臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：遇見另一半：教育婚配過程中的介紹人與接觸場合
書刊名：臺灣社會學
作者：巫麗雪 引用關係／葉秀珍 引用關係／蔡瑞明 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Li-hsueh／Yeh, Hsiu-jen／Tsay, Ruey-ming
出版日期：2013
卷期：26
頁次：頁147-190
主題關鍵詞：婚姻；教育婚配；擇偶方式；接觸場合；介紹人；Marriage；Educational assortative mating；Ways of meeting；Social settings of contact；Matchmakers
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:185
  • 點閱點閱:239
從媒妨之言到自由戀愛，雖然象徵婚姻當事人擁有選擇配偶的自 主權，但配偶選擇並不是隨意選擇的過程，仍然受限於文化規範與人口結構共同型塑的機會結構。我們探討個人的擇偶行為如何受到擇偶過程中擇偶方式、介紹人與接觸場合的作用，嘗試以較完整的理論取向與更細緻的資料，重新檢視婚姻配對研究。本文主要探討介紹人與接觸場合如何影響教育婚姻配對模式的形成，我們檢驗介紹人在擇偶過程中的中介角色，以及其特質來連結結構與文化的關係;同時也探討接觸場合所展現的同類相聚現象的作用。本文使用台灣地區社會意向調查1991 年6 月專題調查計畫、台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第五期二次家庭組的資料，進行多類別邏輯迴歸模型分析。本文的分析顯示，介紹人比較容易媒合教育上男高女低的婚姻，尤其當介紹人與擇偶者之間的關係強度越強時越明顯，不過介紹人所維繫的主流配對文化規範已有些微變動。另外，我們發現介紹人的教育地位對於擇偶者透過婚姻取得較佳的社會位置具有影響力。最後，學校是鞏固教育界限最重要的場合，其為未婚男女創造的教育同質性的擇偶環境會隨著教育層級而增加，更難突破教育藩籬而結婚。
Free choice is the major type of mate selection in modem society, but free choice is not as free as one might expect. The freedom to choose a spouse is, to a certain extent, restricted by the opportunity structure. This paper takes a comprehensive perspective to examine classical assortative mating studies based on more refined measures. We investigate how an individual's mating opportunity is embedded in the social structure， which in turm affects his/her choice ofpotential mate. The major aim ofthis study is to examine the roles of matchmakers and social occasions in the marriage market, a part of the process of social stratification. We examine the bridging role of matchmakers in the mating process and their characteristics in the linkage between social structure and culture. We also assess the social settings of contacts and their effect on homophily in the mating process. The data analyzed come from two sunreys: the General Survey 01 Social Attitudes in Taiwαn and Taiwαn Social Chαnge Survey. Multinomial logit models were applied to test a series of hypotheses. The results show that involvement of matchmakers in the mating process is positively associated with hypergamy and that the effect becomes even more significant when the matchmaker and the mate seeker have a stronger relationship. Nevertheless, the influence of matchmakers has loosened slightly in preserving mainstream cultural norms. Our findings demonstrate that the matchmaker's social status plays a crucial role in bridging a match with associated higher status during the mating process. The results also illustrate that the educational system is the most important institution that reinforces educational boundaries. Educational institutions have created a mating environment for educational homophily, which is likely to increase with education, and reinforces the educational boundary in the mating process.
