晚近，我們可觀察到，關於西藏的敘述在臺灣隱隱成為若有似無的潛流。在意識到歷來臺灣社會因「西藏」衍生出的種種爭議，以及「西藏敘述」的潛流為前提下，本篇論文追問，西藏在臺灣的形象，是如何被構造與敘述的？背後發動的「力」為何，在一組自我與他者的關係中，顯現了怎麼樣的主體化過程？揭示了「我們」或者「我」的何種面貌？而進一步，各個冀求相對獨立的文學作者，他們又是如何觀看西藏，曾經藉由西藏遞傳出什麼樣的訊息？在操作上，論文企圖示顯西藏的多元形象，不使西藏成為單一的想像符碼；同時，也考核三位作家郝譽翔、謝旺霖、張瀛太的文本，提示作家一貫的書寫方向，並詮解文學創作的內蘊，希望能在不減損作家創作的獨特性上，展演他們的「西藏敘述」帶來的複雜意義。

Lately we can perceive that Tibet writing has become a current underneath. The goal of this thesis is to analyze how do we imagine Tibet in the Society of Taiwan under the huge controversy over Tibet and based on the premise of Tibet writing? How do those different authors observe Tibet? What kind of messages are they trying to deliver through this observation? We will press for further questions: what are these Tibet narations? What is the power that pushes them into that? What is the building process of these narations? What are the appearances of ＂me＂ or ＂us＂ it reveals by the phenomena? I try to depict different kinds of Tibet's narations, so Tibet won't become a single symbol. Simultaneously, I will interpret some texts of Tibet writing by Hao Yu-hsiang, Hsieh Wang-Ling, Chang Ying-Tai, and to point out the consistent direction and explore the meaning of their writing. I wish that I can explore the intricate meanings of these authors' Tibet writing without detracting their differences.