The writing of this article is running in according to the differentiation of the contemporary interpretations about Confucianism. In viewing the reconstellation of Confucianism which was made up by Mainland Chinese scholars within the horizon of the post-modern, I try to analyze the theoretical characteristics of Confucianism.This article includes two themes: 1. To question whether the essence of Confucianism can or can't be characterized with the concept of ”subjectivity.” 2. To examine whether the Confucianism is necessary to maintain its ”metaphysical” status under the anti-metaphysic tide of the ”Post-modern.” According to our analysis, we find that the contemporary Neo-Confucian Mou Zongsan did not consistent in using the concept ”subjectivity.” Sometimes he took up with the concept of ”subjectivity” to stick up the existential approach which revealed the Confucians' emphasis of praxis in life, but sometimes he reduced the ”subjectivity” as equal to ”practical reason” in order to justify the ”autonomous morality” of Confucianism. If we cognize the Confucianism in according to the first consideration, then it will be in tune with the tone of the ”Post-modern”; but if we insist on the second consideration, then it will be incompatible with the post-modern culture. And for the second question it will be solved, if we can abandon the Western substance-based classical metaphysics and try again to understand the Heaven-Human Beings relationship from the perspective of philosophical hermeneutics, then it will not be problematic for whether the Confucianism should to maintain its status as ”metaphysics” or not.