期刊論文
1.McPherson, J. Miller、Popielarz, Pamela、Drobnic, Sonja(1992)。Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics。American Sociological Review，57，153-170。  new window
2.Ahuvia, Aaron C.、Adelman, Mara B.(1992)。Formal Intermediaries in the Marriage Market: A Typology and Review。Journal of Marriage and the Family，54，452-463。  new window
3.Bozon, Michel、Heran, Francois(1989)。Finding a Spouse: A Survey of How French Couples Meet。Population: An English Selection，44(1)，91-121。  new window
4.Coleman, James S.(1991)。Matching Processes in the Labor Market。Acta Sociologica，34，3-12。  new window
5.De Graaf, Nan Dirk、Flap, Hendrik Derk(1988)。With a Little Help from My Friends: Social Resources as an Explanation of Occupational Status and Income in West Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States。Social Forces，67(2)，452-472。  new window
6.Eckland, Bruce K.(1968)。Theories of Mate Selection。Eugenics Quarterly，15，71-84。  new window
7.Eve, Michael(2002)。Is Friendship a Sociological Topic?。European Journal of Sociology，43，386-409。  new window
8.Feld, Scott(1984)。The Structured Use of Personal Networks。Social Forces，62，640-652。  new window
9.Houston, S.、R. Wright、M. Ellis、S. Holloway、M. Hudson(2005)。Places of Possibility: Where Mixed-Race Partners Meet。Progress in Human Geography，29(6)，700-717。  new window
10.Lampard, Richard(2007)。Couples, Places of Meeting in Late 20th Century Britain: Class, Continuity and Change。European Sociological Review，23(3)，357-371。  new window
11.Leslie, Leigh A.、Ted L. Huston、Michael R Johnson(1986)。Parental Reactions to Dating Relationships: Do They Make a Difference?。Journal of Marriage and Family，48，57-66。  new window
12.Lin, Ken-Hou、Lundquist, Jennifer(2013)。Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender and Education。American Journal of Sociology，119(1)，183-215。  new window
13.Liefbroer, A. C.、M. Corijn(1999)。Who, What, Where, and When? Specifying the Impact of Educational Attainment and Labour Force Participation on Family Formation。European Journal of Population，15，45-75。  new window
14.Oppenheimer, Valerie K.、Matthijs Kalmijn、Nelson Lim(1997)。Men's Career Development and Marriage Timing During a Period of Raising Inequality。Demography，34(3)，311-330。  new window
15.Pachucki, Mark A.、Breiger, Ronald L.(2010)。Cultural Holes: Beyond Relationality in Social Networks and Culture。Annual Review of Sociology，36，205-224。  new window
16.Sautter, Jessie M.、Rebecca M. Tipett、S. Philip Morgan(2010)。The Social Demography of Internet Dating in the United States。Social Science Quarterly，91(2)，544-575。  new window
17.Skopek, Jan、Florian Schulz、Hans-Peter Blossfeld(2011)。Who Contact Whom? Educational Homophily in Online Mate Selection。European Sociological Review，27(2)，180-195。  new window
18.Tsai, Shu-Ling(1996)。The Relative Importance of Ethnicity and Education in Taiwan’s Change Marriage Market。Proceedings of Humanities and Social Science，6(2)，301-315。  new window
19.Tsai, Shu-Ling、Gates, Hill、Chiu, Hei-Yuan(1994)。Schooling Taiwan's Women: Educational Attainment in the Mid-20th Century。Sociology of Education，67(4)，243-263。  new window
20.Tsay, Ruey-Ming、Li-Hsueh Wu(2006)。Marrying Someone from an Outside Group: An Analysis of Boundary-Crossing Marriage in Taiwan。Current Sociology，54(2)，165-186。  new window
21.Wong,Raymond Sin-kwok(20031200)。To See or Not to See: Another Look at Research on Temporal Trends and Cross-National Differences in Educational Homogamy。臺灣社會學刊，31，47-91。new window  new window
22.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1994)。Assortative Mating by Cultural and Economic Occupational Status。American Journal of Sociology，100(2)，442-452。  new window
23.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1998)。Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends。Annual Review of Sociology，24，395-421。  new window
24.Burt, Ronald S.(1998)。The Gender of Social Capital。Rationality and Society，10(1)，5-46。  new window
25.Burt, R. S.(1997)。The Contigent Value of Social Capital。Administrative Science Quarterly，42(2)，339-365。  new window
26.駱明慶(20060300)。教育成就的性別差異與國際通婚。經濟論文叢刊，34(1)，79-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.張思嘉(20011200)。擇偶歷程與婚前關係的形成與發展。中華心理衛生學刊，14(4)，1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.巫麗雪、蔡瑞明(20060600)。跨越族群的藩籬：從機會供給觀點分析臺灣的族群通婚。人口學刊，32，1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Mare, Robert D.(1991)。Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating。American Sociological Review，56(1)，15-32。  new window
30.Lin, Nan、Walter M. Ensel、John C. Vaughn(1981)。Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Attainment Process。American Sociological Review，46(4)，393-405。  new window
31.Kalmijn, Matthijs、Flap, Henk(2001)。Assortative Meeting and Mating: Unintended Consequences of Organized Setting for Partner Choices。Social Forces，79(4)，1289-1312。  new window
32.McPherson, Miller、Smith-Lovin, Lynn、Cook, James M.(2001)。Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks。Annual Review of Sociology，27(1)，415-444。  new window
33.蔡瑞明(19960700)。Who Marries Whom﹖--The Associations between Wives' and Husbands' Educational Attainment and Class in Taiwan。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學，6(2)，258-277。  延伸查詢new window
34.DiMaggio, Paul、Mohr, John(1985)。Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment, and Marital Selection。American Journal of Sociology，90(6)，1231-1261。  new window
35.Granovetter, Mark S.(1983)。The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited。Sociological Theory，1，201-233。  new window
36.Kerckhoff, Alan C.(1995)。Institutional arrangements and stratification processes in industrial societies。Annual Review of Sociology，21(1)，323-347。  new window
37.楊靜利、李大正、陳寬政(20061200)。臺灣傳統婚配空間的變化與婚姻行為之變遷。人口學刊，33，1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.蔡淑鈴(20040600)。高等教育的擴展對教育機會分配的影響。臺灣社會學，7，47-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.薛承泰(2003)。臺灣地區婚姻的變遷與社會衝擊。國家政策論壇，92(3)，245-259。  延伸查詢new window
40.Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology，78(6)，1360-1380。  new window
41.蔡淑鈴(19940600)。臺灣之婚姻配對模式。人文及社會科學集刊，6(2)，335-371。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade(1988)。A Theory of Marriage Timing。American Journal of Sociology，94(3)，563-591。  new window
43.Mare, Robert D.(1980)。Social Background and School Continuation Decisions。Journal of the American Statistical Association，75(370)，295-305。  new window
44.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1991)。Status Homogamy in the United States。American Journal of Sociology，97(2)，496-523。  new window
45.Marsden, Peter V.、Hurlbert, Jeanne S.(1988)。Social Resources and Mobility Outcomes: A Replication and Extension。Social Forces，66(4)，1038-1059。  new window
46.Feld, S.(1981)。The Focused Organization of Social Ties。American Journal of Sociology，86(5)，1015-1035。  new window
研究報告
1.張思嘉、周玉慧、黃宗堅(1999)。從擇偶歷程看婚姻關係的形成與發展。  延伸查詢new window
2.傅仰止、張晉芬(2007)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫：第五期第二次調查計畫執行報告 (計畫編號：NSC 95-2420-H-001-006-B1)。臺北：中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.巫麗雪(2012)。執誰之手：台灣教育婚姻配對的社會學分析(博士論文)。東海大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.余德林(2004)。認識方式與敎育、族群婚姻配對：以介紹人爲例(碩士論文)。國立台北大學，台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.巫麗雪(2003)。跨越敎育與族群的藩籬：台灣跨越界限之婚姻配對分析(碩士論文)。東海大學，台中。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.伊慶春、楊文山(1991)。台灣地區社會意向調査八十年六月專題調查報吿。台北：中央硏究院中山人文社會科學硏究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Blau, Peter M.(1978)。Inequality and Heterogeneity。New York：Free Press。  new window
3.Blau, Peter M.(1994)。Structural Contexts of Opportunities。University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Blau, Peter M.、Joseph E. Schwartz(1984)。Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations。New York：Academic Press。  new window
5.Blossfeld, Hans-Peter、Andreas Timm(2003)。Who Marries Whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies。London：Kluwer Academic。  new window
6.Blossfeld, Hans-Peter、Andreas Schmitz(2011)。Online Dating: Social Innovation and a Tool for Research on Partnership Formation。Zeitschrift jur Familienforschung, Schwerpunktheft。Leverkusen：Verlag Barbara Budrich。  new window
7.Coleman, James S.(1990)。Social Capital。Foundation of Social Theory。Cambridge, MA：Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Burt, Ronald S.(1992)。Structural Holes. Cambridge。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
9.林南(2001)。Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Blau, Peter M.、Duncan, O. D.(1994)。The Process of Stratification。Social Stratification。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
2.De Graaf, N. Dirk、Smeenk, W.、Ultee, W.、Timm, A.(2003)。The When and Whom of First Marriage in the Netherlands。Who Marries Whom: Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies。London：Kluwer Academic。  new window
3.Marsden, Peter V.(1990)。Network Diversity, Substructures, and Opportunities for Contact。Structures of Power and Constraint: Papers in Honor of Peter M. Blau。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.伊慶春、熊瑞梅(1994)。擇偶過程之網絡與婚姻關係：對介紹人、婚姻配對、和婚姻滿意度之分析。臺灣社會的民眾意向：社會科學的分析。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：266（臺灣：257，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：928275 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：66739741
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上