taiwan in the period from 1998 to 2010, panel regressions are used to investigate the relationship between total fertility rate and the distribution of cash maternity allowance by local governments. In order to resolve the potential endogeneity problem in the regressions, local government revenue is used as an instrument. The regression results suggest that there is positive correlation between total fertility rate and the amount of cash maternity allowance, but the effect is small. For women who want to have children in the first place, each NT$1,000 cash allowance raises total fertility rate by 0.0057.
期刊論文
1.黃曉薇、劉一龍(20090800)。生育、女性就業與兒童照顧支持方案--以南歐模式為例。臺灣社會福利學刊,8(1),149-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.沈桂芬(2006)。少子化現象。網路社會學通訊期刊,54,55。  延伸查詢new window
3.李佳儒(20090600)。日本因應少子女化社會對策對臺灣之啟示。社區發展季刊,125,256-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Edwards, M. E.(2002)。Education and Occupations: Reexamining the Conventional Wisdom About Later First Births Among American Mothers。Sociological Forum,17(3),423-443。  new window
5.Becker, G. S.、Barro, Robert(1988)。A Reformulation of the Economic Theory of Fertility。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,412(1),1-25。  new window
6.McNown, R.、Rajbhandary, S.(2003)。Time Series Analysis of Fertility and Female Labor Market Behavior。Journal of Population Economics,16(3),344-358。  new window
7.Ryder, N. B.(1956)。Problems of Trend Determination during a Translation in Fertility。Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly,34(1),5-21。  new window
8.Narayan, P. K.(2006)。Determinants of Female Fertility in Taiwan, 1991-2001: Empirical Evidence from Co-integration and Variance Decomposition Analysis。Asian Economic Journal,20(3),393-407。  new window
9.駱明慶(20071200)。臺灣總生育率下降的表象與實際。研究臺灣,3,37-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Ruhm, Christopher J.(1996)。Alcohol Policies and Highway Vehicle Fatalities。Journal of Health Economics,15(4),435-454。  new window
11.Hondroyiannis, G.、Papapetrou, E.(2002)。Demographic Transition in Europe。Economics Bulletin,10(3),1-8。  new window
12.孫健忠(20001200)。臺灣社會津貼實施經驗的初步分析。社會政策與社會工作學刊,4(2),5-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Stock, James H.、Wright, Jonathan H.、Yogo, Motohiro(2002)。A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments。Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,20(4),518-529。  new window
14.蔡宏政(20071200)。臺灣人口政策的歷史形構。臺灣社會學刊,39,65-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.劉一龍、王德睦(20050600)。臺灣地區總生育率的分析:完成生育率與生育步調之變化。人口學刊,30,97-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.郭靜晃(20090600)。瑞典與日本因應少子女化之社會對策對臺灣之啟示。社區發展季刊,125,224-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Milligan, K.(2005)。Subsidizing the Stork: New Evidence on Tax Incentives and Fertility。The Review of Economics and Statistics,87(3),539-555。  new window
18.彭建文、蔡怡純(20120600)。住宅自有率對生育率之長短期影響--追蹤資料共整合分析應用。人口學刊,44,57-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Stock, J. H.、Trebbi, F.(2003)。Retrospectives: Who Invented Instrumental Variable Regression?。Journal of Economic Perspectives,17(3),177-194。  new window
研究報告
1.余清祥(2005)。臺灣地區各鄉鎮市區生育率的空間關係研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊慧玲(2008)。臺灣低生育率現象之探討--總合資料與個體資料之實證研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.Duclos, E.、Lefebvre, P.、Merrigan, P.(2001)。A Natural Experiment on the Economics of Storks: Evidence on the Impact of Differential Family Policy on Fertility Rates in Canada。Center for Research on Economic Fluctuations and Employment。  new window
4.Cohen, A.、Dehejia, R.、Romanov, D.(2009)。Do Financial Incentives Affect Fertility?。  new window
5.Aoki, R.、Konishi, Y.(2009)。On the Persistence of Low Birthrate in Japan。Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University。  new window
6.Sleebos, J.(2003)。Low Fertility Rates in OECD Countries: Facts and Policy Response。  new window
7.Engelhardt, H.、Prskawetz, A.(2005)。A Pooled Time-Series Analysis on the Relation between Fertility and Female Employment。Vienna:Vienna Institute of Demography of the Austrian Academy of Sciences。  new window
8.行政院主計處(2010)。國民所得統計年報。臺北:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.郭英照(2007)。台灣婦女勞參率、生育率、離婚率及經濟成長率之間的關係(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳彥仁(2006)。台灣生育率下降因素之實證探討(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉哲全(2007)。台灣地區生育率、男女勞動力與經濟成長(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.雷蓓蓓(2004)。台灣與瑞典的母性保護與兒童照顧制度之比較(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院主計總處(2005)。中華民國臺灣地區國民所得。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部(2005)。人口政策資料彙集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.內政部(2010)。中華民國臺閩地區人口統計。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院主計總處(2010)。中華民國臺灣地區人力資源調查統計年報。臺北:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
5.Judge, George G.、Hill, R. Carter、Griffiths, William E.、Lutkepohl, Helmut、Lee, Tsoung-Chao(1982)。Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics。John Wiley and Sons。  new window
其他
1.內政部統計處(2012)。內政統計應用名詞定義,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/list.aspx, 20120402。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部戶政司(2010)。各直轄市、縣(市)政府發放生育津貼一覽表,http://www.ris.gov.tw/zh_TW/254。  延伸查詢new window
3.王郁倫,吳秀樺,李宜儒(20110119)。增產報國仁寶發生育獎金,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article /finance/20110119/33122821/。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院經濟建設委員會(2009)。女性勞動參與率與生育率之關聯性分析,http://www.cepd.gov.tw/dn.aspx?uid=7784。  延伸查詢new window
5.行政院主計總處(2010)。統計資訊網--縣市重要統計指標查詢系統,http://ebas1.ebas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp。  延伸查詢new window
6.民視新聞網(20110109)。不生族多民眾:養子開銷太大,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI1Z9W2sMF8。  延伸查詢new window
7.呂妍庭(20111106)。嘉縣出生率低議員:加碼補助催生,http://news.chinatimes.com/domestic/11050611/ 112012110600363.html。  延伸查詢new window
8.侯承旭(20120523)。市長宣示第3胎補助考慮提高至2萬,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/may/23/ today-south14.htm。  延伸查詢new window
9.林孟汝(20121024)。生育率降冰點臺學者:津貼應一致,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/12/10/24/n3713438.htm。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭津津(2011)。從性別主流化看性別平等機制的發展與實踐,www.women100.org.tw/Files/20110115140207031 250.doc。  延伸查詢new window
11.Kim, Y.-I.A.(2011)。Impact of Birth Subsidies on Fertility: Empirical Study of Allowance for Newborn Children, a Pronatal Policy,http://www.klea.or.kr/paper/files/5%EC%9B%94%EA%B9%80%EC%98%81%EC%9D%BC_2011.pdf。  new window
12.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007)。Can Policies Boost Birth Rates?,http://www.oecd.org/els/family/39970765.pdf。  new window
13.Milligan, K.(2002)。Quebec'€™s Baby Bonus: Can Public Policy Raise Fertility?,http://cdhowe.org/pdf/milligan_backgrounder.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE